The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 110 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The number of cancer survivors worldwide is growing, with over 15.5 million cancer survivors in the United States alone—a figure expected to double in the coming decades. Cancer survivors face unique health challenges as a result of their cancer diagnosis and the impact of treatments on their physical and mental well-being. For example, cancer survivors often experience declines in physical functioning and quality of life while facing an increased risk of cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality compared with persons without cancer. The 2010 American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable was among the first reports to conclude that cancer survivors could safely engage in enough exercise training to improve physical fitness and restore physical functioning, enhance quality of life, and mitigate cancer-related fatigue. Methods: A second Roundtable was convened in 2018 to advance exercise recommendations beyond public health guidelines and toward prescriptive programs specific to cancer type, treatments, and/or outcomes. Results: Overall findings retained the conclusions that exercise training and testing were generally safe for cancer survivors and that every survivor should “avoid inactivity.” Enough evidence was available to conclude that specific doses of aerobic, combined aerobic plus resistance training, and/or resistance training could improve common cancer-related health outcomes, including anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life. Implications for other outcomes, such as peripheral neuropathy and cognitive functioning, remain uncertain. Conclusions: The proposed recommendations should serve as a guide for the fitness and health care professional working with cancer survivors. More research is needed to fill remaining gaps in knowledge to better serve cancer survivors, as well as fitness and health care professionals, to improve clinical practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
58 Not checked yet · 30 No basis given · 19 Own interpretation · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Own result · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Moderate intensity combined aerobic plus resistance training sessions performed 2–3 times per week or twice weekly moderate intensity resistance training may also be effective(21, 24–26), and the latter particularly in prostate cancer(27).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] source
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
- Partly supportedcites [25] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report reduced fatigue in two resistance-training programs, and the Abstract recommends two to three resistance-training bouts per week for men with prostate cancer. The citation is attached to the sentence’s latter option—resistance training—not the combined aerobic-plus-resistance option in the supplied claim. Our copy does not establish that combined training at moderate intensity two to three times weekly reduces fatigue. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [26] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Intervention and Control Conditions; page not available in our copy) report that 20 studies tested combined aerobic and anaerobic exercise. The Results (Meta-analysis Main Effects; page not available) find that exercise improved cancer-related fatigue and that effectiveness was not associated with exercise mode. The paper does not establish the claimed moderate intensity or 2–3-times-weekly schedule. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“standard fall prevention exercise approaches that reduce the risk of age-related falls”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [60] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) discusses exercise and fracture risk, but does not report whether exercise reduces falls. Searches for fall prevention, fall incidence, and balance found no passage addressing the claimed reduction in age-related falls. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [61] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Lower body strength section reports improved strength in men with prostate cancer, but does not assess whether exercise prevents age-related falls. Section 3.4 mentions a fall as an adverse event, not a fall-prevention outcome. Searches for fall prevention and reduced fall risk found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Recently, the ACSM updated its pre-participation exercise guidelines for all persons in an attempt to reduce barriers to exercise by removing a requirement for medical clearance for individuals whose risk of an adverse cardiac event during exercise are low, including exercise naïve persons(85).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > MEDICAL CLEARANCE & EXERCISE TESTING > Medical Clearance Prior to Exercise
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [85] source
The New Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening Process Algorithm states that physically inactive, otherwise healthy asymptomatic people may begin light- to moderate-intensity exercise without medical clearance. The New ACSM Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening Recommendations explains that the changes aim to avoid unnecessary barriers to exercise. The exemption does not extend to inactive people with relevant symptoms or known cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal disease. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Based on results from high quality trials of aerobic training, there may be a dose-response effect where higher volumes of aerobic exercise (90 min vs. up to 180 min/week) leads to better symptom reduction.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on sufficient evidence, resistance training alone does not seem to be effective for this outcome.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Based on sufficient evidence, it does not appear that resistance training alone reduces anxiety.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moderate intensity combined aerobic plus resistance training sessions performed 2–3 times per week or twice weekly moderate intensity resistance training may also be effective(21, 24–26), and the latter particularly in prostate cancer(27).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The effect of exercise was strongest for moderate to vigorous intensity exercise whereas the effect for low intensity training was weak and this level of exercise is unlikely to reduce fatigue(22, 24, 26, 28).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Improvements in anxiety appear to be greater in supervised training programs or those having a larger supervised component than those that are predominantly unsupervised or home-based.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A dose of moderate intensity aerobic training three times per week for 12 weeks or twice weekly combined aerobic plus resistance training for 6–12 weeks can significantly reduce anxiety in cancer survivors during and after treatment(13–17).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 36
- Probably not a substantial claim. 5
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“neuromuscular contributions explain up to 50% of variation in muscle strength in older adults, thus resistance training in the setting of ADT or deconditioning may still effectively improve muscle strength in the absence of gains in muscle mass(97).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [97] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions report that one year of resistance training improved muscle strength in prostate cancer survivors on ADT. The paper does not report that neuromuscular factors explain up to 50% of strength variation in older adults, or show that strength improved without muscle-mass gains; the Methods passage describes strength measurements but not muscle-mass measurements. Those parts of the citing sentence are unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall findings retained the conclusions that exercise training and testing was generally safe for cancer survivors and that every survivor should “avoid inactivity”.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“exercise training was generally safe and well tolerated during and after cancer treatment and could elicit improvements in some health outcomes.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > Abstract > Results:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moderate intensity aerobic training performed three times per week and for at least 12 weeks or twice weekly combined aerobic plus resistance training lasting 6–12 weeks can significantly reduce depressive symptoms in cancer survivors during and after treatment(18, 19).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is insufficient evidence for a linear dose response since going beyond 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise does not appear to result in the greatest reductions in fatigue.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Further, there is some evidence to suggest that if the intervention is unsupervised, physical function could improve with higher weekly energy expenditure (MET-hr/week) but not weekly exercise duration (min/week)(32).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, improvements seems to be more robust if the physical functioning domain of HRQoL is the primary outcome and this will be covered separately.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Strong Evidence
