The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition
Open accessAbstract
Tasks that demand externalized attention reliably suppress default network activity while activating the dorsal attention network. These networks have an intrinsic competitive relationship; activation of one suppresses activity of the other. Consequently, many assume that default network activity is suppressed during goal-directed cognition. We challenge this assumption in an fMRI study of planning. Recent studies link default network activity with internally focused cognition, such as imagining personal future events, suggesting a role in autobiographical planning. However, it is unclear how goal-directed cognition with an internal focus is mediated by these opposing networks. A third anatomically interposed 'frontoparietal control network' might mediate planning across domains, flexibly coupling with either the default or dorsal attention network in support of internally versus externally focused goal-directed cognition, respectively. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing brain activity during autobiographical versus visuospatial planning. Autobiographical planning engaged the default network, whereas visuospatial planning engaged the dorsal attention network, consistent with the anti-correlated domains of internalized and externalized cognition. Critically, both planning tasks engaged the frontoparietal control network. Task-related activation of these three networks was anatomically consistent with independently defined resting-state functional connectivity MRI maps. Task-related functional connectivity analyses demonstrate that the default network can be involved in goal-directed cognition when its activity is coupled with the frontoparietal control network. Additionally, the frontoparietal control network may flexibly couple with the default and dorsal attention networks according to task domain, serving as a cortical mediator linking the two networks in support of goal-directed cognitive processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, the default and control networks show cooperation during autobiographical future planning—constructing a detailed and sequential mental representation about a future goal state [10, 19, 24].”
From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We propose that creative thought involves similar cognitive and neural mechanisms as other forms of goal-directed, self-generated cognition (e.g., autobiographical future planning; [10, 19, 24]).”
From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this context, the control network may modify and direct self-generated thoughts to meet the demands of task-specific goals [10–11, 20].”
From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The FPCN (as well as the salience network; Box 3) may in turn, mediate internally and externally directed cognition by maintaining a dynamic balance between the default and attention networks.15,155,160,162,163”
From The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance (2014) · cites this paper as [162]
In the citing paper
“However, the FPCN has also been shown to play an important role in regulating self-generated mnemonic, social, and emotional information, and does so by varying its functional connectivity with the DAN or the DN, respectively.”
From The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance (2014) · cites this paper as [162]
In the citing paper
“Although spatially distinct, the FPCN is anatomically interposed between the default and dorsal attention networks,51,160,162 suggesting it may play an important modulatory role in the activation and suppression of these other networks based on switching goal states.”
From The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance (2014) · cites this paper as [162]
In the citing paper
“Visuospatial planning engaged the DAN, whereas autobiographical planning engaged the DN. Both engaged the FPCN and, critically, task-related functional connectivity analyses indicated that this network was coupled with the DN during autobiographical planning and with the dorsal attention network during visuospatial planning.”
From The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance (2014) · cites this paper as [162]
In the citing paper
“Such findings fit with the notion that brain networks functionally couple and uncouple as required by task demands, and a number of studies report connectivity between DMN and frontoparietal control network as the need for flexible or creative thinking increases (e.g., Beaty, Benedek, Barry Kaufman, & Silvia, 2015;Roberts & Addis, 2018;Spreng, Stevens, Chamberlain, Gilmore, & Schacter, 2010).”
