The DOI matches its DataCite record; 185 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Open accessAbstract
State-of-the-art computer vision systems are trained to predict a fixed set of predetermined object categories. This restricted form of supervision limits their generality and usability since additional labeled data is needed to specify any other visual concept. Learning directly from raw text about images is a promising alternative which leverages a much broader source of supervision. We demonstrate that the simple pre-training task of predicting which caption goes with which image is an efficient and scalable way to learn SOTA image representations from scratch on a dataset of 400 million (image, text) pairs collected from the internet. After pre-training, natural language is used to reference learned visual concepts (or describe new ones) enabling zero-shot transfer of the model to downstream tasks. We study the performance of this approach by benchmarking on over 30 different existing computer vision datasets, spanning tasks such as OCR, action recognition in videos, geo-localization, and many types of fine-grained object classification. The model transfers non-trivially to most tasks and is often competitive with a fully supervised baseline without the need for any dataset specific training. For instance, we match the accuracy of the original ResNet-50 on ImageNet zero-shot without needing to use any of the 1.28 million training examples it was trained on. We release our code and pre-trained model weights at https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“During training,the model learns the joint distribution between the two modalities and optimizes the model through methods such as adversarial training or maximizing likelihood, enabling it to generate the target modality”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [188]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Large Image Models (LIMs) such as CLIP [86] and BLIP-2 [87] extend the agent's capabilities into the visual domain. Trained on image-text pairs, LIMs enable perception-based tasks including image classification, object detection, and vision-language grounding.”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [86]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Foundation Models (FMs) [23, 35, 37] - generic models trained on web-scale datasets - have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot performance and can be quickly adapted to various downstream tasks with few additional tuning cost.”
From Towards More General Video-based Deepfake Detection through Facial Component Guided Adaptation for Foundation Model (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“By encoding text descriptions of variations of the dataset bias (e.g.'a blue wall'), using CLIP's text encoder (CLIP T ), we vary visual representations without actually having seen images containing these variations (e.g. an image of a blue wall).”
From Language-Based Augmentation to Address Shortcut Learning in Object-Goal Navigation (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, their capacity for semantic comprehension is comparatively limited when contrasted with vision-based perceptual models like CLIP (Radford et al., 2021).”
From WorldVLA: Towards Autoregressive Action World Model (2025) · cites this paper as Radford et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In natural language [1] and computer vision [39], general-purpose foundation models that are pre-trained on diverse multi-task data tend to outperform narrowly tailored and specialized solutions.”
From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Existing evaluation metrics such as CLIP-Image score [37] and DINO score [6], while commonly used, often fail to reflect subtle differences due to their reliance on high-dimensional semantic features for cosine similarity computation.”
From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“CLIP cosine similarity is often used to measure text prompt and frame consistency, where a reference video dataset is not needed.”
From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Radford et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Trained on image-text pairs, LIMs enable perception-based tasks including image classification, object detection, and vision-language grounding.”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [88]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Vision-Language Models (VLMs) e.g., CLIP [15], allows us to augment at feature-level based on prior knowledge of the environment without any changes to training data.”
From Language-Based Augmentation to Address Shortcut Learning in Object-Goal Navigation (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We find these methods perform poorly on language and image goals, particularly when relying on CLIP [25] features.”
From GOAT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lifelong Navigation (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A notable advancement in this domain is the recent work on CLIP [9, 32, 35, 43], which elevates open-vocabulary recognition performance by collecting millions of image-text pairs and employing contrastive learning techniques.”
From Active Open-Vocabulary Recognition: Let Intelligent Moving Mitigate CLIP Limitations (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The recently proposed Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) [1] learns the correspondence between text and image by projecting them into a shared latent space.”
From Large-Scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentation (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To evaluate the visual similarity of I R and I G , we use the similarity of their CLIP (Radford et al., 2021) embedding, denoted as CLIP ( I R , I G ) .”
From Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as Radford et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This suggests the inability of CLIP [25] features in capturing crucial instance-specific and spatial features in language and image goals.”
From GOAT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lifelong Navigation (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Existing solutions in multimodal Transformer adopt a fixed fusion strategy [18,21,24,26,33].”