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In general, exercise appeared safe in the few published studies, however, the degree of improvement varied for this outcome, and other related outcomes, such as mobility and balance.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The effect of exercise to prevent or ameliorate cardiotoxicity is an emerging field of research and promising results for a protective effect of exercise in animal models and some novel evidence in humans for cardiac function(55), including measures of left ventricular function(55), and vascular endothelial function, measured as flow-mediated dilation(56).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55]
- Not checked yetcites [56] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since that landmark publication the number of randomized controlled exercise trials in cancer survivors has increased by 281% (PubMed Search completed March 2018) to over 2500 published randomized controlled trials.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of human studies, so far, have been conducted in breast cancer survivors, using self-reported measures of cognitive function, and report inconsistent results.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two recent systematic reviews in cancer survivors(49, 50) provided mixed evidence for overall sleep quality, indicating either a positive effect of walking(49), or no effect of exercise(50).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Moderate Evidence
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“understanding the specific efficacy of exercise for a particular outcome is hampered by the fact that the majority of research to date does not consider the training principle of initial values by limiting enrollment to individuals experiencing the specific outcome of interest (i.e., those with sleep issues or high level of fatigue), rarely examines potential moderators of the exercise response (i”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Limitations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While promising results from animal studies are emerging for a protective effect of aerobic training on cancer treatment related changes in cognitive function, to date, the evidence in humans is limited(58).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of available literature is still in the most common cancers, namely early stage breast cancer and prostate cancers, which limits the ability to extrapolate to other cancer types or advanced cancers.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Limitations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Randomized trials of aerobic exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate a preservation of, or an improvement in, cardiorespiratory fitness, especially in those with low initial values(86), while others report better improvement in those with higher initial values(91).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Research to date supports the potential of cancer survivors to respond positively to an exercise training stimulus by improving individual components of physical fitness, including cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., VO2peak)(86), muscular strength and endurance(87, 88), body composition(89).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the literature is reflective of practices for many different types of yoga, including those that incorporate non-exercise features such as breathing or meditation and which use a wide variety of prescriptions (e.g., frequency, duration, with/without home practice), making it difficult to generate a definitive prescription.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Other exercise modes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the majority of available evidence on the safety and efficacy of exercise during and following cancer treatment is derived from RCTs of supervised and/or home-based prescribed exercise, and trials in breast cancer survivors(17, 31, 32).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Safety of exercise training
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a recent systematic review of the role of yoga in symptoms management for cancer survivors, yoga both during and after cancer treatment was reported to improve quality of life and fatigue, while further research is needed to confirm the observed potential to improve sleep, depressive symptoms, anxiety/distress, and cancer-related cognitive change(78).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Other exercise modes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the individuals enrolled in studies commonly meet pre-specified eligibility criteria for age, comorbidities, physical ability, largely based out of academic and/or medical centers, and were willing to participate in research.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Safety of exercise training
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the literature remains insufficient for further detailing prescriptions according to cancer type, timing of treatment, and/or types of treatment, while exercise prescriptions were rarely based on studies that directly compared varying FITT components, such as a head-to-head trial of low versus high intensity training.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“men on ADT may not be able to build lean mass in response to resistance training; however, several trials that have employed resistance training, or combined with aerobic training, have reported small, but statistically significant improvements in lean body mass after 12–36 weeks of training(96)”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The overall conclusion from the 2010 Roundtable was that exercise is generally safe for cancer survivors(6) and this has not changed based on the majority of studies conducted since that time.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Safety of exercise training
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Enough evidence was available to conclude that specific doses of aerobic, combined aerobic plus resistance training, and/or resistance training could improve common cancer-related health outcomes, including anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > Abstract > Results:
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The exercise prescriptions are assumed to generalize across cancer types unless otherwise specified.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, it may not be appropriate for individuals with joint/orthopedic issues and/or stability problems who may be better served by an exercise program aimed at reducing fall risk.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Moderate Evidence
