Cited by 149Gut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and DietProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Consumption of Two Healthy Dietary Patterns Restored Microbiota Dysbiosis in Obese Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction

Haro, Carmen, García‐Carpintero, Sonia, Rangel‐Zúñiga, Oriol A., Alcalá‐Díaz, Juan F., Landa, Blanca B., Clemente, José C., Pérez‐Martínez, Pablo, López‐Miranda, José +2 more·2017·Molecular Nutrition & Food Research

Abstract

SCOPE: The consumption of two healthy diets (Mediterranean (MED) and low-fat (LF) diets) may restore the gut microbiome dysbiosis in obese patients depending on the degree of metabolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The differences in bacterial community at baseline and after 2 years of dietary intervention of 106 subjects from the CORDIOPREV study were analyzed, 33 of whom were obese patients with severe metabolic disease (5 criteria for metabolic syndrome) (MetS-OB), 32 obese patients without metabolic dysfunction (2 or less criteria for metabolic syndrome) (NonMetS-OB) and 41 non-obese subjects (NonMetS-NonOB). Our study showed a marked dysbiosis in people with severe metabolic disease (Met-OB), compared with obese people without MetS (NonMetS-OB) and non-obese people (NonMetS-NonOB). This disbiotic pattern was reversed by consumption of both MED (35% of calories as fat (22% MUFA fat, 6% PUFA fat and <10% saturated fat) or LF (<30% total fat (<10% saturated fat, 12%-14% MUFA fat and 6-8% PUFA fat) diets, whereas no significant microbiota changes were observed in NonMetS-NonOB and NonMetS-OB groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the chronic intake of two healthy dietary patterns partially restores the gut microbiome dysbiosis in obese patients with coronary heart disease, depending on the degree of metabolic dysfunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mnfr.201700300

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After 2 years, consumption of a Mediterranean dietary pattern and a low-fat dietary pattern has been shown to partially restore loss of keystone taxa in 33 participants with obesity and varying levels of metabolic dysfunction.

    “For example, after 2 years, consumption of a Mediterranean dietary pattern and a low-fat dietary pattern has been shown to partially restore loss of keystone taxa in 33 participants with obesity and varying levels of metabolic dysfunction [101].”
  • In a recent randomized clinical trial, obese individuals randomized to a Mediterranean diet for 2 years experienced a reshaping of the gut microbiota, with an increase in Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Faecalibacterium genera, and most importantly of the Roseburia and Ruminococcus genera and Parabacteroides distasonis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii bacterial species.

    “Consistently, in a recent randomized clinical trial, obese individuals randomized to a Mediterranean diet for 2 years experienced a reshaping of the gut microbiota, with an increase in Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Faecalibacterium genera, and most importantly of the Roseburia and Ruminococcus genera and Parabacteroides distasonis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii bacterial species, which are known”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haro, C., García‐Carpintero, S., Rangel‐Zúñiga, O. A., Alcalá‐Díaz, J. F., Landa, B. B., Clemente, J. C., Pérez‐Martínez, P., López‐Miranda, J., Pérez‐Jiménez, F., & Camargo, A.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES)
Corresponding author
Camargo, Antonio
Venue
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-07
Volume
61
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4133
OpenAlex
W2753997213
Cited by
149
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AGL2012/39615, PIE14/00005, PIE 14/00031, AGL2015/‐67896‐P, CP14/00114, FIS PI13/00023, FIS PI13/00185, PI13/00619, FIS PI16/01777)
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CP14/00114, PI13/00185, PI13/00619, PIE 14/00031, PIE14/00005)
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (AGL2012/39615, AGL2015/‐67896‐P)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
gut microbiota, dysbiosis, obesity, metabolic syndrome, Mediterranean diet, low-fat diet, dietary fat composition, monounsaturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, saturated fat, coronary artery disease, CORDIOPREV study, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Feces, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Treatment Outcome, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Metabolic Syndrome, Diet, Mediterranean, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review