The DOI matches its Crossref record; 200 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 119 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing
Open accessAbstract
Risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), the most prevalent dementia, is partially driven by genetics. To identify LOAD risk loci, we performed a large genome-wide association meta-analysis of clinically diagnosed LOAD (94,437 individuals). We confirm 20 previous LOAD risk loci and identify five new genome-wide loci (IQCK, ACE, ADAM10, ADAMTS1, and WWOX), two of which (ADAM10, ACE) were identified in a recent genome-wide association (GWAS)-by-familial-proxy of Alzheimer's or dementia. Fine-mapping of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region confirms the neurological and immune-mediated disease haplotype HLA-DR15 as a risk factor for LOAD. Pathway analysis implicates immunity, lipid metabolism, tau binding proteins, and amyloid precursor protein (APP) metabolism, showing that genetic variants affecting APP and Aβ processing are associated not only with early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease but also with LOAD. Analyses of risk genes and pathways show enrichment for rare variants (P = 1.32 × 10-7), indicating that additional rare variants remain to be identified. We also identify important genetic correlations between LOAD and traits such as family history of dementia and education.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
56 Own result · 47 Not checked yet · 39 Own method · 10 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also identify important genetic correlations between LOAD and traits such as family history of dementia and education.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of risk genes and pathways show enrichment for rare variants (P = 1.32 × 10−7)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fine-mapping of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region confirms the neurological and immune-mediated disease haplotype HLA-DR15 as a risk factor for LOAD.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We confirm 20 previous LOAD risk loci”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
plainn = 94,437- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pathway analysis implicates immunity, lipid metabolism, tau binding proteins, and amyloid precursor protein (APP) metabolism”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“identify five new genome-wide loci (IQCK, ACE, ADAM10, ADAMTS1, and WWOX)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
plainn = 94,437- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The observed heritability (h2) of LOAD was estimated at 0.071 (0.011) using LDSC.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“rs62039712 (NC_000016.9: g.79355857G>A) in the WWOX locus reached genome-wide significance (P = 3.7 × 10−8)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“restricting to Alzheimer’s disease–relevant tissues (via Ensembl Regulatory Build58 and GWAS4D59) appears to aid in regulatory variant prioritization, with probabilities for functional variants increasing substantially when using GWAS4D cell-dependent analyses with brain or monocytes”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Zerbino, D. R., Wilder, S. P., Johnson, N., Juettemann, T. & Flicek, P. R. The Ensembl Regulatory Build. Genome. Biol. 16, 56 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [59] Huang, D. et al. GWAS4D: multidimensional analysis of context-specific regulatory variant for human complex diseases and traits. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W114–W120 (2018). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes implicated include CR1 (CR1 locus), ABCA7 (ABCA7 loci), BIN1 (BIN1 locus), SPI1 and MYBPC3 (SPI1 locus), MS4A2, MS4A6A, and MS4A4A (MS4A2 locus), KNOP1 (IQCK locus), and HLA-DRB1 (HLA-DRB1 locus)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 57
- It may state two separate claims as one. 63
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“angiotensin II, a product of ACE function, mediates a number of neuropathological processes in Alzheimer’s disease84 and is now a target for intervention in phase II clinical trials of Alzheimer’s disease85.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [84] Kehoe, P. G. The coming of age of the angiotensin hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease: progress toward disease prevention and treatment? J. Alzheimers. Dis. 62, 1443–1466 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Additional roles of RAS in AD pathology: beyond blood pressure in AD” (page unavailable), the paper reports that angiotensin II worsened Aβ pathology and stimulated Aβ production and tau phosphorylation in rodent studies. “The imbalanced RAS in Alzheimer’s disease” describes its contribution to human AD pathology as a possibility, not an established causal finding. The phase II trial clause is attached to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Supportedcites [85] Kehoe, P. G. et al. The rationale and design of the reducing pathology in Alzheimer’s disease through Angiotensin TaRgeting (RADAR) Trial. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 61, 803–814 (2017). source
The Conclusion (page not available) identifies RADAR as a phase II study of losartan in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. The Background (page not available) explains that losartan blocks angiotensin II signaling and that the trial tests this intervention in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Meta-analysis of Stages 1 and 2 produced 21 genome-wide-significant associations (P ≤ 5 × 10−8) (Table 1 and Fig. 1), 18 of which were previously reported as genome-wide significant in Lambert et al.1.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Lambert, J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 1452–1458 (2013). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Stage 1 discovery meta-analysis produced 12 loci with genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8) (Table 1), all of which are previously described1,4–11.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Lambert, J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 1452–1458 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Naj, A. C. et al. Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 43, 436–441 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [5] Seshadri, S. et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease. JAMA 303, 1832–1840 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Hollingworth, P. et al. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 43, 429–435 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Jonsson, T. et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 107–116 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Guerreiro, R. et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 117–127 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Jun, G. et al. Meta-analysis confirms CR1, CLU, and PICALM as alzheimer disease risk loci and reveals interactions with APOE genotypes. Arch. Neurol. 67, 1473–1484 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Harold, D. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 41, 1088–1093 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Lambert, J. C. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 41, 1094–1099 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no eQTLs in Alzheimer’s disease–relevant tissues in the WWOX or ACE locus, although several eQTLs for PSMC5 in coronary artery tissue were found for the ACE locus.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Genes driving these enrichments (that is, having a gene-wide P < 0.05) included SCNA, a Parkinson’s risk gene that encodes alpha-synuclein, the main component of Lewy bodies, whch may play a role in tauopathies62,63, for the tau pathway; apolipoprotein genes (APOM, APOA5) and ABCA1, a major regulator of cellular cholesterol, for the lipid metabolism pathways; and 52 immune pathway genes”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Stefanis, L. alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, 1–23 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [63] Takeda, A. et al. C-terminal alpha-synuclein immunoreactivity in structures other than Lewy bodies in neurodegenerative disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 99, 296–304 (2000). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When APOE-region genes and genes near genome-wide-significant genes were removed, tau showed moderate association (P = 0.027), and lipid metabolism and immune-related pathways showed strong associations (P < 0.001)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two of the four other signals approached genome-wide significance: miR142/TSPOAP1-AS1 (P = 5.3 × 10−8) and NDUFAF6 (P = 9.2 × 10−8) (Table 2).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“only 2% of 1,073 variants across the 24 loci (excluding APOE) were exonic variants, with a majority (58%) being intronic”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Co-localization analysis confirmed evidence of a shared causal variant affecting expression and disease risk in 66 genes over 20 loci, including 31 genes over 13 loci in LOAD-relevant tissue”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For our newly identified loci, there were significant eQTLs in Alzheimer’s disease–relevant tissue for ADAM10, FAM63B, and SLTM (in the ADAM10 locus); ADAMTS1 (ADAMTS1 locus); and ACSM1, ANKS4B, C16orf62, GDE1, GPRC5B, IQCK, and KNOP1 (IQCK locus).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nominal enrichment for risk from rare variants was found for the pathway ‘aggregation of Aβ: chaperone’ and 23 of the 335 genes.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found overlapping cis-acting eQTLs for 153 of the 400 protein-coding genes, with 136 eQTL-controlled genes in Alzheimer’s disease–relevant tissues”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several ‘sub-pathways’ were also significantly enriched in the common variants, including ‘clearance and degradation of Aβ’, and ‘aggregation of Aβ’, along with its subcategory ‘microglia’”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“replicated a low-frequency variant in the TREM2 region (rs114812713; NC_000006.11: g.41034000G>C, MAF = 0.03, P = 7.2 × 10−3; combined P = 2.1 × 10−13) in the gene OARD1 that may represent an independent signal according to our conditional analysis”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed significant enrichment of this gene set in common variants (P = 2.27 × 10−4; P = 3.19 × 10−4 excluding APOE), with both ADAM10 and ACE nominally significant drivers of this result”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When not considering fetal astrocytes, mature astrocytes (21%), and microglial cells (20.3%), the resident macrophage cells of the brain thought to play a key role in the pathologic immune response in LOAD8,14,60, became the highest expressed cell types in the genome-wide set of genes, with 5.3% of the 400 genes showing high microglial expression”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Guerreiro, R. et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 117–127 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Sims, R. C. et al. Novel rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3 and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 1373–1387 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [60] Gjoneska, E. et al. Conserved epigenomic signals in mice and humans reveal immune basis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 518, 365–369 (2015). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While no pathways were significantly enriched for rare variants, lipid and Aβ pathways did reach nominal significance in rare-variant-only analyses.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the sentinel variant (defined as the variant with the lowest P value) is just 2.4 mega-bases from PLCG2, which contains a rare variant that we recently associated with Alzheimer’s disease14.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Sims, R. C. et al. Novel rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3 and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 1373–1387 (2017). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we also observed a highly significant correlation between common and rare pathway gene results (P = 1.32 × 10−7), suggesting that risk Alzheimer’s disease genes and pathways are enriched for rare variants.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“80% were expressed in at least one type of brain cell, and the genes were most highly expressed in fetal astrocytes (26%), followed by microglia/ macrophages (15.8%), neurons (14.8%), astrocytes (11.5%), and oligodendrocytes (6.5%).