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Drawing on studies mainly in breast and prostate cancer survivors, the key findings from this review were that exercise training was generally safe and well tolerated during and after cancer treatment and could elicit improvements in some health outcomes.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There was sufficient evidence to conclude that exercise could improve physical fitness, physical functioning, quality of life, and cancer-related fatigue.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, the causes of falls associated with cancer treatment have not been fully characterized and may be due to more than an acceleration of the risks associated with age-related falls (i.e., muscle weakness and poor balance), but may also be due to treatment-related toxicities such as hearing loss, ataxia, peripheral neuropathies and fatigue, creating a challenge to develop new exercise-based”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, determining the effects of exercise on “treatment tolerance” is a challenging goal and may make it difficult to achieve a high degree of generalizability.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are several challenges to this type of research, including the relatively rare occurrence of falls and the large sample and time needed to observe a change in falls from an intervention.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > UPDATE TO EVIDENCE-INFORMED EXERCISE PRESCRIPTIONS > Insufficient Evidence
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise programs that were supervised appear to be more effective than strictly unsupervised or home-based programs, though it is unclear whether or not this is because a higher dose of exercise may be better achieved with supervised training or from other attributes of this setting (i.e., more attention, motivation, reinforcement, selection bias).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > IMPLEMENTING FITT PRESCRIPTIONS IN PRACTICE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“surgery can result in temporary or more permanent reductions in joint range of motion, and extensibility of muscle, tendon, fascia and skin.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“requiring a comprehensive physical fitness assessment prior to starting exercise may create an unnecessary barrier to starting activity.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > MEDICAL CLEARANCE & EXERCISE TESTING > Exercise testing
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on the current literature, an effective exercise prescription that most consistently addresses health-related outcomes experienced due to a cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment includes moderate intensity aerobic training at least 3 times per week, for at least 30 minutes, for at least 8–12 weeks.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > IMPLEMENTING FITT PRESCRIPTIONS IN PRACTICE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which is commonly used as treatment for prostate cancer, results in an abrupt loss of lean body mass accompanied by a reduction in muscle strength and endurance(94, 95).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“obesity is a risk factor for multiple cancers, including postmenopausal breast, renal cell and endometrial cancer, thus these survivors are more likely to be overweight or obese at the time of diagnosis(100).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise programs that only prescribe resistance training are also efficacious at improving most health-related outcomes, though for some specific outcomes the evidence is either insufficient or suggestive that resistance training alone may not be enough (e.g., depressive symptoms).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > IMPLEMENTING FITT PRESCRIPTIONS IN PRACTICE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This often results in a sample that is healthier or with higher physical function and exercise motivation that may not fully generalize to the broader population of cancer survivors.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Safety of exercise training
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The impact of cancer treatment on exercise tolerance may further depend upon the pre-diagnosis health and functional capacity of the individual.”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EFFECTS OF CANCER TREATMENT AND ADVERSE EFFECTS RELEVANT TO EXERCISE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Aerobic exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to stimulate greater production of red blood cells(92), so improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness are contingent on other central (i.e., cardiac function, plasma volume) and peripheral adaptations (i.e., improved vascularization and mitochondrial enzyme function)(93).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“maintenance of body weight can be difficult during treatment for some cancers, where loss of weight and lean body mass is a common concern, such as advanced colon, lung cancer and pancreatic cancer(98); whereas weight gain can be a common side effect of chemotherapy and anti-estrogen therapy for breast cancer or anti-androgen therapy for prostate cancer(99).”
§ Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable > EXERCISE SAFETY & TRAINING TOLERANCE > Exercise Tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The 2010 general exercise recommendations may be unachievable for cancer survivors with physical limitations, and benefits may come from less exercise.
“As it was acknowledged that the general exercise recommendations put forward in 2010 may be unachievable for cancer survivors with physical limitations and that benefits may come from less exercise, a particular goal of the 2018 Roundtable was to develop more granular exercise prescriptions for distinct cancer-related health outcomes to better guide fitness and other healthcare professionals who”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The exercise prescriptions are assumed to generalize across cancer types unless otherwise specified.
“When interpreting and applying a prescription, the exercise professional should be mindful that the evidence is often disproportionately from trials in a single cancer type (i.e., breast), but the prescription is assumed to generalize across cancer types unless otherwise specified.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Differences among cancer survivors by cancer type exist.
“differences among cancer survivors by cancer type are known to exist (i.e., demographics, prognosis, treatments received and associated side effects)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The treatment approach used varies by cancer type, stage, subtype, patient health, and other considerations.
“The treatment approach used will differ by type of cancer, stage of disease, cancer subtype, patient health and many other considerations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Individuals diagnosed with cancer commonly have concerns that may limit prioritization of exercise in their lives.
“individuals diagnosed with cancer commonly have many concerns, such as life expectancy, employment issues, and family matters, that may limit prioritization of exercise in their lives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Both cancer diagnosis and curative cancer treatments may affect the underlying safety of exercise training.
“Both the diagnosis of cancer and curative cancer treatments may affect the underlying safety of exercise training.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the absence of unique safety concerns, the efficacy of exercise on various outcomes would be similar for survivors with early stage cancers other than breast and prostate cancer.
“it could be reasonably assumed that in the absence of any unique safety concerns for survivors of other types of cancer that the efficacy of exercise on various outcomes would be similar for survivors with early stage cancers other than breast and prostate cancer.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The basis for screening and intervention is the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline on fatigue [38–42].”
From The BrEasT cancer afTER-CARE (BETTER-CARE) programme to improve breast cancer follow-up: design and feasibility study results of a cluster-randomised complex intervention trial (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The ACSM expert panel concluded that there is sufficient evidence to support the efficacy of specific doses of exercise training to address cancer-related health outcomes, including fatigue, quality of life, physical function, anxiety, and depressive symptoms.10”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Scientific evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of physical activity, indicating—for people with cancer experience—health benefits such as reduced anxiety, reduced depressive symptoms, reduced fatigue, improved quality of life, and improved physical function [40,41,42,43].”
