Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Restoring miR-132 expression rescues adult hippocampal neurogenesis and memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease

Walgrave, Hannah, Balusu, Sriram, Snoeck, Sarah, Vanden Eynden, Elke, Craessaerts, Katleen, Thrupp, Nicky, Wolfs, Leen, Horré, Katrien, Fourne, Yannick, Ronisz, Alicja, Silajdžić, Edina, Penning, Amber, Tosoni, Giorgia, Callaerts-Vegh, Zsuzsanna, D’Hooge, Rudi, Thal, Dietmar Rudolf, Zetterberg, Henrik, Thuret, Sandrine, Fiers, Mark, Frigerio, Carlo Sala, De Strooper, Bart, Salta, Evgenia·2021·Cell Stem Cell

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2021.05.001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure S2 Related to Figure 2. A, B. In situ hybridization using a scramble control probe combined with Nestin and Ki-67 (A) or Nestin and doublecortin (DCX) (B) immunolabeling in the dentate gyrus of 3month-old Nestin:GFP mice. Scale bar, 50 µm. C. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-212 levels in GFP + or GFP -populations sorted from the dentate gyrus of Nestin:GFP mice at 1.5, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of age. N=6-8 mice per time point. D, E. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-212 levels in GFP + (D) or GFP -(E) populations sorted from the dentate gyrus of sedentary control or running Nestin:GFP mice at 3 months of age. N=5-6 mice per group. F, G. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-124 levels in
Figure S2 Related to Figure 2. A, B. In situ hybridization using a scramble control probe combined with Nestin and Ki-67 (A) or Nestin and doublecortin (DCX) (B) immunolabeling in the dentate gyrus of 3month-old Nestin:GFP mice. Scale bar, 50 µm. C. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-212 levels in GFP + or GFP -populations sorted from the dentate gyrus of Nestin:GFP mice at 1.5, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of age. N=6-8 mice per time point. D, E. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-212 levels in GFP + (D) or GFP -(E) populations sorted from the dentate gyrus of sedentary control or running Nestin:GFP mice at 3 months of age. N=5-6 mice per group. F, G. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-124 levels inCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure S3 Related to Figure 3. A. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in scramble- and Ant-132-injected 9-month-old C57Bl/6 mice prior to running. N=6 mice per group. B. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in GFP + - and GFP --cells sorted from the dentate gyrus of Nestin:GFP
Figure S3 Related to Figure 3. A. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in scramble- and Ant-132-injected 9-month-old C57Bl/6 mice prior to running. N=6 mice per group. B. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in GFP + - and GFP --cells sorted from the dentate gyrus of Nestin:GFPCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure S5 Related to Figures 5 and 8. A, B. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in the dentate gyrus of control- or miR-132-injected 9-month-old APP/PS1 (A) and App NL-G-F (B) mice prior to running. N=4-10 mice per group. C. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in the dentate gyrus of control- or miR-132-injected App NL-G-F 9-month-old female mice prior to running. N=4-5 mice per group. D. Quantification of BrdU + -cells in the dentate gyrus of control- or miR-132-injected, sedentary or running App NL-G-F female mice at 9 months of age. N=4-8 mice per group. E. Semiquantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 and miR-212 levels in the dentate gyrus of C57Bl/6 and App NL-GF mice that were exposed to behavioral testing upon miR-132 overexpression. F. Dcx immunolabeling in the dentate gyrus of saline or TMZ-, Ctr- or miR-132-injected App NL-G-F mice after passive avoidance test completion. G. Quantification of Dcx + -cells upon saline or TMZ injections in Ctr- or miR-132-
Figure S5 Related to Figures 5 and 8. A, B. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in the dentate gyrus of control- or miR-132-injected 9-month-old APP/PS1 (A) and App NL-G-F (B) mice prior to running. N=4-10 mice per group. C. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 levels in the dentate gyrus of control- or miR-132-injected App NL-G-F 9-month-old female mice prior to running. N=4-5 mice per group. D. Quantification of BrdU + -cells in the dentate gyrus of control- or miR-132-injected, sedentary or running App NL-G-F female mice at 9 months of age. N=4-8 mice per group. E. Semiquantitative real-time PCR of miR-132 and miR-212 levels in the dentate gyrus of C57Bl/6 and App NL-GF mice that were exposed to behavioral testing upon miR-132 overexpression. F. Dcx immunolabeling in the dentate gyrus of saline or TMZ-, Ctr- or miR-132-injected App NL-G-F mice after passive avoidance test completion. G. Quantification of Dcx + -cells upon saline or TMZ injections in Ctr- or miR-132-CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 14
