Candida glabrata : new tools and technologies—expanding the toolkit
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, there has been a noticeable rise in fungal infections related to non-albicans Candida species, including Candida glabrata which has both intrinsic resistance to and commonly acquired resistance to azole antifungals. Phylogenetically, C. glabrata is more closely related to the mostly non-pathogenic model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to other Candida species. Despite C. glabrata's designation as a pathogen by Wickham in 1957, relatively little is known about its mechanism of virulence. Over the past few years, technology to analyse the molecular basis of infection has developed rapidly, and here we briefly review the major advances in tools and technologies available to explore and investigate the virulence of C. glabrata that have occurred over the past decade.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review summarizes advances over the past decade in tools and technologies for studying *Candida glabrata* virulence, including a partial deletion collection, plasmid/Gateway resources, alternative infection models, RNA-seq reannotation, and prospective CRISPR-Cas9 adaptation. It argues that these resources are beginning to overcome longstanding barriers such as the absence of a sexual cycle and inefficient gene targeting, but *C. glabrata* remains less well characterized than *S. cerevisiae*.
Key findings
- The *C. glabrata* deletion collection comprises 619 strains representing approximately 12% of the predicted genome, mostly in the HTL background, with about 195 transcription factor mutants made in a single *his3* auxotrophic background; strains are barcoded and use a recyclable *NAT1* marker. Screens identified novel azole tolerance genes including *YPK1* and *KTR2*, and 28 knockout strains hypersensitive to caspofungin that had not been described in *S. cerevisiae* or *C. albicans*.
- In a Toll-deficient *Drosophila* model, 416 deletion strains were screened; virulence in the fly was at least partially predictive of fitness in mice, and cell wall integrity genes were among the most strongly attenuated. RNA-seq/CAGE reannotation suggested more than 50 previously unannotated *C. glabrata* genes and confirmed 4316 previously listed genes; another RNA-seq study identified 49 novel genes and verified four (*NP4*, *11*, *32*, *38*).
- Gene-targeting improvements include a *YKU80* disruption strain that increased targeting efficiency by 5.1% with 40-bp flanking homology, and a *lig4* mutant that increased targeting up to 35 times with 40-bp flanking homologous DNA fragments without deleterious effects under tested conditions. CRISPR-Cas9 has not yet been adapted for *C. glabrata*; the HI-CRISPR system in *S. cerevisiae* could potentially create six targeted disruptions in as little as 12 days, whereas a double knockout in *C. glabrata* currently takes several weeks to several months.
Methods
- Narrative review synthesizing published literature and resources comparing *S. cerevisiae* and *C. glabrata* (Table 1), with sections on the deletion collection, plasmid/Gateway toolbox, infection models, RNA-seq reannotation, and CRISPR-Cas9.
- No primary experimental data are reported; the paper cites published studies and also refers to unpublished work and personal communication.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: *C. glabrata* lacks a known sexual cycle, preventing classical genetic analysis and synthetic genetic array analysis; its preference for non-homologous end joining over homologous recombination hampers gene targeting; the deletion collection covers only about 12% of the genome; no full ORFeome is yet published; CRISPR-Cas9 has not yet been adapted for *C. glabrata*; insect models lack adaptive immunity, and zebrafish are ectothermic with a preferred temperature of 28°C.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it does not present new experimental validation, and some cited findings are unpublished (Ho et al.) or personal communication (Bates), while several proposed tools and models remain prospective for *C. glabrata*.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 143 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Candida glabrata has intrinsic resistance to azole antifungals.
“This could partially be attributed to C. glabrata's intrinsic and acquired resistance to commonly used azole antifungals (Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999; Pfaller and Diekema 2007; Pfaller et al. 2010; Diekema et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pfaller and Diekema 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pfaller et al. 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Candida glabrata isolates exhibiting decreased susceptibility to Amphotericin B have been reported.
“Worryingly, C. glabrata isolates exhibiting a decreased susceptibility to echinocandins (considered the first line treatment for C. glabrata infections; Pappas et al. 2009) and Amphotericin B, considered the gold standard treatment for fungal infections, have also been reported (Krogh-Madsen et al. 2006; Pfaller et al. 2012; Alexander et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Krogh-Madsen et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pfaller et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Alexander et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The lack of a known sexual cycle has hampered research into Candida glabrata by preventing classical genetic analysis.
“Research into C. glabrata has been hampered by the lack of a known sexual cycle, preventing classical genetic analysis, which has been used widely in many fungal species such as S. cerevisiae and Aspergillus species to dissect genes and pathways (Muller et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muller et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Genetic work involving generation of deletion/tagged strains in Candida glabrata has been hampered by its preference for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) over homologous recombination, making gene targeting less efficient than in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
“Furthermore, genetic work involving generation of deletion/tagged strains in C. glabrata has been hampered by its preference for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) over homologous recombination, which is required for targeted integration of a DNA fragment at double-strand breaks (DSB), thus making gene targeting much less efficient than in S. cerevisiae (Ueno et al. 2007; Corrigan et al. 2013; Cen,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ueno et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Corrigan et al. 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The power of synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis cannot be used in Candida glabrata because the method exploits the presence of a sexual cycle.
“Similarly, the power of the synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis, which has revolutionized research by enabling genetic interactions networks to be mapped, cannot be used in C. glabrata as the method itself exploits the presence of a sexual cycle (Tong et al. 2001; Costanzo et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tong et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Costanzo et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Candida glabrata has commonly acquired resistance to azole antifungals.
“This could partially be attributed to C. glabrata's intrinsic and acquired resistance to commonly used azole antifungals (Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999; Pfaller and Diekema 2007; Pfaller et al. 2010; Diekema et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pfaller and Diekema 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pfaller et al. 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Candida glabrata isolates exhibiting decreased susceptibility to echinocandins have been reported.
“Worryingly, C. glabrata isolates exhibiting a decreased susceptibility to echinocandins (considered the first line treatment for C. glabrata infections; Pappas et al. 2009) and Amphotericin B, considered the gold standard treatment for fungal infections, have also been reported (Krogh-Madsen et al. 2006; Pfaller et al. 2012; Alexander et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Krogh-Madsen et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pfaller et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Alexander et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The mechanism of virulence at the molecular level is still not well understood in Candida glabrata.
“Despite these insights, the mechanism of virulence at the molecular level is still not well understood in C. glabrata making it difficult to identify candidate proteins as potential drug targets for effective treatment of infections caused by this yeast (Silva et al. 2011; Ahmad et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Silva et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ahmad et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The majority of annotated genes in Candida glabrata have not been experimentally annotated; their encoded functions have been predicted based on homology to Saccharomyces cerevisiae orthologues.
“For example, the majority of the annotated genes in C. glabrata have not been experimentally annotated, rather their encoded functions have been predicted based on homology to their S. cerevisiae orthologues (Dujon et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dujon et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In the absence of a Candida glabrata ORF library, any set of genes that emerge from large-scale experiments have to be prioritized for investigation individually as constructs will have to be produced for each gene.
“Yet in the absence of a C. glabrata ORF library, any set of genes that emerge from large-scale experiments have to be prioritized for investigation individually as constructs will have to be produced for each gene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A deletion of LIG4 posed no deleterious effect on the strain compared to the parental when grown under a variety of different conditions including cell wall stress, antifungals and DNA damage.
“Furthermore, they noted that a deletion of LIG4 posed no deleterious effect on the strain compared to the parental when grown under a variety of different conditions including cell wall stress, antifungals and DNA damage (Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Schwarzmüller et al. (2014) employed Gateway compatible expression vectors to confirm that the caspofungin sensitivity phenotype observed in 12 of their Candida glabrata knockout strains was due to the absence of each individual gene.
“Schwarzmüller et al. (2014) employed Gateway compatible expression vectors to confirm that the caspofungin sensitivity phenotype observed in 12 of their C. glabrata knockout strains was due to the absence of each individual gene, and that the phenotype was restored upon the insertion of an expression plasmid expressing each gene of interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzmüller et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Thorne et al. (2011) utilized a Gateway adapted yeast-2 hybrid system to experimentally validate predicted Candida glabrata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein-protein interactions.
“Similarly, Thorne et al. (2011) utilized a Gateway adapted yeast-2 hybrid system to experimentally validate predicted C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae protein–protein interactions (PPIs) while investigating the utility of evolutionary correlation between presence and absence of genes in a group of species as a method to predict potential PPIs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thorne et al. 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
These strains can be used to analyse the virulence of Candida glabrata.
“Thus, these strains can be used to analyse the virulence of C. glabrata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The most established invasive infection models for analysis of traits associated with the establishment of candidosis are the intravenous (IV) challenge and gastrointestinal colonization with subsequent dissemination mouse models.
“The most established invasive infection models for analysis of traits associated with the establishment of candidosis are the intravenous (IV) challenge and gastrointestinal colonization with subsequent dissemination mouse models, reviewed in detail by Szabo and MacCallum (2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szabo and MacCallum (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The function of a protein can vary from species to species.
“However, caution should be taken from such approaches as the function of a protein can vary from species to species; for example, C. glabrata Hog1, although having a very similar function to its S. cerevisiae orthologue, has also been found to modulate resistance to weak organic acids in C. glabrata (Gregori et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gregori et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Deletions of YKU70/80 in Candida glabrata have been shown to affect subtelomeric silencing.
“One likely reason that the C. glabrata community has not widely used the reversible YKU80 disruption strain for generating knockouts is because the target efficiency is only increased by 5.1% and disruption of YKU80 leads to synthetic sickness or lethality in S. cerevisiae (Ueno et al. 2007); furthermore, deletions of YKU70/80 in C. glabrata have been shown to affect subtelomeric silencing (Rosas-”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rosas-Hernández et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Kasper et al. (2014) showed that protein mannosylation may play a key role in Candida glabrata's ability to alter the phagosomal environment allowing it to survive and proliferate intracellularly.