From The Effect of Vinyasa Yoga Practice on the Well-Being of Breast-Cancer Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Recently, the American College of Sports Medicine has updated its exercise guidance for cancer prevention as well as for the prevention and treatment of a variety of cancer health-related outcomes (eg, fatigue, anxiety, depression, function, and quality of life).”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“There is also sufficient evidence to confirm the safety of resistance exercise training among patients with and at risk for breast cancer– related lymphedema.10”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“There is consistent evidence that supervised exercise is more effective but that there is still benefit to home-based exercise.10”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“current evidence indicates that exercise under supervision yields better outcomes.10,43-47”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“the expert panel found that the majority of cancer health-related outcomes in the “strong” evidence category of Table 2 are improved by doing thrice-weekly aerobic activity for 30 minutes”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The exponential growth of exercise oncology research has driven the need for revised cancer exercise guidelines10 and a roadmap for oncology clinicians to follow to improve physical and psychological outcomes from cancer diagnosis and for the balance of life.”
From Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Physical inactivity (not meeting the physical activity guidelines) and prolonged sitting time are highly prevalent among cancer patients, partially due to persistent symptoms such as fatigue, which may contribute to these behaviors in addition to self-isolation measures.”
From Physical activity for cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The comprehensive literature review of the ACSM Multidisciplinary Roundtable on Exercise and Cancer also suggested that physical activity, particularly postdiagnosis, is associated with improved survival from breast, colon, and prostate cancers [7].”
From Physical activity for cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Data from USA and UK cancer patients suggested that only approximately a third to 45% of the patients accumulated at least 150 min of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week [7].”
From Physical activity for cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The benefits of physical activity for cancer patients are manifold, such as reduced anxiety, fewer depressive symptoms, less fatigue, better quality of life, and improved physical function.”
From Physical activity for cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“cancer and its treatment can accelerate aging and functional decline, adversely affecting cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, balance, body composition, and physical function and potentially leading to sarcopenia and frailty [[400], [401], [402]].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“It offers benefits across health-related fitness parameters, physical functioning, some cancer treatment side effects, psychosocial functioning, treatment tolerance, treatment response, and possibly even survival [400,[403], [404], [405]].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“Exercise has been shown to assist cancer patients in preparing for treatments, managing treatments, recovering after treatments, and improving long-term outcomes [400,[403], [404], [405]].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“Although the benefits of exercise outweigh the harms for most cancer patients, some risks and contraindications must be considered [400].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“Cancer and its treatments affect all organ systems and tissues [400].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“The side effects may include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, hand-foot syndrome, pain, fatigue, depression, hair loss, lymphedema, poor sleep quality, cardiotoxicity, cognitive dysfunction, and urinary issues [400].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“Although the benefits of exercise outweigh the harms for most cancer patients, some risks and contraindications must be considered [400].”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“Patients with cancer may also be at a higher risk of falls due to side effects of chemotherapy, such as peripheral neuropathy, ataxia, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction.”
From Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR) (2025) · cites this paper as [400]
In the citing paper
“Exercise reduces cancer risk, prolongs survival, and improves therapy efficacy2–4, leading to its recommendation as standard of care treatment5–7.”
From Exercise-induced microbiota metabolite enhances CD8 T cell antitumor immunity promoting immunotherapy efficacy (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21551 · Cited by 20,160
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016
Miller, K. D., Siegel, R. L., Lin, C. C., Mariotto, A. B., Kramer, J. L., Rowland, J. H., Stein, K. D., Alteri, R., & Jemal, A. (2016) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21349 · Cited by 6,066
Exercise and Physical Activity for Older Adults
Chodzko-Zajko, W. J., Proctor, D. N., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Minson, C. T., Nigg, C. R., Salem, G. J., & Skinner, J. S. (2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a0c95c · Cited by 5,153
ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients
Arends, J., Bachmann, P., Baracos, V., Barthelemy, N., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Fearon, K., Hütterer, E., Isenring, E., Kaasa, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015 · Cited by 3,114
