Cited by 1,088Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance

Open access
Williams, Kipling D., Jarvis, Blair·2006·Behavior Research Methods

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, research on interpersonal acceptance and exclusion has proliferated, and several paradigms have evolved that vary in their efficiency, context specificity, and strength. This article describes one such paradigm, Cyberball, which is an ostensibly online ball-tossing game that participants believe they are playing with two or three others. In fact, the "others" are controlled by the programmer. The course and speed of the game, the frequency of inclusion, player information, and iconic representation are all options the researcher can regulate. The game was designed to manipulate independent variables (e.g., ostracism) but can also be used as a dependent measure of prejudice and discrimination. The game works on both PC and Macintosh (OS X) platforms and is freely available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03192765

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mental visualization cover story is emphasized so that Cyberball cannot be viewed as a task at which one can succeed or fail.

    “These are the standard instruction for Cyberball, and the mental visualization cover story is emphasized so that it cannot be viewed as a task at which one can succeed or fail (Williams et al., 2000b;Williams & Jarvis, 2006).”

    From Ostracism increases social susceptibility (2008) · cites this paper as Williams & Jarvis, 2006

    In “Basis for Program Creation” (page unavailable), the authors say the cover story presented Cyberball as an unimportant exercise in mental visualization. Our copy does not say that the story was emphasized to prevent participants from viewing the game as a task they could succeed or fail at. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Gonsalkorale, K., & Williams, K. D. (in press). The KKK wont let me play: Ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts.European Journal of Social Psychology.
  2. Jarvis, B. G. (2004). MediaLab Research Software (Version 2004) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft.
  3. van Beest, I., &Williams, K. D. (2004).Ayberball and Cyberbomb: Effects of ostracism when inclusion is costly. Unpublished manuscript, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  4. Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., &Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42, 213–220. · DOI
  5. Williams, K. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.),Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133–170). New York: Plenum. · DOI
  6. Williams, K. D. (2001).Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford
  7. Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., &von Hippel, W. (Eds.) (2005).The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York: Psychology Press.
  8. Williams, K. D., &Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation?Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,23, 693–706. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Williams, K. D., &Zadro, L. (2005). Ostracism: The indiscriminate early detection system. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.),The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York: Psychology Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Kipling D.
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2006-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
174-180
ISSN
  • 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-3528
OpenAlex
W2048818633
Cited by
1,088
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 27
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
Cyberball, social acceptance, social exclusion, virtual social interaction, prejudice, discrimination, experimental paradigms
MeSH terms
Games, Experimental, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Rejection, Psychology, Sociometric Techniques, Software, User-Computer Interface, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review