“In addition, Kasper et al. (2014) utilized the deletion collection to identify genes required for environmental alkalinization and showed that protein mannosylation may play a key role in C. glabrata's ability to alter the phagosomal environment allowing it to survive and proliferate intracellularly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kasper et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In 2014, Schwarzmüller et al. published the first large-scale phenotypic screen of a Candida glabrata deletion collection revealing several novel antifungal tolerance genes.
“In 2014, Schwarzmüller et al. (2014) published the first large-scale phenotypic screen of a C. glabrata deletion collection revealing several novel antifungal tolerance genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzmüller et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Implementing the Becker et al. screen for the partial C. glabrata deletion collection is clearly impractical on a global scale.
“This is clearly impractical on a global scale”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To implement the Becker et al. screen for the partial C. glabrata deletion collection would require 9285 mice to assay only 12% of C. glabrata genes.
“To implement this screen for the partial C. glabrata deletion collection would require 9285 mice to assay only 12% of C. glabrata genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Drosophila melanogaster has been adapted for use as a model to analyse microbial virulence.
“Recently, it has been adapted for use as a model to analyse microbial virulence (Lemaitre et al. 1996; Alarco et al. 2004; Chamilos et al. 2006; Panayidou, Ioannidou and Apidianakis 2014; Brunke et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lemaitre et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Alarco et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chamilos et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
C. glabrata seems unable to invade or damage (non-phagocytic) host cells to any measureable extent.
“Furthermore, as C. glabrata seems unable to invade or damage (non-phagocytic) host cells to any measureable extent (Seider et al. 2011; Brunke and Hube 2013), there is a lack of good in vitro invasion/ damage model systems available to explore C. glabrata virulence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Seider et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brunke and Hube 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Becker et al. (2010), each C. albicans strain examined required 15 mice, necessitating the use of a minimum of 2655 mice, excluding controls, to complete the screen.
“In this study, each C. albicans strain examined required 15 mice necessitating the use of a minimum of 2655 mice, excluding controls, to complete the screen (Becker et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Becker et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Toll-deficient flies may be a useful model to measure the fitness of C. glabrata mutants for pre-screening strains for selection for further validation in a mouse model or even for microbial drug target screens.
“Thus, Toll-deficient flies may be a useful model to measure the fitness of C. glabrata mutants for pre-screening strains for selection for further validation in a mouse model or even for microbial drug target screens, which are currently selected based on in vivo growth rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Temperature can affect gene expression and thus the induction/repression of genes encoding functions associated with virulence.
“This is an important consideration as temperature can affect gene expression and thus the induction/repression of genes encoding functions associated with virulence (Fuchs et al. 2010b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fuchs et al. 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
C. glabrata had triggered the immune system in wild-type D. melanogaster, as shown by a significant increase in the expression of Drosomycin following immune challenge.
“Additionally, they were able to show that C. glabrata had triggered the immune system in wild-type D. melanogaster by showing a significant increase in the expression of Drosomycin, the antifungal peptide gene regularly used as a read-out for Toll-pathway activation following immune challenge (Quintin et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quintin et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
D. melanogaster has the potential to be an attractive choice for large-scale screens of mutants as both attenuated strains and strains that are virulent but do not activate the immune response can be identified relatively quickly.
“Thus, D. melanogaster has the potential to be an attractive choice for large-scale screens of mutants as both attenuated strains and strains that are virulent but do not activate the immune response can be identified relatively quickly, especially since Drosomycin–GFP-tagged Drosophila strains are available allowing Drosomycin expression to be observed using a fluorescent microscope (Glittenberg”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glittenberg et al. 2011a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
With regard to C. albicans infections, the Galleria model produced results similar to those found in mouse infection models.
“Subsequent experiments have shown that, with regard to C. albicans infections, the Galleria model produced results similar to those found in mouse infection models (Cotter, Doyle and Kavanagh 2000; Brennan et al. 2002; Fuchs et al. 2010a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cotter, Doyle and Kavanagh 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brennan et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fuchs et al. 2010a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
These studies clearly demonstrate that the G. mellonella virulence model can be used as a proxy for murine infection caused by C. albicans.
“These studies clearly demonstrate that the G. mellonella virulence model can be used as a proxy for murine infection caused by C. albicans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a lack of good in vitro invasion/damage model systems available to explore C. glabrata virulence.
“there is a lack of good in vitro invasion/ damage model systems available to explore C. glabrata virulence”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Researchers have started examining other hosts, mostly invertebrates, as alternative model systems for analysis of candidosis.
“Thus, researchers have started examining other hosts, mostly invertebrates, as alternative model systems for analysis of candidosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
C. glabrata evades the host immune system by allowing itself to be taken up by macrophages where it continues to proliferate.
“It is known that C. glabrata evades the host immune system by allowing itself to be taken up by macrophages where it continues to proliferate (Seider et al. 2011; Brunke and Hube 2013; Brunke et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Seider et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brunke and Hube 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brunke et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The D. melanogaster model performed much better as an indicator of virulence than in vitro growth, which has been used as a proxy for virulence capacity.
“The model performed much better as an indicator of virulence than in vitro growth, which has been used as a proxy for virulence capacity, with slow in vitro growth rates taken to indicate a less virulent strain, based on the assumption that the slow growth rate will persist in the host (Brunke et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brunke et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
C. albicans is able to colonize, proliferate and invade deep into the organs of zebrafish.
“In addition, they showed that C. albicans is able to colonize, proliferate and invade deep into the organs of zebrafish (Chao et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chao et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Two previous studies have shown that although G. mellonella provides an effective model of C. albicans infection, it is not a useful model for C. glabrata disease.
“Unfortunately, two previous studies have shown that although the G. mellonella provides an effective model of C. albicans infection, it is not a useful model for C. glabrata disease (Cotter, Doyle and Kavanagh 2000; Bergin, Brennan and Kavanagh 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cotter, Doyle and Kavanagh 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bergin, Brennan and Kavanagh 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Brennan et al. (2002) infected G. mellonella larvae with a C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 mutant strain and found that all larvae survived 48 hours, compared with 100% mortality in larvae infected with the wild-type parental strain, C. albicans SC5314.
“For example, Brennan et al. (2002) infected G. mellonella larvae with a C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 mutant strain and found that all larvae survived 48 hours, compared with 100% mortality in larvae infected with the wild-type parental strain, C. albicans SC5314.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brennan et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
NHEJ is more dominant over homologous recombination in C. glabrata.
“as NHEJ is more dominant over homologous recombination in C. glabrata (Ueno et al. 2007; Corrigan et al. 2013; Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ueno et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Corrigan et al. 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has been successfully developed in both C. albicans and S. pombe.
“The use of the CRISPR-Cas9 system has already been successfully developed in both C. albicans and S. pombe (Jacobs et al. 2014; Vyas, Barrasa and Fink 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jacobs et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vyas, Barrasa and Fink 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Bao et al. (2015) found that triple gene disruptions were also affected by the CRISPR-Cas9 array used.
“In addition, Bao et al. (2015) found that triple gene disruptions were also affected by the CRISPR-Cas9 array (the genome sequence encoding the gRNA strand that directs the degradation/modification of the gene of interest) used; however, this should be addressable in the near future as rules for choosing efficient CRISPR-Cas9 targeting sites emerge with greater understanding of the CRISPR-Cas9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bao et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Bao et al.'s HI-CRISPR system utilized a recyclable plasmid, so that the plasmid can be reused to generate further multiple knockouts in the same strain.
“Furthermore, their new multigene disruption HI-CRISPR system utilized a recyclable plasmid, so that the plasmid can be reused to generate further multiple knockouts in the same strain (Bao et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bao et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Linde et al. (2015) identified 49 novel C. glabrata genes using RNA-seq looking at the transcriptional landscape in nutrient-rich media, following nitrosative stress and during pH shift.
“This is in line with the Linde et al. (2015) recent work looking at the transcriptional landscape of C. glabrata in nutrient-rich media, following nitrosative stress and during pH shift using RNA-seq, which identified 49 novel C. glabrata genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linde et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CRISPR-Cas9 technology relies on NHEJ for insertions/deletions.
“the CRISPR-Cas9 technology relies on NHEJ for insertions/deletions and homologous recombination for site-specific mutations (Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013; Doudna and Charpentier 2014; Gilles and Averof 2014; Kim and Kim 2014; Sander and Joung 2014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Doudna and Charpentier 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gilles and Averof 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Adaptation of CRISPR-Cas9 for use in C. glabrata should revolutionize C. glabrata research by simplifying its genome editing.
“Furthermore, adaptation of CRISPR-Cas9 for use in C. glabrata should revolutionize C. glabrata research by simplifying its genome editing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
- Interpretationreasoning
This will enable more research into essential gene functions in C. glabrata.
“enabling more research into essential gene functions in C. glabrata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
- Premisecitation
The lig4 C. glabrata strain so far appears to be similar to the parental strain on all conditions examined so far.
“as this strain has a disrupted NHEJ pathway and so far appears to be similar to the parental strain on all conditions examined so far.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is probable that using CRISPR-Cas9 technology to generate site-specific mutations in C. glabrata will be highly inefficient due to its preference for NHEJ.
“it is probable that using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology to generate site-specific mutations in C. glabrata will be highly inefficient due to its preference for NHEJ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
CRISPR-Cas9 technology relies on homologous recombination for site-specific mutations.
“the CRISPR-Cas9 technology relies on NHEJ for insertions/deletions and homologous recombination for site-specific mutations (Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013; Doudna and Charpentier 2014; Gilles and Averof 2014; Kim and Kim 2014; Sander and Joung 2014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Doudna and Charpentier 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gilles and Averof 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The lig4 C. glabrata strain has a disrupted NHEJ pathway.
