Cited by 29Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Candida glabrata : new tools and technologies—expanding the toolkit

Open access
Ho, Hsueh-lui, Haynes, Ken·2015·FEMS Yeast Research

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a noticeable rise in fungal infections related to non-albicans Candida species, including Candida glabrata which has both intrinsic resistance to and commonly acquired resistance to azole antifungals. Phylogenetically, C. glabrata is more closely related to the mostly non-pathogenic model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to other Candida species. Despite C. glabrata's designation as a pathogen by Wickham in 1957, relatively little is known about its mechanism of virulence. Over the past few years, technology to analyse the molecular basis of infection has developed rapidly, and here we briefly review the major advances in tools and technologies available to explore and investigate the virulence of C. glabrata that have occurred over the past decade.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes advances over the past decade in tools and technologies for studying *Candida glabrata* virulence, including a partial deletion collection, plasmid/Gateway resources, alternative infection models, RNA-seq reannotation, and prospective CRISPR-Cas9 adaptation. It argues that these resources are beginning to overcome longstanding barriers such as the absence of a sexual cycle and inefficient gene targeting, but *C. glabrata* remains less well characterized than *S. cerevisiae*.

Key findings

  • The *C. glabrata* deletion collection comprises 619 strains representing approximately 12% of the predicted genome, mostly in the HTL background, with about 195 transcription factor mutants made in a single *his3* auxotrophic background; strains are barcoded and use a recyclable *NAT1* marker. Screens identified novel azole tolerance genes including *YPK1* and *KTR2*, and 28 knockout strains hypersensitive to caspofungin that had not been described in *S. cerevisiae* or *C. albicans*.
  • In a Toll-deficient *Drosophila* model, 416 deletion strains were screened; virulence in the fly was at least partially predictive of fitness in mice, and cell wall integrity genes were among the most strongly attenuated. RNA-seq/CAGE reannotation suggested more than 50 previously unannotated *C. glabrata* genes and confirmed 4316 previously listed genes; another RNA-seq study identified 49 novel genes and verified four (*NP4*, *11*, *32*, *38*).
  • Gene-targeting improvements include a *YKU80* disruption strain that increased targeting efficiency by 5.1% with 40-bp flanking homology, and a *lig4* mutant that increased targeting up to 35 times with 40-bp flanking homologous DNA fragments without deleterious effects under tested conditions. CRISPR-Cas9 has not yet been adapted for *C. glabrata*; the HI-CRISPR system in *S. cerevisiae* could potentially create six targeted disruptions in as little as 12 days, whereas a double knockout in *C. glabrata* currently takes several weeks to several months.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesizing published literature and resources comparing *S. cerevisiae* and *C. glabrata* (Table 1), with sections on the deletion collection, plasmid/Gateway toolbox, infection models, RNA-seq reannotation, and CRISPR-Cas9.
  • No primary experimental data are reported; the paper cites published studies and also refers to unpublished work and personal communication.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: *C. glabrata* lacks a known sexual cycle, preventing classical genetic analysis and synthetic genetic array analysis; its preference for non-homologous end joining over homologous recombination hampers gene targeting; the deletion collection covers only about 12% of the genome; no full ORFeome is yet published; CRISPR-Cas9 has not yet been adapted for *C. glabrata*; insect models lack adaptive immunity, and zebrafish are ectothermic with a preferred temperature of 28°C.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, it does not present new experimental validation, and some cited findings are unpublished (Ho et al.) or personal communication (Bates), while several proposed tools and models remain prospective for *C. glabrata*.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsyr/fov066

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 143 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata has intrinsic resistance to azole antifungals.

    “This could partially be attributed to C. glabrata's intrinsic and acquired resistance to commonly used azole antifungals (Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999; Pfaller and Diekema 2007; Pfaller et al. 2010; Diekema et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pfaller and Diekema 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pfaller et al. 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata isolates exhibiting decreased susceptibility to Amphotericin B have been reported.

    “Worryingly, C. glabrata isolates exhibiting a decreased susceptibility to echinocandins (considered the first line treatment for C. glabrata infections; Pappas et al. 2009) and Amphotericin B, considered the gold standard treatment for fungal infections, have also been reported (Krogh-Madsen et al. 2006; Pfaller et al. 2012; Alexander et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Krogh-Madsen et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pfaller et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Alexander et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    The lack of a known sexual cycle has hampered research into Candida glabrata by preventing classical genetic analysis.