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 15
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 16
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 17
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 18
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 19
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 20
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. Aguilar, 2017, Rho GTPases as therapeutic targets in Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimers Res. Ther., 9, 97, 10.1186/s13195-017-0320-4 · DOI
  2. Ally, 2013, Pattern separation and pattern completion in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence of rapid forgetting in amnestic mild cognitive impairment, Hippocampus, 23, 1246, 10.1002/hipo.22162 · DOI
  3. Anacker, 2017, Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive flexibility—linking memory and mood, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 18, 335, 10.1038/nrn.2017.45 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Artegiani, 2017, A single-cell RNA sequencing study reveals cellular and molecular dynamics of the hippocampal neurogenic niche, Cell Rep., 21, 3271, 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.050 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baptista, 2018, Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: regulation and possible functional and clinical correlates, Front. Neuroanat., 12, 44, 10.3389/fnana.2018.00044 · DOI
  6. Becker, 2014, Comprehensive gene-gene interaction meta-analysis of IGAP GWA studies, Alzheimers Dement., 10, 245, 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.375 · DOI
  7. Briley, 2016, Preserved neurogenesis in non-demented individuals with AD neuropathology, Sci. Rep., 6, 27812, 10.1038/srep27812 · DOI
  8. Brkic, 2015, Amyloid β oligomers disrupt blood-CSF barrier integrity by activating matrix metalloproteinases, J. Neurosci., 35, 12766, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0006-15.2015 · DOI
  9. Callaerts-Vegh, 2015, Nxf7 deficiency impairs social exploration and spatio-cognitive abilities as well as hippocampal synaptic plasticity in mice, Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 179, 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00179 · DOI
  10. Choi, 2018, Combined adult neurogenesis and BDNF mimic exercise effects on cognition in an Alzheimer’s mouse model, Science, 361, eaan8821, 10.1126/science.aan8821 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Clelland, 2009, A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation, Science, 325, 210, 10.1126/science.1173215 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Coras, 2010, Low proliferation and differentiation capacities of adult hippocampal stem cells correlate with memory dysfunction in humans, Brain, 133, 3359, 10.1093/brain/awq215 · DOI
  13. D’Ambrosi, 2014, Rac1 at the crossroad of actin dynamics and neuroinflammation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Front. Cell. Neurosci., 8, 279
  14. D’Hooge, 2005, Neurocognitive and psychotiform behavioral alterations and enhanced hippocampal long-term potentiation in transgenic mice displaying neuropathological features of human alpha-mannosidosis, J. Neurosci., 25, 6539, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0283-05.2005 · DOI
  15. Dickey, 2003, Selectively reduced expression of synaptic plasticity-related genes in amyloid precursor protein + presenilin-1 transgenic mice, J. Neurosci., 23, 5219, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-05219.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dobin, 2013, STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner, Bioinformatics, 29, 15, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  17. El Fatimy, 2018, MicroRNA-132 provides neuroprotection for tauopathies via multiple signaling pathways, Acta Neuropathol., 136, 537, 10.1007/s00401-018-1880-5 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Eriksson, 1998, Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus, Nat. Med., 4, 1313, 10.1038/3305 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Espuny-Camacho, 2013, Pyramidal neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells integrate efficiently into mouse brain circuits in vivo, Neuron, 77, 440, 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Finkel, 2016, Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study, Lancet, 388, 3017, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31408-8 · DOI