“as this strain has a disrupted NHEJ pathway and so far appears to be similar to the parental strain on all conditions examined so far.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
CRISPR-Cas9 technology will play a vital role in furthering our understanding of both the biology and virulence of C. glabrata as well as many other species.
“Thus, we believe that CRISPR-Cas9 technology will play a vital role in furthering our understanding of both the biology and virulence of C. glabrata as well as many other species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
High-throughput screening for genes involved in virulence can now take place using one of the new virulence models for preliminary screens before moving to the classical mouse model for further corroboration.
“Thanks to the partial C. glabrata deletion collection, high-throughput screening aimed at elucidating novel drug targets can now take place alongside screens for genes involved in virulence by utilizing one of the new virulence models for preliminary screens before moving to the classical mouse model for further corroboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
- Interpretationreasoning
Thanks to the partial C. glabrata deletion collection, high-throughput screening aimed at elucidating novel drug targets can now take place.
“Thanks to the partial C. glabrata deletion collection, high-throughput screening aimed at elucidating novel drug targets can now take place alongside screens for genes involved in virulence by utilizing one of the new virulence models for preliminary screens before moving to the classical mouse model for further corroboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
- Interpretationreasoning
Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into the host-pathogen relationship.
“Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms, host–pathogen relationship and reveal novel putative drug targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
- Interpretationreasoning
Site-specific mutations can still be generated in C. glabrata using CRISPR-Cas9 technology by utilizing the lig4 C. glabrata strain recently generated by Cen, Fiori and Dijck (2015).
“we believe that site-specific mutations can still be generated in C. glabrata using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology by utilizing the lig4 C. glabrata strain recently generated by Cen, Fiori and Dijck (2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
- May combine two claims. 46
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCandida glabrata belongs to the non-CTG clade, unlike most well-studied Candida species.
“Phylogenetically, it is more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to any other Candida species, see Fig. 1, and unlike most well-studied Candida species, it belongs to the non-CTG clade species (Dujon et al. 2004; Ahmad et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dujon et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ahmad et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCandida glabrata is associated with longer hospital stays and higher costs than Candida albicans.
“Of interest, in the rise of non-albicans Candida species, is C. glabrata which has been shown to be associated with longer hospital stays and higher costs than C. albicans (Moran et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moran et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCandida glabrata is phylogenetically more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to any other Candida species.
“Phylogenetically, it is more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to any other Candida species, see Fig. 1, and unlike most well-studied Candida species, it belongs to the non-CTG clade species (Dujon et al. 2004; Ahmad et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dujon et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ahmad et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCandida glabrata has no known documented sexual cycle.
“Furthermore, C. glabrata has no known documented sexual cycle although both mating types are commonly found and its genome contains homologues of the majority of the genes involved in mating in S. cerevisiae (Muller et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muller et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSaccharomyces cerevisiae has one of the most diverse plasmid toolkits available for ease of investigating and manipulating genes.
“Unsurprisingly, the model organism, S. cerevisiae, has one of the most diverse plasmid toolkits available for ease of investigating and manipulating genes, from expression plasmids to reporter plasmids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAoyama et al. (2014) used RNA-seq to investigate transcriptional initiation in Candida glabrata and predicted 50 new Candida glabrata genes.
“for example, Aoyama et al. (2014) used RNA-seq to investigate transcriptional initiation in C. glabrata and predicted 50 new C. glabrata genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOne likely reason the Candida glabrata community has not widely used the reversible YKU80 disruption strain is because target efficiency is only increased by 5.1% and disruption of YKU80 leads to synthetic sickness or lethality in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
“One likely reason that the C. glabrata community has not widely used the reversible YKU80 disruption strain for generating knockouts is because the target efficiency is only increased by 5.1% and disruption of YKU80 leads to synthetic sickness or lethality in S. cerevisiae (Ueno et al. 2007); furthermore, deletions of YKU70/80 in C. glabrata have been shown to affect subtelomeric silencing (Rosas-”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ueno et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the Candida glabrata deletion collection currently comprises only 12% of the genome, advances have already been made in understanding the virulence mechanisms of Candida glabrata.
“Although the C. glabrata deletion collection currently comprises only 12% of the genome, advances have already been made in understanding the virulence mechanisms of C. glabrata and additional strains have been constructed (K. Haynes et al., unpublished).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA partial C. glabrata Gateway ORFeome has been used to examine conservation of PPIs between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae and to perform a pooled overexpression screen to identify novel C. glabrata genes important for survival under stress conditions.
“Indeed, a partial C. glabrata Gateway ORFeome has been used to examine conservation of PPIs between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae (Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished) and to perform a pooled overexpression screen to identify novel C. glabrata genes important for survival under stress conditions (Ho et al., unpublished).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ho et al., unpublished
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGene targeting can be performed more efficiently in the newly constructed lig4 strain compared to the yku70/80 strains and does not appear to cause any phenotype upon its deletion.
“As gene targeting can be performed more efficiently in this newly constructed lig4 strain compared to the yku70/80 strains and does not appear to cause any phenotype upon its deletion, it will be interesting to see if the Candida community will adopt this strain for use in high-throughput knockout generation in the near future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe construction of a Candida glabrata Gateway adapted ORFeome would alleviate the need to prioritize genes individually, as any gene of interest could easily be shuttled into a range of different destination vectors.
“The construction of a C. glabrata Gateway adapted ORFeome would alleviate this, as any gene of interest could easily be shuttled into a range of different destination vectors thereby”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnce an Entry clone is available, it is possible to shuttle the gene of interest to any available Gateway adapted vector; furthermore, this process is bidirectional.
“However, once an Entry clone is available, it is possible to shuttle the gene of interest to any available Gateway adapted vector; furthermore, this process is bidirectional (Hartley 2000)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartley 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCen Fiori and Dijck (2015) constructed a lig4 mutant and showed that gene targeting efficiency increased up to 35 times compared to the parental strain when using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA fragments.
“More recently, Cen Fiori and Dijck (2015) have constructed a lig4 mutant (Lig4 is a DNA ligase involved in NHEJ) and shown that gene targeting efficiency increased up to 35 times compared to the parental strain when using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA fragments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cen, Fiori and Dijck 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGateway ORFeomes and compatible vectors have been created in other species including Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and Candida albicans.
“Furthermore, Gateway ORFeomes and compatible vectors have been created in other species including D. melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and C. albicans (Reboul et al. 2003; Akbari et al. 2009; Chauvel et al. 2012)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Reboul et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Akbari et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chauvel et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Gateway® Technology facilitates high-efficiency transfer of genes between different Gateway vectors by site-specific recombination.
“This toolkit has recently been expanded with the introduction of the Gateway® Technology which facilitates high-efficiency transfer of genes between different Gateway vectors by site-specific recombination (Hartley 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartley 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA drawback to the Gateway system is that it requires the initial insertion of the gene of interest into a plasmid with the two flanking Gateway recombination sites (attL1 and attL2) to produce an initial Gateway Entry clone.
“A drawback to the system is that it requires the initial insertion of the gene of interest into a plasmid with the two flanking Gateway recombination sites (attL1 and attL2) to produce an initial Gateway Entry clone (Hartley 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartley 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCompared with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata has been less well studied and has fewer molecular tools and resources available to interrogate its biology.
“Compared with the model organism S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata has been less well studied, and as such there are fewer molecular tools and resources available to interrogate its biology; see Table 1 for a summary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUntil recently, no deletion collection existed for Candida glabrata; thus, research has focused on Candida glabrata genes known to impact virulence in other pathogens, or on orthologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes.
“Until recently, no deletion collection existed for C. glabrata; thus, research has focused on C. glabrata genes known to impact virulence in other pathogens, or on orthologues of S. cerevisiae genes that may or may not encode functions important for infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Candida glabrata deletion collection currently comprises 619 strains representing approximately 12% of the predicted genome.
“The C. glabrata deletion collection currently comprises 619 strains representing approximately 12% of the predicted genome (Schwarzmüller et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzmüller et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough a full Candida glabrata ORFeome is yet to be published, the Gateway system is already being utilized by Candida glabrata researchers to investigate genes of interest.
“Although a full C. glabrata ORFeome is yet to be published, the Gateway system is already being utilized by C. glabrata researchers to investigate genes of interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Knockout Collection comprises 5916 individual genes knocked out in one or more of four backgrounds.
“Since the release of the S. cerevisiae Yeast Knockout Collections (YKO), which comprises 5916 individual genes knocked out in one or more of four backgrounds (MATa, MATα, heterozygous diploid, and homozygous diploid) (Winzeler et al. 1999; Giaever et al. 2002)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Winzeler et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Giaever et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLoss of HIS3, LEU2, TRP1 or a combination of all three in Candida glabrata does not impact its virulence, unlike deletion of the URA3 marker in Candida albicans which is known to affect its virulence.
“Pertinently, Jacobsen et al. have shown that loss of HIS3, LEU2, TRP1 or a combination of all three in C. glabrata does not impact its virulence, unlike deletion of the URA3 marker in C. albicans which is known to affect its virulence (Lay et al. 1998; Brand et al. 2004; Jacobsen et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lay et al. 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brand et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jacobsen et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchwarzmüller et al. (2014) identified 28 knockout strains that are hypersensitive to caspofungin and have not been described in Saccharomyces cerevisiae nor Candida albicans, implying that Candida glabrata may have unknown mechanisms of caspofungin resistance.
“Furthermore, they identified 28 knockout strains that are hypersensitive to caspofungin and have not been described in S. cerevisiae nor C. albicans, implying that C. glabrata may have unknown mechanisms of caspofungin resistance (Schwarzmüller et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzmüller et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningUeno et al. generated a reversible YKU80 disruption strain that increased gene targeting efficiency by 5.1% using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA, but this strain has not gained widespread use from the community.