    “Research into C. glabrata has been hampered by the lack of a known sexual cycle, preventing classical genetic analysis, which has been used widely in many fungal species such as S. cerevisiae and Aspergillus species to dissect genes and pathways (Muller et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Muller et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Genetic work involving generation of deletion/tagged strains in Candida glabrata has been hampered by its preference for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) over homologous recombination, making gene targeting less efficient than in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    “Furthermore, genetic work involving generation of deletion/tagged strains in C. glabrata has been hampered by its preference for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) over homologous recombination, which is required for targeted integration of a DNA fragment at double-strand breaks (DSB), thus making gene targeting much less efficient than in S. cerevisiae (Ueno et al. 2007; Corrigan et al. 2013; Cen,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ueno et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Corrigan et al. 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    The power of synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis cannot be used in Candida glabrata because the method exploits the presence of a sexual cycle.

    “Similarly, the power of the synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis, which has revolutionized research by enabling genetic interactions networks to be mapped, cannot be used in C. glabrata as the method itself exploits the presence of a sexual cycle (Tong et al. 2001; Costanzo et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tong et al. 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Costanzo et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
  • May combine two claims. 46
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata belongs to the non-CTG clade, unlike most well-studied Candida species.

    “Phylogenetically, it is more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to any other Candida species, see Fig. 1, and unlike most well-studied Candida species, it belongs to the non-CTG clade species (Dujon et al. 2004; Ahmad et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dujon et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ahmad et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata is associated with longer hospital stays and higher costs than Candida albicans.

    “Of interest, in the rise of non-albicans Candida species, is C. glabrata which has been shown to be associated with longer hospital stays and higher costs than C. albicans (Moran et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moran et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata is phylogenetically more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to any other Candida species.

    “Phylogenetically, it is more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to any other Candida species, see Fig. 1, and unlike most well-studied Candida species, it belongs to the non-CTG clade species (Dujon et al. 2004; Ahmad et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dujon et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ahmad et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata has no known documented sexual cycle.

    “Furthermore, C. glabrata has no known documented sexual cycle although both mating types are commonly found and its genome contains homologues of the majority of the genes involved in mating in S. cerevisiae (Muller et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Muller et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Saccharomyces cerevisiae has one of the most diverse plasmid toolkits available for ease of investigating and manipulating genes.

    “Unsurprisingly, the model organism, S. cerevisiae, has one of the most diverse plasmid toolkits available for ease of investigating and manipulating genes, from expression plasmids to reporter plasmids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aoyama et al. (2014) used RNA-seq to investigate transcriptional initiation in Candida glabrata and predicted 50 new Candida glabrata genes.

    “for example, Aoyama et al. (2014) used RNA-seq to investigate transcriptional initiation in C. glabrata and predicted 50 new C. glabrata genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    One likely reason the Candida glabrata community has not widely used the reversible YKU80 disruption strain is because target efficiency is only increased by 5.1% and disruption of YKU80 leads to synthetic sickness or lethality in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    “One likely reason that the C. glabrata community has not widely used the reversible YKU80 disruption strain for generating knockouts is because the target efficiency is only increased by 5.1% and disruption of YKU80 leads to synthetic sickness or lethality in S. cerevisiae (Ueno et al. 2007); furthermore, deletions of YKU70/80 in C. glabrata have been shown to affect subtelomeric silencing (Rosas-”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ueno et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the Candida glabrata deletion collection currently comprises only 12% of the genome, advances have already been made in understanding the virulence mechanisms of Candida glabrata.

    “Although the C. glabrata deletion collection currently comprises only 12% of the genome, advances have already been made in understanding the virulence mechanisms of C. glabrata and additional strains have been constructed (K. Haynes et al., unpublished).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A partial C. glabrata Gateway ORFeome has been used to examine conservation of PPIs between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae and to perform a pooled overexpression screen to identify novel C. glabrata genes important for survival under stress conditions.

    “Indeed, a partial C. glabrata Gateway ORFeome has been used to examine conservation of PPIs between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae (Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished) and to perform a pooled overexpression screen to identify novel C. glabrata genes important for survival under stress conditions (Ho et al., unpublished).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ho et al., unpublished

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Gene targeting can be performed more efficiently in the newly constructed lig4 strain compared to the yku70/80 strains and does not appear to cause any phenotype upon its deletion.

    “As gene targeting can be performed more efficiently in this newly constructed lig4 strain compared to the yku70/80 strains and does not appear to cause any phenotype upon its deletion, it will be interesting to see if the Candida community will adopt this strain for use in high-throughput knockout generation in the near future.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The construction of a Candida glabrata Gateway adapted ORFeome would alleviate the need to prioritize genes individually, as any gene of interest could easily be shuttled into a range of different destination vectors.