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Potentially deleterious variants include the rare R47H missense variant in TREM2, common missense variants in CR1, SPI1, MS4A2, and IQCK, and a relatively common (MAF = 0.16) splicing variant in IQCK.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stage 3A also extended the analysis of two loci (NME8 and MEF2C) that were previously genome-wide significant in our 2013 meta-analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Three other signals were not initially described in the initial IGAP GWAS: the rare R47H TREM2 coding variant previously reported by others7,8,14; ECHDC3 (rs7920721; NC_000010.10: g.11720308A>G), which was recently identified as a potential genome-wide-significant Alzheimer’s disease risk locus in several studies15–17, and ACE (rs138190086; NC_000017.10: g.61538148G>A)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Jonsson, T. et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 107–116 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Guerreiro, R. et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 117–127 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Sims, R. C. et al. Novel rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3 and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 1373–1387 (2017). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“we also identified ten genes located in our genome-wide loci as having rare deleterious coding, splicing or LOF burden associations with LOAD (false discovery rate (FDR) P < 0.01), including previously implicated rare-variant signals in ABCA7, TREM2, and SORL1 (refs. 14,49–55), and additional associations with TREML4 in the TREM2 locus, TAP2 and PSMB8 in the HLA-DRB1 locus, PIP in the EPHA1 locus,”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Sims, R. C. et al. Novel rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3 and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 1373–1387 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [49] Bis, J. C. et al. Whole exome sequencing study identifies novel rare and common Alzheimer’s-associated variants involved in immune response and transcriptional regulation. Mol. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0112-7 (2018). source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Vardarajan, B. N. et al. Coding mutations in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 77, 215–227 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Verheijen, J. et al. A comprehensive study of the genetic impact of rare variants in SORL1 in European early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 132, 213–224 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [52] Bellenguez, C. et al. Contribution to Alzheimer’s disease risk of rare variants in TREM2, SORL1, and ABCA7 in 1779 cases and 1273 controls. Neurobiol. Aging. 59, 220.e1–220.e9 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [53] Kunkle, B. W. et al. Targeted sequencing of ABCA7 identifies splicing, stop-gain and intronic risk variants for Alzheimer disease. Neurosci. Lett. 649, 124–129 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [54] May, P. et al. Rare ABCA7 variants in 2 German families with Alzheimer disease. Neurol. Genet. 4, e224 (2018). source
- Not checked yetcites [55] Guennec, K. Le et al. ABCA7 rare variants and Alzheimer disease risk. Neurology 86, 1–4 (2016). source
plaincorrelationaln = 5,740- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These alleles form the HLA-DQA1*01:02~HLA-DQB1*06:02~HLA-DRB1*15:01 (DR15) haplotype, which is also associated with Alzheimer’s disease in our sample (FDR P = 0.013)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
plaincorrelationaln = 14,776- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of the 22 genes in the ACE locus, PSMC5, a key regulator of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)75,76, has a top score of 4, while DDX42, MAP3K3, an important regulator of macrophages and innate immunity77,78, and CD79B, a B lymphocyte antigen receptor subunit, each have a score of 3.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Bhat, K. et al. The 19S proteasome ATPase Sug1 plays a critical role in regulating MHC class II transcription. Mol. Immunol. 45, 2214–2224 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Inostroza-Nieves, Y., Venkatraman, P. & Zavala-Ruiz, Z. Role of Sug1, a 19S proteasome ATPase, in the transcription of MHC I and the atypical MHC II molecules, HLA-DM and HLA-DO. Immunol. Lett. 147, 67–74 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Kim, K., Duramad, O., Qin, X. F. & Su, B. MEKK3 is essential for lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production in macrophages. Immunology 120, 242–250 (2007). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the 53 genes are overexpressed in ‘adolescence’ and ‘young adult’ brain tissues in BrainSpan103, a transcriptomic atlas of the developing human brain, which is consistent with accumulating evidence suggesting Alzheimer’s disease may start decades before the onset of disease104,105”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Miller, J. A. et al. Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain. Nature 508, 199–206 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [104] Knickmeyer, R. C. & Ross, M. E. Imaging and rare APOE alleles. Neurology 87, 558–559 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [105] Douaud, G. et al. A common brain network links development, aging, and vulnerability to disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17648–17653 (2014). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two additional alleles, HLA-DQA1*03:01 and HLA-DQB1*03:02, belonging to another haplotype, show a protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease, but their signal was lost after conditioning on HLA-DQA1*01:02, and the HLA-DQA1*03:01~HLA-DQB1*03:02 haplotype is not associated with Alzheimer’s disease (FDR P = 0.651).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“WWOX and MAF, which surround an intergenic signal in an obesity associated locus91, were both prioritized for the WWOX locus, with MAF, another important regulator of macrophages92,93, being highly expressed in microglia in the Brain RNA-seq database, and WWOX, a high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride–associated gene94,95, being expressed most highly in astrocytes and neurons.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Wang, K. et al. A genome-wide association study on obesity and obesity-related traits. PLoS ONE 6, 3–8 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Kang, K. et al. Interferon-γ represses M2 gene expression in human macrophages by disassembling enhancers bound by the transcription factor MAF. Immunity 47, 235–250.e4 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Cao, S., Liu, J., Song, L. & Ma, X. The protooncogene c-Maf Is an essential transcription factor for IL-10 gene expression in macrophages. J. Immunol. 174, 3484–3492 (2005). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, these studies yielded inconsistent results23, and our work reports a clear genome-wide association in NHW at this locus.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Wang, X.-B. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is not a major determining factor in the development of sporadic Alzheimer disease: evidence from an updated meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e111406 (2014). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified significant differential expression in several potentially relevant Alzheimer’s disease tissues including immune-related tissues (upregulation in blood and spleen), obesity-related tissue (upregulation in adipose), heart tissues (upregulation in left ventricle and atrial appendage), and brain tissues (dowregulation in cortex, cerebellum, hippo-campus, basal ganglia, and amygdala).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found risk effects of HLA-DQA1*01:02 (FDR P = 0.014), HLA-DRB1*15:01 (FDR P = 0.083), and HLA-DQB1*06:02 (FDR P = 0.010)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
plaincorrelationaln = 14,776- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After conditioning on the sentinel meta-analysis variant in this region (rs78738018), association signals were lost for the three alleles, suggesting that the signal observed at the variant level is due to the association of these three alleles.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
hedgeddirectn = 14,776- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For the IQCK signal, which is also an obesity locus70,71, IQCK, a relatively uncharacterized gene, was ranked top, although four of the other 11 genes in the locus have a priority rank ≥ 4, including KNOP1 and GPRC5B”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Hinney, A. et al. Genetic variation at the CELF1 (CUGBP, elav-like family member 1 gene) locus is genome-wide associated with Alzheimer’s disease and obesity. Am. J. Med. Genet. B. 165B, 283–293 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [71] Speliotes, E. K. et al. Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nat. Genet. 42, 937–948 (2010). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pathway, tissue and disease trait enrichment analyses support the utility of our prioritization method, as the 53 prioritized genes with a score ≥ 5 are (1) enriched in substantially more Alzheimer’s disease–relevant pathways, processes and dementia-related traits; (2) enriched in candidate Alzheimer’s disease cell types such as monocytes (adjusted P = 9.0 × 10−6) and macrophages (adjusted P = 5.6”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“use of blood pressure medication does show a negative genetic correlation with Alzheimer’s disease in our study (rg = −0.12; P = 0.035), although this result does not survive FDR correction.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Genetic correlations with Alzheimer’s disease.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average size of the LD blocks was 123 kb.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Characterization of gene(s) and non-coding features in associated loci.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 1,180,989 variants were used in the correlation analyses.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After imputation quality control, a total of 14,776 cases and 23,047 controls were available for analysis (Supplementary Table 27).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plainn = 14,776- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Removal of the APOE region reduced the heritability estimate slightly from 0.071 (s.e.m. = 0.011) to 0.0637 (s.e.m. = 0.009).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“univariate linkage disequilibrium score (LDSC) regression12,13 estimates indicated that the majority of this inflation was due to a polygenic signal, with the intercept being close to 1 (1.026, s.e.m. = 0.006).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Zheng, J. et al. LD Hub: A centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics 33, 051094 (2017).
- Not checked yetcites [13] Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ACE and ADAM10 were previously reported as Alzheimer’s disease candidate genes18–22 but were not replicated in some subsequent studies23–25.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Vassar, R. ADAM10 prodomain mutations cause late-onset Alzheimer’s disease: not just the latest FAD. Neuron 80, 250–253 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [19] Kim, M. et al. Potential late-onset Alzheimer’s disease-associated mutations in the ADAM10 gene attenuate alpha-secretase activity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 3987–3996 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Kehoe, P. G. et al. Variation in DCP1, encoding ACE, is associated with susceptibility to Alzheimer disease. Nat. Genet. 21, 71–72 (1999). source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Meng, Y. et al. Association of polymorphisms in the Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene with Alzheimer disease in an Israeli Arab community. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 871–877 (2006). source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Lehmann, D. J. et al. Large meta-analysis establishes the ACE insertion-deletion polymorphism as a marker of Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 162, 305–317 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Wang, X.-B. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is not a major determining factor in the development of sporadic Alzheimer disease: evidence from an updated meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e111406 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Cai, G. et al. Evidence against a role for rare ADAM10 mutations in sporadic Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 33, 416–417.e3 (2012).
