The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state
Open accessAbstract
Developmental programs are controlled by transcription factors and chromatin regulators, which maintain specific gene expression programs through epigenetic modification of the genome. These regulatory events at enhancers contribute to the specific gene expression programs that determine cell state and the potential for differentiation into new cell types. Although enhancer elements are known to be associated with certain histone modifications and transcription factors, the relationship of these modifications to gene expression and developmental state has not been clearly defined. Here we interrogate the epigenetic landscape of enhancer elements in embryonic stem cells and several adult tissues in the mouse. We find that histone H3K27ac distinguishes active enhancers from inactive/poised enhancer elements containing H3K4me1 alone. This indicates that the amount of actively used enhancers is lower than previously anticipated. Furthermore, poised enhancer networks provide clues to unrealized developmental programs. Finally, we show that enhancers are reset during nuclear reprogramming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“providing support for the upstream region being an enhancer element that becomes active upon TLR-4 activation (Creyghton et al., 2010).”
From TET2 Regulates the Neuroinflammatory Response in Microglia (2019) · cites this paper as Creyghton et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Currently mono-methylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1), associated with the binding of Trithorax/MLL complexes, is taken to be the hallmark of both ‘primed’ and active enhancers, whilst active enhancers additionally tend to associate with the acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27ac) [133–137].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [133]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the cerebral cortex, rs1057233- and rs78245530-harboring regions exhibited enhancer activity (indicated by the low H3K4me3 signal and high H3K27ac signal [45]) (Fig. 2d).”
From Association of SPI1 haplotypes with altered SPI1 gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Monomethylation on H3K4 (H3K4me1) in combination with acetylation of H3 at K27 (H3K27ac) designates the active enhancer state33 while H3K4me1 alone, or with trimethylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3), defines a primed or repressed enhancer, respectively30.”
From HNF4A guides the MLL4 complex to establish and maintain H3K4me1 at gene regulatory elements (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Assisted loading events are coupled with increases in enhancer activity as measured by DNase hypersensitivity or H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac), two well-established markers for active enhancers38–40.”
From Synergistic gene expression during the acute phase response is characterized by transcription factor assisted loading (2017) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361
Self-citationHeintzman, N. D., Stuart, R. K., Hon, G., Fu, Y., Ching, C. W., Hawkins, R. D., Barrera, L. O., Van Calcar, S., Qu, C., Ching, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1966 · Cited by 3,398 · cited 2×
“For instance, the histone acetyltransferase p300 has been used as a reliable marker to identify distal enhancers (10, 11, 16) and in agreement with this could be found associated with a significant portion of H3K4me1-enriched regions (Fig.”
BackgroundMethodGenome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko, A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07107 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationHistone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression
Heintzman, N. D., Hon, G. C., Hawkins, R. D., Kheradpour, P., Stark, A., Harp, L. F., Ye, Z., Lee, L. K., Stuart, R. K., Ching, C. W., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07829 · Cited by 2,533
Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers
Kim, T.-K., Hemberg, M., Gray, J. M., Costa, A. M., Bear, D. M., Wu, J., Harmin, D. A., Laptewicz, M., Barbara-Haley, K., Kuersten, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09033 · Cited by 2,450
Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome
Wang, Z., Zang, C., Rosenfeld, J. A., Schones, D. E., Barski, A., Cuddapah, S., Cui, K., Roh, T.-Y., Peng, W., Zhang, M. Q., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.154 · Cited by 2,331
From noncoding variant to phenotype via SORT1 at the 1p13 cholesterol locus
Musunuru, K., Strong, A., Frank-Kamenetsky, M., Lee, N. E., Ahfeldt, T., Sachs, K. V., Li, X., Li, H., Kuperwasser, N., Ruda, V. M., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09266 · Cited by 1,140
Ghisletti, S., Barozzi, I., Mietton, F., Polletti, S., De Santa, F., Venturini, E., Gregory, L., Lonie, L., Chew, A., Wei, C.-L., et al. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.008 · Cited by 666
Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers
Visel, A., Rubin, E. M., & Pennacchio, L. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08451 · Cited by 610