    “The construction of a C. glabrata Gateway adapted ORFeome would alleviate this, as any gene of interest could easily be shuttled into a range of different destination vectors thereby”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Once an Entry clone is available, it is possible to shuttle the gene of interest to any available Gateway adapted vector; furthermore, this process is bidirectional.

    “However, once an Entry clone is available, it is possible to shuttle the gene of interest to any available Gateway adapted vector; furthermore, this process is bidirectional (Hartley 2000)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartley 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cen Fiori and Dijck (2015) constructed a lig4 mutant and showed that gene targeting efficiency increased up to 35 times compared to the parental strain when using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA fragments.

    “More recently, Cen Fiori and Dijck (2015) have constructed a lig4 mutant (Lig4 is a DNA ligase involved in NHEJ) and shown that gene targeting efficiency increased up to 35 times compared to the parental strain when using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA fragments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gateway ORFeomes and compatible vectors have been created in other species including Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and Candida albicans.

    “Furthermore, Gateway ORFeomes and compatible vectors have been created in other species including D. melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and C. albicans (Reboul et al. 2003; Akbari et al. 2009; Chauvel et al. 2012)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Reboul et al. 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Akbari et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chauvel et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Gateway® Technology facilitates high-efficiency transfer of genes between different Gateway vectors by site-specific recombination.

    “This toolkit has recently been expanded with the introduction of the Gateway® Technology which facilitates high-efficiency transfer of genes between different Gateway vectors by site-specific recombination (Hartley 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartley 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A drawback to the Gateway system is that it requires the initial insertion of the gene of interest into a plasmid with the two flanking Gateway recombination sites (attL1 and attL2) to produce an initial Gateway Entry clone.

    “A drawback to the system is that it requires the initial insertion of the gene of interest into a plasmid with the two flanking Gateway recombination sites (attL1 and attL2) to produce an initial Gateway Entry clone (Hartley 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartley 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Compared with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata has been less well studied and has fewer molecular tools and resources available to interrogate its biology.

    “Compared with the model organism S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata has been less well studied, and as such there are fewer molecular tools and resources available to interrogate its biology; see Table 1 for a summary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Until recently, no deletion collection existed for Candida glabrata; thus, research has focused on Candida glabrata genes known to impact virulence in other pathogens, or on orthologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes.

    “Until recently, no deletion collection existed for C. glabrata; thus, research has focused on C. glabrata genes known to impact virulence in other pathogens, or on orthologues of S. cerevisiae genes that may or may not encode functions important for infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Candida glabrata deletion collection currently comprises 619 strains representing approximately 12% of the predicted genome.

    “The C. glabrata deletion collection currently comprises 619 strains representing approximately 12% of the predicted genome (Schwarzmüller et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schwarzmüller et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although a full Candida glabrata ORFeome is yet to be published, the Gateway system is already being utilized by Candida glabrata researchers to investigate genes of interest.

    “Although a full C. glabrata ORFeome is yet to be published, the Gateway system is already being utilized by C. glabrata researchers to investigate genes of interest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Knockout Collection comprises 5916 individual genes knocked out in one or more of four backgrounds.

    “Since the release of the S. cerevisiae Yeast Knockout Collections (YKO), which comprises 5916 individual genes knocked out in one or more of four backgrounds (MATa, MATα, heterozygous diploid, and homozygous diploid) (Winzeler et al. 1999; Giaever et al. 2002)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Winzeler et al. 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Giaever et al. 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Loss of HIS3, LEU2, TRP1 or a combination of all three in Candida glabrata does not impact its virulence, unlike deletion of the URA3 marker in Candida albicans which is known to affect its virulence.

    “Pertinently, Jacobsen et al. have shown that loss of HIS3, LEU2, TRP1 or a combination of all three in C. glabrata does not impact its virulence, unlike deletion of the URA3 marker in C. albicans which is known to affect its virulence (Lay et al. 1998; Brand et al. 2004; Jacobsen et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lay et al. 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brand et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jacobsen et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Schwarzmüller et al. (2014) identified 28 knockout strains that are hypersensitive to caspofungin and have not been described in Saccharomyces cerevisiae nor Candida albicans, implying that Candida glabrata may have unknown mechanisms of caspofungin resistance.

    “Furthermore, they identified 28 knockout strains that are hypersensitive to caspofungin and have not been described in S. cerevisiae nor C. albicans, implying that C. glabrata may have unknown mechanisms of caspofungin resistance (Schwarzmüller et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schwarzmüller et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Ueno et al. generated a reversible YKU80 disruption strain that increased gene targeting efficiency by 5.1% using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA, but this strain has not gained widespread use from the community.