- Not checked yetcites [25] Belbin, O. et al. A multi-center study of ACE and the risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 24, 587–597 (2011). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“WWOX may play a role in Alzheimer’s disease through its interaction with tau28,29”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Chang, J.-Y. & Chang, N.-S. WWOX dysfunction induces sequential aggregation of TRAPPC6AΔ, TIAF1, tau and amyloid β, and causes apoptosis. Cell Death Discov. 1, 15003 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Sze, C. I. et al. Down-regulation of WW domain-containing oxidoreductase induces tau phosphorylation in vitro: a potential role in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30498–30506 (2004). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ADAM10, the most important α-secretase in the brain, is a component of the non-amyloidogenic pathway of APP metabolism67 and sheds TREM2 (ref. 68)”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Haass, C., Kaether, C., Thinakaran, G. & Sisodia, S. Trafficking and proteolytic processing of APP. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006270 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [68] Kleinberger, G. et al. TREM2 mutations implicated in neurodegeneration impair cell surface transport and phagocytosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 243ra86 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overexpression of ADAM10 in mouse models can halt Aβ production and subsequent aggregation69.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Postina, R. et al. A disintegrin-metalloproteinase prevents amyloid plaque formation and hippocampal defects in an Alzheimer disease mouse model. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1456–1464 (2004). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Previous analyses in the ADGC (5,728 Alzheimer’s disease cases and 5,653 controls) have linked both HLA class I and II haplotypes with Alzheimer’s disease risk106.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Steele, N. Z. et al. Fine-mapping of the human leukocyte antigen locus as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: a case-control study. PLoS Med. 14, 1–25 (2017). source
plaincorrelationaln = 5,653- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the DR15 haplotype and its component alleles also associate with protection against diabetes108, a high risk for multiple sclerosis109,110, and risk or protective effects with many other immune-mediated diseases”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Pugliese, A. et al. HLA-DRB1 15:01-DQA1 01:02-DQB1 06:02 haplotype protects autoantibody-positive relatives from type 1 diabetes throughout the stages of disease progression. Diabetes 65, 1109–1119 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Patsopoulos, Na et al. Fine-mapping the genetic association of the major histocompatibility complex in multiple sclerosis: HLA and non-HLA effects. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003926 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [110] Schmidt, H., Williamson, D. & Ashley-Koch, A. HLA-DR15 haplotype and multiple sclerosis: a HuGE review. Am. J. Epidemiol. 165, 1097–1109 (2007). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“two rare ADAM10 alterations segregating with disease in LOAD families increased Aβ plaque load in ‘Alzheimer-like’ mice, with diminished α-secretase activity from the alterations probably the causal mechanism19,44.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Kim, M. et al. Potential late-onset Alzheimer’s disease-associated mutations in the ADAM10 gene attenuate alpha-secretase activity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 3987–3996 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [44] Suh, J. et al. ADAM10 missense mutations potentiate beta-amyloid accumulation by impairing prodomain chaperone function. Neuron 80, 385–401 (2013). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“research shows dementia risk to be associated with lower socio-economic status, independently of education status118,119.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Genetic correlations with Alzheimer’s disease.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Cadar, D. et al. Individual and area-based socioeconomic factors associated with dementia incidence in England: evidencefrom a 12-year follow-up in the English longitudinal study of ageing. JAMA Psychiatry 75, 723–732 (2018). source
- Not checked yetcites [119] Marden, J. R., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., Kawachi, I. & Glymour, M. M. Contribution of socioeconomic status at 3 life-course periods to late-life memory function and decline: early and late predictors of dementia risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 805–814 (2017). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While ACE was not prioritized, it should not be rejected as a candidate gene, as its expression in Alzheimer’s disease brain tissue is associated with Aβ load and Alzheimer’s disease severity80.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Miners, J. S. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and activity in Alzheimer’s disease: differences in brain and CSF ACE and association with ACE1 genotypes. Am. J. Transl. Res. 1, 163–177 (2009).
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“WWOX has been implicated in several neurological phenotypes96; in addition, it binds tau and may play a critical role in regulating tau hyper-phosphorylation, neurofibrillary formation and Aβ aggregation28,29.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] Chang, H. T. et al. WW domain-containing oxidoreductase in neuronal injury and neurological diseases. Oncotarget 5, 11792–11799 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Chang, J.-Y. & Chang, N.-S. WWOX dysfunction induces sequential aggregation of TRAPPC6AΔ, TIAF1, tau and amyloid β, and causes apoptosis. Cell Death Discov. 1, 15003 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Sze, C. I. et al. Down-regulation of WW domain-containing oxidoreductase induces tau phosphorylation in vitro: a potential role in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30498–30506 (2004). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the associated diseases include a large number of traits queried from an HLA-specific Phewas111, including neurological diseases (for example, Parkinson’s disease112,113) and diseases with risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (for example, hyperthyroidism114), pointing to potential shared and/or interacting mechanisms and co-morbidities”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Fine-mapping of the HLA region.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [111] Karnes, J. H. et al. Phenome-wide scanning identifies multiple diseases and disease severity phenotypes associated with HLA variants. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, 1–14 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [112] Wissemann, W. T. et al. Association of Parkinson disease with structural and regulatory variants in the HLA region. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 984–993 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [113] Misra, M. K., Damotte, V. & Hollenbach, J. A. The immunogenetics of neurological disease. Immunology 153, 399–414 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of three genes at this locus, our analyses nominate ADAMTS1 as the likely risk gene, although we cannot rule out that this signal is a regulatory element for APP.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the latter being a regulator of neurogenesis72,73 and inflammatory signaling in obesity74.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [72] Kurabayashi, N., Nguyen, M. D. & Sanada, K. The G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5B contributes to neurogenesis in the developing mouse neocortex. Development 140, 4335–4346 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Cool, B. H. et al. A flanking gene problem leads to the discovery of a Gprc5b splice variant predominantly expressed in C57BL/6J mouse brain and in maturing neurons. PLoS ONE 5, e10351 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Kim, Y.-J., Sano, T., Nabetani, T., Asano, Y. & Hirabayashi, Y. GPRC5B activates obesity-associated inflammatory signaling in adipocytes. Sci. Signal. 5, ra85–ra85 (2012).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) are associated with Aβ levels81 and LOAD risk82, and studies show ACE can inhibit Aβ toxicity and aggregation83.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Jochemsen, H. M. et al. The association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 6, 1–10 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Kauwe, J. S. K. et al. Genome-wide association study of CSFl Levels of 59 Alzheimer’s disease candidate proteins: significant associations with proteins involved in amyloid processing and inflammation. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004758 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Baranello, R. J. et al. Amyloid-beta protein clearance and degradation (ABCD) pathways and their role in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimers Res 12, 32–46 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“similar to the Marioni et al. family proxy analyses26, which found maternal genetic correlation with Alzheimer’s disease to be higher than that for paternal Alzheimer’s disease (rg = 0.91 and 0.66, respectively).”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Genetic correlations with Alzheimer’s disease.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Marioni, R. E. et al. GWAS on family history of Alzheimeras disease. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 99 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ADAMTS1 is elevated in Down’s syndrome with neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease86, and it is a potential neuroprotective gene87–89 or a neuroinflammatory gene important to microglial response90.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] Miguel, R. F., Pollak, A. & Lubec, G. Metalloproteinase ADAMTS-1 but not ADAMTS-5 is manifold overexpressed in neurodegenerative disorders as Down syndrome, Alzheimer’s and Pick’s disease. Brain. Res. Mol. Brain. Res. 133, 1–5 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [87] Suttkus, A. et al. Aggrecan, link protein and tenascin-R are essential components of the perineuronal net to protect neurons against iron-induced oxidative stress. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1119 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [88] Végh, M. J. et al. Reducing hippocampal extracellular matrix reverses early memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2, 76 (2014).
- Not checked yetcites [89] Morawski, M., Filippov, M., Tzinia, A., Tsilibary, E. & Vargova, L. ECM in brain aging and dementia. Prog. Brain. Res. 214, 207–227 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [90] Wilcock, D. M. Neuroinflammation in the aging down syndrome brain; lessons from Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. Res. 2012, 170276 (2012). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Candidate gene studies have associated ACE variants with Alzheimer’s disease risk20,22,79, including a strong association in the Wadi Ara, an Israeli Arab community with high risk of Alzheimer’s disease21.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Kehoe, P. G. et al. Variation in DCP1, encoding ACE, is associated with susceptibility to Alzheimer disease. Nat. Genet. 21, 71–72 (1999). source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Lehmann, D. J. et al. Large meta-analysis establishes the ACE insertion-deletion polymorphism as a marker of Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 162, 305–317 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [79] Farrer, L. A. et al. Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme and Alzheimer disease. New Engl. J. Med. 57, 210–214 (2000).