From Are Multimodal Transformers Robust to Missing Modality? (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“existing foundation models for vision and language such as CLIP [8], SigLIP [9], and Llama 2 [10] are capable of these types of generalization and more, stemming from the priors captured by their Internet-scale pretraining datasets.”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“which shows that our model achieves the highest DINO [5] and CLIP-I [42] scores, with CLIP-T [42] scores that are comparable to other methods.”
From DreamingComics: A Story Visualization Pipeline via Subject and Layout Customized Generation using Video Models (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In early 2021, OpenAI released an architecture termed Contrastive Language Image Pretraining (CLIP), which, when trained on millions of image-text pairs, matched the performance of competitive, fully supervised models without fine-tuning 106”
From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [106]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Even when PwD data is available, data from marginalized groups is often automatically filtered out by techniques for removing 'low' quality data [57, 104], which rely on biased models such as CLIP [92].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [92]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“HOLODECK uses a Large Language Model (GPT-4 [37]) to design the floor plan, assign suitable materials, install the doorways and windows and arrange 3D assets coherently in the scene using constraintbased optimization.”
From Holodeck: Language Guided Generation of 3D Embodied AI Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“[41] famously found evidence of a ‘cat neuron’, a phenomenon that has been remarkably replicable across newer models and analyses [14,42,43]”
From Symbols and grounding in large language models (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E [26,27] enable educators to create visual learning materials from textual content.”
From Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 47,472
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., and Jauvin, C. A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of machine learning research , 3(Feb):1137-1155, 2003.
- Browne, S. Dark Matters: Surveillance of Blackness . Duke University Press, 2015.
- Chen, Y.-C., Li, L., Yu, L., Kholy, A. E., Ahmed, F., Gan, Z., Cheng, Y., and Liu, J. Uniter: Learning universal imagetext representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11740 , 2019. · arXiv
- Coates, A., Ng, A., and Lee, H. An analysis of singlelayer networks in unsupervised feature learning. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics , pp. 215-223, 2011.
- Crawford, K. The trouble with bias. NIPS 2017 Keynote , 2017. URL https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=fMym\_BKWQzk .
- Frome, A., Corrado, G. S., Shlens, J., Bengio, S., Dean, J., Ranzato, M., and Mikolov, T. Devise: A deep visualsemantic embedding model. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 2121-2129, 2013.
- Geirhos, R., Rubisch, P., Michaelis, C., Bethge, M., Wichmann, F. A., and Brendel, W. Imagenet-trained cnns are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12231 , 2018. · arXiv
- Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., and Szegedy, C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572 , 2014. · arXiv
- Ha, D., Dai, A., and Le, Q. V. Hypernetworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09106 , 2016. · arXiv
- He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 770-778, 2016b.
- Hendrycks, D. and Dietterich, T. Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.12261 , 2019. · arXiv
- Hendrycks, D., Liu, X., Wallace, E., Dziedzic, A., Krishnan, R., and Song, D. Pretrained transformers improve out-ofdistribution robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06100 , 2020b. · arXiv
- Ilyas, A., Santurkar, S., Tsipras, D., Engstrom, L., Tran, B., and Madry, A. Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 125-136, 2019.
- Jaderberg, M., Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., et al. Spatial transformer networks. Advances in neural information processing systems , 28:2017-2025, 2015.
- Johnson, J., Hariharan, B., van der Maaten, L., Fei-Fei, L., Lawrence Zitnick, C., and Girshick, R. Clevr: A diagnostic dataset for compositional language and elementary visual reasoning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 2901-2910, 2017.
- Kiros, R., Zhu, Y., Salakhutdinov, R. R., Zemel, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., and Fidler, S. Skip-thought vectors. Advances in neural information processing systems , 28: 3294-3302, 2015.
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 1097-1105, 2012.
- Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Doll´ ar, P., and Zitnick, C. L. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision , pp. 740-755. Springer, 2014.
- Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pp. 181-196, 2018.
- McCann, B., Bradbury, J., Xiong, C., and Socher, R. Learned in translation: Contextualized word vectors. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 6294-6305, 2017.
- Socher, R. and Fei-Fei, L. Connecting modalities: Semisupervised segmentation and annotation of images using unaligned text corpora. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 966-973. IEEE, 2010.
- Srivastava, N. and Salakhutdinov, R. Multimodal learning with deep boltzmann machines. In NIPS , 2012.