American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable on Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors
Schmitz, K. H., Courneya, K. S., Matthews, C., Demark-Wahnefried, W., GALVÃO, D. A., Pinto, B. M., IRWIN, M. L., WOLIN, K. Y., SEGAL, R. J., LUCIA, A., et al. (2010) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181e0c112 · Cited by 2,781
Self-citationNutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors
Rock, C. L., Doyle, C., Demark‐Wahnefried, W., Meyerhardt, J., Courneya, K. S., Schwartz, A. L., Bandera, E. V., Hamilton, K. K., Grant, B., McCullough, M., et al. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21142 · Cited by 1,995
Self-citationPanel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons, A. G. S. A. B. G. S. (2011) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x · Cited by 1,817
Baracos, V. E., Martin, L., Korc, M., Guttridge, D. C., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 · Cited by 1,738
Northey, J. M., Cherbuin, N., Pumpa, K. L., Smee, D. J., & Rattray, B. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096587 · Cited by 1,380
ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition
Arends, J., Baracos, V., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Calder, P. C., Deutz, N. E. P., Erickson, N., Laviano, A., Lisanti, M. P., Lobo, D. N., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017 · Cited by 1,305
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,002
Ispoglou, T., McCullough, D., Windle, A., Nair, S., Cox, N. J., White, H., Burke, D., Kanatas, A. N., & Prokopidis, K. (2024) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.009 · Cited by 28
Natural killer cell mobilization and egress following acute exercise in men with prostate cancer
Hanson, E. D., Sakkal, S., Que, S., Cho, E., Spielmann, G., Kadife, E., Violet, J. A., Battaglini, C. L., Stoner, L. R., Bartlett, D. B., et al. (2020) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/ep088627 · Cited by 27
Czosnek, L., Zopf, E. M., Cormie, P., Rosenbaum, S., Richards, J. A., & Rankin, N. M. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00337-8 · Cited by 37
Baumann, F. T., Jensen, W., Berling-Ernst, A., Theurich, S., Leitzmann, M. F., & Götte, M. (2024) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0038 · Cited by 26
Molecular mechanisms of cancer cachexia. Role of exercise training
Tamayo-Torres, E., Garrido, A., de Cabo, R., Carretero, J., & Gómez‐Cabrera, M. C. (2024) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2024.101293 · Cited by 26
Bettariga, F., Taaffe, D. R., Crespo-Garcia, C., Clay, T. D., Galvao, D. A., & Newton, R. U. (2024) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-024-07559-5 · Cited by 32
Brown, M., O’Connor, D., Murphy, C., McClean, M., McMeekin, A., & Prue, G. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06165-1 · Cited by 26
Singh, B., & Toohey, K. L. (2021) · Journal of science and medicine in sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2021.08.008 · Cited by 28
Barriers and facilitators to exercise among adult cancer survivors in Singapore
Chan, A., Ports, K. D., Neo, P. S. H., Ramalingam, M. B., Lim, A. T., Tan, B., Hart, N. H., Chan, R. J., & Loh, K. W.-J. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-06893-y · Cited by 26
Hartman, S. J., Chen, R., Tam, R. M., Narayan, H. K., Natarajan, L., & Liu, L. (2022) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/37086 · Cited by 30
Wilson, T. N., Nambiema, A., Porro, B., Descatha, A., Aublet‐Cuvelier, A., Evanoff, B., & Roquelaure, Y. (2022) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-022-10052-9 · Cited by 28
Peck, S. S., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Rankin, K., Shalmon, T., Fan, C. S., Somerset, E., Amir, E., Thampinathan, B., Walker, M., Sabiston, C. M., et al. (2022) · JACC CardioOncology · doi:10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.06.006 · Cited by 26
Spence, R. R., Sandler, C. X., Jones, T. L., McDonald, N., Dunn, R. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067998 · Cited by 26
Winters‐Stone, K. M., Horak, F. B., Dieckmann, N. F., Luoh, S., Eckstrom, E., Stoyles, S. A., Roeland, E. J., & Li, F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01519 · Cited by 26
Self-citationChristopher, C. N., Kang, D., Wilson, R. L., Encabo, P. G., Ficarra, S., Heislein, D. M., & Dieli-Conwright, C. M. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15245044 · Cited by 26
Mama, S. K., Bhuiyan, N., Foo, W. Y. X., Segel, J. E., Bluethmann, S. M., Winkels, R. M., Wiskemann, J., Calo, W. A., Lengerich, E. J., & Schmitz, K. H. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05342-y · Cited by 26
Self-citationDíaz-Balboa, E., Salvado, V. G., Rodríguez‐Romero, B., Martínez‐Monzonís, A., Pedreira-Pérez, M., Ozores, P. P., López‐López, R., Peña, C., & González‐Juanatey, J. R. (2021) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-021-01970-2 · Cited by 26
Sun, F., Li, L., Wen, X., Xue, Y., & Yin, J. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101850 · Cited by 26
Radiotherapy-Induced Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients
Kowalczyk, L., Deutschmann, C., Crevenna, R., Konrad, S., Singer, C. F., & Farr, A. (2020) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000509410 · Cited by 26
Thieser, S., Dörfler, J., Rudolph, I., Wozniak, T., Schmidt, T., & Hübner, J. (2021) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-021-01459-0 · Cited by 25
Finley, D. J., Stevens, C. J., Emond, J. A., Batsis, J. A., Fay, K. A., Darabos, C., Sacks, O. A., Cook, S. B., & Lyons, K. D. (2021) · Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101525 · Cited by 25