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“treatment of mice with its binding partner restores memory deficits97”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Results > Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] Lee, M. H. et al. Zfra restores memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease triple-transgenic mice by blocking aggregation of TRAPPC6AΔ, SH3GLB2, tau, and amyloid β, and inflammatory NF-κB activation. Alzheimers Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv 3, 189–204 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Before analyses in LD Hub, we removed all SNPs with extremely large effect sizes including the MHC (Chr6:26,000,000–34,000,000) and APOE region, as outliers can overly influence the regression analyses.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The FDR threshold was set to 10%.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjusted P values were computed using the FDR method and the R ‘p.adjust’ function, and applied to the meta-analysis P values.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Per-study analysis for Stage 2 and Stage 3 followed the same analysis procedures described for Stage 1, except for covariate adjustments per cohort, where all analyses were adjusted on sex and age apart from the Italian, Swedish, and Gr@ACE cohorts, which were also adjusted for principal components.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 2 and 3 genotyping, quality control, and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alleles with an imputation posterior probability lower than 0.5 were considered as undetermined as recommended by HIBAG developers.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plainn = 14,776- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also required the presence of each variant in 30% of cases and 30% of controls across all datasets.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Imputation and pre-analysis quality control.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sex mismatches or individuals showing a high degree of relatedness (identical-by-descent value of 0.98 or greater) were removed from the analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 2 and 3 genotyping, quality control, and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within-study results for Stage 1 were meta-analyzed in METAL141 using an inverse-variance-based model with genomic control.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 association analysis and meta-analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genomic inflation was calculated for lambda (λ) in the GenABEL package142.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individuals with more than two undetermined HLA alleles were excluded.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plainn = 14,776- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Standard quality control was performed on all datasets individually, including exclusion of individuals with low call rate, individuals with a high degree of relatedness, and variants with low call rate.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Pre-imputation genotype chip quality control.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used the q value, which is the adjusted P value using the Benjamini–Hochberg FDR method with a 5% cutoff for correction for multiple hypotheses testing.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Validation of prioritization method.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adaptive permutation was used to produce an empirical P value and an FDR-corrected q value.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Pathway analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Per-sample quality checks for genetic sex and relatedness were performed in PLINK.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 2 and 3 genotyping, quality control, and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A panel of ancestry-informative markers was used to perform principal component analysis with SMARTPCA from EIGENSOFT 4.2 software145, and individuals with non-European ancestry were excluded.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 2 and 3 genotyping, quality control, and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Family datasets were tested using GWAF140, with generalized estimating equations (GEE) implemented for common variants (MAF ≥ 0.01), and a general linear mixed effects model (GLMM) implemented for rare variants (MAF < 0.01), per our preliminary data showing that the behavior of the test statistics for GEE was fine for common variants but inflated for rare variants, while GLMM controlled this rare-”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 association analysis and meta-analysis.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Associations of HLA alleles with disease were tested using logistic regressions, adjusting for age, sex, and principal components as specified above for single variant association analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All 400 protein-coding genes within our LD-defined genome-wide loci were annotated with the gene-based results from this study, and the results were corrected using a 1% FDR P as a cutoff for significance.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Identification of genes with rare-variant burden via gene-based testing.
plainn = 5,740- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes located less than 1 Mb from the GWAS sentinel variants that pass a 5% Benjamini–Hochberg FDR-corrected SMR P-value significance threshold and a HEIDI P-value > 0.05 threshold were considered significant.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Regulatory variant and eQTL analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Splicing variants with high splicing potential according to MaxEntScan159 and protein-coding variants predicted to be deleterious by two or more programs were considered to be potentially causal variants for a locus.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Identification of potentially causal coding or splicing variants.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Statistical significance of the genetic correlations was estimated using 5% Benjamini−Hochberg FDR corrected P values.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For haplotypes analysis, only individuals with no undetermined HLA alleles and only datasets with more than 100 cases or controls were included.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plainn = 100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be noted that while we do include rare variants from imputation in our analyses, we may be missing many rare causal variants in this study.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Identification of potentially causal coding or splicing variants.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, we performed LDSC regression via LD Hub v.1.9.0 (refs. 12,13) to calculate the LD score regression intercept and derive a heritability estimate for the inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis summary statistics.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Zheng, J. et al. LD Hub: A centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics 33, 051094 (2017).
- Not checked yetcites [13] Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The individuals in the ADSP study largely overlap with individuals in the ADGC and CHARGE cohorts included in our Stage 1 meta-analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Identification of genes with rare-variant burden via gene-based testing.
plaincorrelationaln = 5,740- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individuals with non-European ancestry according to principal components analysis of ancestry-informative markers were excluded from the further analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Pre-imputation genotype chip quality control.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Variants with regression coefficient |β| > 5 or P value equal to 0 or 1 were excluded from further analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 association analysis and meta-analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant enrichment was defined by Bonferonni-corrected P ≤ 0.05.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Validation of prioritization method.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Common variants (MAF ≥ 0.01%) with an r2 or an information measure <0.40 from MaCH and IMPUTE2 were excluded from further analyses.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Imputation and pre-analysis quality control.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These datasets, conducted in whole blood, are large eQTL studies (Westra: discovery phase n = 5,311, replication phase n = 2,775; CAGE: n = 2,765), and while there is some overlap in samples between the two datasets, CAGE provides finer coverage.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Regulatory variant and eQTL analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stage 1 single variant-based association analysis employed an additive genotype model adjusting for age (defined as age-at-onset for cases and age-at-last exam for controls), sex, and population substructure using principal components138.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 association analysis and meta-analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes with a Bonferonni-corrected P < 0.05 and absolute log(fold change) ≥ 0.58 were considered DEGs.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Validation of prioritization method.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The APOE region (Chr19:45,116,911–46,318,605) was removed to calculate the intercept.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 1 summary statistics quality control and analysis.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For Stages 1, 2, and 3, samples did not overlap.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 2 and 3 genotyping, quality control, and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Variant quality control was also performed separately in each country including removal of variants missing in more than 10% of individuals, having a Hardy−Weinberg P value in controls lower than 1 × 10−6 or a P value for missingness between cases and controls lower than 1 × 10−6.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Stage 2 and 3 genotyping, quality control, and analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rare variants (MAF < 0.01%) with a ‘global’ weighted imputation quality score of <0.70 were also excluded from analyses.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Imputation and pre-analysis quality control.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Haplotype estimations and association analyses with disease were performed using the ‘haplo.glm’ function from the haplo.stats R package185 with age, sex, and principal components as covariates.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustments on HLA significant variants and HLA alleles were performed by introducing the variant or alleles as covariates in the regression models.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering the high LD in the MHC region, only haplotypes predicted with posterior probabilities higher than 0.2 were considered for analysis.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > HLA region analysis.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the most significant gene sets are related to amyloid and tau5”
From New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Our pathway enrichment analyses removed ambiguities concerning the involvement of tau-binding proteins and APP/Aβ peptide metabolism in late-onset AD processes at a much higher level than had been described previously5.”
From New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SPI1 encodes PU.1, a central transcription factor in microglial development and activation, and has a genome-wide significant genic association with AD in the IGAP GWAS (rs3740688 Odds Ratio 0.92 Meta p = 5.4 × 10−13), comprising 35,274 Alzheimer’s disease cases and 59,163 controls4.”
From Modest changes in Spi1 dosage reveal the potential for altered microglial function as seen in Alzheimer’s disease (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Missense variants with predicted deleterious effects on protein function have been identified by GWAS in TREM2, CR1, MS4A2, MS4A6A, TOMM40, IQCK, and CD33, among others [97, 113]”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [97]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Over the last two decades, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 40 risk loci associated with pathways including lipid metabolism, immune regulation, and endosomal trafficking128,129,150,151.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [128]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The APOE gene remains the prominent genetic risk factor, with the ε4 allele significantly increasing susceptibility.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [128]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, recently identified variants in genes such as bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) and clusterin (CLU) highlight the multifactorial nature of the disease and extend the genetic landscape beyond the classical amyloid and tau pathways128,150.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [128]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, are implicated in the pathology and genetic risk of several CNS diseases, including AD.46,47,48,49”
From hdWGCNA identifies co-expression networks in high-dimensional transcriptomics data (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“cluster B genes significantly overlap with candidate susceptibility loci from AD GWASs (Kunkle et al., 2019)”
From Meta-Analysis of the Alzheimer’s Disease Human Brain Transcriptome and Functional Dissection in Mouse Models (2020) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More than 90 genetic loci are associated with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia (ADRD).”
From Consensus meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which is a known blood pressure and AD association”
From Multi-trait association studies discover pleiotropic loci between Alzheimer’s disease and cardiometabolic traits (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genes associated with AD that are predominantly or exclusively expressed in myeloid cells, including INPP5D (inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase 1), which encodes SHIP17–10.”
From INPP5D/SHIP1 regulates endo-lysosomal function and cargo-selective phagocytosis in human microglia (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is unclear whether SPI1 genetic factors modulate AD risk in populations of non-European descent, as related studies have only been conducted in populations of European descent.”
From Association of SPI1 haplotypes with altered SPI1 gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of SPI1—rs3740688, rs1057233, and rs78245530—protect against AD risk in populations of European descent [4–6].”
From Association of SPI1 haplotypes with altered SPI1 gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In recent years, genome wide association studies (GWASs) and analyses of rare-coding variants have identified over 70 loci associated with conferring risk for late-onset AD (LOAD).”
From Microglial function, INPP5D/SHIP1 signaling, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation: implications for Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“GWASs have identified three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs35349669, rs10933431, and rs7597763, at the INPP5D locus that are associated risk for AD [8–10].”
