Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lipid-lowering nutraceuticals in clinical practice: position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel

Cicero, Arrigo F G, Colletti, Alessandro, Bajraktari, Gani, Descamps, Olivier, Djuric, Dragan M, Ezhov, Marat, Fras, Zlatko, Katsiki, Niki, Langlois, Michel, Latkovskis, Gustavs, Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B, Paragh, Gyorgy, Mikhailidis, Dimitri P, Mitchenko, Olena, Paulweber, Bernhard, Pella, Daniel, Pitsavos, Christos, Reiner, Željko, Ray, Kausik K, Rizzo, Manfredi, Sahebkar, Amirhossein, Serban, Maria-Corina, Sperling, Laurence S, Toth, Peter P, Vinereanu, Dragos, Vrablík, Michal, Wong, Nathan D, Banach, Maciej·2017·Nutrition Reviews
DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nux047
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the possible use of nutraceuticals to improve and optimize dyslipidemia control and therapy. Based on the data from available studies, nutraceuticals might help patients obtain theraputic lipid goals and reduce cardiovascular residual risk. Some nutraceuticals have essential lipid-lowering properties confirmed in studies; some might also have possible positive effects on nonlipid cardiovascular risk factors and have been shown to improve early markers of vascular health such as endothelial function and pulse wave velocity. However, the clinical evidence supporting the use of a single lipid-lowering nutraceutical or a combination of them is largely variable and, for many of the nutraceuticals, the evidence is very limited and, therefore, often debatable. The purpose of this position paper is to provide consensus-based recommendations for the optimal use of lipid-lowering nutraceuticals to manage dyslipidemia in patients who are still not on statin therapy, patients who are on statin or combination therapy but have not achieved lipid goals, and patients with statin intolerance. This statement is intended for physicians and other healthcare professionals engaged in the diagnosis and management of patients with lipid disorders, especially in the primary care setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nutrit/nux047

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Cicero, A. F. G., Colletti, A., Bajraktari, G., Descamps, O., Djuric, D. M., Ezhov, M., Fras, Z., Katsiki, N., Langlois, M., Latkovskis, G., Panagiotakos, D. B., Paragh, G., Mikhailidis, D. P., Mitchenko, O., Paulweber, B., Pella, D., Pitsavos, C., Reiner, Ž., Ray, K. K., Rizzo, M., Sahebkar, A., Serban, M.-C., Sperling, L. S., Toth, P. P., Vinereanu, D., Vrablík, M., Wong, N. D., & Banach, M.
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
75
Issue
9
Pages
731-767
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
DOI
10.1093/nutrit/nux047
OpenAlex
W2754294894
Cited by
295
References
62
FWCI
34.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.