Cited by 227COVID-19 and Mental HealthLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Impact of COVID-19 Infection and Enforced Prolonged Social Isolation on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Older Adults With and Without Dementia: A Review

Open access
Manca, Riccardo, De Marco, Matteo, Venneri, Annalena·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The sudden and drastic changes due to the Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic have impacted people’s physical and mental health. Clinically-vulnerable older people are more susceptible to severe effects either directly by the COVID-19 infection or indirectly due to stringent social isolation measures. Social isolation and loneliness negatively impact on mental health in older adults and may predispose to cognitive decline. People with cognitive impairments may also be at high risk of worsening cognitive and mental health due to the current pandemic. This review provides a summary of the recent literature on the consequences of COVID-19, due to either viral infection or social isolation, on neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults with and without dementia. Methods A search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify all relevant papers published up to the 7th July 2020. Two independent assessors screened and selected the papers suitable for inclusion. Additional suitable papers not detected by literature search were manually added. Results Fifteen articles were included: 8 focussed on the psychiatric symptoms caused by the COVID-19 infection and 7 investigated the impact of social isolation on older adults’ neuropsychiatric symptoms. Four studies included older adults without dementia and 11 included patients with cognitive impairment mainly due to Alzheimer’s disease. All studies found that different neuropsychiatric symptoms emerged and/or worsened in older adults with and without dementia. These changes were observed as the consequence of both COVID-19 infection and of the enforced prolonged conditions of social isolation. Cases were reported of viral infection manifesting with delirium at onset in the absence of other symptoms. Delirium, agitation and apathy were the symptoms most commonly detected, especially in people with dementia. Conclusion The available evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has a wide negative impact on the mental well-being of older adults with and without dementia. Viral infection and the consequent social isolation to limit its spreading have a range of neuropsychiatric consequences. Larger and more robustly designed studies are needed to clarify such effects and to assess the long-term implications for the mental health of older adults, and to test possible mitigating strategies.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes 15 studies published up to July 2020 on neuropsychiatric effects of COVID-19 infection and enforced social isolation in older adults with and without dementia. It reports that delirium, agitation, and apathy commonly emerged or worsened via both direct infection and isolation-related pathways.

Key findings

  • Across 15 included articles (8 on COVID-19 infection, 7 on social isolation; 4 included older adults without dementia and 11 included patients with cognitive impairment mainly due to Alzheimer’s disease), all studies found that different neuropsychiatric symptoms emerged and/or worsened in older adults with and without dementia.
  • In acute COVID-19, delirium was common at onset, especially in dementia: Bianchetti et al. found delirium in 67% of dementia patients at onset (hypoactive in 50%) and behavioural symptoms in 11%; Annweiler et al. found higher delirium in major neurocognitive disorder vs no MND (hypoactive 27.6% vs 11.4%; overactive 14.9% vs 5.5%) and altered consciousness (17.2% vs 6.4%); Varatharaj et al. found altered mental status in 31.2% of 125 patients with complete assessments, with 59% of these meeting criteria for psychiatric diagnoses, 91.3% of which were new.
  • In social isolation without COVID-19 infection, Canevelli et al. reported NPS worsened in 57.3% of patients with dementia and 48.8% of those with MCI/SCD, while NPS improved in only 2.1% and 7%, respectively; Boutoleau-Bretonnière et al. found caregiver-reported worsening of NPS in 26.3% of patients and a correlation between confinement duration and NPI-Q score/caregiver distress; Lara et al. found general worsening of NPI scores after 5 weeks of confinement, especially agitation, apathy, and aberrant motor behaviour.
  • Among older adults without dementia, Emerson et al. found no differences in self-rated mental health between ages 60–70 and 70+, but the younger group reported higher stress after social isolation; Shrira et al. found loneliness due to social isolation was positively associated with anxiety, depression, and peritraumatic distress, especially among individuals feeling older than their age.

Methods

  • A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science up to 7 July 2020, using keywords for COVID-19, populations of interest (dementia, MCI, neurodegeneration, Alzheimer’s disease, older adults, ageing/aging), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (including delirium); no date-of-publication interval was set, but only papers published up to the search date were included.
  • Two independent assessors screened and selected papers, with a third assessor resolving disagreements; original data were required, but letters and commentaries were included if they presented novel data; exclusion criteria included non-English manuscripts, non-target populations, disease/treatment mechanisms, irrelevant clinical or social aspects, and non-clinical subsidiary topics; additional relevant papers were manually added.
  • The search yielded 344 entries; 127 duplicates were discarded; 217 manuscripts were screened; the final review included 15 manuscripts (12 from the search plus 3 manually added), summarized in a table of study characteristics and outcomes.

Limitations

  • Stated: the evidence base is limited to a small number of studies; infection findings came from clinical environments hosting severe cases needing hospitalisation, so it remains undetermined whether milder infections may lead to these or other psychiatric symptoms; social isolation studies used simple exploratory designs, mainly online/telephone surveys, without control groups or pre-lockdown baseline data, preventing definite conclusions; larger, more robustly designed, theory-grounded studies are needed.
  • Stated: variables that may mitigate cognitive and neuropsychiatric decline were not considered by the included studies, such as number of people living in the household or width of the social network; mechanistic hypotheses are speculative at this stage, and there is a paucity of neuropathological research.
  • Evident from the text: infection studies often relied on clinical judgment rather than standardised tools, whereas social isolation studies more often used standardised tools such as the NPI; most evidence is short-term, rapidly published in the first half of 2020, and heterogeneous in design and sample.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585540

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 89 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
45 of 45
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many questions about the potential detrimental effects of the current pandemic on neuropsychiatric manifestations in older adults remain unanswered.

    “However, many of the questions sparked around the potential detrimental effects of the current pandemic on neuropsychiatric manifestations in older adults still remain unanswered.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relevant findings on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults are quite scattered at the time of writing (July 2020).

    “As a result of such hectic efforts, however, the relevant findings are quite scattered at time of writing (July 2020).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Older adults are clinically vulnerable to COVID-19 viral infection.

    “On one hand they are clinically vulnerable to the viral infection, on the other hand they are at risk of suffering from the negative consequences of reduced social interactions (Figure 1).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Governmental instructions provided to older adults objectively steer towards increased isolation.

    “Although the governmental instructions provided to older adults objectively steer towards increased isolation, the extent to which this translates into a psychological sense of loneliness may vary.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Agitation timing differs for one case

    Minor

    The summary says all eight patients presented with agitation at hospitalisation, but the Sinvani case is described as developing agitation only after a few days of hospitalisation.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Manca, R., De Marco, M., & Venneri, A.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Venneri, Annalena
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2020-10-22
Volume
11
Pages
585540-585540
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093935683
Cited by
227
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-INF-0478)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation, neuropsychiatric symptoms, older adults, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, delirium, agitation, apathy, mental health, cognitive impairment, lockdown

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review