    “Although attempts have been made to overcome this problem in C. glabrata, for example, Ueno et al. (2007) generated a reversible YKU80 disruption strain (Yku80 is involved in the NHEJ pathway) thereby increasing gene targeting efficiency by 5.1% using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA, this strain has not gained widespread use from the community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ueno et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Many high-throughput screens using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae YKO library have produced a wealth of information that has led to functions being assigned to previously unannotated proteins.

    “many high-throughput screens have been undertaken using these libraries producing a wealth of information that has led to functions being assigned to previously unannotated proteins.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These types of screens and analyses can easily be extended to any organism in which a deletion collection has been constructed.

    “These types of screens and analyses can easily be extended to any organism in which a deletion collection has been constructed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gelperin et al. constructed the MORF library, a library containing 5854 Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORFs as C-terminal His6-HA fusions under regulated control in Gateway compatible expression plasmids.

    “Utilizing Gateway Technology, Gelperin et al. constructed the MORF (Moveable ORF) library, a library containing 5854 S. cerevisiae ORFs as C-terminal His6-HA fusions under regulated control in Gateway compatible expression plasmids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gelperin et al. 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Using the MORF collection, Gelperin et al. performed the first systematic screen for glycosylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identified 454 new candidate glycoproteins.

    “Using this collection, they performed the first systematic screen for glycosylated proteins in S. cerevisiae and identified 454 new candidate glycoproteins (Gelperin et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gelperin et al. 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Zebrafish were chosen as a virulence model because they have an adaptive component to their immune system, a high reproductive rate, low maintenance costs, transparent embryos that make in vivo visualization possible, and can be manipulated with a comprehensive series of molecular tools.

    “Zebrafish were chosen as they have an adaptive component to their immune system, a high reproductive rate, low maintenance costs, have transparent embryos that makes in vivo visualization possible and can be manipulated with a comprehensive series of molecular tools (Chao et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chao et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Toll-deficient D. melanogaster do succumb to C. glabrata infection and attenuated C. glabrata null strains can be identified using Toll-deficient flies.

    “Furthermore, Toll-deficient D. melanogaster do succumb to C. glabrata infection and attenuated C. glabrata null strains can be identified using Toll-deficient flies; for example Quintin et al. observed that Toll-deficient flies injected with a double null C. glabrata yps1 yps7 (Yps1 and Yps 7 have previously been shown to be required for cell wall integrity and survival inside macrophages) succumb”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kaur, Ma and Cormack 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Quintin et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bates et al. have preliminary data that indicate that an inoculum of 5 × 10^5-1 × 10^6 cells of C. glabrata ATCC 2001 was sufficient to observe approximately 80% mortality in G. mellonella 24 h post-infection at 37°C and that it follows a clear dose response, similar to that seen in a mouse model of dose-dependent killing.

    “In contrast, Bates et al. have preliminary data that indicate that an inoculum of 5 × 105–1 × 106 cells of C. glabrata ATCC 2001 was sufficient to observe approximately 80% mortality in G. mellonella 24 h post-infection at 37°C and that it follows a clear dose response, similar to that seen in a mouse model of dose-dependent killing (Steven Bates, Exeter University, pers. Comm.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steven Bates, Exeter University, pers. Comm.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rocha et al. (2001) have previously shown that mice infected with C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 in the IV model of candidosis had 100% survival 42 days post-infection, while complete mortality was observed in mice infected with a C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 reconstituted with a plasmid expressing CDC35 16 days post-infection.

    “Similarly, Rocha et al. (2001) have previously shown that mice infected with C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 in the IV model of candidosis had 100% survival 42 days post-infection, while complete mortality was observed in mice infected with a C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 reconstituted with a plasmid expressing CDC35 16 days post-infection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rocha et al. 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Controversy remains over whether wild-type D. melanogaster is susceptible to fungal infections.

    “However, controversy remains over whether wild-type D. melanogaster is susceptible to fungal infections, Alarco et al. (2004) reported that on average 85% of their wild-type D. melanogaster survived when injected with approximately 1 × 103 C. albicans cells per fly leading them to conclude that wild-type D. melanogaster is highly tolerant to fungal infection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alarco et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An invertebrate host may not appear relevant to human diseases, but they possess an innate immune system that shares many similarities with the innate immune response of mammals.

    “Although, an invertebrate host may not appear relevant to human diseases, they possess an innate immune system that shares many similarities with the innate immune response of mammals (Kavanagh and Reeves 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kavanagh and Reeves 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Becker et al. (2010) assayed the virulence of 177 C. albicans strains in a mouse model and identified 102 genes that play a role in host survival and establishment of an infection, including genes that encode known antifungal drug targets such as FKS1 and ERG1.

