The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accepting threatening information: Self‐affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases
Abstract
Why do people resist evidence that challenges the validity of long–held beliefs? And why do they persist in maladaptive behavior even when persuasive information or personal experience recommends change? We argue that such defensive tendencies are driven, in large part, by a fundamental motivation to protect the perceived worth and integrity of the self. Studies of social–political debate, health–risk assessment, and responses to team victory or defeat have shown that people respond to information in a less defensive and more open–minded manner when their self–worth is buttressed by an affirmation of an alternative source of identity. Self–affirmed individuals are more likely to accept information that they would otherwise view as threatening, and subsequently to change their beliefs and even their behavior in a desirable fashion. Defensive biases have an adaptive function for maintaining self–worth, but maladaptive consequences for promoting change and reducing social conflict.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Researchers have shown that individuals who are either personally affirmed or exposed to group-affirming stimuli thereafter display less bias when processing information that is contrary to beliefs dominantly held by their peers (Cohen, 2000;Sherman & Cohen, 2002;Cohen et al., in press).”
From Culture and Identity‐Protective Cognition: Explaining the White‐Male Effect in Risk Perception (2007) · cites this paper as Sherman & Cohen, 2002
In the citing paper
“Self-aYrmation theory proposes a third alternative, a diVerent kind of psychological adaptation-one that, under many circumstances, enables both the restoration of self-integrity and adaptive behavior change.”
From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Sherman & Cohen, 2002
In the citing paper
“One way that these defensive adaptations can be reduced, or even eliminated, is through the process of self-aYrmation (Aronson, Cohen, & Nail, 1999;Sherman & Cohen, 2002;Steele, 1988).”
From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Sherman & Cohen, 2002
Citations
Cites
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Connolly, T., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392481 · Cited by 2,690
Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.593 · Cited by 1,614
Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see
Hare, B. A., Call, J., Agnetta, B., & Tomasello, M. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1377 · Cited by 1,082
Motivated inference: Self‐serving generation and evaluation of causal theories
Kunda, Z. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636 · Cited by 1,059
Positive illusions: creative self-deception and the healthy mind
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4168 · Cited by 790
Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind
Savage‐Rumbaugh, E. S., & Lewin, R. A. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 673
Sherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611003 · Cited by 660
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.132 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for its Salutary Effects
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400701598298 · Cited by 3,654
“As in the mindfulness research reviewed here, self-enhancement manipulations have been shown to make individuals more open and objective in evaluating threatening information ( Correll, Spencer, & Zanna, 2004 ; Sherman & Cohen, 2002 ).”
MethodThe psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38004-5 · Cited by 1,614
Self-citationThe Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem
Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392 · Cited by 1,402
“…and prejudice, alleviates " hardening of the attitudes " under conditions of uncertainty, and increases openness to negative or threatening information, thus facilitating learning (Fein & Spencer, 1997; McGregor, Zanna, Holmes, & Spencer, 2001; Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Steele, 1988; Tesser, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
“These consequences could substantially diminish her welfare—materially and psychically (Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Akerlof & Kranton, 2000; Hillman, 2010).”
BackgroundParty Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationCulture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., & Mertz, C. K. (2007) · Cited by 812
Kim, J., & Lee, J.-E. R. (2011) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0374 · Cited by 930
Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit
Yaniv, I. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002 · Cited by 652
How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface
Kizilcec, R. F. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858402 · Cited by 615
Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence
Ruiter, R. A. C., Kessels, L. T. E., Peters, G.-J., & Kok, G. (2014) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12042 · Cited by 635
Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
Affirmation of personal values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses
Creswell, J. D., Welch, W. T., Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mann, T. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01624.x · Cited by 482
“On the psychological side, affirmations of personal values can attenuate perceptions of threat (Keough, 1998; Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Steele, 1988), reduce rumination after failure (Koole, Smeets, van Knippenberg, & Dijksterhuis, 1999), and reduce defensive responses to threatening information…”
BackgroundSelf-citationKay, A. C., Gaucher, D. M., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J. P., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015997 · Cited by 434
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405 · Cited by 430
Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review
MCQueen, A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860600805325 · Cited by 563
“Others have reviewed self-affirmation theory (Aronson, Cohen, & Nail, 1999 ; Sherman & Cohen, 2002 , 2006 ; Steele, 1988 ); however, our goal was to review the manipulations of self-affirmation that are employed to test the theory.”
ResultMisconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition
Kahan, D. M. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2973067 · Cited by 423
Defensiveness Versus Remediation: Self-Theories and Modes of Self-Esteem Maintenance
Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207312960 · Cited by 425
“As noted, these processes also share an important shortcoming: They are defensive in nature (see Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
BackgroundIdeology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study
Kahan, D. M. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2182588 · Cited by 331
"I Am Us": Negative Stereotypes as Collective Threats.
Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.566 · Cited by 313
Self-citationThe plasticity of well-being: A training-based framework for the cultivation of human flourishing
Dahl, C. J., Wilson‐Mendenhall, C. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014859117 · Cited by 295
Hart, J., Shaver, P. R., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.999 · Cited by 344
“Finally, when vital aspects of one’s worldview are affirmed, self-protective mechanisms such as the defensive denial of threats or challenges to one’s beliefs are reduced (Cohen et al., 2000; Sherman & Cohen, 2002), which implies that self-esteem is protected.”
BackgroundSelf-Affirmation and the Biased Processing of Threatening Health-Risk Information
Harris, P. R., & Napper, L. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205274694 · Cited by 319
“Recently, however, self-affirmation has been shown to reduce this tendency to resist information that challenges prior beliefs (Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialAn affirmed self and an open mind: Self‐affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength
Correll, J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.001 · Cited by 225
“…improve understanding, people seem to be motivated to discount both the source and the content of a challenging message in an effort to protect their existing beliefs (Cohen, Aronson, & Steele, 2000; Reed & Aspinwall, 1998; Sherman, Nelson, & Steele, 2000; for a review, see Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
BackgroundAffirmed yet unaware: Exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation.
Sherman, D. K., Cohen, G. L., Nelson, L. D., Nussbaum, A. D., Bunyan, D. P., & Garcia, J. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015451 · Cited by 223
Self-citationCoifman, K. G., Bonanno, G. A., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.745 · Cited by 222
“Consistent with the notion that most avoidant tendencies derive from a motive to protect self-worth or the integrity of the self (see Sherman & Cohen, 2002), repressor behaviors are evidenced most clearly in situations that present a threat to self-evaluation (e.g., Barger, Kircher, & Croyle, 1997;…”
BackgroundSchmeichel, B. J., & Martens, A. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271567 · Cited by 220
“…colleagues (Steele, 1988; Steele & Liu, 1983) and elaborated subsequently by Steele and others (e.g., Fein & Spencer, 1997; Reed & Aspinwall, 1998; Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Sherman, Nelson, & Steele, 2000; Tesser, Crepaz, Collins, Cornell, & Beach, 2000), self-affirmation often entails the explicit…”
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Effron, D. A., Halperin, E., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. D. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023936 · Cited by 221
Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework
Fransen, M. L., Smit, E. G., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01201 · Cited by 200
Park, L. E. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206296301 · Cited by 202
Implicit self-esteem compensation: Automatic threat defense
Rudman, L. A., Dohn, M. C., & Fairchild, K. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.798 · Cited by 178
“In addition, we tested SA as a potential moderator of defensive reactions because affirming self-worth promotes security and paves the way to reacting with greater equanimity to threat (Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Sherman & Kim, 2005).”
BackgroundCreswell, J. D., Lam, S., Stanton, A. L., Taylor, S. E., Bower, J. E., & Sherman, D. K. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206294412 · Cited by 174
Self-citationThe effect of self-affirmation on perception of racism
Adams, G., Tormala, T. T., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.001 · Cited by 169
Self-affirmation reduces smokers' defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels.