Jacquinot, Q., Méneveau, N., Falcoz, A., Bouhaddi, M., Roux, P., Degano, B., Chatot, M., Curtit, E., Mansi, L., Paillard, M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1000846 · Cited by 25
Mavropalias, G., Cormie, P., Peddle‐McIntyre, C. J., Galvao, D. A., Taaffe, D. R., Schofield, C., Ray, S., Zissiadis, Y., & Newton, R. U. (2022) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-022-01408-3 · Cited by 25
Nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related fatigue: A comprehensive literature review
Zuo, S., Cheng, H., Wang, Z., Liu, T., Chen, S., Li, T., & Lü, L. (2023) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100230 · Cited by 27
Liu, X., Xu, X., Cheung, D. S. T., Chau, P. H., Ho, M., Takemura, N., & Lin, C. (2023) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-023-01396-z · Cited by 26
Evaluation and management of body composition changes in cancer patients
Wang, J., Tan, S., Gianotti, L. V., & Wu, G. (2023) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2023.112132 · Cited by 32
Avancini, A., Skroče, K., Tregnago, D., Frada, P., Trestini, I., Cercato, M. C., Bonaiuto, C., Tarperi, C., Schena, F. F., Milella, M., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227846 · Cited by 25
Zhou, W., Woo, S., & Larson, J. L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15511 · Cited by 25
Exercise to Reduce Anthracycline-Mediated Cardiovascular Complications in Breast Cancer Survivors
Varghese, S. S., Johnston, W. J., Eekhoudt, C. R., Keats, M. R., Jassal, D. S., & Grandy, S. A. (2021) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol28050351 · Cited by 25
Virtual Reality–Based Exercise Rehabilitation in Cancer-Related Dysfunctions: Scoping Review
Su, Z., Zhang, L., Lian, X., & Guan, M. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/49312 · Cited by 26
Lifestyle and integrative oncology interventions for cancer-related fatigue and sleep disturbances
Ee, C., Kay, S., Reynolds, A. C., Lovato, N., Lacey, J., & Koczwara, B. (2024) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108056 · Cited by 24
Filis, P., Markozannes, G., Chan, D. S. M., Mauri, D., Foukakis, T., Matikas, A., Droufakou, S., Pentheroudakis, G. E., & Tsilidis, K. K. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104602 · Cited by 26
Obesity–cancer axis crosstalk: Molecular insights and therapeutic approaches
Rakib, A., Mamun, M. A. A., Mandal, M., Sinha, P., & Singh, U. P. (2025) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.029 · Cited by 25
Carmack, C. L., Parker, N. H., Demark‐Wahnefried, W., Shely, L., Baum, G. P., Yuan, Y., Giordano, S. H., Rodrı́guez-Bigas, M. A., Pettaway, C. A., & Basen-Engquist, K. M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13124460 · Cited by 24
Soltero, E. G., Larkey, L., Kim, S. W., Chavez, J. R., & Lee, R. E. (2022) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101554 · Cited by 24
Supportive Care in Oncology—From Physical Activity to Nutrition
Schmidt, T., Süß, P., Schulte, D. M., Letsch, A., & Jensen, W. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14061149 · Cited by 24
Díaz-Balboa, E., Salvado, V. G., Rodríguez‐Romero, B., Martínez‐Monzonís, A., Pedreira-Pérez, M., Cuesta‐Vargas, A., López‐López, R., González‐Juanatey, J. R., & Peña, C. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07268-z · Cited by 24
Scriney, A., Russell, A., Loughney, L. A., Gallagher, P., & Boran, L. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6029 · Cited by 25
Promoting physical activity among cancer survivors: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
Qiu, L., Ye, M., Tong, Y., & Jin, Y. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07760-0 · Cited by 24
Embedding lifestyle interventions into cancer care: has telehealth narrowed the equity gap?
Dennett, A. M., Hirko, K. A., Porter, K., Loh, K. P., Liao, Y., Yang, L., Arem, H. E., Sukumar, J. S., & Salerno, E. A. (2023) · JNCI Monographs · doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac028 · Cited by 24
Geng, L., Duan, Y., Li, X., Yue, S., Li, R., Liu, H., & Su, C. (2023) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12669 · Cited by 24
Yan, H., Jiang, A., Huang, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Zhang, W., & Liu, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1265914 · Cited by 24
Wellness Coaching: An Intervention to Increase Healthy Behavior in Breast Cancer Survivors
Stan, D. L., Cutshall, S. M., Adams, T. F., Ghosh, K., Clark, M. M., Wieneke, K. C., Kebede, E. B., Donelan-Dunlap, B., Ruddy, K. J., Hazelton, J. K., et al. (2020) · Clinical journal of oncology nursing · doi:10.1188/20.cjon.305-315 · Cited by 24
Felser, S., Behrens, M., Liese, J., Strüder, D., Rhode, K., Junghanß, C., & Große-Thie, C. (2020) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/1534735420918935 · Cited by 24
Ferri, A., Gane, E. M., Smith, M. D., Pinkham, E. P., Gomersall, S. R., & Johnston, V. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05647-y · Cited by 24
Weemaes, A. T. R., Beelen, M., Bongers, B. C., Weijenberg, M. P., & Lenssen, A. F. (2021) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.016 · Cited by 24
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Time to Care for the Survivors
Fedele, P. L., & Opat, S. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.02738 · Cited by 24
Smartphone-recorded physical activity for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness
Eades, M. T., Tsanas, A., Juraschek, S. P., Kramer, D. B., Gervino, E. V., & Mukamal, K. J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94164-x · Cited by 23
Exercise Across the Phases of Cancer Survivorship: A Narrative Review
An, K., Min, J., Lee, D. H., Kang, D., Courneya, K. S., & Jeon, J. Y. (2024) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2023.0638 · Cited by 23
