Cited by 1,308Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsBiosensors and Analytical Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 22 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat

Open access

Abstract

A soft, skin-mounted microfluidic device captures microliter volumes of sweat and quantitatively measures biochemical markers by colorimetric analysis.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A soft, skin-mounted microfluidic device captures sweat through microchannels and reservoirs and colorimetrically quantifies sweat rate, total loss, pH, chloride, lactate, and glucose, with optional NFC smartphone readout. Human testing during controlled cycling and a 104-km outdoor bicycle race demonstrated feasibility, though the colorimetric chemistry limits real-time and time-dependent marker tracking.

Key findings

  • The device retained ~50 μL of sweat, corresponding to 1 to 6 hours of exercise depending on sweat loss and mounting location; sweat rates were 12 to 120 μL/hour per cm².
  • In 9 subjects during controlled cycling at 38°C and 50% relative humidity, lower-back sweat rates were typically ~2.3-fold greater than volar forearm rates; large-harvesting-area devices agreed with absorbent pads, and colorimetric chloride, lactate, and pH results agreed with laboratory analysis.
  • In 12 cyclists during the 104-km El Tour de Tucson, devices collected sweat without detachment, leakage, or reported discomfort; older subjects (50–69 years) had greater sweating rates than younger subjects (10–29 years), and males had greater rates than females.
  • Colorimetric assays covered pH 5.0–7.0, lactate 1.5–100 mM, and glucose with an LOD of ~200 μM; image analysis could resolve 0.5 pH units and 0.2, 0.3, and 0.1 mM changes in chloride, lactate, and glucose, respectively, corresponding to a 1% change in the R channel.

Methods

  • Soft lithography fabricated multilayer PDMS microfluidic devices with a skin adhesive layer, colorimetric reagent reservoirs, serpentine sweat-volume channel, and optional NFC electronics; in vitro testing used an artificial sweat-pore system with a syringe pump.
  • Indoor human study: 9 healthy subjects exercised on cycle ergometers under controlled 38°C and 50% relative humidity, with devices on the lower back and volar forearm and two harvesting areas; results were compared with absorbent pads and laboratory chemical analysis.
  • Outdoor human study: 12 healthy volunteers wore devices on the lower back and volar forearm during a 104-km bicycle race; sweat images were captured by smartphone and digital single-lens reflex cameras, and Pearson/Spearman correlation analyses were performed using SAS and JMP.

Limitations

  • Stated: the colorimetric schemes do not afford real-time tracking of changes in analyte concentration, and the current channel/reservoir designs cannot easily provide time-dependent marker concentration information.
  • Stated: limitations are primarily in the range of chemical reagents available for accurate colorimetric analysis at relevant concentrations; further field studies are needed to demonstrate accuracy in realistic, demanding scenarios.
  • Stated and evident: the small sample size only partially demonstrated correlations across individual subjects, and glucose in healthy subjects fell below the LOD for both image and laboratory analysis; small harvesting areas yielded somewhat higher inferred sweat rates, perhaps due to altered perspiration behavior caused by the device’s physical presence.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2593

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

40 Own result · 18 Not checked yet · 10 Own interpretation · 9 No basis given · 7 Own method

Verify all 22 references — free account

Show all 41 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pressure that drives fluid flow through the device arises from the action of the sweat glands themselves, assisted by capillary effects in the microchannels and the materials embedded within them.

    “The pressure that drives fluid flow arises from the action of the sweat glands themselves, assisted by capillary effects in the microchannels and the materials embedded within them.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sweat pH is an index of hydration state.

    “In sweat, pH is often considered an index of hydration state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Glucose concentration in sweat is typically one order of magnitude lower than in plasma.

    “We note that glucose concentration in sweat is typically one order of magnitude lower than in plasma;”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The conventional absorbing pad and laboratory analysis methods provide accurate reference measurements of sweat rate and marker concentrations.

    “We compared the performance of the device in situ to conventional procedures that use absorbing pads applied onto the skin with subsequent weighing and laboratory-based analyses, such as spectrophotometry.”
    “Concentrations of the markers chloride, glucose, lactate, and pH obtained by the colorimetric readouts demonstrated excellent agreement with conventional laboratory analysis of sweat collected from absorbing pads as shown in Fig. 5F.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sweat marker concentrations are indicative of health and disease status.

    “The epidermal microfluidic devices introduced here represent versatile platforms for evaluating athletic performance and monitoring health and disease status.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The physical presence of the device does not significantly alter local sweat rate or composition when large harvesting areas are used.

    “Devices with small harvesting areas yielded somewhat higher inferred rates than those with larger harvesting areas, perhaps due to alternations in perspiration behavior caused by the physical presence of the device (Fig. 5E) (55).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The constituent materials of the device are biocompatible and safe for prolonged skin contact.

    “The soft mechanical properties, biocompatible constituent materials, digitally analyzable colorimetric responses, and overall careful optimization of structural, evaporative and fluidic properties are integral to the effectiveness of these devices and differentiate them from other sweat analysis technologies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The tested populations (nine indoor subjects and 12 outdoor cyclists) are representative of the broader populations for whom the device is intended.

    “The epidermal microfluidic devices introduced here represent versatile platforms for evaluating athletic performance and monitoring health and disease status.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. White F. M., Fluid Mechanics (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, ed. 7, 2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,308

Metadata

Authors
Koh, A., Kang, D., Xue, Y., Lee, S., Pielak, R. M., Kim, J., Hwang, T., Min, S., Banks, A., Bastien, P., Manco, M. C., Wang, L., Ammann, K. R., Jang, K.-I., Won, P., Han, S., Ghaffari, R., Paik, U., Slepian, M. J., Balooch, G., Huang, Y., & Rogers, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • L’Oréal Technology Incubator, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
  • L'Oréal (France) (FR)
  • L’Oréal Early Clinical, Clark, NJ 07066, USA.
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • MC10 (United States) (US)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Koh, Ahyeon
  • Kang, Daeshik
  • Rogers, John A.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2016-11-23
Volume
8
Issue
366
Pages
366ra165-366ra165
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2552540631
Cited by
1,308
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 1
FWCI
50.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Global Research Laboratory Program (K20704000003TA050000310)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • NIH (R01EB019337)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
sweat analysis, colorimetric sensing, sweat collection, stretchable electronics, wireless communication, chloride determination, lactate measurement, sweat pH, glucose, sweat rate, health monitoring, cycling, sweat loss
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Wearable Electronic Devices, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Chlorides, Colorimetry, Equipment Design, Female, Glucose, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Sweat, User-Computer Interface, Biosensing Techniques, Lactic Acid, Microfluidics, Young Adult, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review