Harris, P. R., Mayle, K., Mabbott, L., & Napper, L. (2007) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.437 · Cited by 234
Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39006-5 · Cited by 167
Finding The “Self” in Self-Regulation: The Identity-Value Model
Berkman, E. T., Livingston, J., & Kahn, L. E. (2017) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2017.1323463 · Cited by 181
“On the other hand, because different aspects of the self are linked and value is somewhat fluid between them, bolstering one part of one’s identity can protect other parts from threats or the whole from integrity threat (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
Reducing narcissistic aggression by buttressing self-esteem: An experimental field study
Thomaes, S., Bushman, B. J., Castro, B. O. D., Cohen, G. L., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02478.x · Cited by 153
“…and thereby reduce the psychological impact of threatening feedback and social-evaluative stress both in the laboratory (Creswell et al., 2005; Koole, Smeets, Van Knippenberg, & Dijksterhuis, 1999; Sherman & Cohen, 2002) and in actual classroom settings (Cohen, Garcia, Apfel, & Master, 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. A. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207303027 · Cited by 150
“When self-affirmed in this manner, people have less need to distort or reconstrue the provoking threat and can respond to the threatening information in a more open and even-handed manner (Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Steele, 1988).”
Self-citationKahan, D. M., Wittlin, M., Peters, E. M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. N. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1871503 · Cited by 166
“A long-standing body of work in social psychology suggests that individuals are motivated to fit their beliefs to those of people with whom they are intimately connected (Sherman & Cohen 2002; Chen, Duckworth & Chaiken 1999; Kunda 1990).”
BackgroundSlade, K., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Smart, D. W., & Bailey, R. (2008) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.594 · Cited by 159
“…that in order to preserve one’s self-integrity people tend to seek out and accept feedback information that is more aligned with their positive selfimage (Blanton, Pelham, DeHart, & Carvallo, 2001; Sherman & Cohen, 2002), which can be seen as an attempt to avoid dissonance-arousing information.”
BackgroundSelf-affirmation promotes health behavior change.
Epton, T., & Harris, P. R. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.746 · Cited by 187
Exaggerating Current and Past Performance: Motivated Self-Enhancement Versus Reconstructive Memory
Gramzow, R. H., & Willard, G. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206288600 · Cited by 138
“That is, the impact of the selfenhancement motive on a given judgment or behavior is reduced when people are provided with an alternative method of affirming the self (Fein & Spencer, 1997; Gramzow & Gaertner, 2005; Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
MethodIs There an "I" in "Team"? The Role of the Self in Group-Serving Judgments.
Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.108 · Cited by 139
“Our research adopts the approach of self-affirmation theory (Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Steele, 1988) to address these issues.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationWitnessing change: Dynamic norms help resolve diverse barriers to personal change
Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.007 · Cited by 151
Culture and Identity‐Protective Cognition: Explaining the White‐Male Effect in Risk Perception
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (2007) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x · Cited by 136
“Researchers have shown that individuals who are either personally affirmed or exposed to group-affirming stimuli thereafter display less bias when processing information that is contrary to beliefs dominantly held by their peers (Cohen et al. 2000; Sherman & Cohen 2002; Cohen et al. in press).”
BackgroundTanesini, A. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198858836.001.0001 · Cited by 143
Beike, D. R., Lampinen, J. M., & Behrend, D. A. (2004) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203337974 · Cited by 136
Automating the News: How Personalized News Recommender System Design Choices Impact News Reception
Beam, M. A. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650213497979 · Cited by 159
An investigation of self-ambivalence in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Bhar, S. S., & Kyrios, M. (2007) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.005 · Cited by 138
“Social psychological research shows that people tend to reject self-incriminating information in order to protect a positive sense of self-worth (reviewed in Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
Background(Why) Is Misinformation a Problem?
Adams, Z., Osman, M., Bechlivanidis, C., & Meder, B. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221141344 · Cited by 182
Perry, S., Murphy, M. C., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.007 · Cited by 132
Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013068 · Cited by 124
“In the present research, we compare two strategies that are aimed at diminishing the detrimental effects of social identity threat and improving performance motivation in status-defining domains: selfaffirmation (Steele, 1988), which is directed at restoring personal identity, and group affirmation…”
BackgroundMethodReducing Information Avoidance Through Affirmation
Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611424164 · Cited by 145
“Evidence suggests that self-affirmation reduces feelings of threat (Sherman & Cohen, 2002), increases the acceptance of personal health information (Sherman, Nelson, & Steele, 2000), and can promote healthy behaviors (Epton & Harris, 2008).”
BackgroundThe promise and peril of self-affirmation in de-escalation of commitment
Sivanathan, N., Molden, D. C., Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.004 · Cited by 123
Life lacks meaning without acceptance: Ostracism triggers suicidal thoughts.