“Although attempts have been made to overcome this problem in C. glabrata, for example, Ueno et al. (2007) generated a reversible YKU80 disruption strain (Yku80 is involved in the NHEJ pathway) thereby increasing gene targeting efficiency by 5.1% using 40-bp flanking homologous DNA, this strain has not gained widespread use from the community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ueno et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany high-throughput screens using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae YKO library have produced a wealth of information that has led to functions being assigned to previously unannotated proteins.
“many high-throughput screens have been undertaken using these libraries producing a wealth of information that has led to functions being assigned to previously unannotated proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese types of screens and analyses can easily be extended to any organism in which a deletion collection has been constructed.
“These types of screens and analyses can easily be extended to any organism in which a deletion collection has been constructed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGelperin et al. constructed the MORF library, a library containing 5854 Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORFs as C-terminal His6-HA fusions under regulated control in Gateway compatible expression plasmids.
“Utilizing Gateway Technology, Gelperin et al. constructed the MORF (Moveable ORF) library, a library containing 5854 S. cerevisiae ORFs as C-terminal His6-HA fusions under regulated control in Gateway compatible expression plasmids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gelperin et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing the MORF collection, Gelperin et al. performed the first systematic screen for glycosylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identified 454 new candidate glycoproteins.
“Using this collection, they performed the first systematic screen for glycosylated proteins in S. cerevisiae and identified 454 new candidate glycoproteins (Gelperin et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gelperin et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationZebrafish were chosen as a virulence model because they have an adaptive component to their immune system, a high reproductive rate, low maintenance costs, transparent embryos that make in vivo visualization possible, and can be manipulated with a comprehensive series of molecular tools.
“Zebrafish were chosen as they have an adaptive component to their immune system, a high reproductive rate, low maintenance costs, have transparent embryos that makes in vivo visualization possible and can be manipulated with a comprehensive series of molecular tools (Chao et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chao et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationToll-deficient D. melanogaster do succumb to C. glabrata infection and attenuated C. glabrata null strains can be identified using Toll-deficient flies.
“Furthermore, Toll-deficient D. melanogaster do succumb to C. glabrata infection and attenuated C. glabrata null strains can be identified using Toll-deficient flies; for example Quintin et al. observed that Toll-deficient flies injected with a double null C. glabrata yps1 yps7 (Yps1 and Yps 7 have previously been shown to be required for cell wall integrity and survival inside macrophages) succumb”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kaur, Ma and Cormack 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Quintin et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBates et al. have preliminary data that indicate that an inoculum of 5 × 10^5-1 × 10^6 cells of C. glabrata ATCC 2001 was sufficient to observe approximately 80% mortality in G. mellonella 24 h post-infection at 37°C and that it follows a clear dose response, similar to that seen in a mouse model of dose-dependent killing.
“In contrast, Bates et al. have preliminary data that indicate that an inoculum of 5 × 105–1 × 106 cells of C. glabrata ATCC 2001 was sufficient to observe approximately 80% mortality in G. mellonella 24 h post-infection at 37°C and that it follows a clear dose response, similar to that seen in a mouse model of dose-dependent killing (Steven Bates, Exeter University, pers. Comm.).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Steven Bates, Exeter University, pers. Comm.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRocha et al. (2001) have previously shown that mice infected with C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 in the IV model of candidosis had 100% survival 42 days post-infection, while complete mortality was observed in mice infected with a C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 reconstituted with a plasmid expressing CDC35 16 days post-infection.
“Similarly, Rocha et al. (2001) have previously shown that mice infected with C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 in the IV model of candidosis had 100% survival 42 days post-infection, while complete mortality was observed in mice infected with a C. albicans cdc35/cdc35 reconstituted with a plasmid expressing CDC35 16 days post-infection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rocha et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationControversy remains over whether wild-type D. melanogaster is susceptible to fungal infections.
“However, controversy remains over whether wild-type D. melanogaster is susceptible to fungal infections, Alarco et al. (2004) reported that on average 85% of their wild-type D. melanogaster survived when injected with approximately 1 × 103 C. albicans cells per fly leading them to conclude that wild-type D. melanogaster is highly tolerant to fungal infection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alarco et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn invertebrate host may not appear relevant to human diseases, but they possess an innate immune system that shares many similarities with the innate immune response of mammals.
“Although, an invertebrate host may not appear relevant to human diseases, they possess an innate immune system that shares many similarities with the innate immune response of mammals (Kavanagh and Reeves 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kavanagh and Reeves 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBecker et al. (2010) assayed the virulence of 177 C. albicans strains in a mouse model and identified 102 genes that play a role in host survival and establishment of an infection, including genes that encode known antifungal drug targets such as FKS1 and ERG1.
“For example, Becker et al. (2010) assayed the virulence of 177 C. albicans strains in a mouse model and identified 102 genes that play a role in host survival and establishment of an infection, including genes that encode known antifungal drug targets such as FKS1 and ERG1, validating the results of the screen for discovering potential novel drug targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Becker et al. (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA significant drawback to using an insect host is that they do not have an adaptive immune system, and integration of the innate and adaptive immune system occurs in C. albicans infections.
“However, a significant drawback to using an insect host is that they do not have an adaptive immune system, and it has been documented that, at least in the case of C. albicans infections, integration of the innate and adaptive immune system occurs, for instance, phagocytic activity is reinforced by Th1 cytokines and impaired by Th2 cytokines (Romani, Bistoni and Puccetti 1997; Romani 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Romani, Bistoni and Puccetti 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Romani 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth mouse models enable host-pathogen interactions to be explored in vivo and allow comparison of the ability of mutants to progress disease via measurement of organ fungal burden.
“While both mouse models enable host–pathogen interactions to be explored in vivo and allow comparison of the ability of mutants to progress disease via measurement of organ fungal burden, they come with caveats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szabo and MacCallum (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrennan et al. used the G. mellonella infection model to distinguish between avirulent, virulent and reduced virulence C. albicans strains; C. albicans hst7/hst7 was as virulent as the wild type (100% mortality at 48 h), while cpp1/cpp1 mutants were reduced in virulence compared to the wild type (90% mortality at 48 h).
“Furthermore, Brennan et al. used the G. mellonella infection model to distinguish between avirulent, virulent and reduced virulence C. albicans strains. They observed that C. albicans hst7/hst7 was as virulent as the wild type (100% mortality at 48 h), while cpp1/cpp1 mutants were reduced in virulence compared to the wild type (90% mortality at 48 h) (Brennan et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brennan et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThus, G. mellonella could develop as an important host for examining C. glabrata virulence as at a physiologically relevant temperature of 37°C it is susceptible to C. glabrata infection, but not at 30°C.
“Thus, G. mellonella could develop as an important host for examining C. glabrata virulence as at a physiologically relevant temperature of 37°C it is susceptible to C. glabrata infection, but not at 30°C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrunke et al. screened 416 C. glabrata mutants using Toll-deficient flies and showed that virulence in D. melanogaster was at least partially predictive of fitness in mice.
“Brunke et al. have combined the use of Toll-deficient flies and the deletion collection to screen 416 C. glabrata mutants to investigate whether results from this model of virulence can be used to predict the outcome of infections in murine models. They showed that virulence in D. melanogaster was at least partially predictive of fitness in mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brunke et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth Toll and Spätzle-deficient D. melanogaster are susceptible to fungal infections.
“Despite the controversy surrounding the use of wild-type D. melanogaster as a virulence model for fungal infections, both Toll and Spätzle-deficient D. melanogaster are susceptible to fungal infections (Alarco et al. 2004; Quintin et al. 2013; Panayidou, Ioannidou and Apidianakis 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Alarco et al. 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Quintin et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Panayidou, Ioannidou and Apidianakis 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis correlates with previous mouse data where 50% of the mice survived 35 days post-infection with C. albicans cpp1/cpp1, while 100% mouse mortality was observed 6 days post-infection with C. albicans hst7/hst7.
“Again, this correlates with previous mouse data where 50% of the mice survived 35 days post-infection with C. albicans cpp1/cpp1 (Csank et al. 1997), while 100% mouse mortality was observed 6 days post-infection with C. albicans hst7/hst7 (Leberer et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Csank et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leberer et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the case of C. albicans, although filamentous growth is enhanced at higher temperatures, fungal germination has been observed in vivo at 28°C and many studies have implicated a role of filamentation in virulence at this temperature.
“However, in the case of C. albicans, although filamentous growth is enhanced at higher temperatures, fungal germination has been observed in vivo at 28°C and many studies have implicated a role of filamentation in virulence at this temperature (Brennan et al. 2002; Chamilos et al. 2006; Fuchs and Mylonakis 2006; Brothers, Newman and Wheeler 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Brennan et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chamilos et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fuchs and Mylonakis 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA drawback to using zebrafish is that they are ectothermic and prefer temperatures of 28°C, while humans are endothermic and have a normal body temperature of 36.8 ± 0.4°C.
“A drawback to using zebrafish is that they are ectothermic and prefer temperatures of 28°C, while humans are endothermic and have a normal body temperature of 36.8 ± 0.4°C (Chao et al. 2010; Brothers, Newman and Wheeler 2011; Gratacap and Wheeler 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chao et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brothers, Newman and Wheeler 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gratacap and Wheeler 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnlike RNAi, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is not limited solely to the silencing or deletion of genes and has been adapted so that it can also be used for editing/modifying the genome via its homology directed repair mechanism, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging.
“Unlike RNAi, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is not limited solely to the silencing or deletion of genes and has been adapted so that it can also be used for editing/modifying the genome via its homology directed repair mechanism, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging; see Fig. 3 for a schematic and applications of the CRISPR-Cas9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationZalatan et al. adapted the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate synthetic multigene transcriptional programs by repressing and activating genes to redirect flux through the violacein biosynthetic pathway, which they recreated in S. cerevisiae.