From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Spreng, Stevens, Chamberlain, Gilmore, & Schacter, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baltosser, W. H., & Zar, J. H. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265725 · Cited by 35,166
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
Self-citationThe human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775
Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function
Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 · Cited by 5,592
Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest
Smith, S. M., Fox, P. T., Miller, K. L., Glahn, D. C., Fox, P. M., Mackay, C. E., Filippini, N., Watkins, K. E., Toro, R., Laird, A. R., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905267106 · Cited by 5,150
Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects
Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Beckmann, C. F. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601417103 · Cited by 4,326
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization
Margulies, D. S., Ghosh, S. S., Goulas, A., Falkiewicz, M., Huntenburg, J. M., Langs, G., Bezgin, G., Eickhoff, S. B., Castellanos, F. X., Petrides, M., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1608282113 · Cited by 2,321
Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12360 · Cited by 2,102
Self-citationSpreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029 · Cited by 2,143
Self-citationNiendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., & Carter, C. S. (2012) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5 · Cited by 1,700
Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework
Christoff, K., Irving, Z. C., Fox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.113 · Cited by 1,376
Self-citationThe future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001 · Cited by 1,398
Self-citationThe sleep-deprived human brain
Krause, A. J., Simon, E. B., Mander, B. A., Greer, S. M., Saletin, J. M., Goldstein-Piekarski, A. N., & Walker, M. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.55 · Cited by 1,200
The brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation
Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2012) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858411403316 · Cited by 1,114
Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004 · Cited by 1,105
“, autobiographical future planning [10,19,24]).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBroad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex
Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315235110 · Cited by 952
Spreng, R. N., & Grady, C. L. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21282 · Cited by 985
Self-citationThe role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease
Anticevic, A., Cole, M. W., Murray, J. D., Corlett, P. R., Wang, X.-J., & Krystal, J. H. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.008 · Cited by 978
Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience
Hamilton, J. P., Farmer, M., Fogelman, P., & Gotlib, I. H. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.020 · Cited by 952
Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006 · Cited by 917
New perspectives on the role of melatonin in human sleep, circadian rhythms and their regulation
Zisapel, N. (2018) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.14116 · Cited by 947
Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review
Dixon, M. L., Thiruchselvam, R., Todd, R., & Christoff, K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000096 · Cited by 745
Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Barry Kaufman, S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10964 · Cited by 705
“Under these contexts—including autobiographical future planning, positive constructive daydreaming, keeping track of social information, and evaluating creative ideas—the dorsal attention network and executive networks become decoupled and the executive network couples with the default mode network (18, 38, 50-53).”
BackgroundFox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., Ellamil, M., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Christoff, K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.039 · Cited by 690
Self-citationA Brain-Wide Study of Age-Related Changes in Functional Connectivity
Geerligs, L., Renken, R. J., Saliasi, E., Maurits, N. M., & Lorist, M. M. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu012 · Cited by 788
Spreng, R. N., Sepulcre, J., Turner, G. R., Stevens, W. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00281 · Cited by 668
Self-citationTowards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks
Uddin, L. Q., Yeo, B. T. T., & Spreng, R. N. (2019) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6 · Cited by 683
Self-citationFox, K. C. R., Dixon, M. L., Nijeboer, S., Girn, M., Floman, J. L., Lifshitz, M., Ellamil, M., Sedlmeier, P., & Christoff, K. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.021 · Cited by 656
The effects of aging in the hippocampus and cognitive decline
Bettio, L. E. B., Rajendran, L., & Gil‐Mohapel, J. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.030 · Cited by 700
Dixon, M. L., De La Vega, A., Mills, C., Andrews-Hanna, J., Spreng, R. N., Cole, M. W., & Christoff, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1715766115 · Cited by 595
Self-citationEvaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008 · Cited by 611
Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007 · Cited by 588
Smallwood, J. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030010 · Cited by 564
Fornito, A., Harrison, B. J., Zalesky, A., & Simons, J. S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1204185109 · Cited by 555
A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition
Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1417144111 · Cited by 539
Self-citationNoonan, K. A., Jefferies, E., Visser, M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00442 · Cited by 543
Sestieri, C., Corbetta, M., Romani, G. L., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3335-10.2011 · Cited by 523
Posterior cingulate cortex: adapting behavior to a changing world
Pearson, J. M., Heilbronner, S. R., Barack, D. L., Hayden, B. Y., & Platt, M. L. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.002 · Cited by 504
Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control
Cocchi, L., Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Mattingley, J. B. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.006 · Cited by 429
Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention
Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010 · Cited by 509
Self-citationFunctional Specialization and Flexibility in Human Association Cortex
Yeo, B. T. T., Krienen, F. M., Eickhoff, S. B., Yaakub, S. N., Fox, P. T., Buckner, R. L., Asplund, C. L., & Chee, M. W. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu217 · Cited by 448
Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory
Schacter, D. L. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0029869 · Cited by 417
