Cited by 400Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Attenuation of frontal asymmetry in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder

Carrion, Victor G, Weems, Carl F, Eliez, Stephan, Patwardhan, Anil, Brown, Wendy, Ray, Rebecca D, Reiss, Allan L·2001·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Volumetric imaging research has shown abnormal brain morphology in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) when compared with matched control subjects. In this article, we present brain imaging findings from a study of children with PTSD symptoms.Methods Twenty-four children between the ages of 7 and 14 with a history of trauma and PTSD symptoms were assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents (CAPS-CA). The sample underwent magnetic resonance imaging in a 1.5 T scanner. Brain images were analyzed by raters blind to diagnostic status using well-standardized methods, and images were compared with age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects.Results The clinical group demonstrated attenuation of frontal lobe asymmetry and smaller total brain and cerebral volumes when compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in hippocampal volume between clinical and control subjects.Conclusions Frontal lobe abnormalities may occur as a result of PTSD in children or, alternatively, be a risk factor for the development of the syndrome in this age group. The implications of the findings and their consistency with previous research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01218-5

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carrion, V. G., Weems, C. F., Eliez, S., Patwardhan, A., Brown, W., Ray, R. D., & Reiss, A. L.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
943-951
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004069331
Cited by
400
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 32
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 50047, R01MH050047)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
frontal lobe asymmetry, brain structure, total brain volume, brain volume, hippocampal volume, childhood trauma, neuroimaging findings
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Intelligence, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Wechsler Scales, Case-Control Studies, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review