“For example, Zalatan et al. have recently adapted the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate synthetic multigene transcriptional programs by repressing and activating genes to redirect flux through the violacein biosynthetic pathway (an important metabolic pathway for bacteria) which they recreated in S. cerevisiae.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zalatan et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe most commonly used CRISPR Type II system consists of a gRNA and an endonuclease, the CRISPR-associated (Cas) nuclease, Cas9, which cleaves the targeted chromosomal DNA in a site-specific manner triggering endogenous DNA repair systems resulting in genome modification.
“The most commonly used CRISPR Type II system consists of a gRNA and an endonuclease, the CRISPR-associated (Cas) nuclease, Cas9, which cleaves the targeted chromosomal DNA in a site-specific manner triggering endogenous DNA repair systems resulting in genome modification (for an in-depth review, see Doudna and Charpentier 2014; Kim and Kim 2014; Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Doudna and Charpentier 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kim and Kim 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBao et al. (2015) used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate multiple gene disruptions in a single step in S. cerevisiae, representing a powerful tool for creating yeast strains with multiple knockouts in less than a week, termed the HI-CRISPR system.
“Bao et al. (2015) on the other hand have used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to generate multiple gene disruptions in a single step in S. cerevisiae representing a powerful tool for creating yeast strains with multiple knockouts in less than a week, and they have termed this the HI-CRISPR system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bao et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTsai et al. (2014) performed comparative genomics on four species of Taphrina fungi and discovered that Taphrina fungi utilized multiple strategies to cope with the host environment that were also found in some yeast species such as aneuploidy of genes.
“For example, Tsai et al. (2014) have recently performed comparative genomics on four species of Taphrina fungi, a plant pathogen that causes plant deformity, and discovered that Taphrina fungi utilized multiple strategies to cope with the host environment that were also found in some yeast species such as aneuploidy of genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tsai et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThus, zebrafish may prove to be a tractable virulence model for real-time visualization of pathogen-host interactions, and although researchers have yet to investigate C. glabrata in a zebrafish model, the need to understand pathogen-host interactions in real time makes zebrafish a serious contender for use in future virulence studies.
“Thus, zebrafish may prove to be a tractable virulence model for real-time visualization of pathogen–host interactions, and although researchers have yet to investigate C. glabrata in a zebrafish model, the need to understand pathogen–host interactions in real time makes zebrafish a serious contender for use in future virulence studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith so many fungal genomes readily available, the possibility now exists of performing comparative genomic analysis with C. glabrata to predict evolutionary pathways that may have evolved to aid its survival as a pathogen, and to experimentally validate these predictions.
“With so many fungal genomes readily available, the possibility now exists of performing comparative genomic analysis with C. glabrata to predict evolutionary pathways that may have evolved to aid its survival as a pathogen, and to experimentally validate these predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlternative hosts for virulence studies are emerging and their relative simplicity could be used in global screens facilitating analysis of C. glabrata infections.
“Thus, it can be seen that alternative hosts for virulence studies are emerging and their relative simplicity could be used in global screens facilitating analysis of C. glabrata infections”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBased on CAGE analysis, Aoyama et al. predicted 72 C. glabrata genes to contain uORFs, yet none of the 72 S. cerevisiae orthologues have been reported to harbour uORFs; these data strongly suggest that there is regulatory divergence between these two yeasts.
“Instead, based on the CAGE analysis, Aoyama et al. predicted 72 C. glabrata genes to contain uORFs, yet none of the 72 S. cerevisiae orthologues have been reported to harbour uORFs. These data strongly suggest that there is regulatory divergence between these two yeasts (Aoyama et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFurther advances in next-generation sequencing as well as RNA-seq data in C. glabrata will greatly aid our understanding of the unique changes in transcriptional regulation that occur when C. glabrata encounters a host and the mechanisms underpinning its virulence.
“Further advances in next-generation sequencing as well as RNA-seq data in C. glabrata will greatly aid our understanding of the unique changes in transcriptional regulation that occur when C. glabrata encounters a host and the mechanisms underpinning its virulence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy 2011 a total of 108 fungal genomes had been annotated, and the growing list of annotated fungal genomes continues to grow as sequencing technologies improve.
“Since the publication of the first genome sequence of a free-living eukaryote, S. cerevisiae, was published 24 years ago by Goffeau et al., by 2011 a total of 108 fungal genomes had been annotated (Goffeau et al. 1996; Haas et al. 2011), and the growing list of annotated fungal genomes continues to grow as sequencing technologies improve.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goffeau et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Haas et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCandida glabrata NP4 and NP38 were shown to be downregulated upon interaction with human neutrophils, suggesting that the encoded proteins may be important for C. glabrata's role as a pathogen.
“Candida glabrata NP4 and NP38 were also shown to be downregulated upon interaction with human neutrophils, suggesting that the encoded proteins may be important for C. glabrata's role as a pathogen (Linde et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linde et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAoyama et al. performed CAGE analysis on RNA isolated from C. glabrata grown in seven different conditions, and this analysis suggested the existence of more than 50 previously unannotated C. glabrata genes as well as confirming the identity of 4316 genes previously listed on the Candida Genome Database.
“Indeed, recently Aoyama et al. performed Cap Analysis Gene Expression (CAGE analysis), a method that was introduced to determine the transcription start sites on a genome-wide scale by isolating and sequencing fragments originating from the 5′ end of RNA transcripts, on RNA isolated from C. glabrata grown in seven different conditions. This analysis suggested the existence of more than 50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA host-pathogen interaction network for a C. albicans-zebrafish infection model identified several important proteins related to C. albicans infection that may prove useful drug targets, and identified important immune defensive mechanisms activated in zebrafish in response to C. albicans invasion.
“The power behind this virulence model can be seen by the publication of a host–pathogen interaction network for a C. albicans–zebrafish infection model, which identified several important proteins related to C. albicans infection that may prove useful drug targets. At the same time, the study identified important immune defensive mechanisms activated in zebrafish in response to C. albicans”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kuo et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gratacap and Wheeler 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThree distinct bacterial CRISPR systems have been identified; Type I, II and III, and it is the Type II system that has mainly been adapted for use in artificial gene regulation and genome editing.
“So far three distinct bacterial CRISPR systems have been identified; Type I, II and III, and it is the Type II system that has mainly been adapted for use in artificial gene regulation and genome editing (Kim and Kim 2014; Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kim and Kim 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shalem, Sanjana and Zhang 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CRISPR-Cas9 system has revolutionized and advanced research in the field of artificial gene regulation and genome editing.
“A technology that has revolutionized and advanced research in the field of artificial gene regulation and genome editing is the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 system (Doudna and Charpentier 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doudna and Charpentier 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation252 genes in S. cerevisiae have been reported to contain upstream small open reading frames (uORFS) that can inhibit translation of the downstream ORF, and none of the C. glabrata orthologous genes were reported to contain uORFs.
“For example, 252 genes in S. cerevisiae have been reported to contain upstream small open reading frames (uORFS) that can inhibit translation of the downstream ORF by interfering with the initiation of translation from its start codon. None of the C. glabrata orthologous genes were reported to contain uORFs (Aoyama et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth Aoyama et al. (2014) and Linde et al. (2015) found divergence in the transcriptional regulation between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae, reinforcing the idea that great care should be taken when extrapolating such regulatory data between species.
“Interestingly both Aoyama et al. (2014) and Linde et al. (2015) found divergence in the transcriptional regulation between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae, thereby reinforcing the idea that great care should be taken when extrapolating such regulatory data between species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Aoyama et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Linde et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLinde et al. verified four of the novel genes, C. glabrata NP4, 11, 32 and 38 via RT-PCR, and showed that their expression was upregulated during a pH shift from pH4 to pH8, suggesting that the encoded proteins play a role in helping C. glabrata regulate and/or adapt to changes in environmental pH.
“These workers went on to verify four of the novel genes, C. glabrata NP4, 11, 32 and 38 via RT-PCR, and showed that their expression was upregulated during a pH shift from pH4 to pH8 suggesting that the encoded proteins play a role in helping C. glabrata regulate and/or adapt to changes in environmental pH (Linde et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linde et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCRISPR-Cas systems utilize short guide RNA (gRNA) strands to direct the degradation of foreign DNA that the system has previously encountered by incorporating fragments of foreign DNA into the CRISPR loci to produce the short gRNAs required to degrade homologous sequences.
“Similar to RNAi, CRISPR-Cas systems utilize short guide RNA (gRNA) strands to direct the degradation of foreign DNA that the system has previously encountered by incorporating fragments of foreign DNA into the CRISPR loci to produce the short gRNAs required to degrade homologous sequences (Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013; Gilles and Averof 2014; Laganà, Shasha and Croce 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mali, Esvelt and Church 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gilles and Averof 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Laganà, Shasha and Croce 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPotentially, using the HI-CRISPR system a C. glabrata strain with six targeted genes knocked out/disrupted could be created in as little as 12 days, whereas it currently takes several weeks to several months to make a double knockout in C. glabrata.
“Potentially, using the HI-CRISPR system a C. glabrata strain with six targeted genes knocked out/disrupted could be created in as little as 12 days, whereas it currently takes several weeks to several months to make a double knockout in C. glabrata, speeding up research as the construction of knockout/disrupted genes is often a rate-limiting step in advancement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningRecent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should reveal novel putative drug targets.
“Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms, host–pathogen relationship and reveal novel putative drug targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningRecent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms.
“Recent advances in the C. glabrata molecular tool box should aid research into its virulence mechanisms, host–pathogen relationship and reveal novel putative drug targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMaking a knockdown construction of an essential gene in C. glabrata will be less time consuming and difficult.