- Thomee, B., Shamma, D. A., Friedland, G., Elizalde, B., Ni, K., Poland, D., Borth, D., and Li, L.-J. Yfcc100m: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM , 59(2):64-73, 2016.
- Touvron, H., Vedaldi, A., Douze, M., and J´ egou, H. Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 8252-8262, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,100 of 1,203
Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models
Singh, M., Gustafson, L., Adcock, A., De Freitas Reis, V., Gedik, B., Kosaraju, R. P., Mahajan, D., Girshick, R., Dollar, P., & Van Der Maaten, L. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00088 · Cited by 99
The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience
Aru, J., Larkum, M. E., & Shine, J. M. (2023) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2023.09.009 · Cited by 98
ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion Framework
Lu, S., Duan, N., Han, H., Guo, D., Hwang, S.-W., & Svyatkovskiy, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.07722 · Cited by 96
“Contrastive learning on code Inspired by the great success of contrastive learning in other domains (Wu et al., 2018; Reimers and Gurevych, 2019; Fang et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020; He et al., 2020; Radford et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2021), researchers have deployed this technique to source code for better code fragm…”
BackgroundLiu, R., Zuo, H., Lian, Z., Schuller, B. W., & Li, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2024.3378570 · Cited by 96
Symbols and grounding in large language models
Pavlick, E. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0041 · Cited by 95
Unsolved Problems in ML Safety
Hendrycks, D., Carlini, N., Schulman, J., & Steinhardt, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.13916 · Cited by 95
Ties-merging: Resolving interference when merging models
Yadav, P., Tam, D., Choshen, L., Raffel, C., & Bansal, M. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-0310 · Cited by 95
Text2NeRF: Text-Driven 3D Scene Generation With Neural Radiance Fields
Zhang, J., Li, X., Wan, Z., Wang, C., & Liao, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3361502 · Cited by 94
Prediction of single-cell RNA expression profiles in live cells by Raman microscopy with Raman2RNA
Kobayashi-Kirschvink, K. J., Comiter, C. S., Gaddam, S., Joren, T., Grody, E. I., Ounadjela, J. R., Zhang, K., Ge, B., Kang, J. W., Xavier, R. J., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-02082-2 · Cited by 93
GridMM: Grid Memory Map for Vision-and-Language Navigation
Wang, Z., Li, X., Yang, J., Liu, Y., & Jiang, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01432 · Cited by 93
Tian, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, B., & Bo, L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.17485 · Cited by 92
Deep language algorithms predict semantic comprehension from brain activity
Caucheteux, C., Gramfort, A., & King, J.-R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20460-9 · Cited by 91
Vision Transformers Need Registers
Darcet, T., Oquab, M., Mairal, J., & Bojanowski, P. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.16588 · Cited by 90
COCOA: Cross Modality Contrastive Learning for Sensor Data
Deldari, S., Xue, H., Saeed, A., Smith, D. V., & Salim, F. D. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550316 · Cited by 92
ViP-LLaVA: Making Large Multimodal Models Understand Arbitrary Visual Prompts
Cai, M., Liu, H., Mustikovela, S. K., Meyer, G. P., Chai, Y., Park, D., & Lee, Y. J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01227 · Cited by 88
Envedit: Environment Editing for Vision-and-Language Navigation
Li, J., Tan, H., & Bansal, M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01497 · Cited by 87
The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Caffagni, D., Cocchi, F., Barsellotti, L., Moratelli, N., Sarto, S., Baraldi, L., Baraldi, L., Cornia, M., & Cucchiara, R. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.807 · Cited by 98
“Initially, this breakthrough was lever-aged for language-specific models (Devlin et al., 2018; Brown et al., 2020) but quickly extended to support diverse modalities (Li et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2019) and facilitate their integration within unified embedding spaces (Radford et al., 2021).”
GODIVA: Generating Open-DomaIn Videos from nAtural Descriptions
Wu, C., Huang, L., Zhang, Q., Li, B., Ji, L., Yang, F., Sapiro, G., & Duan, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14806 · Cited by 85
Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy
Titus, L. M. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101174 · Cited by 82
Cross-modal autoencoder framework learns holistic representations of cardiovascular state
Radhakrishnan, A., Friedman, S. F., Khurshid, S., Ng, K., Batra, P., Lubitz, S. A., Philippakis, A. A., & Uhler, C. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38125-0 · Cited by 82
“A line of recent works utilize autoencoders to learn joint representations of multi-modal data including natural images and captions in computer vision 14,22 – 27 , nuclear images and gene expression in biology 20 , and paired clinical measurements 28 – 31 .”