    “For example, Becker et al. (2010) assayed the virulence of 177 C. albicans strains in a mouse model and identified 102 genes that play a role in host survival and establishment of an infection, including genes that encode known antifungal drug targets such as FKS1 and ERG1, validating the results of the screen for discovering potential novel drug targets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Becker et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A significant drawback to using an insect host is that they do not have an adaptive immune system, and integration of the innate and adaptive immune system occurs in C. albicans infections.

    “However, a significant drawback to using an insect host is that they do not have an adaptive immune system, and it has been documented that, at least in the case of C. albicans infections, integration of the innate and adaptive immune system occurs, for instance, phagocytic activity is reinforced by Th1 cytokines and impaired by Th2 cytokines (Romani, Bistoni and Puccetti 1997; Romani 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Romani, Bistoni and Puccetti 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Romani 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both mouse models enable host-pathogen interactions to be explored in vivo and allow comparison of the ability of mutants to progress disease via measurement of organ fungal burden.

    “While both mouse models enable host–pathogen interactions to be explored in vivo and allow comparison of the ability of mutants to progress disease via measurement of organ fungal burden, they come with caveats.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Szabo and MacCallum (2011)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brennan et al. used the G. mellonella infection model to distinguish between avirulent, virulent and reduced virulence C. albicans strains; C. albicans hst7/hst7 was as virulent as the wild type (100% mortality at 48 h), while cpp1/cpp1 mutants were reduced in virulence compared to the wild type (90% mortality at 48 h).

    “Furthermore, Brennan et al. used the G. mellonella infection model to distinguish between avirulent, virulent and reduced virulence C. albicans strains. They observed that C. albicans hst7/hst7 was as virulent as the wild type (100% mortality at 48 h), while cpp1/cpp1 mutants were reduced in virulence compared to the wild type (90% mortality at 48 h) (Brennan et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brennan et al. 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Thus, G. mellonella could develop as an important host for examining C. glabrata virulence as at a physiologically relevant temperature of 37°C it is susceptible to C. glabrata infection, but not at 30°C.

    “Thus, G. mellonella could develop as an important host for examining C. glabrata virulence as at a physiologically relevant temperature of 37°C it is susceptible to C. glabrata infection, but not at 30°C.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brunke et al. screened 416 C. glabrata mutants using Toll-deficient flies and showed that virulence in D. melanogaster was at least partially predictive of fitness in mice.

    “Brunke et al. have combined the use of Toll-deficient flies and the deletion collection to screen 416 C. glabrata mutants to investigate whether results from this model of virulence can be used to predict the outcome of infections in murine models. They showed that virulence in D. melanogaster was at least partially predictive of fitness in mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brunke et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both Toll and Spätzle-deficient D. melanogaster are susceptible to fungal infections.

    “Despite the controversy surrounding the use of wild-type D. melanogaster as a virulence model for fungal infections, both Toll and Spätzle-deficient D. melanogaster are susceptible to fungal infections (Alarco et al. 2004; Quintin et al. 2013; Panayidou, Ioannidou and Apidianakis 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alarco et al. 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Quintin et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Panayidou, Ioannidou and Apidianakis 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This correlates with previous mouse data where 50% of the mice survived 35 days post-infection with C. albicans cpp1/cpp1, while 100% mouse mortality was observed 6 days post-infection with C. albicans hst7/hst7.

    “Again, this correlates with previous mouse data where 50% of the mice survived 35 days post-infection with C. albicans cpp1/cpp1 (Csank et al. 1997), while 100% mouse mortality was observed 6 days post-infection with C. albicans hst7/hst7 (Leberer et al. 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Csank et al. 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Leberer et al. 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the case of C. albicans, although filamentous growth is enhanced at higher temperatures, fungal germination has been observed in vivo at 28°C and many studies have implicated a role of filamentation in virulence at this temperature.

    “However, in the case of C. albicans, although filamentous growth is enhanced at higher temperatures, fungal germination has been observed in vivo at 28°C and many studies have implicated a role of filamentation in virulence at this temperature (Brennan et al. 2002; Chamilos et al. 2006; Fuchs and Mylonakis 2006; Brothers, Newman and Wheeler 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brennan et al. 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chamilos et al. 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fuchs and Mylonakis 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A drawback to using zebrafish is that they are ectothermic and prefer temperatures of 28°C, while humans are endothermic and have a normal body temperature of 36.8 ± 0.4°C.

