Cited by 549Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 370 of the 371 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The bright side of being blue: Depression as an adaptation for analyzing complex problems.

Open access
Andrews, Paul W., Thomson, J. Anderson·2009·Psychological Review

Abstract

Depression is the primary emotional condition for which help is sought. Depressed people often report persistent rumination, which involves analysis, and complex social problems in their lives. Analysis is often a useful approach for solving complex problems, but it requires slow, sustained processing, so disruption would interfere with problem solving. The analytical rumination hypothesis proposes that depression is an evolved response to complex problems, whose function is to minimize disruption and sustain analysis of those problems by (a) giving the triggering problem prioritized access to processing resources, (b) reducing the desire to engage in distracting activities (anhedonia), and (c) producing psychomotor changes that reduce exposure to distracting stimuli. As processing resources are limited, sustained analysis of the triggering problem reduces the ability to concentrate on other things. The hypothesis is supported by evidence from many levels-genes, neurotransmitters and their receptors, neurophysiology, neuroanatomy, neuroenergetics, pharmacology, cognition, behavior, and efficacy of treatments. In addition, the hypothesis provides explanations for puzzling findings in the depression literature, challenges the belief that serotonin transmission is low in depression, and has implications for treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016242

Cites

370 of 370 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw BF Emery G 1979 Cognitive therapy of depression New York, NY The Guilford Press
  2. Cosmides L Tooby J 2000 Evolutionary psychology and the emotions Lewis M Haviland-Jones JM Handbook of the Emotions 2 91 115 New York, NY The Guilford Press
  3. Edwards JA Weary G 1998 Antecedents of causal uncertainty and perceived control: a prospective study European Journal of Personality 12 2 135 148
  4. Frijda NH 1986 The emotions New York, NY Cambridge University Press
  5. Jones EE Harris VA 1967 Attribution of attitudes Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3 1 1 24
  6. Kia HK Miquel MC Brisorgueil MJ Daval G Riad M ElMestikawy S 1996 Immunocytochemical localization of serotonin(1A) receptors in the rat central nervous system Journal of Comparative Neurology 365 2 289 305 8822171
  7. Kraepelin E 1907 Clinical psychiatry Diefendorf AR 2 Norwood, MA Norwood Press
  8. Mayorga AJ Dalvi A Page ME Zimov-Levinson S Hen R Lucki I 2001 Antidepressant-like behavioral effects in 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) and 5-hydroxytryptamine(1B) receptor mutant Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 298 3 1101 1107 11504807
  9. Moller AP Swaddle JP 1998 Asymmetry, developmental instability and evolution Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
  10. Somogyi P Tamas G Lujan R Buhl EH 1998 Salient features of synaptic organisation in the cerebral cortex Brain Research Reviews 26 2–3 113 135 9651498

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
Andrews, P. W., & Thomson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2009-07
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
620-654
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W1966233504
Cited by
549
References
371
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 32
FWCI
33.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH-20030, DA-018673)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
depression, rumination, complex problem solving, anhedonia, psychomotor changes, processing resources, serotonin transmission, neurobiology of depression, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Antidepressive Agents, Arousal, Attention, Awareness, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Biological Evolution, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Synaptic Transmission, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Psychotherapy, Serotonin, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review