The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Momentary work recovery: The role of within-day work breaks
Abstract
Drawing from research on personal resources (e.g., Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, & Tice, 1998; Fredrickson, 1998) and the episodic nature of work (Beal, Weiss, Barros, & MacDermid, 2005), we examine research and theory relevant to the study of momentary recovery in the workplace. Specifically, we propose that the nature of within workday breaks influences the levels of psychological resources, which in turn influence various workplace outcomes. First, we discuss the momentary approach to studying workplace breaks and consequent resource levels. In doing so, we distinguish between two types of breaks, respites and chores; and we detail two types of psychological resources, regulatory and affective resources. Consequences of psychological resource levels on emotional exhaustion and performance are considered. We also explore possible moderators of the proposed relationships; we discuss job and individual characteristics, and motivation to perform. Finally, we conclude the chapter with a brief discussion on future research and possible applications of the momentary approach to work recovery in organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 · Cited by 12,910
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x · Cited by 6,835
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775
Research works printed but not linked: 96
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00807.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0034845 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/014616727800400425 · DOI
- 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90087-D · DOI
- 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90147-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00253.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00031-5 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.89.3.368 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1595 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1595 · Paper page
- 10.1080/00140130121538 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001872679404701205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00004-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90010-7 · DOI
- Elkin A.J., 1990, Occupational Medicine: State of Art Review, 5, 739
- 10.1080/02678379508256554 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872089303500206 · doi:10.1177/001872089303500206
- 10.1080/026999300402808 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218 · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01372.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.936 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.322 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90133-C · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.299 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00025-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90070-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Glass D.C., 1973, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 4, 165
- 10.1037/h0031697 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95 · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95 · Paper page
- 10.2307/30040678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1015142124306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.20 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1087 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1087 · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02856520 · DOI
- 10.1080/001401397188396 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0169-8141(94)90100-7 · doi:10.1016/0169-8141(94)90100-7
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3033588 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.68.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.1.3 · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0029902 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.922 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00345.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.117 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.117
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00023 · DOI · Paper page
- Locke E.A., 2004, Academy of Management Review, 29, 388, 10.5465/amr.2004.13670974 · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.13670974 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1039 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1039 · Paper page
- 10.2307/2094577 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00071-5 · DOI
- Mehrabian A., 1975, Humanitas, 11, 219
- 10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.93 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.93 · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317905X40105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167206288008 · DOI · Paper page
- Morris J.A., 1996, Academy of Management Review, 21, 986, 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071861 · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9704071861 · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772890 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167203029007008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0035584 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-1031(76)90076-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.157 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00053-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00087-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076-8998.8.1.3 · DOI
- Repetti R.L., 1987, Applied Social Psychology Annual, 7, 98
- 10.1037/0278-6133.12.2.125 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.899 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.899 · Paper page
- 10.2307/3094827 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.869 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.869
- 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.27 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.27 · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167206288669 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.196 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13594320500513939 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1072-5245.11.4.366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0267837031000155949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0191-8869(94)00110-E · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00943.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1034 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1034 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.516 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.516 · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.4030160207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08870440108405529 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0730888493020002004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17730/humo.53.1.a1205g53j7334631 · doi:10.17730/humo.53.1.a1205g53j7334631
- 10.1177/014920639101700305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.486 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.486 · Paper page
Cited by
Early predictors of job burnout and engagement.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498 · Cited by 2,397
Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement, and Relation to Work Outcomes
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.583 · Cited by 920
Work Stress and Employee Health: A Multidisciplinary Review
Ganster, D. C., & Rosen, C. C. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313475815 · Cited by 831
Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003 · Cited by 812
The business case for investing in physician well-being
Shanafelt, T., Goh, J., & Sinsky, C. (2017) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4340 · Cited by 714
Metadata
- Authors
- Trougakos, J. P., & Hideg, I.
- Venue
- Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Pages
- 37-84
- ISSN
- 1479-3555 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.1108/s1479-3555(2009)0000007005
- OpenAlex
- W2500519773
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 104.98
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emeraldinsight.com/page/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Momentary work recovery: The role of within-day work breaks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/s1479-3555(2009)0000007005
- The paper
- Trougakos, J. P., & Hideg, I. (2009). Momentary work recovery: The role of within-day work breaks. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-3555(2009)0000007005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.