    “A drawback to using zebrafish is that they are ectothermic and prefer temperatures of 28°C, while humans are endothermic and have a normal body temperature of 36.8 ± 0.4°C (Chao et al. 2010; Brothers, Newman and Wheeler 2011; Gratacap and Wheeler 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chao et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brothers, Newman and Wheeler 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gratacap and Wheeler 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unlike RNAi, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is not limited solely to the silencing or deletion of genes and has been adapted so that it can also be used for editing/modifying the genome via its homology directed repair mechanism, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging.

    “Unlike RNAi, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is not limited solely to the silencing or deletion of genes and has been adapted so that it can also be used for editing/modifying the genome via its homology directed repair mechanism, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging; see Fig. 3 for a schematic and applications of the CRISPR-Cas9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Zalatan et al. adapted the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate synthetic multigene transcriptional programs by repressing and activating genes to redirect flux through the violacein biosynthetic pathway, which they recreated in S. cerevisiae.

    “For example, Zalatan et al. have recently adapted the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate synthetic multigene transcriptional programs by repressing and activating genes to redirect flux through the violacein biosynthetic pathway (an important metabolic pathway for bacteria) which they recreated in S. cerevisiae.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zalatan et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The most commonly used CRISPR Type II system consists of a gRNA and an endonuclease, the CRISPR-associated (Cas) nuclease, Cas9, which cleaves the targeted chromosomal DNA in a site-specific manner triggering endogenous DNA repair systems resulting in genome modification.

    “The most commonly used CRISPR Type II system consists of a gRNA and an endonuclease, the CRISPR-associated (Cas) nuclease, Cas9, which cleaves the targeted chromosomal DNA in a site-specific manner triggering endogenous DNA repair systems resulting in genome modification (for an in-depth review, see Doudna and Charpentier 2014; Kim and Kim 2014; Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Doudna and Charpentier 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kim and Kim 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bao et al. (2015) used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate multiple gene disruptions in a single step in S. cerevisiae, representing a powerful tool for creating yeast strains with multiple knockouts in less than a week, termed the HI-CRISPR system.

    “Bao et al. (2015) on the other hand have used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate multiple gene disruptions in a single step in S. cerevisiae representing a powerful tool for creating yeast strains with multiple knockouts in less than a week, and they have termed this the HI-CRISPR system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bao et al. 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tsai et al. (2014) performed comparative genomics on four species of Taphrina fungi and discovered that Taphrina fungi utilized multiple strategies to cope with the host environment that were also found in some yeast species such as aneuploidy of genes.

    “For example, Tsai et al. (2014) have recently performed comparative genomics on four species of Taphrina fungi, a plant pathogen that causes plant deformity, and discovered that Taphrina fungi utilized multiple strategies to cope with the host environment that were also found in some yeast species such as aneuploidy of genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tsai et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Thus, zebrafish may prove to be a tractable virulence model for real-time visualization of pathogen-host interactions, and although researchers have yet to investigate C. glabrata in a zebrafish model, the need to understand pathogen-host interactions in real time makes zebrafish a serious contender for use in future virulence studies.

    “Thus, zebrafish may prove to be a tractable virulence model for real-time visualization of pathogen–host interactions, and although researchers have yet to investigate C. glabrata in a zebrafish model, the need to understand pathogen–host interactions in real time makes zebrafish a serious contender for use in future virulence studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With so many fungal genomes readily available, the possibility now exists of performing comparative genomic analysis with C. glabrata to predict evolutionary pathways that may have evolved to aid its survival as a pathogen, and to experimentally validate these predictions.

    “With so many fungal genomes readily available, the possibility now exists of performing comparative genomic analysis with C. glabrata to predict evolutionary pathways that may have evolved to aid its survival as a pathogen, and to experimentally validate these predictions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Alternative hosts for virulence studies are emerging and their relative simplicity could be used in global screens facilitating analysis of C. glabrata infections.

    “Thus, it can be seen that alternative hosts for virulence studies are emerging and their relative simplicity could be used in global screens facilitating analysis of C. glabrata infections”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Based on CAGE analysis, Aoyama et al. predicted 72 C. glabrata genes to contain uORFs, yet none of the 72 S. cerevisiae orthologues have been reported to harbour uORFs; these data strongly suggest that there is regulatory divergence between these two yeasts.

    “Instead, based on the CAGE analysis, Aoyama et al. predicted 72 C. glabrata genes to contain uORFs, yet none of the 72 S. cerevisiae orthologues have been reported to harbour uORFs. These data strongly suggest that there is regulatory divergence between these two yeasts (Aoyama et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Further advances in next-generation sequencing as well as RNA-seq data in C. glabrata will greatly aid our understanding of the unique changes in transcriptional regulation that occur when C. glabrata encounters a host and the mechanisms underpinning its virulence.

