Cited by 317Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Big five dimensions and ADHD symptoms: links between personality traits and clinical symptoms

Nigg, Joel T., John, Oliver P., Blaskey, Lisa G., Huang-Pollock, Cynthia L., Willcutt, Erik G., Hinshaw, Stephen P., Pennington, Bruce·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is conceptualized as originating in childhood. Despite considerable theoretical interest, little is known about how ADHD symptoms relate to normal personality traits in adults. In 6 studies, the Big Five personality dimensions were related to ADHD symptoms that adults both recalled from childhood and reported concurrently (total N = 1,620). Substantial effects emerged that were replicated across samples. First, the ADHD symptom cluster of inattention-disorganization was substantially related to low Conscientiousness and, to a lesser extent, Neuroticism. Second, ADHD symptom clusters of hyperactivity-impulsivity and oppositional childhood and adult behaviors were associated with low Agreeableness. Results were replicated with self-reports and observer reports of personality in community and clinical samples. Findings support theoretical connections between personality traits and ADHD symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.451

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nigg, J. T., John, O. P., Blaskey, L. G., Huang-Pollock, C. L., Willcutt, E. G., Hinshaw, S. P., & Pennington, B.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California System (US)
  • University of Colorado System (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002-08
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
451-469
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2124821810
Cited by
315
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03mh057244-01, 5r29mh049255-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 45064, MH 43948, MH 49255, MH 38820, R01MH043948, MH57244)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 27802, HD-04024, P30HD004024, P50HD027802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional behavior, childhood ADHD symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Parents, Personality, Mental Recall, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review