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- ND Heintzman, B Ren, Finding distal regulatory elements in the human genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19, 541–549 (2009). · DOI
- M Bulger, M Groudine, Looping versus linking: Toward a model for long-distance gene activation. Genes Dev 13, 2465–2477 (1999). · DOI
- D Boffelli, MA Nobrega, EM Rubin, Comparative genomics at the vertebrate extremes. Nat Rev Genet 5, 456–465 (2004). · DOI
- S Heinz, et al., Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38, 576–589 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- E Birney, et al., Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447, 799–816 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- H Xi, et al., Identification and characterization of cell type-specific and ubiquitous chromatin regulatory structures in the human genome. PLoS Genet 3, e136 (2007). · DOI
- A Visel, et al., ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- J Xu, et al., Transcriptional competence and the active marking of tissue-specific enhancers by defined transcription factors in embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Genes Dev 23, 2824–2838 (2009). · DOI
- K Cui, et al., Chromatin signatures in multipotent human hematopoietic stem cells indicate the fate of bivalent genes during differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 4, 80–93 (2009). · DOI
- F Tie, et al., CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing. Development 136, 3131–3141 (2009). · DOI
- A Marson, et al., Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521–533 (2008). · DOI
- X Chen, et al., Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106–1117 (2008). · DOI
- MP Creyghton, et al., H2AZ is enriched at polycomb complex target genes in ES cells and is necessary for lineage commitment. Cell 135, 649–661 (2008). · DOI
- AC Seila, et al., Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science 322, 1849–1851 (2008). · DOI
- KS Zaret, et al., Pioneer factors, genetic competence, and inductive signaling: Programming liver and pancreas progenitors from the endoderm. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 73, 119–126 (2008). · DOI
- ED Wederell, et al., Global analysis of in vivo Foxa2-binding sites in mouse adult liver using massively parallel sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 36, 4549–4564 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- W Reith, et al., Congenital immunodeficiency with a regulatory defect in MHC class II gene expression lacks a specific HLA-DR promoter binding protein, RF-X. Cell 53, 897–906 (1988). · DOI
- R Dubruille, et al., Drosophila regulatory factor X is necessary for ciliated sensory neuron differentiation. Development 129, 5487–5498 (2002). · DOI
- T Perlot, FW Alt, Cis-regulatory elements and epigenetic changes control genomic rearrangements of the IgH locus. Adv Immunol 99, 1–32 (2008). · DOI
- N Maherali, et al., Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55–70 (2007).
- M Wernig, et al., In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318–324 (2007). · DOI
- L Conti, et al., Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell. PLoS Biol 3, e283 (2005). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–176 of 176
Lio, C.-W., Zhang, J., González-Avalos, E., Hogan, P. G., Chang, X., & Rao, A. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18290 · Cited by 170
Genome-scale high-resolution mapping of activating and repressive nucleotides in regulatory regions
Ernst, J., Melnikov, A., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Rogov, P., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Kellis, M. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3678 · Cited by 162
Insights into the genetic architecture of the human face
White, J. D., Indencleef, K., Naqvi, S., Eller, R. J., Hoskens, H., Roosenboom, J., Lee, M. K., Li, J., Mohammed, J., Richmond, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00741-7 · Cited by 166
Histone Acetyltransferase p300 Induces De Novo Super-Enhancers to Drive Cellular Senescence
Sen, P., Lan, Y., Li, C. Y., Sidoli, S., Donahue, G., Dou, Z., Frederick, B., Chen, Q., Luense, L. J., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.021 · Cited by 164
Immediate and deferred epigenomic signatures of in vivo neuronal activation in mouse hippocampus
Fernandez-Albert, J., Lipinski, M., Lopez-Cascales, M. T., Rowley, M. J., Martin-Gonzalez, A. M., del Blanco, B., Corces, V. G., & Barco, A. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0476-2 · Cited by 166
Global reorganisation of cis-regulatory units upon lineage commitment of human embryonic stem cells
Freire-Pritchett, P., Schoenfelder, S., Várnai, C., Wingett, S. W., Cairns, J., Collier, A. J., García-Vílchez, R., Furlan-Magaril, M., Osborne, C. S., Fraser, P., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21926 · Cited by 161
“…activity associated with poised and active enhancers and have been used to show that widespread changes in enhancer position and activity occur upon cell fate decisions such as the lineage commitment of pluripotent cells (Creyghton et al., 2010; Rada-Iglesias et al., 2011; Zentner et al., 2011).”