Chen, Z., Poon, K., DeWall, C. N., & Jiang, T. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000238 · Cited by 137
Evaluation of a template for countering misinformation—Real-world Autism treatment myth debunking
Paynter, J. M., Luskin-Saxby, S., Keen, D., Fordyce, K., Frost, G., Imms, C., Miller, S., Trembath, D. L., Tucker, M. N., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210746 · Cited by 129
“Self-affirmation interventions have been shown to make potentially worldview-inconsistent corrections “easier to swallow”—affirming a person’s values makes them more open to worldview-inconsistent information, presumably by fostering resilience to the inherent identity threat [29, 30].”
BackgroundShapiro, J. R., Williams, A. M., & Hambarchyan, M. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030461 · Cited by 119
“…domain is less threatening when domains unrelated to the provoking threat are affirmed, and as a result, individuals react with fewer defensive biases (Aronson, Blanton, & Cooper, 1995; Aronson, Cohen, & Nail, 1999; Derks, van Laar, & Ellemers, 2009; Sherman & Cohen, 2002; 2006; Steele, 1988).”
Backgroundvan Laar, C., Meeussen, L., Veldman, J., Grootel, S. V., Sterk, N., & Jacobs, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01879 · Cited by 130
Bastardi, A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Ross, L. D. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611406447 · Cited by 107
I Am Aware of My Inconsistencies but Can Tolerate Them
Itzchakov, G., Kluger, A. N., & Castro, D. R. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216675339 · Cited by 103
Toward an Integrative Theory of Psychological Defense
Hart, J. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613506018 · Cited by 109
“And self-affirmation research has established that affirming cherished values mitigates defensiveness (e.g., Sherman & Cohen, 2002), consistent with terror management research.”
BackgroundStereotype Threat and Female Communication Styles
von Hippel, C., Wiryakusuma, C., Bowden, J., & Shochet, M. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211410439 · Cited by 117
“Study 2 Self-affirmation theory proposes that one of our primary social motivations is to achieve and maintain a sense of integrity and self-worth (Sherman & Cohen, 2006; Steele, 1988; Steele & Liu, 1983).”
BackgroundBreaking the Cycle of Stigmatization
García, J. A., Crocker, J., & Wyman, J. F. (2005) · Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/00152192-200501000-00009 · Cited by 100
“whether the negative feedback was deserved and looking for ways to deflect their implications for the self to protect self-esteem.(51,52) When the recipient of such negative feedback is also stigmatized, another factor comes into play— perhaps it was deserved, perhaps not, and perhaps the rejection or negative evaluat…”
BackgroundWhen fiends become friends: The need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination.
Carvallo, M., & Pelham, B. W. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.94 · Cited by 100
“Finally, self-affirmation theorists might argue that our manipulation of acceptance in Study 2 was actually a subtle selfaffirmation manipulation (e.g., see Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Steele & Liu, 1983 ).”
BackgroundGruffydd-Jones, J. J. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414018784066 · Cited by 98
“One way is through defensive biases in how they process the threatening information (Sherman & Cohen 2002).”
BackgroundThe Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 2: Unanswered Questions
Kahan, D. M. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0418 · Cited by 99
Conditioned Superstition: Desire for Control and Consumer Brand Preferences
Hamerman, E. J., & Johar, G. V. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/670762 · Cited by 95
Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment Laws
Han, D.-K. M., Braman, D., Monahan, J., Callahan, L., & Peters, E. (2010) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9174-4 · Cited by 91
“Individuals conform their factual perceptions to their values in part to avoid the psychic costs of believing that societal well-being depends on either restricting practices essential to their identities or promoting activities inimical to them (Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Kahan et al., 2007).”
BackgroundI use it but will Tell you that I Don't: Consumers’ Country-of-Origin Cue usage Denial
Herz, M. F., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.16.0051 · Cited by 89
“However, self-affirmation theory postulates that people’s self-systems can be flexible and that theremaybeother responses to threats, such as reinterpreting uncomfortable information or focusing on other positive aspects of the self (Sherman and Cohen 2002, 2006; Steele, Spencer, and Lynch, 1993).”
