Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research Review: Maternal prenatal distress and poor nutrition – mutually influencing risk factors affecting infant neurocognitive development

Open access
Monk, Catherine, Georgieff, Michael K., Osterholm, Erin A.·2013·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Accumulating data from animal and human studies indicate that the prenatal environment plays a significant role in shaping children’s neurocognitive development. Clinical, epidemiologic, and basic science research suggests that two experiences relatively common in pregnancy – an unhealthy maternal diet and psychosocial distress – significantly affect children’s future neurodevelopment. These prenatal experiences exert their influence in the context of one another and yet, almost uniformly, are studied independently. Scope and Method of Review: In this review, we suggest that studying neurocognitive development in children in relation to both prenatal exposures is ecologically most relevant, and methodologically most sound. To support this approach, we selectively review two research topics that demonstrate the need for dual exposure studies, including exemplar findings on (a) the associations between pregnant women’s inadequate maternal intake of key nutrients – protein, fat, iron, zinc, and choline – as well as distress in relation to overlapping effects on children’s neurocognitive development; and (b) cross‐talk between the biology of stress and nutrition that can amplify each experience for the mother and fetus,. We also consider obstacles to this kind of study design, such as questions of statistical methods for ‘disentangling’ the exposure effects, and aim to provide some answers. Conclusion: Studies that specifically include both exposures in their design can begin to determine the relative and/or synergistic impact of these prenatal experiences on developmental trajectories – and thereby contribute most fully to the understanding of the early origins of health and disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12000

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1001/archneur.1970.00480280003001 · doi:10.1001/archneur.1970.00480280003001
  2. Carlson S.E., 1997, Functional effects of increasing omega‐3 fatty acid intake, Journal of Pediatrics, 131, 173
  3. 10.1542/peds.38.5.789 · DOI
  4. 10.3181/00379727-159-40279 · doi:10.3181/00379727-159-40279
  5. 10.3181/00379727-144-37661 · doi:10.3181/00379727-144-37661
  6. National Institute of Mental Health, 2008, The National Institute of Mental Health Stategic Plan
  7. 10.1037/0735-7044.114.5.950 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1515/jpme.1986.14.3.163 · doi:10.1515/jpme.1986.14.3.163
  9. Pollitt E., 1994, Nutritional deficiencies as developmental risk factors
  10. 10.1515/jpme.1993.21.3.195 · doi:10.1515/jpme.1993.21.3.195

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Monk, C., Georgieff, M. K., & Osterholm, E. A.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-05
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
115-130
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
DOI
10.1111/jcpp.12000
OpenAlex
W1574694280
Cited by
258
References
136
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.