BackgroundGenomic Perspectives of Transcriptional Regulation in Forebrain Development
Nord, A. S., Pattabiraman, K., Visel, A., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.011 · Cited by 152
Zhao, C., Deng, Y., Liu, L., Yu, K., Zhang, L., Wang, H., He, X., Wang, J., Lu, C., Wu, L. N., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10883 · Cited by 154
Carter, B., Ku, W. L., Kang, J. Y., Hu, G., Perrie, J., Tang, Q., & Zhao, K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11559-1 · Cited by 148
Enhancers: emerging roles in cell fate specification
Ong, C., & Corces, V. G. (2012) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2012.52 · Cited by 144
Transcriptional Networks Controlled by NKX2-1 in the Development of Forebrain GABAergic Neurons
Sandberg, M., Flandin, P., Silberberg, S., Su-Feher, L., Price, J. D., Hu, J. S., Kim, C., Visel, A., Nord, A. S., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.020 · Cited by 129
Pham, T.-H., Benner, C., Lichtinger, M., Schwarzfischer, L., Hu, Y., Andreesen, R., Chen, W., & Rehli, M. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-01-402453 · Cited by 143
Schleicher, U., Paduch, K., Debus, A., Obermeyer, S., König, T., Kling, J. C., Ribechini, E., Dudziak, D., Mougiakakos, D., Murray, P. J., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.001 · Cited by 136
“This histonemark is highly enriched at active cis-regulatory regions (promoters and enhancers) and directly correlates with chromatin accessibility and transcription of the target gene (Creyghton et al., 2010; Rada-Iglesias et al., 2011).”
Beck, D., Thoms, J. A. I., Perera, D., Schütte, J., Unnikrishnan, A., Knezevic, K., Kinston, S. J., Wilson, N. K., O’Brien, T. A., Göttgens, B., et al. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2013-03-490425 · Cited by 133
A unique role for DNA (hydroxy)methylation in epigenetic regulation of human inhibitory neurons
Kozlenkov, A., Li, J., Apontes, P., Hurd, Y. L., Byne, W. M., Koonin, E. V., Wegner, M., Mukamel, E. A., & Dracheva, S. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau6190 · Cited by 103
Andersson, R. (2015) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201400162 · Cited by 127
Transcription factor assisted loading and enhancer dynamics dictate the hepatic fasting response
Goldstein, I., Baek, S., Presman, D. M., Paakinaho, V., Swinstead, E. E., & Hager, G. L. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.212175.116 · Cited by 121
Super enhancer regulation of cytokine-induced chemokine production in alcoholic hepatitis
Liu, M., Cao, S., He, L., Gao, J., Arab, J. P., Cui, H., Xuan, W., Gao, Y., Sehrawat, T. S., Hamdan, F. H., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24843-w · Cited by 120
H3K4me1 Distribution Predicts Transcription State and Poising at Promoters
Bae, S., & Lesch, B. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00289 · Cited by 120
Evidence for additive and synergistic action of mammalian enhancers during cell fate determination
Choi, J., Lysakovskaia, K., Stik, G., Demel, C., Söding, J., Tian, T. V., Graf, T., & Cramer, P. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65381 · Cited by 117
“Putative enhancers can be detected by mapping of chromatin signatures (Creyghton et al., 2010; Heintzman et al., 2007; Robertson et al., 2008).”