From Microglial function, INPP5D/SHIP1 signaling, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation: implications for Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase D (INPP5D/SHIP1) is a myeloid-expressed gene genetically-associated with AD.”
From INPP5D regulates inflammasome activation in human microglia (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In males, 864 mQTLs (associated with the CpG cg06363485) overlapped with the LD block at chromosome 6:40706366-41365821, which included genetic variants mapped to the UNC5CL, TSPO2, APOBEC2, OARD1, NFYA, TREML1, TREM2, TREML2, TREML3P, TREML4, TREML5P, TREM1, and NCR2 genes [60] (Supplementary Table 13).”
From Distinct sex-specific DNA methylation differences in Alzheimer’s disease (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“genetic variants at the HLA-DQB1 locus discovered in the recent AD genetic meta-analysis [84] included eQTLs for TNXB/TNXA in brain tissues [84, 85].”
From Sex-specific DNA methylation differences in Alzheimer’s disease pathology (2021) · cites this paper as [84]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Whereas APOE ε4 is the main contributor to late‐onset AD, and has provided the clearest and most consistent signal in GWASs, 6 , 7”
From APOE and dementia – resequencing and genotyping in 105,597 individuals (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although the allele frequency of p.R47H is as low as 0.8% [37], it confers a high risk for AD, which is comparable to that of APOE ε4.”
From Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although the allele frequency of p.R47H is as low as 0.8% [37], it confers a high risk for AD, which is comparable to that of APOE ε4.”
From Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Since then, multiple studies have attempted to validate its genetic association with AD, and a recent GWAS of nearly 100,000 individuals has estimated an odds ratio of 2.08 with a P value of 2.7 × 10−15 for this variant [37].”
From Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“since the seminal GWAS papers published in 2009 [47, 83], more than 30 loci of interest have been identified to be associated with AD risk (Suppl. Table) [50, 59, 67, 76, 84, 97, 116, 120].”
From The new genetic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease: from amyloid cascade to genetically driven synaptic failure hypothesis? (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Very recent GWASs have strengthened the importance of APP metabolism by directly pointing out two of its main actors as AD genetic risk factors: ADAM10, which carries out the main α-secretase activity in the brain, and APH1B, which is part of the γ-secretase complex [59, 76].”
From The new genetic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease: from amyloid cascade to genetically driven synaptic failure hypothesis? (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, we identified a loss-of-function PLCG2 variant, PLCG2 M28L , that confers an increased AD risk.”
From Genetic variants of phospholipase C-γ2 alter the phenotype and function of microglia and confer differential risk for Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“We analyzed data from a large-scale GWAS of >94,000 individuals with late-onset AD 22 and identified a PLCG2 missense mutation (rs61749044) associated with elevated AD risk (OR=1.164; p=0.047) encoding the PLCG2 M28L variant.”
From Genetic variants of phospholipase C-γ2 alter the phenotype and function of microglia and confer differential risk for Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the PLCG2 missense exonic variant encoding PLCG2 P522R (rs72824905) protects against AD (OR=0.76, p=0.007) 22 .”
From Genetic variants of phospholipase C-γ2 alter the phenotype and function of microglia and confer differential risk for Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, recent evidence from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and other follow-up analyses has suggested that a proportion of the genetic risk of neurological and psychiatric diseases acts through myeloid cells22–25.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The comparison of m-values between microglia (MiGA) and monocytes (MyND42, and Fairfax41) showed that a large number of eQTLs in AD loci have shared effects between these two cell types, for example, MS4A6A, RABEP1, CD33, FCER1G, and ABCA7.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the association of this rs13500 CH25H promoter polymorphism was not found in two subsequent studies [87, 88] nor has an association between CH25H and AD risk be observed in several large GWA studies, making this association “suggestive” at best [89–91].”
From 25-Hydroxycholesterol amplifies microglial IL-1β production in an apoE isoform-dependent manner (2020) · cites this paper as [89]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“recent AD genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified several new genetic risk loci for AD3,4, with candidate risk genes at these loci being involved in innate immune functions4,5”
From Deletion of SPI1 in microglia exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease models (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“has been reported to be a genetic risk factor for AD”
From Deletion of SPI1 in microglia exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease models (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“this approach enabled us to define 39 signals in 33 loci already known to be associated with the risk of developing ADD3,5–10”
From New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for AD suggests that genes expressed in microglia modulate risk for late onset AD (Jones et al., 2015; Kunkle et al., 2019).”
From Alzheimer's-associated PU.1 expression levels regulate microglial inflammatory response (2021) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When we repeated the analysis using the updated IGAP data (Kunkle et al., 2019) containing 29.2% more cases and 12.9% more controls, and 62.7% more SNPs as compared to Lambert et al. (2013), four of the five identified genes from the centre of the co-expression network in mice were still strongly associated with the orthologues containing variants in human Alzheimer’s disease.”
From Genetic variability in response to amyloid beta deposition influences Alzheimer’s disease risk (2019) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Human genetic studies recently identified SPI1 (encoding PU.1) as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1–3.”
From Effects of SPI1-mediated transcriptome remodeling on Alzheimer's disease-related phenotypes in mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“SPI1 gene has been identified as a genetic risk factor in recent human AD genetic studies1–3.”
From Effects of SPI1-mediated transcriptome remodeling on Alzheimer's disease-related phenotypes in mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“human genome-wide association studies (GWASs) support a causal role for immune mechanisms (Jansen et al., 2019; Kunkle et al., 2019; Raj et al., 2014).”
From Meta-Analysis of the Alzheimer’s Disease Human Brain Transcriptome and Functional Dissection in Mouse Models (2020) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“multiple cluster B modules were significantly enriched for AD GWAS loci (Kunkle et al., 2019) (Figure 1D).”
From Meta-Analysis of the Alzheimer’s Disease Human Brain Transcriptome and Functional Dissection in Mouse Models (2020) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“All of these loci are novel pleiotropic loci between AD and the respective cardiometabolic traits, but have previously been identified as genome-wide significant for AD in recent single-trait AD GWAS [4, 17, 31].”
From Multi-trait association studies discover pleiotropic loci between Alzheimer’s disease and cardiometabolic traits (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A recent meta-analysis of all genetic risk factors for AD identified through genome-wide association studies discovered genes involved in lipid processing and innate immunity as a statistically enriched category of genetic risk factors for AD, alongside the more characteristic categories of genes in amyloid and Tau processing1.”
From APOE4/4 is linked to damaging lipid droplets in Alzheimer’s disease microglia (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“genome-wide association studies (GWASs) suggest that SPI1—which encodes PU.1, a transcription factor that regulates the expression of immune-related genes in myeloid cells [7], is associated with AD [4–6].”
From Association of SPI1 haplotypes with altered SPI1 gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“non-coding mutations also modulate AD risk [4–6], likely through modifying gene expression.”
From Association of SPI1 haplotypes with altered SPI1 gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A significant proportion of these AD‐linked genes are associated with microglia and the immune response, reinforcing the necessity to understand the intersection of immunity and AD pathogenesis in the development of novel AD therapeutics.”
From PLCG2 modulates TREM2 expression and signaling in response to Alzheimer's disease pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent genetic studies on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have brought microglia under the spotlight, as loci associated with AD risk are enriched in genes expressed in microglia.”
From Microglial function, INPP5D/SHIP1 signaling, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation: implications for Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The importance of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis has been demonstrated by large-scale genetic association studies, which have identified AD risk variants in a growing list of microglia-related genes1–4.”
From Somatic cancer variants enriched in Alzheimer’s disease microglia-like cells drive inflammatory and proliferative states (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In genome‐wide association studies (GWASs) the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene stands out as an impressive signal for risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), 6 , 7”
From APOE and dementia – resequencing and genotyping in 105,597 individuals (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The ECHDC3 locus has been associated with AD risk in several GWAS23,46,49.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The transcription factor PU.1 (encoded by SPI1) is expressed mainly in microglia in the central nervous system”
From Deletion of SPI1 in microglia exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease models (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“One of the most significant variants was rs35980966 (p=5.5x10-8 ), which is a rare variant (gnomAD v3.1.2MAF=0.35%) that tags the CLU locus on chromosome 8 and exhibits replication in three studies [18,19] and ADGC EOAD study in progress.”
From Genetic associations with age at dementia onset in the PSEN1 E280A Colombian kindred (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“We found a strong enrichment of heritability for variants within neuronal enhancers and promoters for all psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits (Fig. 1D), which was substantially lower in PsychENCODE bulk brain enhancers (Fig. 1D) (13).”
From Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease - risk association (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“which, along with other studies (Sala Frigerio et al., 2019), strongly suggests that although these changes may occur subsequent to disease onset, they are likely causal, perhaps affecting progression.”
From Meta-Analysis of the Alzheimer’s Disease Human Brain Transcriptome and Functional Dissection in Mouse Models (2020) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the SNPs rs3740688 and rs78245530 are significantly associated with Alzheimer's disease in European [23] and Chinese [24] populations, respectively. Interestingly, these variants are also suggested to reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in these specific populations [23, 24].”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“All but two SNPs (rs35136575, rs114448690) in the APOE region were associated with AD risk in the IGAP discovery data [24].”