  21. Fortin, 2010, Long-term potentiation-dependent spine enlargement requires synaptic Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors recruited by CaM-kinase I, J. Neurosci., 30, 11565, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1746-10.2010 · DOI
  22. Fuster-Matanzo, 2013, Role of neuroinflammation in adult neurogenesis and Alzheimer disease: therapeutic approaches, Mediators Inflamm., 2013, 260925, 10.1155/2013/260925 · DOI
  23. Gatt, 2019, Expression of neurogenic markers in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and metatranscriptional analysis, Neurobiol. Aging, 76, 166, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.12.016 · DOI
  24. Goold, 2010, Single-cell optogenetic excitation drives homeostatic synaptic depression, Neuron, 68, 512, 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.020 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Guo, 2013, CaMKIα regulates AMP kinase-dependent, TORC-1-independent autophagy during lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung neutrophilic inflammation, J. Immunol., 190, 3620, 10.4049/jimmunol.1102975 · DOI
  26. Hagihara, 2009, Dissection of hippocampal dentate gyrus from adult mouse, J. Vis. Exp., 33, 1543
  27. Hansen, 2013, miRNA-132: a dynamic regulator of cognitive capacity, Brain Struct. Funct., 218, 817, 10.1007/s00429-012-0431-4 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hansen, 2016, Targeted deletion of miR-132/-212 impairs memory and alters the hippocampal transcriptome, Learn. Mem., 23, 61, 10.1101/lm.039578.115 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Haughey, 2002, Disruption of neurogenesis by amyloid beta-peptide, and perturbed neural progenitor cell homeostasis, in models of Alzheimer’s disease, J. Neurochem., 83, 1509, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01267.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hébert, 2013, A study of small RNAs from cerebral neocortex of pathology-verified Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with lewy bodies, hippocampal sclerosis, frontotemporal lobar dementia, and non-demented human controls, J. Alzheimers Dis., 35, 335, 10.3233/JAD-122350 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hernandez-Rapp, 2015, Memory formation and retention are affected in adult miR-132/212 knockout mice, Behav. Brain Res., 287, 15, 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.032 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jimenez-Mateos, 2011, miRNA Expression profile after status epilepticus and hippocampal neuroprotection by targeting miR-132, Am. J. Pathol., 179, 2519, 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.036 · DOI
  33. Johansson, 2013, Serum but not cerebrospinal fluid levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) are increased in Alzheimer’s disease, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1729, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.006 · DOI
  34. Kempermann, 2018, Human adult neurogenesis: evidence and remaining questions, Cell Stem Cell, 23, 25, 10.1016/j.stem.2018.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lau, 2013, Alteration of the microRNA network during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, EMBO Mol. Med., 5, 1613, 10.1002/emmm.201201974 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lee, 2013, Amyloid-β oligomers regulate the properties of human neural stem cells through GSK-3β signaling, Exp. Mol. Med., 45, e60, 10.1038/emm.2013.125 · DOI
  37. Liufu, 2017, Redundant and incoherent regulations of multiple phenotypes suggest microRNAs’ role in stability control, Genome Res., 27, 1665, 10.1101/gr.222505.117 · DOI
  38. Livak, 2001, Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method, Methods, 25, 402, 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lucassen, 2020, Adult neurogenesis, human after all (again): Classic, optimized, and future approaches, Behav. Brain Res., 381, 112458, 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112458 · DOI
  40. Lucassen, 2020, Limits to human neurogenesis—really?, Mol. Psychiatry, 25, 2207, 10.1038/s41380-018-0337-5 · DOI
  41. Magill, 2010, microRNA-132 regulates dendritic growth and arborization of newborn neurons in the adult hippocampus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 107, 20382, 10.1073/pnas.1015691107 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Maruszak, 2017, Cellular phenotyping of hippocampal progenitors exposed to patient serum predicts conversion to Alzheimer’s disease, bioRxiv
  43. McAvoy, 2016, Modulating neuronal competition dynamics in the dentate gyrus to rejuvenate aging memory circuits, Neuron, 91, 1356, 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.009 · DOI