BackgroundCross-species analysis of enhancer logic using deep learning
Minnoye, L., Taskiran, I. I., Mauduit, D., Fazio, M., Van Aerschot, L., Hulselmans, G., Christiaens, V., Makhzami, S., Seltenhammer, M., Karras, P., et al. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.260844.120 · Cited by 116
The genomic landscape of cohesin-associated chromatin interactions
DeMare, L. E., Leng, J., Cotney, J., Reilly, S. K., Yin, J., Sarro, R., & Noonan, J. P. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.156570.113 · Cited by 114
Marie, C., Clavairoly, A., Frah, M., Hmidan, H., Yan, J., Zhao, C., Van Steenwinckel, J., Daveau, R., Zalc, B., Hassan, B., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1802620115 · Cited by 103
Supervised enhancer prediction with epigenetic pattern recognition and targeted validation
Sethi, A., Gu, M., Gumusgoz, E., Chan, L., Yan, K.-K., Rozowsky, J., Barozzi, I., Afzal, V., Akiyama, J. A., Plajzer-Frick, I., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0907-8 · Cited by 109
Enhancers Are Major Targets for Murine Leukemia Virus Vector Integration
De Ravin, S. S., Su, L., Theobald, N., Choi, U., Macpherson, J. L., Poidinger, M., Symonds, G., Pond, S. M., Ferris, A. L., Hughes, S. H., et al. (2014) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00011-14 · Cited by 103
Integrative genomic analysis reveals widespread enhancer regulation by p53 in response to DNA damage
Younger, S. T., Kenzelmann-Broz, D., Jung, H., Attardi, L. D., & Rinn, J. L. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv284 · Cited by 99
TET2 Regulates the Neuroinflammatory Response in Microglia
Carrillo-Jimenez, A., Deniz, Ö., Niklison-Chirou, M. V., Ruiz, R., Bezerra-Salomão, K., Stratoulias, V., Amouroux, R., Yip, P. K., Vilalta, A., Cheray, M., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.013 · Cited by 104
Sleutels, F., Soochit, W., Bartkuhn, M., Heath, H., Dienstbach, S., Bergmaier, P., Franke, V., Rosa-Garrido, M., van de Nobelen, S., Caesar, L., et al. (2012) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-5-8 · Cited by 96
Xiong, H., Luo, Y., Wang, Q., Yu, X., & He, A. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01129-z · Cited by 100
Vockley, C. M., Guo, C., Majoros, W. H., Nodzenski, M., Scholtens, D. M., Hayes, M. G., Lowe, W. L., & Reddy, T. E. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.190090.115 · Cited by 99
ATF3 promotes the serine synthesis pathway and tumor growth under dietary serine restriction
Li, X., Gracilla, D., Cai, L., Zhang, M., Yu, X., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Long, X., Ding, H.-F., & Yan, C. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109706 · Cited by 98
Goldstein, I., Paakinaho, V., Baek, S., Sung, M.-H., & Hager, G. L. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02055-5 · Cited by 97
Fogarty, M. P., Cannon, M. E., Vadlamudi, S., Gaulton, K. J., & Mohlke, K. L. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004633 · Cited by 93
“DNase and FAIRE are established methods of identification of nucleosome depleted regulatory regions [20], while H3K4me1 and H3K9ac are post-translational chromatin marks often associated with enhancer regions [21,22].”
BackgroundMethodActors with Multiple Roles: Pleiotropic Enhancers and the Paradigm of Enhancer Modularity
Sabarís, G., Laiker, I., Preger-Ben Noon, E., & Frankel, N. (2019) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2019.03.006 · Cited by 84
Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters
Ray-Jones, H., & Spivakov, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03903-w · Cited by 81
Epigenetic Regulation of BDNF Gene during Development and Diseases
Chen, K.-W., & Chen, L. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18030571 · Cited by 75
Kyzar, E. J., Zhang, H., & Pandey, S. C. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.021 · Cited by 75
“Several epigenetic marks at histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) and H3K4 are critical for regulating enhancer sequences and eRNA expression (19, 22, 23).”
BackgroundAutomated in situ chromatin profiling efficiently resolves cell types and gene regulatory programs