Self-citationFleming, S. T., Jones, T., Janda, M., Vagenas, D., Ward, L. C., Reul-Hirche, H. M., Sandler, C. X., Obermair, A., & Hayes, S. C. (2020) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001543 · Cited by 23
Ryans, K., Perdomo, M., Davies, C. C., Levenhagen, K., & Gilchrist, L. S. (2021) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-021-00991-2 · Cited by 23
Tamí-Maury, I. M., Liao, Y., Rangel, M. L., Gatus, L. A., Shinn, E. H., Alexander, A., & Basen-Engquist, K. M. (2021) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.33904 · Cited by 23
Caperchione, C. M., Sharp, P., Phillips, J. L., Agar, M. R., Liauw, W., Harris, C. A., Marin, E., McCullough, S., & Lilian, R. (2021) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.002 · Cited by 23
Tock, W. L., Maheu, C., & Johnson, N. A. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/08445621211062467 · Cited by 23
Pilotto, S., Avancini, A., Menis, J., Sperduti, I., Levra, M. G., Berghmans, T., Bironzo, P., Brandão, M., Ruysscher, D. D., Edwards, J. G., et al. (2022) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.009 · Cited by 23
de Leeuwerk, M. E., Botjes, M., van Vliet, V., Geleijn, E., de Groot, V., van Wegen, E. E. H., van der Schaaf, M., Tuynman, J. B., Dickhoff, C., & van der Leeden, M. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/35694 · Cited by 24
Piraux, E., Reychler, G., Vancraeynest, D., Geets, X., Léonard, D., & Caty, G. D. (2022) · Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy · doi:10.5603/rpor.a2022.0036 · Cited by 23
Reljic, D., Herrmann, H. J., JAKOBS, B., Dieterich, W., Mougiakakos, D., Neurath, M. F., & Zopf, Y. (2022) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002989 · Cited by 23
Wechsler, S., Fu, M. R., Lyons, K. D., Wood, K. C., & Wood, L. J. (2022) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzac143 · Cited by 27
Neoadjuvant Exercise Therapy in Prostate Cancer
Jones, L. W., Moskowitz, C. S., Lee, C. P., Fickera, G. A., Chun, S. S., Michalski, M., Stoeckel, K., Underwood, W. P., Lavery, J. A., Bhanot, U. K., et al. (2024) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2156 · Cited by 23
Natalucci, V., Villarini, M., Emili, R., Acito, M., Vallorani, L., Barbieri, E., & Villarini, A. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11050381 · Cited by 23
Moulton, C., Grazioli, E., Antinozzi, C., Fantini, C., Cerulli, C., Murri, A., Duranti, G., Ceci, R., Vulpiani, M. C., Pellegrini, P., et al. (2023) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox12051138 · Cited by 22
Capozzi, L., Daun, J. T., Francis, G. J., Wilding, M. D. G., Urgoiti, G. B. R., Langelier, D. M., & Culos-Reed, N. S. (2023) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol30070461 · Cited by 22
Nelson, E., Kelly, D., Bhriain, O. N., Garry, F., Clifford, A. M., & Allardyce, J. M. (2023) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daad077 · Cited by 22
Paterson, C. C., Armitage, L., & Turner, M. R. (2023) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151514 · Cited by 22
Nakagawa, N., Yamamoto, S., Hanai, A., Oiwa, A., & Arao, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1346099 · Cited by 22
Han, B., Zhang, P., Zhao, H., Zhang, X., Gao, H., Dong, J., Zeng, L., Pi, P., & Pei, J. (2024) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6370 · Cited by 24
Bettariga, F., Taaffe, D. R., Crespo-Garcia, C., Clay, T. D., Santi, M. D., Baldelli, G., Adhikari, S., Gray, E. S., Galvao, D. A., & Newton, R. U. (2025) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07772-w · Cited by 30
Rosero, I. D., Ramírez‐Vélez, R., Martínez‐Velilla, N., Cedeño‐Veloz, B. A., Morilla, I., & Izquierdo, M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9030862 · Cited by 22
Breast Cancer: A Lifestyle Medicine Approach
Orman, A., Johnson, D. L., Comander, A. H., & Brockton, N. T. (2020) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/1559827620913263 · Cited by 23
Community-based exercise programs and cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wagoner, C. W., Lee, J. T., & Battaglini, C. L. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06135-7 · Cited by 22
Kokorovic, A., So, A., Serag, H. A., French, C., Hamilton, R. J., Izard, J., Nayak, J. G., Pouliot, F., Fred Saad, C., Shayegan, B., et al. (2021) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.7355 · Cited by 23
Exercise and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers among Adult with Cancer: A Systematic Review
Longobucco, Y., Masini, A., Marini, S., Barone, G., Fimognari, C., Bragonzoni, L., Dallolio, L., & Maffei, F. (2022) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2022/2097318 · Cited by 27
Hollman, H., Updegraff, J. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rhodes, R. E. (2022) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-022-01245-9 · Cited by 22
Depenbusch, J., Haussmann, A., Wiskemann, J., Tsiouris, A., Schmidt, L. I., Sieverding, M., Ungar, N., & Steindorf, K. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14102480 · Cited by 22
Self-citationJee, H., Park, E., Hur, K., Kang, M., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.818470 · Cited by 22
Exercise and Bone Health in Cancer: Enemy or Ally?
Avancini, A., Benato, G., Borsati, A., Oliviero, L., Belluomini, L., Sposito, M., Tregnago, D., Trestini, I., Insolda, J., Zacchi, F., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14246078 · Cited by 22
Collao, N., Sanders, O., Caminiti, T., Messeiller, L., & Lisio, M. D. (2023) · Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.13185 · Cited by 22
Schad, F., Rieser, T., Becker, S., Groß, J., Matthes, H., Oei, S. L., & Thronicke, A. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15112920 · Cited by 22
Time to consider the potential role of alternative resistance training methods in cancer management?
