Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 732

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Altered functional connectivity in early Alzheimer's disease: A resting‐state fMRI study

Open access
Wang, Kun, Liang, Meng, Wang, Liang, Tian, Lixia, Zhang, Xinqing, Li, Kuncheng, Jiang, Tianzi·2007·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Previous studies have led to the proposal that patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may have disturbed functional connectivity between different brain regions. Furthermore, recent resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have also shown that low‐frequency (<0.08 Hz) fluctuations (LFF) of the blood oxygenation level‐dependent signals were abnormal in several brain areas of AD patients. However, few studies have investigated disturbed LFF connectivity in AD patients. By using resting‐state fMRI, this study sought to investigate the abnormal functional connectivities throughout the entire brain of early AD patients, and analyze the global distribution of these abnormalities. For this purpose, the authors divided the whole brain into 116 regions and identified abnormal connectivities by comparing the correlation coefficients of each pair. Compared with healthy controls, AD patients had decreased positive correlations between the prefrontal and parietal lobes, but increased positive correlations within the prefrontal lobe, parietal lobe, and occipital lobe. The AD patients also had decreased negative correlations (closer to zero) between two intrinsically anti‐correlated networks that had previously been found in the resting brain. By using resting‐state fMRI, our results supported previous studies that have reported an anterior–posterior disconnection phenomenon and increased within‐lobe functional connectivity in AD patients. In addition, the results also suggest that AD may disturb the correlation/anti‐correlation effect in the two intrinsically anti‐correlated networks. Hum Brain Mapp 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20324

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, K., Liang, M., Wang, L., Tian, L., Zhang, X., Li, K., & Jiang, T.
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-28
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
967-978
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2171630967
Cited by
732
References
9
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.