Janssens, D. H., Wu, S. J., Sarthy, J. F., Meers, M. P., Myers, C. H., Olson, J. M., Ahmad, K., & Henikoff, S. (2018) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-018-0243-8 · Cited by 73
Enhancer RNA: Biogenesis, function, and regulation
Ye, R., Cao, C., & Xue, Y. (2020) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20200014 · Cited by 71
DNA methylation signatures in panic disorder
Iurato, S., Carrillo-Roa, T., Arloth, J., Czamara, D., Diener-Hölzl, L., Lange, J., Müller-Myhsok, B., Binder, E. B., & Erhardt, A. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0026-1 · Cited by 70
Bohnsack, J. P., Zhang, H., Wandling, G. M., He, D., Kyzar, E. J., Lasek, A. W., & Pandey, S. C. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn2748 · Cited by 68
A direct fate exclusion mechanism by Sonic hedgehog-regulated transcriptional repressors
Nishi, Y., Zhang, X., Jeong, J., Peterson, K. A., Vedenko, A., Bulyk, M. L., Hide, W. A., & McMahon, A. P. (2015) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.124636 · Cited by 53
Visser, M., Palstra, R.-J., & Kayser, M. (2015) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddv029 · Cited by 57
Personalized and graph genomes reveal missing signal in epigenomic data
Groza, C., Kwan, T., Soranzo, N., Pastinen, T., & Bourque, G. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02038-8 · Cited by 57
Circadian transcription from beta cell function to diabetes pathophysiology
Perelis, M., Ramsey, K. M., Marcheva, B., & Bass, J. (2016) · Journal of Biological Rhythms · doi:10.1177/0748730416656949 · Cited by 57
Safeguard function of PU.1 shapes the inflammatory epigenome of neutrophils
Fischer, J., Walter, C., Tönges, A., Aleth, H., Jordão, M. J. C., Leddin, M., Gröning, V., Erdmann, T., Lenz, G., Roth, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0343-z · Cited by 56
Loss of Kat2a enhances transcriptional noise and depletes acute myeloid leukemia stem-like cells
Domingues, A. F., Kulkarni, R., Giotopoulos, G., Gupta, S., Vinnenberg, L., Arede, L., Foerner, E., Khalili, M., Adao, R. R., Johns, A., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.51754 · Cited by 52
Chromatin architecture defines the glucocorticoid response
Burd, C. J., & Archer, T. K. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2013.03.020 · Cited by 48
Lopez‐Atalaya, J. P., Askew, K. E., Sierra, A., & Gomez‐Nicola, D. (2018) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.22545 · Cited by 49
Burns, A. M., Farinelli-Scharly, M., Hugues-Ascery, S., Sanchez-Mut, J. V., Santoni, G., & Gräff, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116797119 · Cited by 49
Impact of the gut microbiota on enhancer accessibility in gut intraepithelial lymphocytes
Semenkovich, N. P., Planer, J. D., Ahern, P. P., Griffin, N. W., Lin, C. Y., & Gordon, J. I. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1617793113 · Cited by 45
Jego, G., Lanneau, D., De Thonel, A., Berthenet, K., Hazoumé, A., Droin, N., Hamman, A., Girodon, F., Bellaye, P.-S., Wettstein, G., et al. (2014) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2014.63 · Cited by 42
Izawa, N., Kurotaki, D., Nomura, S., Fujita, T., Omata, Y., Yasui, T., Hirose, J., Matsumoto, T., Saito, T., Kadono, Y., et al. (2019) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.3689 · Cited by 40
Xie, B., Yin, Z., Hu, Z., Lv, J., Du, C., Deng, X., Huang, Y., Li, Q., Huang, J., Liang, K., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02032 · Cited by 39
Colquitt, B. M., Markenscoff-Papadimitriou, E., Duffié, R., & Lomvardas, S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.013 · Cited by 38
Evolution of regulatory signatures in primate cortical neurons at cell-type resolution
Kozlenkov, A., Vermunt, M. W., Apontes, P., Li, J., Hao, K., Sherwood, C. C., Hof, P. R., Ely, J. J., Wegner, M., Mukamel, E. A., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2011884117 · Cited by 30
Self-citationAssociation of SPI1 haplotypes with altered SPI1 gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease risk
Cao, H., Initiative, A. D. N., Zhou, X., Chen, Y., Ip, F. C. F., Chen, Y., Lai, N. C. H., Lo, R. M. N., Tong, E. P. S., Mok, V. C. T., et al. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-215311 · Cited by 28
Perinatal stress and epigenetics.