From Genome-wide analysis identifies novel loci influencing plasma apolipoprotein E concentration and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“only a few such studies have been performed to date on larger sets of proteins (Kunkle et al, 2019; Sasayama et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2021)”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Previous analyses have prioritized ECHDC3, as it is upregulated in AD post-mortem brains53,54, and an eQTL for ECHDC3 was seen in whole blood55, though it did not colocalize with the GWAS SNP23.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“the basis of the observed association between age of dementia onset and these variants in TSPAN14 and TSPAN10 (both with a deleterious correlation) may result from disruption of a protective role of ADAM10.”
From Genetic associations with age at dementia onset in the PSEN1 E280A Colombian kindred (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous studies,55,56 linked peaks identified in microglia were significantly enriched for heritability of AD across five different studies2,3,4,5,6”
From Single nucleus multiomics identifies ZEB1 and MAFB as candidate regulators of Alzheimer’s disease-specific cis-regulatory elements (2023) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have also implicated microglia as the primary cell type expressing AD genes.82–85”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“APOE is the strongest genetic risk factor for LOAD”
From Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies (2019) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“The latest GWAS studies published during 2019 mark the largest of their kind for Alzheimer’s disease featuring 71 880 Alzheimer’s disease cases to identify 9 novel risk loci (Jansen et al., 2019), and 35 274 clinically assessed Alzheimer’s disease cases to identify 5 novel risk loci from the updated IGAP study (Kunkle et al., 2019).”
From Genetic variability in response to amyloid beta deposition influences Alzheimer’s disease risk (2019) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Several genesassoci-ated with AD incidence (APOE, CLU, ABCA7, SORL1, INPP5D, and PLCG2)(Jansen et al., 2019; Kunkle et al., 2019; Marioni et al., 2018) also function in lipid transport or signaling.”
From Alzheimer’s Patient Microglia Exhibit Enhanced Aging and Unique Transcriptional Activation (2020) · cites this paper as Kunkle et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“only 2% of variants identified as associated with LOAD in the latest meta-analysis fell within exons [97].”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“For a number of genes including APOE, ABCA7, BIN1, TREM2, SORL1, ADAM10, and SPI1, there exists a number of functional studies and genetic evidence to suggest they are indeed the causal genes in their respective loci [97, 173], although their identification does not preclude the existence of additional pathogenic genes in these loci.”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“for example in the most recent large GWAS of AD, implicated loci contained an average of 16 genes [97].”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [97]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Methods > Imputation and pre-analysis quality control.
“Common variants (MAF ≥ 0.01%) with an r2 or an information measure <0.40 from MaCH and IMPUTE2 were excluded from further analyses. Rare variants (MAF < 0.01%) with a ‘global’ weighted imputation quality score of <0.70 were also excluded from analyses.”
§ Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing > Abstract
“To sample both common and rare variants (minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.01 and MAF < 0.01, respectively)”
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Ogata, H., Goto, S., Sato, K., Fujibuchi, W., Bono, H., & Kanehisa, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29 · Cited by 31,232
A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.
Adzhubei, I. A., Schmidt, S., Peshkin, L., Ramensky, V. E., Gerasimova, A., Bork, P., Kondrashov, A. S., & Sunyaev, S. R. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · Cited by 13,194
Sudlow, C., Gallacher, J., Allen, N., Beral, V., Burton, P., Danesh, J., Downey, P., Elliott, P., Green, J., Landray, M., et al. (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · Cited by 12,728
Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update
Kuleshov, M. V., Jones, M. R., Rouillard, A. D., Fernandez, N. F., Duan, Q., Wang, Z., Koplev, S., Jenkins, S. L., Jagodnik, K. M., Lachmann, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377 · Cited by 10,799
STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life
Szklarczyk, D., Franceschini, A., Wyder, S., Forslund, K., Heller, D., Huerta-Cepas, J., Simonovic, M., Roth, A., Santos, A., Tsafou, K. P., et al. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1003 · Cited by 10,436
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor
McLaren, W., Gil, L., Hunt, S. E., Riat, H. S., Ritchie, G. R. S., Thormann, A., Flicek, P., & Cunningham, F. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 · Cited by 8,099
An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11632 · Cited by 7,711
Genetics of Food Intake Self-Regulation in Childhood: Literature Review and Research Opportunities
Faith, M. S., Carnell, S., & Kral, T. V. E. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353879 · Cited by 7,633
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Vardarajan, B. N. et al. Coding mutations in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 77, 215–227 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Tsao, C. W., Aday, A. W., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Beaton, A. Z., Boehme, A. K., Buxton, A. E., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001123 · Cited by 8,300
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 3,204
“The strength of this association has been confirmed in numerous clinical, pathological, epidemiological, genome-wide association (GWAS) and whole genome sequencing studies over the years (Kunkle et al., 2019).”
Martin, S. S., Aday, A. W., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Barone Gibbs, B., Beaton, A. Z., Boehme, A. K., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001209 · Cited by 2,800
New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
Bellenguez, C., Küçükali, F., Jansen, I. E., Kleineidam, L., Moreno-Grau, S., Amin, N., Naj, A. C., Campos-Martin, R., Grenier-Boley, B., Andrade, V., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z · Cited by 2,498
“To prioritize candidate genes in the new loci, we systematically searched for evidence for these genes in seven different domains: (1) variant annotation, (2) eQTL-GWAS integration, (3) sQTL-GWAS integration, (4) protein QTL (pQTL)-GWAS integration, (5) mQTL-GWAS integration, (6) histone acetylation QTL (haQTL)-GWAS i…”
MethodSelf-citationKnopman, D. S., Amieva, H., Petersen, R. C., Chételat, G., Holtzman, D. M., Hyman, B. T., Nixon, R. A., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-021-00269-y · Cited by 2,606
Metadata
- Authors
- Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), Kunkle, B. W., The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI), Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE), Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, P. A. E. R. F. A. D. C. (., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., Boland, A., Vronskaya, M., van der Lee, S. J., Amlie-Wolf, A., Bellenguez, C., Frizatti, A., Chouraki, V., Martin, E. R., Sleegers, K., Badarinarayan, N., Jakobsdottir, J., Hamilton-Nelson, K. L., Moreno-Grau, S., Olaso, R., Raybould, R., Chen, Y., Kuzma, A. B., Hiltunen, M., Morgan, T., Ahmad, S., Vardarajan, B. N., Epelbaum, J., Hoffmann, P., Boada, M., Beecham, G. W., Garnier, J.-G., Harold, D., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Valladares, O., Moutet, M.-L., Gerrish, A., Smith, A. V., Qu, L., Bacq, D., Denning, N., Jian, X., Zhao, Y., Del Zompo, M., Fox, N. C., Choi, S.