Self-citationSmallwood, J., Brown, K., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.072 · Cited by 379
Benoit, R. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.034 · Cited by 366
Self-citationThe inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction: A network perspective
Igelström, K. M., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.001 · Cited by 367
Default Mode Dynamics for Global Functional Integration
Vatansever, D., Menon, D. K., Manktelow, A. E., Sahakian, B. J., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2135-15.2015 · Cited by 333
Functional Connectivity of the Infant Human Brain
Gao, W., Lin, W., Grewen, K., & Gilmore, J. H. (2016) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858416635986 · Cited by 387
Development of human brain cortical network architecture during infancy
Gao, W., Alcauter, S., Smith, J. K., Gilmore, J. H., & Lin, W. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0710-3 · Cited by 356
Martin, A., Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., & Richlan, F. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22749 · Cited by 378
Brain activity at rest: a multiscale hierarchical functional organization
Doucet, G., Naveau, M., Petit, L., Delcroix, N., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Jobard, G., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Mazoyer, B., Mellet, E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00895.2010 · Cited by 319
Grady, C. L., Sarraf, S., Saverino, C., & Campbell, K. L. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.020 · Cited by 357
Shared understanding of narratives is correlated with shared neural responses
Nguyen, M., Vanderwal, T., & Hasson, U. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.010 · Cited by 304
Stepwise Connectivity of the Modal Cortex Reveals the Multimodal Organization of the Human Brain
Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Yeo, T. B., Liu, H., & Johnson, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0759-12.2012 · Cited by 323
The fallacy of a “task‐negative” network
Spreng, R. N. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00145 · Cited by 320
Self-citationState-dependent architecture of thalamic reticular subnetworks
Halassa, M. M., Chen, Z., Wimmer, R. D., Brunetti, P. M., Zhao, S., Zikopoulos, B., Wang, F., Brown, E. N., & Wilson, M. A. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.025 · Cited by 309
Cognitive impairment and resting-state network connectivity in Parkinson's disease
Baggio, H. C., Segura, B., Sala‐Llonch, R., Martı́, M. J., Valldeoriola, F., Compta, Y., TOLOSA, E. S., & Junqué, C. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22622 · Cited by 327
Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Maquet, P., & D'Argembeau, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016997 · Cited by 305
Brain activity during walking: A systematic review
Hamacher, D., Herold, F., Wiegel, P., Hamacher, D., & Schega, L. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.002 · Cited by 332
Creswell, J. D., Taren, A. A., Lindsay, E. K., Greco, C. M., Gianaros, P. J., Fairgrieve, A., Marsland, A. L., Brown, K. W., Way, B. M., Rosen, R. K., et al. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.01.008 · Cited by 299
Cognitive Demands of Lower Paleolithic Toolmaking
Stout, D., Hecht, E. E., Khreisheh, N., Bradley, B., & Chaminade, T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121804 · Cited by 310
The contribution of the human posterior parietal cortex to episodic memory
Sestieri, C., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2017) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.6 · Cited by 299
Touroutoglou, A., Hollenbeck, M., Dickerson, B. C., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.012 · Cited by 276
Resting brain dynamics at different timescales capture distinct aspects of human behavior
Liégeois, R., Li, J., Kong, R., Orbán, C., Ville, D. V. D., Ge, T., Sabuncu, M. R., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10317-7 · Cited by 300
Brain correlates of hypnosis: A systematic review and meta-analytic exploration
Landry, M., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.020 · Cited by 295
Pupillometric Evidence for the Decoupling of Attention from Perceptual Input during Offline Thought
Smallwood, J., Brown, K., Tipper, C. M., Giesbrecht, B., Franklin, M. S., Mrazek, M. D., Carlson, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018298 · Cited by 321
Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience
Christoff, K., Cosmelli, D., Legrand, D., & Thompson, E. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.001 · Cited by 286
The Hippocampus and Imagining the Future: Where Do We Stand?
Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00173 · Cited by 285
Self-citationfMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains
Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., Begany, K. L., Leckie, R. L., Barry, K. P., Ciccia, A. H., & Snyder, A. Z. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061 · Cited by 280
The neuroscience of musical improvisation
Beaty, R. E. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.004 · Cited by 261
Fusion and Fission of Cognitive Functions in the Human Parietal Cortex
Humphreys, G. F., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu198 · Cited by 265
Shine, J. M., Matar, E., Ward, P. B., Frank, M. J., Moustafa, A. A., Pearson, M., Naismith, S. L., & Lewis, S. J. G. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt272 · Cited by 279
The Shifting Architecture of Cognition and Brain Function in Older Adulthood
Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619827511 · Cited by 267
Self-citationDynamic reconfiguration of functional brain networks during working memory training
Finc, K., Bonna, K., He, X., Lydon‐Staley, D. M., Kühn, S., Duch, W., & Bassett, D. S. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15631-z · Cited by 255
A unifying account of angular gyrus contributions to episodic and semantic cognition
Humphreys, G. F., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Simons, J. S. (2021) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2021.01.006 · Cited by 220
Rest Is Not Idleness: Implications of the Brain’s Default Mode for Human Development and Education
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Christodoulou, J. A., & Singh, V. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612447308 · Cited by 245
Stern, E. R., Fitzgerald, K. D., Welsh, R. C., Abelson, J. L., & Taylor, S. F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036356 · Cited by 245
Sripada, C., Kessler, D. A., & Angstadt, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1407787111 · Cited by 258
Yeo, B. T. T., Krienen, F. M., Chee, M. W. L., & Buckner, R. L. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.046 · Cited by 247
Principles of dynamic network reconfiguration across diverse brain states
Shine, J. M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.010 · Cited by 247
Ode to positive constructive daydreaming
McMillan, R. L., Kaufman, S. B., & Singer, J. L. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00626 · Cited by 238
Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery?