(2021) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820107-7.00008-2 · Cited by 28
Locus-specific induction of gene expression from heterochromatin loci during cellular senescence
Tomimatsu, K., Bihary, D., Olan, I., Parry, A. J., Schoenfelder, S., Chan, A. S. L., Slater, G. S. C., Ito, Y., Rugg-Gunn, P. J., Kirschner, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-021-00147-y · Cited by 25
Human genetic variation within neural crest enhancers: molecular and phenotypic implications
Rada-Iglesias, A., Prescott, S. L., & Wysocka, J. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0360 · Cited by 24
Ferreira, A. C. F., Szeto, A. C. H., Clark, P. A., Crisp, A., Kozik, P., Jolin, H. E., & McKenzie, A. N. J. (2023) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2023.05.010 · Cited by 23
Paldi, F., Szalay, M.-F., Dufau, S., Di Stefano, M., Reboul, H., Jost, D., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02489-4 · Cited by 18
Multi‐omics analysis reveals the functional transcription and potential translation of enhancers
Wu, Y., Yang, Y., Gu, H., Tao, B., Zhang, E., Wei, J., Wang, Z., Liu, A., Sun, R., Chen, M., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.33132 · Cited by 18
The role of enhancer RNAs in epigenetic regulation of gene expression
Rahnamoun, H., Orozco, P., & Lauberth, S. M. (2020) · Transcription · doi:10.1080/21541264.2019.1698934 · Cited by 16
Vathipadiekal, V., Alsultan, A., Baltrusaitis, K., Farrell, J. J., Al‐Rubaish, A. M., Al‐Muhanna, F., Naserullah, Z., Suliman, A., Patra, P. K., Milton, J. N., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Hematology · doi:10.1002/ajh.24368 · Cited by 15
Zhao, W., Yuan, W., Dong, T., Qi, W., Feng, Z., Li, C., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08160-2 · Cited by 16
Zhang, T., Wang, Y.-F., Montoya, A., Patrascan, I., Nebioglu, N., Pallikonda, H. A., Georgieva, R., King, J. W. D., Kramer, H. B., Shliaha, P. V., et al. (2025) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2024024787 · Cited by 14
Collino, A., Termanini, A., Nicoli, P., Diaferia, G., Polletti, S., Recordati, C., Castiglioni, V., Caruso, D., Mitro, N., Natoli, G., et al. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007380 · Cited by 13
Ryu, A. H., Eckalbar, W. L., Kreimer, A., Yosef, N., & Ahituv, N. (2017) · doi:10.1101/130484 · Cited by 139
Long, S., Qiu, Y., Lin, T., Huang, S., Zhang, W., Liu, S., Tian, L., Palli, S. R., Li, S., & Li, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2509608122 · Cited by 11
HNF4A guides the MLL4 complex to establish and maintain H3K4me1 at gene regulatory elements
Thakur, A., Park, K., Cullum, R., Fuglerud, B. M., Khoshnoodi, M., Drissler, S., Stephan, T. L., Lotto, J., Kim, D., Gonzalez, F. J., et al. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-05835-0 · Cited by 10
Epigenome overlap measure (EPOM) for comparing tissue/cell types based on chromatin states
Li, W. V., Razaee, Z. S., & Li, J. J. (2016) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2303-9 · Cited by 10
Epigenetic preparation of future gene induction kinetics
Xiong, J., & Zhu, B. (2025) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-012825-093148 · Cited by 12
Caporale, A. L., Cinalli, A. R., Rubinstein, M., & Franchini, L. F. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae186 · Cited by 7
“S7, Supplementary Material on-line) and found that the annotated region cHMM e7709 predicts a regulatory element based on epigenetic marks typically found in active enhancers, such as H3K4me1 (Heintzman et al. 2009) and H3K27ac (Creyghton et al. 2010), detected in the forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain of E12–E16 mouse…”
BackgroundXu, J., Yan, Q., Song, C., Liang, J., Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Weng, Z., Xu, C., Liu, Q., Xu, S., et al. (2021) · Hereditas · doi:10.1186/s41065-021-00182-0 · Cited by 4
Choppavarapu, L., Nosirov, B., Kahn, M., & Jin, V. X. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18213416
Metadata
- Authors
- Creyghton, M. P., Cheng, A. W., Welstead, G. G., Kooistra, T., Carey, B. W., Steine, E. J., Hanna, J., Lodato, M. A., Frampton, G. M., Sharp, P. A., Boyer, L. A., Young, R. A., & Jaenisch, R.
- Affiliations
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jaenisch, Rudolf
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-11-24
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 21931-21936
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3003124
- OpenAlex
- W1981030303
- Cited by
- 4,302
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 228 · 2025: 286 · 2024: 349 · 2023: 365 · 2022: 345 · 2021: 362 · 2020: 346 · 2019: 315 · 2018: 292 · 2017: 267 · 2016: 261 · 2015: 242 · 2014: 239 · 2013: 220 · 2012: 124
- FWCI
- 51.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2r01ca084198-10)
- U.S. Public Health Service (5-RO1-HDO45022)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (HG002668, R01HG002668)
- National Cancer Institute (R01-CA084198, R01CA087869, 5-RO1-CA87869, P01CA042063, R37CA084198, P30CA014051, P30-CA-14051, P01 CA 42063)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD045022)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- enhancer activity, poised enhancers, H3K4me1, developmental state, embryonic stem cells, nuclear reprogramming, cell differentiation, chromatin regulation, mouse tissues
- MeSH terms
- Acetylation, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Histones, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