-H., Mateo, I., Hughes, J. T., Adams, H. H., Malamon, J., Sanchez-Garcia, F., Patel, Y., Brody, J. A., Dombroski, B. A., Naranjo, M. C. D., Daniilidou, M., Eiriksdottir, G., Mukherjee, S., Wallon, D., Uphill, J., Aspelund, T., Cantwell, L. B., Garzia, F., Galimberti, D., Hofer, E., Butkiewicz, M., Fin, B., Scarpini, E., Sarnowski, C., Bush, W. S., Meslage, S., Kornhuber, J., White, C. C., Song, Y., Barber, R. C., Engelborghs, S., Sordon, S., Voijnovic, D., Adams, P. M., Vandenberghe, R., Mayhaus, M., Cupples, L. A., Albert, M. S., De Deyn, P. P., Gu, W., Himali, J. J., Beekly, D., Squassina, A., Hartmann, A. M., Orellana, A., Blacker, D., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, E., Lovestone, S., Garcia, M. E., Doody, R. S., Munoz-Fernadez, C., Sussams, R., Lin, H., Fairchild, T. J., Benito, Y. A., Holmes, C., Karamujić-Čomić, H., Frosch, M. P., Thonberg, H., Maier, W., Roshchupkin, G., Ghetti, B., Giedraitis, V., Kawalia, A., Li, S., Huebinger, R. M., Kilander, L., Moebus, S., Hernández, I., Kamboh, M. I., Brundin, R., Turton, J., Yang, Q., Katz, M. J., Concari, L., Lord, J., Beiser, A. S., Keene, C. D., Helisalmi, S., Kloszewska, I., Kukull, W. A., Koivisto, A. M., Lynch, A., Tarraga, L., Larson, E. B., Haapasalo, A., Lawlor, B., Mosley, T. H., Lipton, R. B., Solfrizzi, V., Gill, M., Longstreth, W. T., Montine, T. J., Frisardi, V., Diez-Fairen, M., Rivadeneira, F., Petersen, R. C., Deramecourt, V., Alvarez, I., Salani, F., Ciaramella, A., Boerwinkle, E., Reiman, E. M., Fievet, N., Rotter, J. I., Reisch, J. S., Hanon, O., Cupidi, C., Andre Uitterlinden, A. G., Royall, D. R., Dufouil, C., Maletta, R. G., de Rojas, I., Sano, M., Brice, A., Cecchetti, R., George-Hyslop, P. S., Ritchie, K., Tsolaki, M., Tsuang, D. W., Dubois, B., Craig, D., Wu, C.-K., Soininen, H., Avramidou, D., Albin, R. L., Fratiglioni, L., Germanou, A., Apostolova, L. G., Keller, L., Koutroumani, M., Arnold, S. E., Panza, F., Gkatzima, O., Asthana, S., Hannequin, D., Whitehead, P., Atwood, C. S., Caffarra, P., Hampel, H., Quintela, I., Carracedo, Á., Lannfelt, L., Rubinsztein, D. C., Barnes, L. L., Pasquier, F., Frölich, L., Barral, S., McGuinness, B., Beach, T. G., Johnston, J. A., Becker, J. T., Passmore, P., Bigio, E. H., Schott, J. M., Bird, T. D., Warren, J. D., Boeve, B. F., Lupton, M. K., Bowen, J. D., Proitsi, P., Boxer, A., Powell, J. F., Burke, J. R., Kauwe, J. S. K., Burns, J. M., Mancuso, M., Buxbaum, J. D., Bonuccelli, U., Cairns, N. J., McQuillin, A., Cao, C., Livingston, G., Carlson, C. S., Bass, N. J., Carlsson, C. M., Hardy, J., Carney, R. M., Bras, J., Carrasquillo, M. M., Guerreiro, R., Allen, M., Chui, H. C., Fisher, E., Masullo, C., Crocco, E. A., DeCarli, C., Bisceglio, G., Dick, M., Ma, L., Duara, R., Graff-Radford, N. R., Evans, D. A., Hodges, A., Faber, K. M., Scherer, M., Fallon, K. B., Riemenschneider, M., Fardo, D. W., Heun, R., Farlow, M. R., Kölsch, H., Ferris, S., Leber, M., Foroud, T. M., Heuser, I., Galasko, D. R., Giegling, I., Gearing, M., Hüll, M., Geschwind, D. H., Gilbert, J. R., Morris, J., Green, R. C., Mayo, K., Growdon, J. H., Feulner, T., Hamilton, R. L., Harrell, L. E., Drichel, D., Honig, L. S., Cushion, T. D., Huentelman, M. J., Hollingworth, P., Hulette, C. M., Hyman, B. T., Marshall, R., Jarvik, G. P., Meggy, A., Abner, E., Menzies, G. E., Jin, L.-W., Leonenko, G., Real, L. M., Jun, G. R., Baldwin, C. T., Grozeva, D., Karydas, A., Russo, G., Kaye, J. A., Kim, R., Jessen, F., Kowall, N. W., Vellas, B., Kramer, J. H., Vardy, E., LaFerla, F. M., Jöckel, K.-H., Lah, J. J., Dichgans, M., Leverenz, J. B., Mann, D., Levey, A. I., Pickering-Brown, S., Lieberman, A. P., Klopp, N., Lunetta, K. L., Wichmann, H.-E., Lyketsos, C. G., Morgan, K., Marson, D. C., Brown, K., Martiniuk, F., Medway, C., Mash, D. C., Nöthen, M. M., Masliah, E., Hooper, N. M., McCormick, W. C., Daniele, A., McCurry, S. M., Bayer, A., McDavid, A. N., Gallacher, J., McKee, A. C., van den Bussche, H., Mesulam, M., Brayne, C., Miller, B. L., Riedel-Heller, S., Miller, C. A., Miller, J. W., Al-Chalabi, A., Morris, J. C., Shaw, C. E., Myers, A. J., Wiltfang, J., O’Bryant, S., Olichney, J. M., Alvarez, V., Parisi, J. E., Singleton, A. B., Paulson, H. L., Collinge, J., Perry, W. R., Mead, S., Peskind, E., Cribbs, D. H., Rossor, M., Pierce, A., Ryan, N. S., Poon, W. W., Nacmias, B., Potter, H., Sorbi, S., Quinn, J. F., Sacchinelli, E., Raj, A., Spalletta, G., Raskind, M., Caltagirone, C., Bossù, P., Orfei, M. D., Reisberg, B., Clarke, R., Reitz, C., Smith, A. D., Ringman, J. M., Warden, D., Roberson, E. D., Wilcock, G., Rogaeva, E., Bruni, A. C., Rosen, H. J., Gallo, M., Rosenberg, R. N., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Sager, M. A., Mecocci, P., Saykin, A. J., Pastor, P., Cuccaro, M. L., Vance, J. M., Schneider, J. A., Schneider, L. S., Slifer, S., Seeley, W. W., Smith, A. G., Sonnen, J. A., Spina, S., Stern, R. A., Swerdlow, R. H., Tang, M., Tanzi, R. E., Trojanowski, J. Q., Troncoso, J. C., Van Deerlin, V. M., Van Eldik, L. J., Vinters, H. V., Vonsattel, J. P., Weintraub, S., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Wilhelmsen, K. C., Williamson, J., Wingo, T. S., Woltjer, R. L., Wright, C. B., Yu, C.-E., Yu, L., Saba, Y., Pilotto, A., Bullido, M. J., Peters, O., Crane, P. K., Bennett, D., Bosco, P., Coto, E., Boccardi, V., De Jager, P. L., Lleo, A., Warner, N., Lopez, O. L., Ingelsson, M., Deloukas, P., Cruchaga, C., Graff, C., Gwilliam, R., Fornage, M., Goate, A. M., Sanchez-Juan, P., Kehoe, P. G., Amin, N., Ertekin-Taner, N., Berr, C., Debette, S., Love, S., Launer, L. J., Younkin, S. G., Dartigues, J.-F., Corcoran, C., Ikram, M. A., Dickson, D. W., Nicolas, G., Campion, D., Tschanz, J., Schmidt, H., Hakonarson, H., Clarimon, J., Munger, R., Schmidt, R., Farrer, L. A., Van Broeckhoven, C., C. O’Donovan, M., DeStefano, A. L., Jones, L., Haines, J. L., Deleuze, J.-F., Owen, M. J., Gudnason, V., Mayeux, R., Escott-Price, V., Psaty, B. M., Ramirez, A., Wang, L.-S., Ruiz, A., van Duijn, C. M., Holmans, P. A., Seshadri, S., Williams, J., Amouyel, P., Schellenberg, G. D., Lambert, J.-C., & Pericak-Vance, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Inserm (FR)
- University of Washington (US)
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Boston University (US)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Icelandic Heart Association (IS)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Iceland (IS)
- Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine for the Prevention of Human Diseases (US)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES)
- Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
- King's College London (GB)
- Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín (ES)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- MRC Prion Unit (GB)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Broad Institute (US)
- University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- Framingham Heart Study (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Parma (IT)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- University Hospital Mútua de Terrassa (ES)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
- Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
- Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
- The Lundquist Institute (US)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Université de Bordeaux (FR)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Brigham Young University (US)
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center (US)
- UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
- University of Southern California (US)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Mount Sinai Medical Center (US)
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Hospital Universitario de Valme (ES)
- Swedish Medical Center (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES)
- University of Florence (IT)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of Perugia (IT)
- University of Kansas (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Medical University of Graz (AT)
- Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Oasi Maria SS (IT)
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- Southmead Hospital (GB)
- Université de Montpellier (FR)
- Utah State University (US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Université de Lille (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Kunkle, Brian W.
- ORCID
- Kunkle, Brian W.
- Sims, Rebecca
- Bis, Joshua C.
- Damotte, Vincent
- Naj, Adam C.
- Boland, Anne
- van der Lee, Sven J.
- Amlie-Wolf, Alexandre
- Bellenguez, Céline
- Chouraki, Vincent
- Martin, Eden R.
- Sleegers, Kristel
- Badarinarayan, Nandini
- Olaso, Robert
- Raybould, Rachel
- Chen, Yuning
- Kuzma, Amanda B.
- Ahmad, Shahzad
- Vardarajan, Badri N.
- Hoffmann, Per
- Beecham, Gary W.
- Harold, Denise
- Valladares, Otto
- Gerrish, Amy
- Smith, Albert V.
- Qu, Liming
- Denning, Nicola
- Jian, Xueqiu
- Zhao, Yi
- Fox, Nick C.
- Adams, Hieab H.
- Malamon, John
- Brody, Jennifer A.
- Dombroski, Beth A.
- Daniilidou, Makrina
- Mukherjee, Shubhabrata
- Wallon, David
- Aspelund, Thor
- Galimberti, Daniela
- Hofer, Edith
- Butkiewicz, Mariusz
- Scarpini, Elio
- Bush, Will S.
- Kornhuber, Johannes
- White, Charles C.
- Barber, Robert C.
- Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
- Sordon, Sabrina
- Adams, Perrie M.
- Vandenberghe, Rik
- Cupples, L. Adrienne
- Albert, Marilyn S.
- De Deyn, Peter P.
- Gu, Wei
- Himali, Jayanadra J.
- Squassina, Alessio
- Hartmann, Annette M.
- Orellana, Adelina
- Blacker, Deborah
- Lovestone, Simon
- Lin, Honghuang
- Holmes, Clive
- Frosch, Matthew P.
- Roshchupkin, Gennady
- Ghetti, Bernardino
- Giedraitis, Vilmantas
- Kawalia, Amit
- Li, Shuo
- Huebinger, Ryan M.
- Moebus, Susanne
- Kamboh, M. Ilyas
- Turton, James
- Yang, Qiong
- Katz, Mindy J.