“for instance, making a knockdown construction of an essential gene in C. glabrata will be less time consuming and difficult”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA partial C. glabrata ORFeome is being constructed.
“Additionally, a partial C. glabrata ORFeome is being constructed (Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished, Ho et al., unpublished)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ho and Huvet et al., unpublished
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ho et al., unpublished
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIt is likely that a proportion of the essential genes will play an important role in virulence of C. glabrata.
“It is likely that a proportion of the essential genes will play an important role in virulence of C. glabrata.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOnce complete, the partial C. glabrata ORFeome will facilitate high-throughput phenotypic screens and basic research.
“and once complete will facilitate high-throughput phenotypic screens and basic research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The use of mammalian models requires careful ethical consideration and has a significant economic cost.
“The use of mammalian models requires careful ethical consideration, and has a significant economic cost.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Large numbers of larvae can be infected with each mutant strain increasing the statistical power of the Galleria assay.
“large numbers of larvae can be infected with each mutant strain increasing the statistical power of the assay”
The paper relies on this without support.
The infection experiments with Galleria are simple to perform and inexpensive.
“the infection experiments are simple to perform and inexpensive”
The paper relies on this without support.
G. mellonella can be maintained at a temperature range from 25 to 37°C, facilitating analysis at or near human body temperature.
“unlike many other insect hosts, G. mellonella can be maintained at a temperature range from 25 to 37°C, so facilitating analysis at or near to human body temperature”
The paper relies on this without support.
RNA-seq shows a snapshot of the quantity and nature of mRNA expressed in a genome at a given moment in time.
“RNA-seq, which shows a snapshot of the quantity and nature of mRNA expressed in a genome at a given moment in time”
The paper relies on this without support.
In nature, CRISPR-Cas systems form part of the adaptive immune system used by archaea and bacteria against foreign DNA.
“In nature, CRISPR-Cas systems form part of the adaptive immune system used by archaea and bacteria against foreign DNA.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CRISPR-Cas9 system can be used for editing/modifying the genome via homology directed repair, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging.
“the CRISPR-Cas9 system is not limited solely to the silencing or deletion of genes and has been adapted so that it can also be used for editing/modifying the genome via its homology directed repair mechanism, to activate or repress gene expression, to purify regions of genomic DNA and to label genomic DNA for imaging”
The paper relies on this without support.
The construction of knockout/disrupted genes is often a rate-limiting step in advancement.
“the construction of knockout/disrupted genes is often a rate-limiting step in advancement”
The paper relies on this without support.
Still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence of C. glabrata.
“However, still today relatively little is known about the molecular basis of virulence.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current research on C. glabrata focuses on orthologues of genes involved in virulence in other species yet an entire subset of C. glabrata-specific genes remains unexplored.
“Furthermore, current research on C. glabrata focuses on orthologues of genes involved in virulence in other species yet an entire subset of C. glabrata-specific genes remains unexplored.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some essential genes for C. glabrata virulence are switched on only at 37 °C.
“Thus, this suggested that some essential genes for C. glabrata virulence are switched on only at 37 °C [62].”
From Candida glabrata: pathogenicity and resistance mechanisms for adaptation and survival (2021) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Different names given for the 1957 pathogen designation
MinorThe abstract attributes the designation to Wickham, while the conclusion attributes the same 1957 designation to Wickerham.
“Despite C. glabrata's designation as a pathogen by Wickham in 1957”
“Since the designation of C. glabrata as a pathogen in 1957 by Wickerham (1957)”
Gateway Entry clone described as both required and optional
MinorThe text says the Gateway system requires an initial Entry clone, but the Figure 2 caption describes a route that omits that step.
“A drawback to the system is that it requires the initial insertion of the gene of interest into a plasmid with the two flanking Gateway recombination sites (attL1 and attL2) to produce an initial Gateway Entry clone (Hartley 2000).”
“The gene of interest can also be cloned directly between the attR1/2 sites of a pDestination vector (containing features of interest such as protein tags, etc.) via a LR Clonase reaction to generate an expression vector thereby omitting the initial step of generating a pEntry clone.”
Cites
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062 · see citing works
Gouy, M., Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp259 · Cited by 5,820 · see citing works
Goffeau, A., Barrell, B., Bussey, H., Davis, R. W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H., Galibert, F., Hoheisel, J., Jacq, C., Johnston, M., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.546 · Cited by 4,420 · see citing works
Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
Giaever, G., Chu, A. M., Ni, L., Connelly, C., Riles, L., Véronneau, S., Dow, S., Lucau-Danila, A., Anderson, K., André, B., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00935 · Cited by 4,316 · see citing works
Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast
Huh, W.-K., Falvo, J. V., Gerke, L. C., Carroll, A. S., Howson, R. W., Weissman, J. S., & O'Shea, E. K. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02026 · Cited by 4,248 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…of non-essential genes √ Partial collection available (2015) Giaever et al. (2002); Winzeler et al. (1999) Green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged library √ × Huh et al. (2003) HA- tagged library √ × Kumar et al. (2002) Tap-fusion library √ × Ghaemmaghami et al. (2003) GST-tagged library √ ×…”
Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00029-06 · Cited by 4,174 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This could partially be attributed to C. glabrata’s intrinsic and acquired resistance to commonly used azole antifungals (Fidel, Vazquez and Sobel 1999; Pfaller and Diekema 2007; Pfaller et al. 2010; Diekema et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialLemaître, B., Nicolas, E., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J., & Hoffmann, J. A. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80172-5 · Cited by 4,027 · see citing works
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., Andre, B., Bangham, R., Benito, R., Boeke, J. D., Bussey, H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901 · Cited by 3,953 · see citing works
Global analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750 · see citing works
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566 · see citing works
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D., Benjamin, D. K., Calandra, T. F., Edwards, J. E., Filler, S. G., Fisher, J. F., Kullberg, B.-J., Zeichner, L. O., et al. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/596757 · Cited by 3,191 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153 · see citing works
Janke, C., Magiera, M., Rathfelder, N., Taxis, C., Reber, S., Maekawa, H., Moreno-Borchart, A. C., Doenges, G., Schwob, E., Schiebel, E., et al. (2004) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1142 · Cited by 2,251 · see citing works
The Genetic Landscape of a Cell
Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E. D., Sevier, C. S., Ding, H., Koh, J. L. Y., Toufighi, K., Mostafavi, S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180823 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138 · see citing works
Construction of Biologically Functional Bacterial Plasmids In Vitro
Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C. Y., Boyer, H. W., & Helling, R. B. (1973) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.70.11.3240 · Cited by 1,811 · see citing works
Dujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer, G., Durrens, P., Casaregola, S., Lafontaine, I., de Montigny, J., Marck, C., Neuvéglise, C., Talla, E., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02579 · Cited by 1,623 · see citing works
High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9
Shalem, O., Sanjana, N. E., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3899 · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
Simultaneous Identification of Bacterial Virulence Genes by Negative Selection
Hensel, M., Shea, J. E., Gleeson, C., Jones, M. D., Dalton, E. C., & Holden, D. W. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7618105 · Cited by 1,200 · see citing works
Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology
Mali, P., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2649 · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases
Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3686 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
DNA Cloning Using In Vitro Site-Specific RecombinationPreprint
Hartley, J. L. (2000) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.143000 · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Fidel, P. L., Vazquez, J. A., & Sobel, J. D. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.80 · Cited by 953 · see citing works
Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds
Zalatan, J. G., Lee, M. E., Almeida, R., Gilbert, L. A., Whitehead, E. H., La Russa, M., Tsai, J. C., Weissman, J. S., Dueber, J. E., Qi, L. S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.052 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Alexander, B. D., Johnson, M. D., Pfeiffer, C. D., Jiménez-Ortigosa, C., Catania, J., Booker, R., Castanheira, M., Messer, S. A., Perlin, D. S., & Pfaller, M. A. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit136 · Cited by 778 · see citing works
An in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome
Tarassov, K., Messier, V., Landry, C. R., Radinovic, S., Molina, M. M. S., Shames, I., Malitskaya, Y., Vogel, J., Bussey, H., & Michnick, S. W. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153878 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Kim, D.-U., Hayles, J., Kim, D., Wood, V., Park, H.-O., Won, M., Yoo, H.-S., Duhig, T., Nam, M., Palmer, G., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1628 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Subcellular localization of the yeast proteomePreprint
Kumar, A., Agarwal, S., Heyman, J. A., Matson, S., Heidtman, M. I., Piccirillo, S., Umansky, L., Drawid, A., Jansen, R., Liu, Y., et al. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.970902 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Mapping Pathways and Phenotypes by Systematic Gene Overexpression
Sopko, R., Huang, D., Preston, N., Chua, G., Papp, B., Kafadar, K. A., Snyder, M., Oliver, S. G., Cyert, M., Hughes, T. R., et al. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.011 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Exploration of Essential Gene Functions via Titratable Promoter Alleles
Mnaimneh, S., Davierwala, A. P., Haynes, J., Moffat, J., Peng, W.-T., Zhang, W., Yang, X., Pootoolal, J., Chua, G., Lopez, A., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.013 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Total Synthesis of a Functional Designer Eukaryotic Chromosome
Annaluru, N., Muller, H., MITCHELL, L. A., Ramalingam, S., Stracquadanio, G., Richardson, S. M., Dymond, J. S., Kuang, Z., Scheifele, L. Z., Cooper, E. M., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1249252 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast
Steinmetz, L. M., Scharfe, C., Deutschbauer, A. M., Mokranjac, D., Herman, Z. S., Jones, T., Chu, A. M., Giaever, G. N., Prokisch, H., Oefner, P. J., et al. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng929 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Large-scale analysis of the yeast genome by transposon tagging and gene disruption