Geranmayeh, F., Brownsett, S. L. E., & Wise, R. J. S. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu163 · Cited by 252
Murphy, C., Jefferies, E., Rueschemeyer, S., Sormaz, M., Wang, H.-T., Margulies, D. S., & Smallwood, J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.017 · Cited by 243
Spreng, R. N., Stevens, W. D., Viviano, J. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.05.020 · Cited by 241
Self-citationAge differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: Implications for distractibility
Campbell, K. L., Grady, C. L., Ng, C., & Hasher, L. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.025 · Cited by 250
Gerlach, K. D., Spreng, R. N., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.030 · Cited by 224
Self-citationA framework for understanding the relationship between externally and internally directed cognition
Dixon, M. L., Fox, K. C. R., & Kalina Christoff, A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.024 · Cited by 238
Shine, J. M., Matar, E., Ward, P. B., Bolitho, S., Gilat, M., Pearson, M., Naismith, S. L., & Lewis, S. J. G. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt049 · Cited by 240
Chen, J., Tam, A., Kebets, V., Orbán, C., Ooi, L. Q. R., Asplund, C. L., Marek, S. A., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Eickhoff, S. B., Bzdok, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29766-8 · Cited by 240
Default Network Modulation and Large-Scale Network Interactivity in Healthy Young and Old Adults
Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr339 · Cited by 214
Self-citationKeller, J. B., Hedden, T., Thompson, T. W., Anteraper, S. A., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Whitfield, S. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.001 · Cited by 227
Dixon, M. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., Spreng, R. N., Irving, Z. C., Mills, C., Girn, M., & Kalina Christoff, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.073 · Cited by 239
Self-citationMental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation.
Addis, D. R. (2020) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-020-00470-0 · Cited by 225
Sezer, I., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Sacchet, M. D. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104583 · Cited by 214
“This network is linked to top-down control of attention activated by endogenous stimuli, a goal-directed type of attention (Spreng et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMadore, K. P., Gaesser, B., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0034885 · Cited by 208
Self-citationLinking inter-individual differences in neural activation and behavior to intrinsic brain dynamics
Mennes, M., Zuo, X., Kelly, C. A. M., Martino, A. D., Zang, Y., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046 · Cited by 218
Liu, J., Liao, X., Xia, M., & Yong He, A. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23890 · Cited by 212
Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in healthy non-sleep-deprived subjects: A systematic review
Battleday, R. M., & Brem, A.-K. (2015) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.028 · Cited by 215
Konishi, M., McLaren, D. G., Engen, H., & Smallwood, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132209 · Cited by 194
The serendipitous discovery of the brain's default network
Buckner, R. L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.035 · Cited by 304
Ossandón, T., Jerbi, K., Vidal, J. R., Bayle, D. J., Hénaff, M., Jung, J., Minotti, L., Bertrand, O., Kahane, P., & Lachaux, J.-P. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2483-11.2011 · Cited by 222
Hellyer, P. J., Shanahan, M., Scott, G., Wise, R. J. S., Sharp, D. J., & Leech, R. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1853-13.2014 · Cited by 205
Jackson, R. L., Hoffman, P., Pobric, G., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2999-15.2016 · Cited by 210
Shine, J. M., Halliday, G. M., Naismith, S. L., & Lewis, S. J. G. (2011) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23896 · Cited by 205
Beaty, R. E., Christensen, A. P., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012 · Cited by 208
Self-citationSelf-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., & Macrae, C. N. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.017 · Cited by 202
Are episodic memories special? On the sameness of remembered and imagined event simulation
Addis, D. R. (2018) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.2018.1439071 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Spreng, R. N., Stevens, W. D., Chamberlain, J. P., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Spreng, R. Nathan
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 303-317
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2914129
- OpenAlex
- W1998268694
- Cited by
- 1,256
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 27.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (MH060941)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- default mode network, dorsal attention network, frontoparietal network, goal-directed cognition, planning, resting-state functional connectivity, network coupling
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Frontal Lobe, Goals, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Feedback, Physiological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
