Cited by 157Primate Behavior and EcologyNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroethology of primate social behavior

Open access
Chang, Steve W. C., Brent, Lauren J. N., Adams, Geoffrey K., Klein, Jeffrey T., Pearson, John M., Watson, Karli K., Platt, Michael L.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A neuroethological approach to human and nonhuman primate behavior and cognition predicts biological specializations for social life. Evidence reviewed here indicates that ancestral mechanisms are often duplicated, repurposed, and differentially regulated to support social behavior. Focusing on recent research from nonhuman primates, we describe how the primate brain might implement social functions by coopting and extending preexisting mechanisms that previously supported nonsocial functions. This approach reveals that highly specialized mechanisms have evolved to decipher the immediate social context, and parallel circuits have evolved to translate social perceptual signals and nonsocial perceptual signals into partially integrated social and nonsocial motivational signals, which together inform general-purpose mechanisms that command behavior. Differences in social behavior between species, as well as between individuals within a species, result in part from neuromodulatory regulation of these neural circuits, which itself appears to be under partial genetic control. Ultimately, intraspecific variation in social behavior has differential fitness consequences, providing fundamental building blocks of natural selection. Our review suggests that the neuroethological approach to primate behavior may provide unique insights into human psychopathology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1301213110

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. JM Allman Evolving Brains (Scientifc American Library, New York, 1999).
  2. BB Smuts, DL Cheney, RM Seyfarth, RW Wrangham, TT Struhsaker Primate Societies (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987).
  3. DW Stephens, JR Krebs Foraging Theory (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 1986).
  4. R Plomin Behavioral Genetics (Worth, 4th Ed, New York, 2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
Chang, S. W. C., Brent, L. J. N., Adams, G. K., Klein, J. T., Pearson, J. M., Watson, K. K., & Platt, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
110
Issue
supplement_2
Pages
10387-10394
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1999221289
Cited by
157
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6
FWCI
20.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH1110584, W81XWH-11-1-, W81XWH)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r00mh099093-04, 5f31mh081443-03, 5r01ey019303-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH099093, R00-MH099093, MH089484, MH086712, R01MH086712, R01MH089484, F31-MH081443, R01MH096875, R01MH095894)
  • National Eye Institute (R01-EY019303)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008441)
  • Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
neuroethology, primate social behavior, social cognition, brain evolution, neuromodulation, social motivation, social perception, genetic control of behavior, natural selection, non-human primates
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Biological, Nerve Net, Primates, Selection, Genetic, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review