CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tracing 20 years of research on problematic use of the internet and social media: Theoretical models, assessment tools, and an agenda for future work

Open access
Moretta, Tania, Buodo, Giulia, Demetrovics, Zsolt, Potenza, Marc N.·2022·Comprehensive Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152286
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been increasing interest in the impact of internet use and growing concern about whether problematic use of the internet (PUI) constitutes an addiction. Despite the growing number of studies investigating PUI and PUI subtypes, its conceptualization and inclusion in a classification system have not been possible yet. Several models aimed at inspiring clinical research and practice have proposed possible mechanisms involved in PUI and problematic use of social media, and multiple self-report instruments have been consequentially developed. The diversity of theoretical models and instruments currently hinders standardized assessment procedures across studies and, in turn, their comparability. The purpose of the present overview is to highlight the current conceptualization and assessment of both PUI and problematic use of social media, in order to critically discuss the existing fragmentation in the field and the need to achieve conceptual convergence. Two suggestions for future directions are also provided, i.e., define diagnostic criteria by bottom-up and top-down processes and develop a psychobiological hypothesis including the description of higher-order mechanisms involved in PUI and not other psychopathological conditions (e.g., the multiple available internet-related cues and outcomes that may lead to parallel forms of associative learning; probabilities of obtaining internet-related reinforcements; and intrinsic motivation processes).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152286

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 2013, vol. 25
  2. Ozcan, 2005, An assistive tool in determining problematic internet use: validity and reliability of the “online cognition scale” in a sample of university students, J Depend, 6, 19
  3. Latif, 2016, 5, 51
  4. Brown, 1997, A theoretical model of the Behavioural addictions—applied to offending, Addict Crime, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 125

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moretta, T., Buodo, G., Demetrovics, Z., & Potenza, M. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Moretta, Tania
ORCID
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
112
Pages
152286
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152286
OpenAlex
W3208908485
Cited by
125
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 13
FWCI
24.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Dipartimenti di Eccellenza
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (art.1, Dipartimenti di Eccellenza (art.1, 314‐337)
  • Università degli Studi di Padova
  • Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova
  • National Research, Development and Innovation Office (KKP126835, K128614)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
problematic internet use, social media addiction, internet addiction, theoretical model, assessment instruments, diagnostic criteria, conceptual convergence, associative learning, intrinsic motivation, reinforcement, classification systems
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review