Ross‐Macdonald, P., Coelho, P. S. R., Roemer, T., Agarwal, S., Kumar, A., Jansen, R., Cheung, K., Sheehan, A. E., Symoniatis, D., Umansky, L., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46558 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Drinnenberg, I. A., Weinberg, D. E., Xie, K. T., Mower, J. P., Wolfe, K. H., Fink, G. R., & Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176945 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome
Breslow, D. K., Cameron, D. M., Collins, S. R., Schuldiner, M., Stewart-Ornstein, J., Newman, H. W., Braun, S. J., Madhani, H. D., Krogan, N. J., & Weissman, J. S. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1234 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collectionPreprint
Gelperin, D. M., White, M. A., Wilkinson, M. L., Kon, Y., Kung, L. A., Wise, K. J., Lopez-Hoyo, N., Jiang, L., Piccirillo, S., Yu, H., et al. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1362105 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Morgan, J., Meltzer, M. I., Plikaytis, B. D., Sofair, A. N., Huie-White, S., Wilcox, S., Harrison, L. H., Seaberg, E. C., Hajjeh, R. A., & Teutsch, S. M. (2005) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/502581 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
da Silva Ferreira, M. E., Kress, M. R. V. Z., Savoldi, M., Goldman, M. H. S., Härtl, A., Heinekamp, T., Brakhage, A. A., & Goldman, G. H. (2006) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.5.1.207-211.2006 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Cormack, B. P., Ghori, N., & Falkow, S. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5427.578 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Exploiting the potential of insects for in vivo pathogenicity testing of microbial pathogens
Kavanagh, K. A., & Reeves, E. P. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.002 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Reboul, J., Vaglio, P., Rual, J.-F. M., Lamesch, P., Martinez, M., Armstrong, C. M., Li, S., Jacotot, L., Bertin, N., Janky, R., et al. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1140 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Pfaller, M. A., Castanheira, M., Lockhart, S. R., Ahlquist, A. M., Messer, S. A., & Jones, R. N. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.06112-11 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
The direct cost and incidence of systemic fungal infections
Wilson, L. S., Reyes, C. M., Stolpman, M., Speckman, J., Allen, K., & Beney, J. (2002) · Value in Health · doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.51108.x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families
Vyas, V. K., Barrasa, M. I., & Fink, G. R. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500248 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Correlation between virulence of Candida albicans mutants in mice and Galleria mellonella larvae
Brennan, M., Thomas, D. Y., Whiteway, M. S., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2002) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2002.tb00617.x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Bao, Z., Xiao, H., Liang, J., Zhang, L., Xiong, X., Sun, N., Si, T., & Zhao, H. (2015) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb500255k · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Rocha, C. R. C., Schröppel, K., Harcus, D., Marcil, A., Dignard, D., Taylor, B. N., Thomas, D. Y., Whiteway, M. S., & Leberer, E. (2001) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.12.11.3631 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Kershaw, M. J., & Talbot, N. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901477106 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Leberer, E., Harcus, D., Broadbent, I. D., Clark, K., Dignard, D., Ziegelbauer, K. B., Schmidt, A., Gow, N. A. R., Brown, A. J. P., & Thomas, D. Y. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.13217 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Methods for usingGalleria mellonellaas a model host to study fungal pathogenesis
Fuchs, B. B., O’Brien, E., Khoury, J. B. E., & Mylonakis, E. E. (2010) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.1.6.12985 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
The changing epidemiology of healthcare-associated candidemia over three decades
Diekema, D., Arbefeville, S., Boyken, L., Kroeger, J., & Pfaller, M. (2012) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.001 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Nookaew, I., Papini, M., Pornputtapong, N., Scalcinati, G., Fagerberg, L., Uhlén, M., & Nielsen, J. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks804 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Adherence and biofilm formation of non-Candida albicans Candida species
Silva, S., Negri, M., Henriques, M., Oliveira, R., Williams, D. W., & Azeredo, J. (2011) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.02.003 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Kaur, R., Ma, B., & Cormack, B. P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611195104 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Brand, A., MacCallum, D. M., Brown, A. J. P., Gow, N. A. R., & Odds, F. C. (2004) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.3.4.900-909.2004 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
De Las Peñas, A., Pan, S.-J., Castaño, I., Alder, J., Cregg, R., & Cormack, B. P. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1121003 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Flagfeldt, D. B., Siewers, V., Huang, L., & Nielsen, J. (2009) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1705 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Brunke, S., & Hube, B. (2013) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/cmi.12091 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Development of an insect model for the in vivo pathogenicity testing of yeasts
Cotter, G., Doyle, S., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2000) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2000.tb01427.x · Cited by 234 · see citing works
de Groot, P. W. J., Kraneveld, E. A., Yin, Q. Y., Dekker, H. L., Groß, U., Crielaard, W., de Koster, C. G., Bader, O., Klis, F. M., & Weig, M. (2008) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00284-08 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Probing Nucleosome Function: A Highly Versatile Library of Synthetic Histone H3 and H4 Mutants
Dai, J., Hyland, E. M., Yuan, D., Huang, H., Bader, J. S., & Boeke, J. D. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.019 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Seider, K., Brunke, S., Schild, L., Jablonowski, N., Wilson, D., Majer, O., Barz, D., Haas, A., Kuchler, K., Schaller, M., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1003730 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Krogh-Madsen, M., Arendrup, M. C., Heslet, L., & Knudsen, J. D. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/500939 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Inglis, D. O., Arnaud, M. B., Binkley, J., Shah, P., Skrzypek, M. S., Wymore, F., Binkley, G., Miyasato, S. R., Simison, M., & Sherlock, G. J. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr945 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Schwarzmüller, T., Ma, B., Hiller, E., Istel, F., Tscherner, M., Brunke, S., Ames, L., Firon, A., Green, B., Cabral, V., et al. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004211 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-citationImplementation of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in fission yeast
Jacobs, J. Z., Ciccaglione, K. M., Tournier, V., & Zaratiegui, M. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6344 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Castaño, I., Pan, S., Zupancic, M., Hennequin, C., Dujon, B., & Cormack, B. P. (2005) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04465.x · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Lay, J., Henry, L. K., Clifford, J., Koltin, Y., Bulawa, C. E., & Becker, J. M. (1998) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.66.11.5301-5306.1998 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Chan, T., Carvalho, J. J., Riles, L., & Zheng, X.-F. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.240444197 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Kaur, R., Castaño, I., & Cormack, B. P. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.5.1600-1613.2004 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Using non-mammalian hosts to study fungal virulence and host defense
Fuchs, B. B., & Mylonakis, E. E. (2006) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2006.06.004 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Villalba, F., Collemare, J., Landraud, P., Lambou, K., Brozek, V., Cirer, B., Morin, D., Bruel, C. A., Beffa, R., & Lebrun, M. (2007) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2007.06.006 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Approaches to Fungal Genome Annotation
Haas, B. J., Zeng, Q., Pearson, M. D., Cuomo, C. A., & Wortman, J. R. (2011) · Mycology: An International Journal on Fungal Biology · doi:10.1080/21501203.2011.606851 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Autophagy supports<i>Candida glabrata</i>survival during phagocytosis
Roetzer, A., Gratz, N., Kovarik, P., & Schüller, C. (2010) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01391.x · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Pathway analysis of Candida albicans survival and virulence determinants in a murine infection model
Becker, J. M., Kauffman, S., Hauser, M., Huang, L.-Y., Lin, M. T.-Y., Sillaots, S., Jiang, B., Xu, D., & Roemer, T. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009845107 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Brothers, K. M., Newman, Z. R., & Wheeler, R. T. (2011) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.05005-11 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Bergin, D. A., Brennan, M., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2003) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2003.09.019 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Alarco, A., Marcil, A., Chen, J., Suter, B., Thomas, D. Y., & Whiteway, M. S. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5622 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
<i>Candida glabrata</i>displays pseudohyphal growth
Csank, C., & Haynes, K. (2000) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09216.x · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationRoetzer, A., Gregori, C., Jennings, A. M., Quintin, J., Ferrandon, D., Butler, G., Kuchler, K., Ammerer, G., & Schüller, C. (2008) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06301.x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Chamilos, G., Lionakis, M. S., Lewis, R. E., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., Saville, S. P., Albert, N. D., Halder, G. A., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2006) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/500950 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Functional genetics for all: engineered nucleases, CRISPR and the gene editing revolution
Gilles, A. F., & Averof, M. (2014) · EvoDevo · doi:10.1186/2041-9139-5-43 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Zebrafish as a Model Host for Candida albicans Infection
Chao, C., Hsu, P., Jen, C.-F., Chen, I.-H., Wang, C., Chan, H.-C., Tsai, P.-W., Tung, K.-C., Wang, C., Lan, C., et al. (2010) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01293-09 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Csank, C., Makris, C., Meloche, S., Schröppel, K., Röllinghoff, M., Dignard, D., Thomas, D. Y., & Whiteway, M. S. (1997) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.8.12.2539 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Innate and adaptive immunity in <i>Candida albicans</i> infections and saprophytism
Romani, L. (2000) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.68.2.175 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Role of filamentation in Galleria mellonella killing by Candida albicans