  44. Mignone, 2004, Neural stem and progenitor cells in nestin-GFP transgenic mice, J. Comp. Neurol., 469, 311, 10.1002/cne.10964 · DOI
  45. Mirra, 1991, The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease, Neurology, 41, 479, 10.1212/WNL.41.4.479 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mosher, 2018, Influence of hippocampal niche signals on neural stem cell functions during aging, Cell Tissue Res., 371, 115, 10.1007/s00441-017-2709-6 · DOI
  47. Mu, 2011, Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and its role in Alzheimer’s disease, Mol. Neurodegener., 6, 85, 10.1186/1750-1326-6-85 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Nakashiba, 2012, Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion, Cell, 149, 188, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.046 · DOI
  49. Naskar, 2014, Wnt5a-Rac1-NF-κB homeostatic circuitry sustains innate immune functions in macrophages, J. Immunol., 192, 4386, 10.4049/jimmunol.1302817 · DOI
  50. Niibori, 2012, Suppression of adult neurogenesis impairs population coding of similar contexts in hippocampal CA3 region, Nat. Commun., 3, 1253, 10.1038/ncomms2261 · DOI
  51. Overk, 2014, Toward a unified therapeutics approach targeting putative amyloid-β oligomer receptors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 111, 13680, 10.1073/pnas.1414554111 · DOI
  52. Paredes, 2018, Does adult neurogenesis persist in the human hippocampus?, Cell Stem Cell, 23, 780, 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.006 · DOI
  53. Patrick, 2017, Dissecting the role of non-coding RNAs in the accumulation of amyloid and tau neuropathologies in Alzheimer’s disease, Mol. Neurodegener., 12, 51, 10.1186/s13024-017-0191-y · DOI · Paper page
  54. Petersen, 2001, Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment, Arch. Neurol., 58, 1985, 10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Pichler, 2017, The miRNome of Alzheimer’s disease: consistent downregulation of the miR-132/212 cluster, Neurobiol. Aging, 50, 167.e1, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Pillat, 2016, Bradykinin promotes neuron-generating division of neural progenitor cells through ERK activation, J. Cell Sci., 129, 3437, 10.1242/jcs.192534 · DOI
  57. Riascos, 2014, Alterations of Ca2+-responsive proteins within cholinergic neurons in aging and Alzheimer’s disease, Neurobiol. Aging, 35, 1325, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.017 · DOI
  58. Rijal Upadhaya, 2014, Biochemical stages of amyloid-β peptide aggregation and accumulation in the human brain and their association with symptomatic and pathologically preclinical Alzheimer’s disease, Brain, 137, 887, 10.1093/brain/awt362 · DOI
  59. Salta, 2017, microRNA-132: a key noncoding RNA operating in the cellular phase of Alzheimer’s disease, FASEB J., 31, 424, 10.1096/fj.201601308 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Salta, 2014, A self-organizing miR-132/Ctbp2 circuit regulates bimodal notch signals and glial progenitor fate choice during spinal cord maturation, Dev. Cell, 30, 423, 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Salta, 2016, miR-132 loss de-represses ITPKB and aggravates amyloid and TAU pathology in Alzheimer’s brain, EMBO Mol. Med., 8, 1005, 10.15252/emmm.201606520 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Schindelin, 2012, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9, 676, 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Serneels, 2009, gamma-Secretase heterogeneity in the Aph1 subunit: relevance for Alzheimer’s disease, Science, 324, 639, 10.1126/science.1171176 · DOI
  64. Shi, 2012, Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1836, 10.1038/nprot.2012.116 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Shin, 2015, Single-cell RNA-seq with waterfall reveals molecular cascades underlying adult neurogenesis, Cell Stem Cell, 17, 360, 10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Smith, 2015, miR-132/212 deficiency impairs tau metabolism and promotes pathological aggregation in vivo, Hum. Mol. Genet., 24, 6721, 10.1093/hmg/ddv377 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Snyder, 2019, Recalibrating the relevance of adult neurogenesis, Trends Neurosci., 42, 164, 10.1016/j.tins.2018.12.001 · DOI
  68. Sorrells, 2018, Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults, Nature, 555, 377, 10.1038/nature25975 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Spalding, 2013, Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans, Cell, 153, 1219, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Suh, 2018, Long-term labeling of hippocampal neural stem cells by a lentiviral vector, Front. Mol. Neurosci., 11, 415, 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00415 · DOI