Bettariga, F., Bishop, C. J., Taaffe, D. R., Galvao, D. A., Maestroni, L., & Newton, R. U. (2023) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2023.06.007 · Cited by 24
Rowing Training in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal Study of Physical Fitness
González, J. G., Gálvez-Fernández, I., Melé, P. M., & Fernández‐García, J. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17144938 · Cited by 22
Unraveling the link between cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer: a state-of-the-art review
Kunutsor, S. K., Kaminsky, L. A., Lehoczki, A., & Laukkanen, J. A. (2024) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-024-01222-z · Cited by 21
Koivula, T., Lempiäinen, S., Neuvonen, J., Norha, J., Hollmén, M., Sundberg, C. J., Rundqvist, H., Minn, H. R. I., Rinne, P., & HEINONEN, I. H. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1394420 · Cited by 24
Belluomini, L., Avancini, A., Sposito, M., Pontolillo, L., Tregnago, D., Trestini, I., Insolda, J., Carbognin, L., Milella, M., Bria, E., et al. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104444 · Cited by 21
Beyer, M., Bischoff, C., Lässing, J., Gockel, I., & Falz, R. (2024) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-024-06064-y · Cited by 21
Lesser, I., Prystupa, J., Bélanger, L. J., Thomson, C. J., & Nienhuis, C. P. (2020) · Applied cancer research/Applied Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s41241-020-00094-x · Cited by 21
Impact and Determinants of Structural Barriers on Physical Activity in People with Cancer
Depenbusch, J., Wiskemann, J., Haussmann, A., Tsiouris, A., Schmidt, L. I., Ungar, N., Sieverding, M., & Steindorf, K. (2021) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-021-10014-0 · Cited by 21
Self-citationZhu, X., Li, Z., Chen, C., Feng, R., Cheng, B.-R., Liu, R., Wang, R., Xu, L., Wang, Y., Tao, X., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.745280 · Cited by 23
Exercise and anemia in cancer patients: could it make the difference?
Avancini, A., Belluomini, L., Tregnago, D., Trestini, I., Milella, M., Lanza, M., & Pilotto, S. (2021) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2021.2007764 · Cited by 21
López, P., Newton, R. U., Taaffe, D. R., Singh, F., Lyons‐Wall, P., Buffart, L. M., Tang, C., Hayne, D., & Galvao, D. A. (2021) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002843 · Cited by 22
Ikio, Y., Sagari, A., Nakashima, A., Matsuda, D., Sawai, T., & Higashi, T. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-06846-5 · Cited by 21
Physical Exercise and Tumor Energy Metabolism
Vulczak, A., & Alberici, L. C. (2022) · Cancer Treatment and Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100600 · Cited by 21
Ee, C., MacMillan, F., Boyages, J., & McBride, K. A. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13980-6 · Cited by 21
Baguley, B. J., Via, J. D., Fraser, S. F., Daly, R. M., & Kiss, N. K. (2022) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuac079 · Cited by 21
Ma, Z., Yao, S., Shi, Y., Lu, N., & Cheng, F. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07368-w · Cited by 21
Weiner, L. S., Nagel, S., Su, H.-C. I., Hurst, S., Levy, S. S., Arredondo, E. M., Hekler, E. B., & Hartman, S. J. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-022-00381-8 · Cited by 21
Capela, A., Antunes, P., Coelho, C. A., Garcia, C., Custódio, S., Amorim, R., Costa, T., Vilela, E., Teixeira, M., Amarelo, A. L., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1129028 · Cited by 23
Telemedicine in Care of Sarcoma Patients beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities
Tsagkaris, C., Trygonis, N., Spyrou, V., & Koulouris, A. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15143700 · Cited by 22
Orellana-Jaén, J., Páez, L. C., & Fernández, M. M. (2023) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-023-01484-z · Cited by 22
Li, Q., Chen, G., Cao, B., Zhou, F., Wang, J., Ren, H. C., Li, Y., Wang, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.15272 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- CAMPBELL, K. L., WINTERS-STONE, K. M., WISKEMANN, J., MAY, A. M., SCHWARTZ, A. L., COURNEYA, K. S., ZUCKER, D. S., MATTHEWS, C. E., LIGIBEL, J. A., GERBER, L. H., MORRIS, G. S., PATEL, A. V., HUE, T. F., PERNA, F. M., & SCHMITZ, K. H.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- School of Nursing and Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Swedish Medical Center (US)
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Inova Health System (US)
- Wingate University (US)
- American Cancer Society (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Penn State Cancer Institute (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2375-2390
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-0315
- PMC
- PMC8576825
- OpenAlex
- W2981263606
- Semantic Scholar
- 476921561b2d12cddc4775c6092670414d9c97c5
- Cited by
- 2,988
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 488 · 2025: 490 · 2024: 532 · 2023: 438 · 2022: 426 · 2021: 378 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 106.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA163474, R01CA222605)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- cancer survivors, exercise recommendations, exercise prescription, cancer-related fatigue, aerobic exercise, resistance training, physical function, quality of life, anxiety, depressive symptoms, exercise safety, cancer recurrence risk, all-cause mortality
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Anxiety, Depression, Exercise Test, Exercise Therapy, Fatigue, Humans, Lymphedema, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life, Exercise, Exercise Tolerance, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