Multimodal single cell data integration challenge: results and lessons learned
Lance, C., Luecken, M. D., Burkhardt, D. B., Cannoodt, R., Rautenstrauch, P., Laddach, A., Ubingazhibov, A., Cao, Z.-J., Deng, K., Khan, S., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.04.11.487796 · Cited by 81
RRSIS: Referring Remote Sensing Image Segmentation
Yuan, Z., Mou, L., Hua, Y., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3369720 · Cited by 81
Neural representational geometry underlies few-shot concept learning
Sorscher, B., Ganguli, S., & Sompolinsky, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2200800119 · Cited by 78
A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
Zhuang, B., Liu, J., Pan, Z., He, H., Weng, Y., & Shen, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/764 · Cited by 78
Generative AI for self-adaptive systems: State of the art and research roadmap
Li, J., Zhang, M., Li, N., Weyns, D., Jin, Z., & Tei, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/3686803 · Cited by 77
AgentAI: A comprehensive survey on autonomous agents in distributed AI for industry 4.0
Piccialli, F., Chiaro, D., Sarwar, S., Cerciello, D., Qi, P., & Mele, V. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128404 · Cited by 77
What matters in language conditioned robotic imitation learning over unstructured data
Mees, O., Hermann, L., & Burgard, W. (2022) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3196123 · Cited by 77
ContIG: Self-supervised Multimodal Contrastive Learning for Medical Imaging with Genetics
Taleb, A., Kirchler, M., Monti, R., & Lippert, C. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02024 · Cited by 83
Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: updates in 2024
Komura, D., Ochi, M., & Ishikawa, S. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.12.033 · Cited by 76
Towards a holistic framework for multimodal LLM in 3D brain CT radiology report generation
Li, C.-Y., Chang, K.-J., Yang, C.-F., Wu, H.-Y., Chen, W., Bansal, H., Chen, L., Yang, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-C., Chen, S.-P., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57426-0 · Cited by 75
“Detailed instruction examples can be referenced in Extended Data Fig.”
V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs
Wu, P., & Xie, S. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01243 · Cited by 74
“In this work, we choose the CLIP ViT-L/14 model [39] as the visual feature extractor, with input resized and padded to 224 2 .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMiller, J., Taori, R., Raghunathan, A., Sagawa, S., Koh, P. W., Shankar, V., Liang, P., Carmon, Y., & Schmidt, L. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.04649 · Cited by 74
A multifaceted vision of the human-AI collaboration: a comprehensive review
Puerta-Beldarrain, M., Gómez-Carmona, O., Sánchez-Corcuera, R., Casado-Mansilla, D., López-de-Ipiña, D., & Chen, L. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3536095 · Cited by 73
Wang, J., Duan, H., Liu, J., Chen, S., Min, X., & Zhai, G. (2024) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9119-8_5 · Cited by 80
Efficient Emotional Adaptation for Audio-Driven Talking-Head Generation
Gan, Y., Yang, Z., Yue, X., Sun, L., & Yang, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.02069 · Cited by 72
When is a Tool a Tool? User Perceptions of System Agency in Human–AI Co-Creative Drawing
Lawton, T., Grace, K., & Ibarrola, F. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3595977 · Cited by 72
RT-H: Action Hierarchies Using Language
Belkhale, S., Ding, T., Xiao, T., Sermanet, P., Vuong, Q., Tompson, J., Chebotar, Y., Dwibedi, D., & Sadigh, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.01823 · Cited by 71
He, K., Mao, R., Lin, Q., Ruan, Y., Lan, X., Feng, M., & Cambria, E. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4809363 · Cited by 69
Multimodal Prompt Learning with Missing Modalities for Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Recognition
Guo, Z., Jin, T., & Zhao, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.94 · Cited by 77
Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigation
Wang, Z., Li, J., Hong, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, Q., Bansal, M., Gould, S., Tan, H., & Qiao, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01103 · Cited by 64
Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigation
Wang, Z., Li, J., Hong, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, Q., Bansal, M., Gould, S., Tan, H., & Qiao, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15644 · Cited by 64
Bridging Zero-shot Object Navigation and Foundation Models through Pixel-Guided Navigation Skill
Cai, W., Huang, S., Cheng, G., Long, Y., Gao, P., Sun, C., & Dong, H. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610499 · Cited by 63
LEGO-Net: Learning Regular Rearrangements of Objects in Rooms
Wei, Q. A., Ding, S., Park, J. J., Sajnani, R., Poulenard, A., Sridhar, S., & Guibas, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01825 · Cited by 60
NoisyQuant: Noisy Bias-Enhanced Post-Training Activation Quantization for Vision Transformers
Liu, Y., Yang, H., Dong, Z., Keutzer, K., Du, L., & Zhang, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01946 · Cited by 60
A Length-Extrapolatable Transformer
Sun, Y., Dong, L., Patra, B., Ma, S., Huang, S., Benhaim, A., Chaudhary, V., Song, X., & Wei, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.816 · Cited by 59
GREEN: Generative Radiology Report Evaluation and Error Notation
Ostmeier, S., Xu, J., Chen, Z., Varma, M., Blankemeier, L., Bluethgen, C., Md, A. E. M., Moseley, M., Langlotz, C., Chaudhari, A. S., et al. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.21 · Cited by 59
GenAssist: Making Image Generation Accessible
Huh, M., Peng, Y.-H., & Pavel, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606735 · Cited by 67
“The most common errors made in our pipeline were from perspective, medium, and error categories which are all extracted using the CLIP score.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUnderstanding World or Predicting Future? A Comprehensive Survey of World Models
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Shang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zong, Z., Feng, J., Yuan, Y., Su, H., Li, N., Sukiennik, N., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3746449 · Cited by 169
PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering
Zhang, X., Wu, C., Zhao, Z., Lin, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10415 · Cited by 66
“2 Vision Backbone CLIP [30] is a model trained from scratch on a dataset of 400 million image-text pairs collected from the internet with contrastive loss.”
MethodModel metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
Feather, J., Leclerc, G., Mądry, A., & McDermott, J. H. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01442-0 · Cited by 59
Efficient Multimodal Fusion via Interactive Prompting
Li, Y., Quan, R., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00256 · Cited by 60
“For methods that prompt multimodally pretrained models for unimodal tasks, many recent works apply prompt tuning to pretrained vision-language models ( i.e. CLIP [30]) for unimodal vision tasks [3, 14, 25, 46, 47].”
BackgroundMethodProduct1M: Towards Weakly Supervised Instance-Level Product Retrieval via Cross-Modal Pretraining
Zhan, X., Wu, Y., Dong, X., Wei, Y., Lu, M., Zhang, Y., Xu, H., & Liang, X. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01157 · Cited by 54
Khan, S. A., & Dang-Nguyen, D.-T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3348450 · Cited by 53
Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation and Beyond
Shao, R., Wu, T., Wu, J., Nie, L., & Liu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3367749 · Cited by 53
Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Zhong, T., Dong, P., Xie, K., Liu, Y., Jiang, H., Wu, Z., Liu, Z., Zhao, W., et al. (2024) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100103 · Cited by 52
Multi-task paired masking with alignment modeling for medical vision-language pre-training
Zhang, K., Yang, Y., Yu, J., Jiang, H., Fan, J., Huang, Q., & Han, W. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3325965 · Cited by 51
Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology
Jaume, G., Oldenburg, L., Vaidya, A., Chen, R. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Peeters, T., Song, A. H., & Mahmood, F. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00920 · Cited by 51
Hernandez, D., Kaplan, J., Henighan, T., & McCandlish, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.01293 · Cited by 51
Decoupling Common and Unique Representations for Multimodal Self-supervised Learning
Wang, Y., Albrecht, C. M., Braham, N. A. A., Liu, C., Xiong, Z., & Zhu, X. X. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73397-0_17 · Cited by 49
Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?