  71. Susaki, 2015, Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging, Nat. Protoc., 10, 1709, 10.1038/nprot.2015.085 · DOI
  72. Tartt, 2018, Considerations for assessing the extent of hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult and aging human brain, Cell Stem Cell, 23, 782, 10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.025 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Thal, 2000, Sequence of Abeta-protein deposition in the human medial temporal lobe, J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 59, 733, 10.1093/jnen/59.8.733 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Theus, 2010, EphB3 limits the expansion of neural progenitor cells in the subventricular zone by regulating p53 during homeostasis and following traumatic brain injury, Stem Cells, 28, 1231, 10.1002/stem.449 · DOI
  75. Tobin, 2019, Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists in aged adults and Alzheimer’s disease patients, Cell Stem Cell, 24, 974, 10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Vadodaria, 2013, Stage-specific functions of the small Rho GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1 for adult hippocampal neurogenesis, J. Neurosci., 33, 1179, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2103-12.2013 · DOI
  77. van Boxelaere, 2017, Unpredictable chronic mild stress differentially impairs social and contextual discrimination learning in two inbred mouse strains, PLoS ONE, 12, e0188537, 10.1371/journal.pone.0188537 · DOI
  78. Wang, 2017, Downregulation of miR-132/212 impairs S-nitrosylation balance and induces tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease, Neurobiol. Aging, 51, 156, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Wesnes, 2014, Performance on a pattern separation task by Alzheimer’s patients shows possible links between disrupted dentate gyrus activity and apolipoprotein E ∈4 status and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β42 levels, Alzheimers Res. Ther., 6, 20, 10.1186/alzrt250 · DOI
  80. Wong, 2013, De-repression of FOXO3a death axis by microRNA-132 and -212 causes neuronal apoptosis in Alzheimer’s disease, Hum. Mol. Genet., 22, 3077, 10.1093/hmg/ddt164 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Yang, 2012, DOCK7 interacts with TACC3 to regulate interkinetic nuclear migration and cortical neurogenesis, Nat. Neurosci., 15, 1201, 10.1038/nn.3171 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Yassa, 2010, High-resolution structural and functional MRI of hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus in patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, Neuroimage, 51, 1242, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.040 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Yuniati, 2019, Tumor suppressors BTG1 and BTG2: beyond growth control, J. Cell. Physiol., 234, 5379, 10.1002/jcp.27407 · DOI
  84. Zhao, 2006, Distinct morphological stages of dentate granule neuron maturation in the adult mouse hippocampus, J. Neurosci., 26, 3, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3648-05.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Zhu, 2016, MicroRNA-132 and early growth response-1 in nucleus basalis of Meynert during the course of Alzheimer’s disease, Brain, 139, 908, 10.1093/brain/awv383 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Walgrave, H., Balusu, S., Snoeck, S., Vanden Eynden, E., Craessaerts, K., Thrupp, N., Wolfs, L., Horré, K., Fourne, Y., Ronisz, A., Silajdžić, E., Penning, A., Tosoni, G., Callaerts-Vegh, Z., D’Hooge, R., Thal, D. R., Zetterberg, H., Thuret, S., Fiers, M., Frigerio, C. S., De Strooper, B., & Salta, E.
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1805-1821.e8
ISSN
1934-5909
Cited by
175
References
29
Language
en
Funders
  • KU Leuven
  • Horizon 2020
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N030087/1, MR/S00484X/1)
  • European Research Council (ERC-2010-AG_268675)
  • European External Action Service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoring miR-132 expression rescues adult hippocampal neurogenesis and memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.stem.2021.05.001
The paper
Walgrave, H., Balusu, S., Snoeck, S., Vanden Eynden, E., Craessaerts, K., Thrupp, N., Wolfs, L., Horré, K., Fourne, Y., Ronisz, A., Silajdžić, E., Penning, A., Tosoni, G., Callaerts-Vegh, Z., D’Hooge, R., Thal, D. R., Zetterberg, H., Thuret, S., Fiers, M., . . . Salta, E. (2021). Restoring miR-132 expression rescues adult hippocampal neurogenesis and memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Stem Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.05.001