Cited by 188Fungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Telomere length control and transcriptional regulation of subtelomeric adhesins in Candida glabrata

Castaño, Irene, Pan, Shih‐Jung, Zupancic, Margaret, Hennequin, Christophe, Dujon, Bernard, Cormack, Brendan P.·2005·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

The pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata is able to bind in vitro to human epithelial cells. This interaction depends on expression of the adhesin Epa1p. The genome contains a number of EPA1 paralogues which localize to the subtelomeric regions of the C. glabrata. We have identified three hyperadherent mutants of C. glabrata. The first has an insertion adjacent to EPA7, an EPA1-related adhesin. The others disrupt the SIR3 and RIF1 genes of C. glabrata. We show that SIR3 and RIF1 are required for subtelomeric silencing in C. glabrata and that RIF1 regulates telomere length in C. glabrata. We show that the hyperadherent phenotype of the sir3Delta and rif1Delta deletion strains depends primarily on derepression of two novel members of the EPA gene family -EPA6 and EPA7. The sir3Delta and rif1Delta mutants show increased colonization of the kidney in a murine model of disseminated infection and this hypercolonization depends, at least in part, on derepression of EPA6 and EPA7. The analysis here is the first evidence that multiple EPA genes encode adhesins and demonstrates that transcription of at least two of these adhesins is regulated by subtelomeric silencing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04465.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other adhesins, cell wall proteins and RNA polymerase II mediator complex subunits including Epa3, Epa7, Epa12, Awp4-6, Pwp1, Pwp3, Med12, Med13 and Med15 have also been implicated in biofilm formation.

    “Additionally, other adhesins, cell wall proteins and RNA polymerase II mediator complex subunits including Epa3, Epa7, Epa12, Awp4–6, Pwp1, Pwp3, Med12, Med13 and Med15 have also been implicated in biofilm formation [36,37,40,53,54].”

    From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [36]

  • The adhesin encoded by EPA6 plays a central role in biofilm formation in C. glabrata.

    “Among these, the adhesin encoded by the EPA6 gene, which is regulated by multiple factors including the CgYak1p kinase, subtelomeric silencing, chromatin remodeling Swi/Snf complex components and the transcriptional factor CgCst6, plays a central role [36,37,53].”

    From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [36]

  • Epa6 and Epa7 are pivotal to adherence under specific environmental conditions.

    “Although the in vitro adherence of C. glabrata to epithelial cells is primarily mediated by the Epa1 adhesin [32], Epa6 and Epa7 have been shown to be pivotal to adherence under specific environmental conditions [30,36].”

    From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [36]

  • The EPA gene family is composed of 17-23 genes depending on the strain.

    “The family of EPA genes are composed of 17–23 genes depending on the strain”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [49]

  • Candida glabrata clinical isolates are known to have the aldo-keto-reductase superfamily upregulated in the resistant isolates.

    “Candida glabrata clinical isolates are known to have the aldo-keto-reductase superfamily upregulated in the resistant isolates.”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castaño, I., Pan, S., Zupancic, M., Hennequin, C., Dujon, B., & Cormack, B. P.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Cormack, Brendan P.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-12
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1246-1258
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W1594622192
Cited by
188
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI046223, R01AI46223)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2PO1 DK49720, P01DK049720)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, telomere length control, adhesins, Sir3, RIF1, transcriptional regulation, kidney colonization, systemic candidiasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Fungal Proteins, Genotype, Cricetinae, Humans, Kidney, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Plasmids, Transfection, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, CHO Cells, Telomere, DNA Primers, Lectins, Candida glabrata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review