Fuchs, B. B., Eby, J., Nobile, C. J., Khoury, J. B. E., Mitchell, A. P., & Mylonakis, E. E. (2010) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2010.03.001 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Chauvel, M., Nesseir, A., Cabral, V., Znaidi, S., Goyard, S., Bachellier‐Bassi, S., Firon, A., Legrand, M., Diogo, D., Naulleau, C., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045912 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Jacobsen, I. D., Brunke, S., Seider, K., Schwarzmüller, T., Firon, A., d’Enfert, C., Kuchler, K., & Hube, B. (2009) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01244-09 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Moran, C., Grussemeyer, C. A., Spalding, J. R., Benjamin, D. K., & Reed, S. D. (2010) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.014 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Leigh, J. E., Steele, C. H., Wormley, F. L., Luo, W., Clark, R. A., Gallaher, W. R., & Fidel, P. L. (1998) · Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes & Human Retrovirology · doi:10.1097/00042560-199812010-00008 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Ueno, K., Uno, J., Nakayama, H., Sasamoto, K., Mikami, Y., & Chibana, H. (2007) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00414-06 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The Asexual Yeast Candida glabrata Maintains Distinct a and α Haploid Mating Types
Muller, H., Hennequin, C., Gallaud, J., Dujon, B., & Fairhead, C. (2008) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00456-07 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Fidel, P. L., Ginsburg, K. A., Cutright, J. L., Wolf, N. A., Leaman, D., Dunlap, K., & Sobel, J. D. (1997) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514097 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Gibbs, D. L., Newell, V. A., Barton, R., Bijie, H., Bille, J., Chang, S.-C., da Luz Martins, M., Duse, A., et al. (2010) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.01.002 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Human pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and viruses inDrosophila
Panayidou, S., Ioannidou, E., & Apidianakis, Y. (2014) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.27524 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Crook, N., Schmitz, A. C., & Alper, H. S. (2013) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb4001432 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Tn 7 -Based Genome-Wide Random Insertional Mutagenesis of Candida glabrataPreprint
Castaño, I., Kaur, R., Pan, S., Cregg, R. C., Peñas, A. D. L., Guo, N., Biery, M. C., Craig, N. L., & Cormack, B. P. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.848203 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Initiation of T-Helper Cell Immunity to Candida albicans by IL-12: The Role of Neutrophils
Romani, L. R., Bistoni, F., & Puccetti, P. (1997) · KARGER eBooks · doi:10.1159/000058688 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Defining the transcriptomic landscape of Candida glabrata by RNA-Seq
Linde, J., Duggan, S., Weber, M., Horn, F., Sieber, P. A., Hellwig, D., Riege, K., Marz, M., Martin, R., Guthke, R., et al. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1357 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Calcagno-Pizarelli, A. M., Bignell, E., Warn, P. A., Jones, M. D., Denning, D. W., Mühlschlegel, F. A., Rogers, T. R., & Haynes, K. (2003) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03755.x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationGlittenberg, M. T., Kounatidis, I., Christensen, D. R., Kostov, M., Kimber, S., Roberts, I. J. H., & Ligoxygakis, P. (2011) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.006627 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Brunke, S., Seider, K., Fischer, D., Jacobsen, I. D., Kasper, L., Jablonowski, N., Wartenberg, A., Bader, O., Angoulvant, A., Schaller, M., et al. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004478 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Differential virulence of Candida glabrata glycosylation mutants
West, L., Lowman, D. W., Mora-Montes, H. M., Grubb, S., Murdoch, C., Thornhill, M. H., Gow, N. A. R., Williams, D., & Haynes, K. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.478743 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationSzabo, E. K., & MacCallum, D. M. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02262.x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kasper, L., Seider, K., Gerwien, F., Allert, S., Brunke, S., Schwarzmüller, T., Ames, L., Zubiria-Barrera, C., Mansour, M. K., Becken, U., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096015 · Cited by 59 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, Kasper et al. (2014) utilized the deletion collection to identify genes required for environmental alkalinization and showed that protein mannosylation may play a key role in C. glabrata’s ability to alter the phagosomal environment allowing it to survive and proliferate…”
MethodSelf-citationGenome structure and dynamics of the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata
Ahmad, K. M., Kokošar, J., Guo, X., Gu, Z., Ishchuk, O. P., & Piškur, J. (2014) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/1567-1364.12145 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Gregori, C., Schüller, C., Roetzer, A., Schwarzmüller, T., Ammerer, G., & Kuchler, K. (2007) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00106-07 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
APPARENT INCREASE IN FREQUENCY OF INFECTIONS INVOLVING TORULOPSIS GLABRATA
Wickerham, L. J. (1957) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1957.72980190007010b · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Glittenberg, M. T., Silas, S., MacCallum, D. M., Gow, N. A. R., & Ligoxygakis, P. (2011) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.006619 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Comparative Genomics of Taphrina Fungi Causing Varying Degrees of Tumorous Deformity in Plants
Tsai, I. J., Tanaka, E., Masuya, H., Tanaka, R., Hirooka, Y., Endoh, R., Sahashi, N., & Kikuchi, T. (2014) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evu067 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Of mice, flies – and men? Comparing fungal infection models for large-scale screening efforts
Brunke, S., Quintin, J., Kasper, L., Jacobsen, I. D., Richter, M. E. A., Hiller, E., Schwarzmüller, T., d’Enfert, C., Kuchler, K., Rupp, S., et al. (2015) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.019901 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
yKu70/yKu80 and Rif1 Regulate Silencing Differentially at Telomeres in Candida glabrata
Rosas-Hernández, L. L., Juárez‐Reyes, A., Arroyo-Helguera, O. E., Peñas, A. D. L., Pan, S., Cormack, B. P., & Castaño, I. (2008) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00228-08 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Candida infections: outcome and attributable ICU costs in critically ill patients
Pelz, R. K., Lipsett, P. A., Swoboda, S. M., Diener-West, M., Powe, N. R., Brower, R. G., Perl, T. M., Hammond, J. M., & Hendrix, C. W. (2000) · Journal of Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1489.2000.00255.x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
MacCallum, D. M., Findon, H., Kenny, C. C., Butler, G., Haynes, K., & Odds, F. C. (2006) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00817-06 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationThe <i>Drosophila</i> Toll Pathway Controls but Does Not Clear <i>Candida glabrata</i> Infections
Quintin, J., Asmar, J., Matskevich, A. A., Lafarge, M.-C., & Ferrandon, D. (2013) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1201861 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Utilization of zebrafish for intravital study of eukaryotic pathogen–host interactions
Gratacap, R. L., & Wheeler, R. T. (2014) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.dci.2014.01.020 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Synthetic RNAs for Gene Regulation: Design Principles and Computational Tools
Laganà, A., Shasha, D. E., & Croce, C. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2014.00065 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Kobrynski, L. J., Tanimune, L., Kilpatrick, L. E., et al. (1996) · Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology · doi:10.1128/cdli.3.6.740-745.1996 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Kuo, Z.-Y., Chuang, Y., Chao, C., Liu, F., Lan, C., & Chen, B. (2013) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000347104 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Akbari, O. S., Oliver, D., Eyer, K., et al. (2009) · BMC Cell Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2121-10-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Suter, B. P., Fetchko, M. J., Imhof, R., et al. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6667007 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Predicting gene function through systematic analysis and quality assessment of high-throughput data
Kemmeren, P., Kockelkorn, T. T. J. P., Bijma, T., Donders, R., & Holstege, F. C. P. (2004) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti103 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) for Analysis of Genomic Information
Skrzypek, M. S., & Hirschman, J. (2011) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0120s35 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Corrigan, M. W., Kerwin-Iosue, C. L., Kuczmarski, A. S., Amin, K. B., & Wykoff, D. D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069628 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Sidhu, Y., Cairns, T. C., Chaudhari, Y., Usher, J., Talbot, N. J., Studholme, D. J., Csukai, M., & Haynes, K. (2015) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.015 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationSala, A. L., Urbani, F., Torosantucci, A., et al. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cen, Y., Fiori, A., & Dijck, P. V. (2015) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00281-14 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Kurzai, O. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39432-4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A Surprising Role for the Sch9 Protein Kinase in Chromosome Segregation in Candida albicans
Varshney, N., Schaekel, A., Singha, R., et al. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.173542 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ma, J., Bharucha, N., Dobry, C. J., Frisch, R. L., Lawson, S. K., & Kumar, A. (2008) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.6308 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Genome‐wide survey of transcriptional initiation in the pathogenic fungus, <i>Candida glabrata</i>
Aoyama, T., Nakayama, H., Ueno, K., Inukai, T., Tanabe, K., Nagi, M., Bard, M., & Chibana, H. (2014) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1111/gtc.12147 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Hirai, H., Zhang, P., Dayaram, T., Hetherington, C. J., Mizuno, S., Imanishi, J., Akashi, K., & Tenen, D. G. (2006) · Protocol Exchange · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.138 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Thorne, T. W., Ho, H.-L., Huvet, M., Haynes, K., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2011) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2010.12.005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Candida glabrata: pathogenicity and resistance mechanisms for adaptation and survival
Hassan, Y., Chew, S. Y., & Than, L. T. L. (2021) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof7080667 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye
Kumar, K., Askari, F., Sahu, M. S., & Kaur, R. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7020039 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Gabaldón, T., & Carreté, L. (2016) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fov110 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Meng, Q., Wang, H., Xiao, W., Mai, W., Liu, Y., Xiao, Y., Wang, P., Sui, J., He, X., Yin, F., et al. (2025) · Mycology · doi:10.1080/21501203.2025.2461725 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ho, H.-L., & Haynes, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ho, Hsueh-lui
- Venue
- FEMS Yeast Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- fov066
- ISSN
- 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
- 1567-1364
- PMC
- PMC4629792
- OpenAlex
- W2196963808
- Semantic Scholar
- 8272ddd6a1b065df3088c05cdb9ec04c1820d1fa
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 133
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (097377/Z/11/Z, 097377, /Z/11/Z)
- University of Exeter
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F005210/2)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- Candida glabrata, fungal virulence, non-albicans Candida, azole resistance, antifungal resistance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, fungal pathogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Candidiasis, Disease Models, Animal, Genetics, Microbial, Humans, Molecular Biology, Virulence, Virulence Factors, Candida glabrata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review