BackgroundMeasuring defensive responses to threatening messages: a meta-analysis of measures
Good, A., & Abraham, C. (2007) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437190802280889 · Cited by 89
“Rejection of the photoageing risk could represent defensiveness because failing to accept a threatening message ‘protects self-worth shielding people from the conclusion that their beliefs or actions were misguided’ (Sherman & Cohen, 2002, p. 119).”
Backgroundde Buisonjé, D. R., Ritter, S. M., de Bruin, S., ter Horst, J. M.-L., & Meeldijk, A. (2017) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1303308 · Cited by 93
“…be accomplished by instructing participants to write about their personal core-values (see McQueen & Klein, 2006), a manipulation that has proven to be effective in creating openness to threat (Sherman & Cohen, 2002) and in reducing biased evaluations (Stone, Whitehead, Schmader, & Focella, 2011).”
BackgroundDerks, B., Scheepers, D. T., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.016 · Cited by 87
“…also because previous research on the effects of self-affirmation (e.g., Cohen et al., 2006; Koole & Van Knippenberg, 2007; Martens et al., 2006; Sherman & Cohen, 2002) and group affirmation (Derks, Van Laar & Ellemers, 2006; 2009; Sherman et al., 2007) has convincingly demonstrated the…”
BackgroundResultTheories Related to Changing Clinician Practice
Riemer, M., Rosof-Williams, J., & Bickman, L. (2005) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.05.002 · Cited by 93
“To preserve their self-concept, people are more likely to seek out and accept feedback information that is aligned with their positive selfimage [43,44].”
BackgroundNaturally better? A review of the natural‐is‐better bias
Meier, B. P., Dillard, A. J., & Lappas, C. M. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12494 · Cited by 84
“…decisions such as the use of narratives or stories, or first-hand accounts of others’ experiences (Dillard, Fagerlin, Dal Cin, Zikmund-Fisher, & Ubel, 2010), self-affirmation manipulations (Sherman & Cohen, 2002), or increasing risk perceptions (Brewer et al., 2007) may also be effective.”
BackgroundGoldberg, T. (2013) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.757265 · Cited by 88
“Under certain emotional conditions, especially when one’s esteem is affirmed, even threatening information can be accepted and used (Sherman & Cohen, 2002).”
BackgroundGender Identity Salience and Perceived Vulnerability to Breast Cancer
Puntoni, S., Sweldens, S., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.3.413 · Cited by 91
“It has been shown that defensive processing of threatening health messages is eliminated when people are self-affirmed in unrelated ways—for example, by thinking about values important to them (e.g., Klein and Harris 2009; Reed and Aspinwall 1998; Sherman and Cohen 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-Esteem and Favoritism Toward Novel In-Groups: The Self as an Evaluative Base.
Gramzow, R. H., & Gaertner, L. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.801 · Cited by 116
Acknowledging the Skeletons in Our Closet
Gunn, G. R., & Wilson, A. E. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211413607 · Cited by 78
“Consequently, just as self-affirmation enables people to be more open-minded toward their personal failures (Sherman & Cohen, 2002), group affirmation may have allowed participants to reflect on their ingroup’s wrongdoing without justifying or dismissing the harm inflicted, thus freeing them to…”
BackgroundCognitive dissonance, ego-involvement, and motivated reasoning
Carpenter, C. J. (2019) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2018.1564881 · Cited by 76
“Sherman and Cohen (2002) reviewed studies indicating that self-affirmation may be a particularly effective way to reduce egodefensive responses to counterattitudinal information.”
BackgroundReducing the stigma associated with seeking psychotherapy through self-affirmation.
Lannin, D. G., Guyll, M., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2013) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033789 · Cited by 86
Self-affirmation can enable goal disengagement.
Vohs, K. D., Park, J. K., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030478 · Cited by 74
“…problems that might befall them, people who have affirmed the self show reduced defensiveness and vow to make positive behavioral changes more than nonaffirmed persons do (Harris et al., 2007; Harris & Napper, 2005; Reed & Aspinwall, 1998; Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Sherman, Nelson, & Steele, 2000).”
System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology.