- Concari, Letizia
- Lord, Jenny
- Beiser, Alexa S.
- Keene, C. Dirk
- Helisalmi, Seppo
- Kukull, Walter A.
- Koivisto, Anne Maria
- Larson, Eric B.
- Haapasalo, Annakaisa
- Lawlor, Brian
- Mosley, Thomas H.
- Lipton, Richard B.
- Solfrizzi, Vincenzo
- Gill, Michael
- Montine, Thomas J.
- Frisardi, Vincenza
- Rivadeneira, Fernando
- Petersen, Ronald C.
- Deramecourt, Vincent
- Ciaramella, Antonio
- Boerwinkle, Eric
- Reiman, Eric M.
- Rotter, Jerome I.
- Hanon, Olivier
- Cupidi, Chiara
- Dufouil, Carole
- Maletta, Raffaele Giovanni
- Brice, Alexis
- Ritchie, Karen
- Tsolaki, Magda
- Tsuang, Debby W.
- Dubois, Bruno
- Craig, David
- Soininen, Hilkka
- Albin, Roger L.
- Fratiglioni, Laura
- Apostolova, Liana G.
- Koutroumani, Maria
- Arnold, Steven E.
- Panza, Francesco
- Gkatzima, Olymbia
- Asthana, Sanjay
- Hannequin, Didier
- Atwood, Craig S.
- Hampel, Harald
- Quintela, Inés
- Carracedo, Ángel
- Rubinsztein, David C.
- Barnes, Lisa L.
- Pasquier, Florence
- McGuinness, Bernadette
- Beach, Thomas G.
- Becker, James T.
- Bigio, Eileen H.
- Schott, Jonathan M.
- Bird, Thomas D.
- Warren, Jason D.
- Boeve, Bradley F.
- Lupton, Michelle K.
- Bowen, James D.
- Boxer, Adam
- Powell, John F.
- Burke, James R.
- Burns, Jeffrey M.
- Mancuso, Michelangelo
- Buxbaum, Joseph D.
- Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
- Cairns, Nigel J.
- McQuillin, Andrew
- Cao, Chuanhai
- Livingston, Gill
- Bass, Nicholas J.
- Carlsson, Cynthia M.
- Hardy, John
- Carrasquillo, Minerva M.
- Guerreiro, Rita
- Allen, Mariet
- Chui, Helena C.
- Fisher, Elizabeth
- Masullo, Carlo
- Crocco, Elizabeth A.
- DeCarli, Charles
- Ma, Li
- Duara, Ranjan
- Evans, Denis A.
- Hodges, Angela
- Faber, Kelley M.
- Scherer, Martin
- Fardo, David W.
- Heun, Reinhard
- Farlow, Martin R.
- Ferris, Steven
- Leber, Markus
- Foroud, Tatiana M.
- Heuser, Isabella
- Galasko, Douglas R.
- Giegling, Ina
- Gearing, Marla
- Geschwind, Daniel H.
- Gilbert, John R.
- Green, Robert C.
- Hamilton, Ronald L.
- Drichel, Dmitriy
- Honig, Lawrence S.
- Cushion, Thomas D.
- Huentelman, Matthew J.
- Hyman, Bradley T.
- Jarvik, Gail P.
- Abner, Erin
- Menzies, Georgina E.
- Leonenko, Ganna
- Jun, Gyungah R.
- Grozeva, Detelina
- Russo, Giancarlo
- Kaye, Jeffrey A.
- Jessen, Frank
- Kowall, Neil W.
- Vellas, Bruno
- Kramer, Joel H.
- Vardy, Emma
- LaFerla, Frank M.
- Lah, James J.
- Dichgans, Martin
- Leverenz, James B.
- Mann, David
- Levey, Allan I.
- Pickering-Brown, Stuart
- Lieberman, Andrew P.
- Lunetta, Kathryn L.
- Wichmann, H-Erich
- Lyketsos, Constantine G.
- Morgan, Kevin
- Marson, Daniel C.
- Martiniuk, Frank
- Mash, Deborah C.
- Nöthen, Markus M.
- Masliah, Eliezer
- Hooper, Nigel M.
- Daniele, Antonio
- McCurry, Susan M.
- McDavid, Andrew N.
- Gallacher, John
- McKee, Ann C.
- Mesulam, Marsel
- Brayne, Carol
- Miller, Bruce L.
- Riedel-Heller, Steffi
- Al-Chalabi, Ammar
- Shaw, Christopher E.
- Myers, Amanda J.
- Wiltfang, Jens
- O’Bryant, Sid
- Olichney, John M.
- Singleton, Andrew B.
- Paulson, Henry L.
- Collinge, John
- Mead, Simon
- Peskind, Elaine
- Cribbs, David H.
- Rossor, Martin
- Ryan, Natalie S.
- Poon, Wayne W.
- Nacmias, Benedetta
- Potter, Huntington
- Sorbi, Sandro
- Quinn, Joseph F.
- Sacchinelli, Eleonora
- Spalletta, Gianfranco
- Raskind, Murray
- Bossù, Paola
- Orfei, Maria Donata
- Reisberg, Barry
- Clarke, Robert
- Smith, A David
- Ringman, John M.
- Roberson, Erik D.
- Wilcock, Gordon
- Rogaeva, Ekaterina
- Bruni, Amalia Cecilia
- Gallo, Maura
- Mecocci, Patrizia
- Saykin, Andrew J.
- Pastor, Pau
- Cuccaro, Michael L.
- Vance, Jeffery M.
- Schneider, Julie A.
- Seeley, William W.
- Smith, Amanda G.
- Sonnen, Joshua A.
- Spina, Salvatore
- Stern, Robert A.
- Swerdlow, Russell H.
- Tang, Mitchell
- Tanzi, Rudolph E.
- Trojanowski, John Q.
- Troncoso, Juan C.
- Vinters, Harry V.
- Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.
- Wilhelmsen, Kirk C.
- Williamson, Jennifer
- Wingo, Thomas S.
- Woltjer, Randall L.
- Yu, Chang-En
- Yu, Lei
- Saba, Yasaman
- Bullido, Maria J.
- Peters, Oliver
- Crane, Paul K.
- Boccardi, Virginia
- De Jager, Phil L.
- Ingelsson, Martin
- Deloukas, Panagiotis
- Cruchaga, Carlos
- Graff, Caroline
- Fornage, Myriam
- Goate, Alison M.
- Kehoe, Patrick G.
- Amin, Najaf
- Berr, Claudine
- Debette, Stéphanie
- Love, Seth
- Launer, Lenore J.
- Corcoran, Chris
- Ikram, M. Arfan
- Dickson, Dennis W.
- Campion, Dominique
- Tschanz, JoAnn
- Hakonarson, Hakon
- Schmidt, Reinhold
- Farrer, Lindsay A.
- Van Broeckhoven, Christine
- C. O’Donovan, Michael
- DeStefano, Anita L.
- Jones, Lesley
- Haines, Jonathan L.
- Owen, Michael J.
- Gudnason, Vilmundur
- Mayeux, Richard
- Escott-Price, Valentina
- Psaty, Bruce M.
- Ramirez, Alfredo
- Holmans, Peter A.
- Seshadri, Sudha
- Williams, Julie
- Amouyel, Phillippe
- Schellenberg, Gerard D.
- Lambert, Jean-Charles
- Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 414-430
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC6463297
- OpenAlex
- W2916749909
- Cited by
- 2,946
- References
- 201
- Citations by year
- 2026: 278 · 2025: 431 · 2024: 475 · 2023: 410 · 2022: 448 · 2021: 445 · 2020: 343 · 2019: 112
- FWCI
- 40.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2019-08-15)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (acceptedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
- DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (203249/Z/16/Z)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0616-10090, NF-SI-0617-10175, NF-SI-0611-10084)
- Parkinson's UK (G-0907)
- Motor Neurone Disease Association (ALCHALABI-DOBSON/APR14/829-791, Shaw/Nov14/985-797)
- Rosetrees Trust
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0013, ANR-17-EURE-0019)
- National Institutes of Health (1r01hl120393-01a1, UL1TR001414, UL1TR002369)
- Medical Research Council (MR/L023784/2, MR/K01417X/1, MR/L501517/1, MR/L501542/1, MR/M024784/1, MR/L021803/1, MR/N012453/1, MR/R024804/1, MR/L501529/1, MR/N026004/1, MR/L010305/1, MR/K013041/1, MR/M009076/1, MR/L023784/1)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, P30AG053760, P30AG010129, U01AG049505, RF1AG051504, U01AG016976, R01AG054060, RF1AG015473, U01AG052409, K25AG055620, P30AG010124, P01AG017586, R01AG041232, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, R01AG054076, U01AG032984, RF1AG054023, R01AG018454, P50AG005681, P50AG005142, P01AG003991, U01AG046139, R01AG061796, P30AG013854, U01AG032438, U24AG056270, P01AG019724, P30AG017266, P30AG044271, P01AG026276, U24AG021886)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL120393, U01HL120393, R01HL105756)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017950)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, genetic susceptibility loci, amyloid-beta, tau protein, immunity, lipid metabolism, genetic correlation, family history of dementia, rare variants
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Genetic Testing, Haplotypes, Humans, Immunity, Lipids, Male, Case-Control Studies, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Lipid Metabolism, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review