Majumdar, A., Yadav, K., Arnaud, S., Ma, Y. J., Chen, C., Silwal, S., Jain, A., Berges, V.-P., Abbeel, P., Malik, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.18240 · Cited by 49
“3 However, curiously, the kinds of PVRs that are locally-dominant in CORTEXBENCH differ significantly in the size and type of pre-training datasets: CLIP (Radford et al., 2021) was pretrained on 400M image-text pairs from the web; MVP (Radosavovic et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems
Weidinger, L., Rauh, M., Marchal, N., Manzini, A., Hendricks, L. A., Mateos-Garcia, J., Bergman, S., Kay, J., Griffin, C., Bariach, B., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.11986 · Cited by 49
DeepFake-Adapter: Dual-Level Adapter for DeepFake Detection
Shao, R., Wu, T., Nie, L., & Liu, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02274-6 · Cited by 48
Coelho Mollo, D., & Millière, R. (2026) · Philosophy and the Mind Sciences · doi:10.33735/phimisci.2026.12307 · Cited by 48
Visual Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Knowledge-Based Visual Reasoning
Chen, Z., Zhou, Q., Shen, Y., Hong, Y., Sun, Z., Gutfreund, D., & Gan, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27888 · Cited by 48
Huber, L. S., Geirhos, R., & Wichmann, F. A. (2023) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.23.7.4 · Cited by 42
Sketchar: Supporting Character Design and Illustration Prototyping Using Generative AI
Ling, L., Chen, X., Wen, R., Li, T. J.-J., & LC, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3677102 · Cited by 52
OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model
Kim, M. J., Pertsch, K., Karamcheti, S., Xiao, T., Balakrishna, A., Nair, S., Rafailov, R., Foster, E., Lam, G., Sanketi, P., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09246 · Cited by 62
“Yet beyond robotics, existing foundation models for vision and language such as CLIP [8], SigLIP [9], and Llama 2 [10] are capable of these types of generalization and more, stemming from the priors captured by their Internet-scale pretraining datasets.”
BackgroundData Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology
Jernite, Y., Nguyen, H., Biderman, S., Rogers, A., Masoud, M., Danchev, V., Tan, S., Luccioni, A. S., Subramani, N., Johnson, I., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534637 · Cited by 75
C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detection
Tan, C., Tao, R., Liu, H., Gu, G., Wu, B., Zhao, Y., & Wei, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i7.32772 · Cited by 93
Qu, B., Liang, X., Sun, S., & Gao, W. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13573 · Cited by 44
FigurA11y: AI Assistance for Writing Scientific Alt Text
Singh, N., Wang, L. L., & Bragg, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645212 · Cited by 42
CM3: A Causal Masked Multimodal Model of the Internet
Aghajanyan, A., Huang, B., Ross, C., Karpukhin, V., Xu, H., Goyal, N., Okhonko, D., Joshi, M., Ghosh, G., Lewis, M., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.07520 · Cited by 42
Dangol, A., Newman, M., Wolfe, R., Lee, J. H., Kientz, J. A., Yip, J., & Pitt, C. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3661515 · Cited by 42
“Cosine similarities are proportional to logits in CLIP [76], such that the highest cosine similarities indicate the words the model would be most likely to use to classify the image.”
Forgery-Aware Adaptive Learning With Vision Transformer for Generalized Face Forgery Detection
Luo, A., Cai, R., Kong, C., Ju, Y., Kang, X., Huang, J., & Kot, A. C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3522091 · Cited by 41
Ferret-UI: Grounded Mobile UI Understanding with Multimodal LLMs
You, K., Zhang, H., Schoop, E., Weers, F., Swearngin, A., Nichols, J., Yang, Y., & Gan, Z. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.05719 · Cited by 40
Wolfe, R., Yang, Y., Howe, B., & Caliskan, A. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594072 · Cited by 42
Language-driven Grasp Detection
Vuong, A. D., Vu, M. N., Huang, B., Nguyen, N., Le, H., Vo, T., & Nguyen, A. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01695 · Cited by 39
Natural Language Processing in Marketing
Hartmann, J., & Netzer, O. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence in Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1548-643520230000020011 · Cited by 38
Beyond Text-to-Image: Multimodal Prompts to Explore Generative AI
Liu, V. (2023) · Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544549.3577043 · Cited by 38
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Bai, Z., Wang, P., Xiao, T., He, T., Han, Z., Zhang, Z., & Shou, M. Z. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.18930 · Cited by 38
“It first verifies that CLIPScore [88] can effectively distinguish between hallucinated and non-hallucinated sentences through a series of studies across different models and datasets.”