    “Further advances in next-generation sequencing as well as RNA-seq data in C. glabrata will greatly aid our understanding of the unique changes in transcriptional regulation that occur when C. glabrata encounters a host and the mechanisms underpinning its virulence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By 2011 a total of 108 fungal genomes had been annotated, and the growing list of annotated fungal genomes continues to grow as sequencing technologies improve.

    “Since the publication of the first genome sequence of a free-living eukaryote, S. cerevisiae, was published 24 years ago by Goffeau et al., by 2011 a total of 108 fungal genomes had been annotated (Goffeau et al. 1996; Haas et al. 2011), and the growing list of annotated fungal genomes continues to grow as sequencing technologies improve.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goffeau et al. 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Haas et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Candida glabrata NP4 and NP38 were shown to be downregulated upon interaction with human neutrophils, suggesting that the encoded proteins may be important for C. glabrata's role as a pathogen.

    “Candida glabrata NP4 and NP38 were also shown to be downregulated upon interaction with human neutrophils, suggesting that the encoded proteins may be important for C. glabrata's role as a pathogen (Linde et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Linde et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aoyama et al. performed CAGE analysis on RNA isolated from C. glabrata grown in seven different conditions, and this analysis suggested the existence of more than 50 previously unannotated C. glabrata genes as well as confirming the identity of 4316 genes previously listed on the Candida Genome Database.

    “Indeed, recently Aoyama et al. performed Cap Analysis Gene Expression (CAGE analysis), a method that was introduced to determine the transcription start sites on a genome-wide scale by isolating and sequencing fragments originating from the 5′ end of RNA transcripts, on RNA isolated from C. glabrata grown in seven different conditions. This analysis suggested the existence of more than 50”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A host-pathogen interaction network for a C. albicans-zebrafish infection model identified several important proteins related to C. albicans infection that may prove useful drug targets, and identified important immune defensive mechanisms activated in zebrafish in response to C. albicans invasion.

    “The power behind this virulence model can be seen by the publication of a host–pathogen interaction network for a C. albicans–zebrafish infection model, which identified several important proteins related to C. albicans infection that may prove useful drug targets. At the same time, the study identified important immune defensive mechanisms activated in zebrafish in response to C. albicans”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kuo et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gratacap and Wheeler 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Three distinct bacterial CRISPR systems have been identified; Type I, II and III, and it is the Type II system that has mainly been adapted for use in artificial gene regulation and genome editing.

    “So far three distinct bacterial CRISPR systems have been identified; Type I, II and III, and it is the Type II system that has mainly been adapted for use in artificial gene regulation and genome editing (Kim and Kim 2014; Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kim and Kim 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CRISPR-Cas9 system has revolutionized and advanced research in the field of artificial gene regulation and genome editing.

    “A technology that has revolutionized and advanced research in the field of artificial gene regulation and genome editing is the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 system (Doudna and Charpentier 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doudna and Charpentier 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    252 genes in S. cerevisiae have been reported to contain upstream small open reading frames (uORFS) that can inhibit translation of the downstream ORF, and none of the C. glabrata orthologous genes were reported to contain uORFs.

    “For example, 252 genes in S. cerevisiae have been reported to contain upstream small open reading frames (uORFS) that can inhibit translation of the downstream ORF by interfering with the initiation of translation from its start codon. None of the C. glabrata orthologous genes were reported to contain uORFs (Aoyama et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both Aoyama et al. (2014) and Linde et al. (2015) found divergence in the transcriptional regulation between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae, reinforcing the idea that great care should be taken when extrapolating such regulatory data between species.

    “Interestingly both Aoyama et al. (2014) and Linde et al. (2015) found divergence in the transcriptional regulation between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae, thereby reinforcing the idea that great care should be taken when extrapolating such regulatory data between species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Linde et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Linde et al. verified four of the novel genes, C. glabrata NP4, 11, 32 and 38 via RT-PCR, and showed that their expression was upregulated during a pH shift from pH4 to pH8, suggesting that the encoded proteins play a role in helping C. glabrata regulate and/or adapt to changes in environmental pH.

    “These workers went on to verify four of the novel genes, C. glabrata NP4, 11, 32 and 38 via RT-PCR, and showed that their expression was upregulated during a pH shift from pH4 to pH8 suggesting that the encoded proteins play a role in helping C. glabrata regulate and/or adapt to changes in environmental pH (Linde et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Linde et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CRISPR-Cas systems utilize short guide RNA (gRNA) strands to direct the degradation of foreign DNA that the system has previously encountered by incorporating fragments of foreign DNA into the CRISPR loci to produce the short gRNAs required to degrade homologous sequences.

