Cited by 1,571Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 25 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful approach for reconstructing cellular differentiation trajectories. However, inferring both the state and direction of differentiation is challenging. Here, we demonstrate a simple, yet robust, determinant of developmental potential-the number of expressed genes per cell-and leverage this measure of transcriptional diversity to develop a computational framework (CytoTRACE) for predicting differentiation states from scRNA-seq data. When applied to diverse tissue types and organisms, CytoTRACE outperformed previous methods and nearly 19,000 annotated gene sets for resolving 52 experimentally determined developmental trajectories. Additionally, it facilitated the identification of quiescent stem cells and revealed genes that contribute to breast tumorigenesis. This study thus establishes a key RNA-based feature of developmental potential and a platform for delineation of cellular hierarchies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aax0249

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 39 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
19 of 19
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The experimentally determined differentiation states in the training and validation datasets accurately reflect developmental potential.

    “nine gold standard scRNA-seq datasets with experimentally-confirmed differentiation trajectories”
    “52 experimentally determined developmental trajectories”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The known phenotype labels used to average features and assess correlation are correct.

    “when averaged according to known phenotypes and assessed across independent studies”
    “compare each RNA-based feature, averaged by phenotype, against known differentiation states”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The differentiation states and tumor-initiating properties of LP subsets remain incompletely understood.

    “However, the differentiation states and tumor-initiating properties of LP subsets remain incompletely understood.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. T. Hastie R. Tibshirani J. H. Friedman The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining Inference and Prediction (Springer ed. 2 2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,571

Metadata

Authors
Gulati, G. S., Sikandar, S. S., Wesche, D. J., Manjunath, A., Bharadwaj, A., Berger, M. J., Ilagan, F., Kuo, A. H., Hsieh, R. W., Cai, S., Zabala, M., Scheeren, F. A., Lobo, N. A., Qian, D., Yu, F. B., Dirbas, F. M., Clarke, M. F., & Newman, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Westlake University (CN)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
  • Stanford Cancer Institute (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Newman, Aaron M.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-01-24
Volume
367
Issue
6476
Pages
405-411
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3002770500
Cited by
1,571
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 360 · 2025: 386 · 2024: 346 · 2023: 224 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 31
FWCI
40.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-1656518)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-11-1-0287, W81XWH-13-1-0281, W81XWH-12-1-0020)
  • National Cancer Institute (R00CA187192-03, 5R01CA100225-09, CA09302)
  • Stanford Bio-X Bowes Graduate Student Fellowship
  • Stanford Medical Science Training Program (5T32GM007365-38)
  • Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  • Stinehart-Reed foundation
  • Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiatives Seed Grants Program
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, transcriptional diversity, developmental potential, quiescent stem cells, breast tumorigenesis, cellular hierarchy
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Neoplasms, Transcription, Genetic, Genetic Variation, RNA, Small Cytoplasmic, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review