InfluentialMusic Understanding LLaMA: Advancing Text-to-Music Generation with Question Answering and Captioning
Liu, S., Hussain, A. S., Sun, C., & Shan, Y. (2024) · ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10447027 · Cited by 38
Vision-language models for autonomous driving: CLIP-based dynamic scene understanding
Elhenawy, M., Ashqar, H. I., Rakotonirainy, A., Alhadidi, T. I., Jaber, A., & Tami, M. A. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14071282 · Cited by 37
Carrillo-Perez, F., Pizurica, M., Zheng, Y., Nandi, T. N., Madduri, R., Shen, J., & Gevaert, O. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01193-8 · Cited by 37
OpenEMMA: Open-Source Multimodal Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Xing, S., Qian, C., Wang, Y., Hua, H., Tian, K., Zhou, Y., & Tu, Z. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw65960.2025.00113 · Cited by 37
Clinical insights: A comprehensive review of language models in medicine
Neveditsin, N., Lingras, P., & Mago, V. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000800 · Cited by 37
Dar, S. S., Rehman, M. Z. U., Bais, K., Haseeb, M. A., & Kumar, N. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125337 · Cited by 36
Generating dermatopathology reports from gigapixel whole slide images with HistoGPT
Tran, M., Schmidle, P., Guo, R. R., Wagner, S. J., Koch, V., Lupperger, V., Novotny, B., Murphree, D. H., Hardway, H. D., D’Amato, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60014-x · Cited by 36
Embodied navigation with multi-modal information: A survey from tasks to methodology
Wu, Y., Zhang, P., Gu, M., Zheng, J., & Bai, X. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102532 · Cited by 34
Language Models Meet World Models: Embodied Experiences Enhance Language Models
Xiang, J., Tao, T., Gu, Y., Shu, T., Wang, Z., Yang, Z., & Hu, Z. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-3295 · Cited by 34
Lowis3D: Language-Driven Open-World Instance-Level 3D Scene Understanding
Ding, R., Yang, J., Xue, C., Zhang, W., Bai, S., & Qi, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3410324 · Cited by 34
Collaborative Dynamic 3D Scene Graphs for Automated Driving
Greve, E., Büchner, M., Vödisch, N., Burgard, W., & Valada, A. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610112 · Cited by 32
A LLM-informed multi-agent AI system for drone-based visual inspection for infrastructure
Liu, J., Li, H., Chai, C., Chen, K., & Wang, D. (2025) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2025.103643 · Cited by 32
A Survey: Collaborative Hardware and Software Design in the Era of Large Language Models
Guo, C., Cheng, F., Du, Z., Kiessling, J., Ku, J., Li, S., Li, Z., Ma, M., Molom-Ochir, T., Morris, B., et al. (2025) · IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcas.2024.3476008 · Cited by 32
PneumoLLM: Harnessing the power of large language model for pneumoconiosis diagnosis
Song, M., Wang, J., Yu, Z., Wang, J., Yang, L., Lu, Y., Li, B., Wang, X., Wang, X., Huang, Q., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103248 · Cited by 31
DeAR: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Additive Residuals
Seth, A., Hemani, M., & Agarwal, C. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00659 · Cited by 34
Automated Feedback for Student Math Responses Based on Multi-Modality and Fine-Tuning
Li, H., Li, C., Xing, W., Baral, S., & Heffernan, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636860 · Cited by 29
Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06977 · Cited by 635
Human Beauty according to Artificial Intelligence
Kenig, N., Monton Echeverria, J., & Muntaner Vives, A. (2023) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000005153 · Cited by 30
Collective predictive coding hypothesis: symbol emergence as decentralized Bayesian inference
Taniguchi, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1353870 · Cited by 28
Multistain Pretraining for Slide Representation Learning in Pathology
Jaume, G., Vaidya, A., Zhang, A., H. Song, A., J. Chen, R., Sahai, S., Mo, D., Madrigal, E., Phi Le, L., & Mahmood, F. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73414-4_2 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., & Sutskever, I.
- Affiliations
- OpenAI (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Kim, Jong Wook
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2103.00020
- OpenAlex
- W3135367836
- Cited by
- 15,293
- References
- 193
- Citations by year
- 2026: 214 · 2025: 3988 · 2024: 6413 · 2023: 3389 · 2022: 932 · 2021: 349
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- natural language supervision, zero-shot transfer, image representation learning, image captioning, visual concept learning, cross-modal learning, human action recognition, geolocation, optical character recognition, CLIP
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