    “Similar to RNAi, CRISPR-Cas systems utilize short guide RNA (gRNA) strands to direct the degradation of foreign DNA that the system has previously encountered by incorporating fragments of foreign DNA into the CRISPR loci to produce the short gRNAs required to degrade homologous sequences (Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013; Gilles and Averof 2014; Laganà, Shasha and Croce 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gilles and Averof 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Laganà, Shasha and Croce 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Potentially, using the HI-CRISPR system a C. glabrata strain with six targeted genes knocked out/disrupted could be created in as little as 12 days, whereas it currently takes several weeks to several months to make a double knockout in C. glabrata.

    “Potentially, using the HI-CRISPR system a C. glabrata strain with six targeted genes knocked out/disrupted could be created in as little as 12 days, whereas it currently takes several weeks to several months to make a double knockout in C. glabrata, speeding up research as the construction of knockout/disrupted genes is often a rate-limiting step in advancement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should reveal novel putative drug targets.

    “Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms, host–pathogen relationship and reveal novel putative drug targets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms.

    “Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms, host–pathogen relationship and reveal novel putative drug targets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Making a knockdown construction of an essential gene in C. glabrata will be less time consuming and difficult.

    “for instance, making a knockdown construction of an essential gene in C. glabrata will be less time consuming and difficult”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A partial C. glabrata ORFeome is being constructed.

    “Additionally, a partial C. glabrata ORFeome is being constructed (Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished, Ho et al., unpublished)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ho et al., unpublished

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    It is likely that a proportion of the essential genes will play an important role in virulence of C. glabrata.

    “It is likely that a proportion of the essential genes will play an important role in virulence of C. glabrata.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Once complete, the partial C. glabrata ORFeome will facilitate high-throughput phenotypic screens and basic research.

    “and once complete will facilitate high-throughput phenotypic screens and basic research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
71 of 71
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The use of mammalian models requires careful ethical consideration and has a significant economic cost.

    “The use of mammalian models requires careful ethical consideration, and has a significant economic cost.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Large numbers of larvae can be infected with each mutant strain increasing the statistical power of the Galleria assay.

    “large numbers of larvae can be infected with each mutant strain increasing the statistical power of the assay”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The infection experiments with Galleria are simple to perform and inexpensive.

    “the infection experiments are simple to perform and inexpensive”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    G. mellonella can be maintained at a temperature range from 25 to 37°C, facilitating analysis at or near human body temperature.

    “unlike many other insect hosts, G. mellonella can be maintained at a temperature range from 25 to 37°C, so facilitating analysis at or near to human body temperature”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    RNA-seq shows a snapshot of the quantity and nature of mRNA expressed in a genome at a given moment in time.

    “RNA-seq, which shows a snapshot of the quantity and nature of mRNA expressed in a genome at a given moment in time”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In nature, CRISPR-Cas systems form part of the adaptive immune system used by archaea and bacteria against foreign DNA.

    “In nature, CRISPR-Cas systems form part of the adaptive immune system used by archaea and bacteria against foreign DNA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CRISPR-Cas9 system can be used for editing/modifying the genome via homology directed repair, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging.

    “the CRISPR-Cas9 system is not limited solely to the silencing or deletion of genes and has been adapted so that it can also be used for editing/modifying the genome via its homology directed repair mechanism, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The construction of knockout/disrupted genes is often a rate-limiting step in advancement.

    “the construction of knockout/disrupted genes is often a rate-limiting step in advancement”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.

    “However, still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current research on C. glabrata focuses on orthologues of genes involved in virulence in other species yet an entire subset of C. glabrata-specific genes remains unexplored.

    “Furthermore, current research on C. glabrata focuses on orthologues of genes involved in virulence in other species yet an entire subset of C. glabrata-specific genes remains unexplored.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Different names given for the 1957 pathogen designation

    Minor

    The abstract attributes the designation to Wickham, while the conclusion attributes the same 1957 designation to Wickerham.

  • Gateway Entry clone described as both required and optional

    Minor

    The text says the Gateway system requires an initial Entry clone, but the Figure 2 caption describes a route that omits that step.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, H.-L., & Haynes, K.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Ho, Hsueh-lui
Venue
FEMS Yeast Research
Published
2015-07-22
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
fov066
ISSN
  • 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1567-1364
OpenAlex
W2196963808
Cited by
29
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (097377/Z/11/Z, 097377, /Z/11/Z)
  • University of Exeter
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F005210/2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, fungal virulence, non-albicans Candida, azole resistance, antifungal resistance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, fungal pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Candidiasis, Disease Models, Animal, Genetics, Microbial, Humans, Molecular Biology, Virulence, Virulence Factors, Candida glabrata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review