Day, M. V., Kay, A. C., Holmes, J. G., & Napier, J. L. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023197 · Cited by 90
“…or thirstier, and threatening one's self or group identity has been shown to engage self or group protective motives (e.g., Fein & Spencer, 1997; Sherman & Cohen, 2002; Steele & Liu, 1983), threatening the sociopolitical system through broad challenges to system legitimacy has been shown to…”
BackgroundHow believing in affirmative action quotas protects White men’s self-esteem
Unzueta, M. M., Lowery, B. S., & Knowles, E. D. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.001 · Cited by 70
CHAPTER 7 A Contextual Analysis of the System Justification Motive and Its Societal Consequences
Kay, A. C., & Zanna, M. P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.007 · Cited by 70
Self-Affirmation Theory and the Science of Well-Being
Howell, A. J. (2016) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9713-5 · Cited by 74
“According to Steele (1988), a threat to self-integrity lies at the heart of self-affirmation effects, by serving as the motivation to secure a self-view as adequate.”
BackgroundPsychological and neural contributions to appetite self‐regulation
Stoeckel, L. E., Birch, L. L., Heatherton, T. F., Mann, T. L., Hunter, C. M., Czajkowski, S. M., Onken, L. S., Berger, P. K., & Savage, C. R. (2017) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.21789 · Cited by 71
“Indeed, interventions in which people affirm their positive values have been shown to reduce defensiveness and lead to healthier behavioral intentions (62); (103).”
BackgroundHealey, M. P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2017) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125617712258 · Cited by 67
Influence of Self-Affirmation on Responses to Gain- Versus Loss-Framed Antismoking Messages
Zhao, X., & Nan, X. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01385.x · Cited by 67
Cramwinckel, F. M., van Dijk, E., Scheepers, D. T., & van den Bos, K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.009 · Cited by 63
Restoration processes after need thwarting: When autonomy depends on competence
Radel, R., Pelletier, L. G., & Sarrazin, P. G. (2012) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9308-3 · Cited by 61
“another activity that makes salient important values unconnected to the threatening event (Sherman and Cohen 2002), and research on mental contrasting that posits that when people realize that there is a discrepancy between”
BackgroundCan high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?
Itzchakov, G., Weinstein, N., Legate, N., & Amar, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104022 · Cited by 65
Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B., & Porat, D. A. (2011) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.556832 · Cited by 62
“It has been shown that accounts of the history of the social group to which an individual belongs evoke shame or pride even when the respondents cannot be held in any way accountable for recounted events ( Doosje, Branscombe, Spears, & Manstead, 1998 ; Sherman & Cohen, 2002 ).”
BackgroundThomaes, S., Bushman, B. J., de Castro, B. O., & Reijntjes, A. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025677 · Cited by 55
Gratitude facilitates healthy eating behavior in adolescents and young adults
Fritz, M. M., Armenta, C. N., Walsh, L. C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.011 · Cited by 60
Oswald, S., Lewiński, M., Greco, S., & Villata, S. (2022) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4 · Cited by 60
Halpern, D. M., Katz, J. E., & Carril, C. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.014 · Cited by 57
Grootel, S. V., van Laar, C., Meeussen, L., Schmader, T., & Sczesny, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01344 · Cited by 56
“In this sense, valuing both agentic and communal traits serves as an affirmation of that identity at the same time that it broadens the identity (Sherman and Cohen, 2002; Derks et al., 2009; Glasford et al., 2009; Spencer-Rodgers et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDerks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.375 · Cited by 54
“Moreover, Sherman and Cohen (2002) showed that an opportunity to self-affirm reduces defensive responses to failure, hereby increasing the opportunity for individuals to improve performance.”
BackgroundPreserving Integrity in the Face of Performance Threat
Legault, L., Al‐Khindi, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612448483 · Cited by 52
“Many responses to threats to selfintegrity involve defensive psychological alterations aimed at denying, rejecting, or transforming the threat in order to restore self-worth (D. K. Sherman & Cohen, 2002; D. K. Sherman & Hartson, 2011).”
BackgroundService recovery for moderate and high involvement services
Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Rabeson, L. E. (2015) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-05-2014-0155 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sherman, David K.
- Cohen, Geoffrey L.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 119-123
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2146463557
- Semantic Scholar
- efa426cefbedeb6a8d58ba3c27f93d8e20c2bf01
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 35.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- self-affirmation, belief revision, self-worth, identity affirmation, persuasion, health risk assessment, social conflict, openness to experience, behavior change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review