Cited by 429Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 244 of the 244 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxytocin and Vasopressin Agonists and Antagonists as Research Tools and Potential Therapeutics

Open access
Manning, M., Misicka, A., Olma, A., Bankowski, K., Stoev, S., Chini, B., Durroux, T., Mouillac, B., Corbani, M., Guillon, G.·2012·Journal of Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

We recently reviewed the status of peptide and nonpeptide agonists and antagonists for the V 1a , V 1b and V 2 receptors for arginine vasopressin (AVP) and the oxytocin receptor for oxytocin (OT). In the present review, we update the status of peptides and nonpeptides as: (i) research tools and (ii) therapeutic agents. We also present our recent findings on the design of fluorescent ligands for V 1b receptor localisation and for OT receptor dimerisation. We note the exciting discoveries regarding two novel naturally occurring analogues of OT. Recent reports of a selective VP V 1a agonist and a selective OT agonist point to the continued therapeutic potential of peptides in this field. To date, only two nonpeptides, the V 2 /V 1a antagonist, conivaptan and the V 2 antagonist tolvaptan have received Food and Drug Administration approval for clinical use. The development of nonpeptide AVP V 1a , V 1b and V 2 antagonists and OT agonists and antagonists has recently been abandoned by Merck, Sanofi and Pfizer. A promising OT antagonist, Retosiban, developed at Glaxo SmithKline is currently in a Phase II clinical trial for the prevention of premature labour. A number of the nonpeptide ligands that were not successful in clinical trials are proving to be valuable as research tools. Peptide agonists and antagonists continue to be very widely used as research tools in this field. In this regard, we present receptor data on some of the most widely used peptide and nonpeptide ligands, as a guide for their use, especially with regard to receptor selectivity and species differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02303.x

Cites

244 of 244 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Manning M, 1981, The Pituitary, 265
  2. Manning M, 1985, Development of Selective Agonists and Antagonists of Vasopressin and Oxytocin, 131
  3. Manning M, 1991, Vasopressin, 297
  4. Manning M, 2005, Peptides 2004, 101
  5. Lebl M, 1988, Handbook of Neurohypophyseal Hormone Analogs, 17
  6. Jard S, 1998, Adv Exp Med Biol, 1
  7. 10.1210/en.137.9.3906 · DOI
  8. Wisniewski K, 2010, Peptides 2010, 306
  9. Manning M, 2010, Peptides 2010, 366
  10. Guillon G, 2007, Peptides 2006, 742
  11. 10.1021/jm010526 · DOI
  12. Mimoun MB, 2001, Peptides 2000, 589
  13. Reichert J, 2010, Development Trends for Peptide Therapeutics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Manning, M., Misicka, A., Olma, A., Bankowski, K., Stoev, S., Chini, B., Durroux, T., Mouillac, B., Corbani, M., & Guillon, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Lodz University of Technology (PL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Manning, M.
Venue
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-26
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
609-628
ISSN
  • 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2826
OpenAlex
W1803779312
Cited by
423
References
244
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM25280, R01GM025280)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
oxytocin, vasopressin, vasopressin receptor, oxytocin receptor, V1a receptor, V1b receptor, V2 receptor, peptide agonists, peptide antagonists, conivaptan, tolvaptan, fluorescent ligands, receptor localization, receptor dimerization, oxytocin analogues, receptor selectivity, species differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Oxytocin, Structure-Activity Relationship, Receptors, Vasopressin, Receptors, Oxytocin, Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review