Cited by 1,286Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorBehavioral Health and Interventions

How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?

Open access
Pessoa, Luiz·2009·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Emotion and motivation have crucial roles in determining human behavior. Yet, how they interact with cognitive control functions is less understood. Here, the basic elements of a conceptual framework for understanding how they interact are introduced. More broadly, the 'dual competition' framework proposes that emotion and motivation affect both perceptual and executive competition. In particular, the anterior cingulate cortex is hypothesized to be engaged in attentional/effortful control mechanisms and to interact with several other brain structures, including the amygdala and nucleus accumbens, in integrating affectively significant signals with control signals in prefrontal cortex. An implication of the proposal is that emotion and motivation can either enhance or impair behavioral performance depending on how they interact with control functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is suggested that emotional states, such as anxiety, interact with cognitive functioning through motivation.

    “it is suggested that emotional states (e.g., anxiety) interact with cognitive functioning through motivation [75]”

    From Prevalence and diagnostic validity of motivational impairments and deficits in visuospatial short-term memory and working memory in ADHD subtypes (2015) · cites this paper as [75]

    The State-dependent effects section describes anxiety as an emotional state that can affect executive control. It discusses motivation’s effects on executive function in parallel with threat processing, but does not say that anxiety affects cognition through motivation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is increasing interest in integrating motivation and reinforcement with controlled processing.

    “there has been increasing interest in the integration of motivation and reinforcement on the one hand and controlled processing on the other”

    From Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation (2011) · cites this paper as Pessoa, 2009

  • Motivation and control must be interwoven rather than functioning as competing processes.

    “Evidently, motivation and control must be interwoven (Hazy et al., 2006;Kouneiher et al., 2009;Pessoa, 2009), as opposed to functioning as competing processes.”

    From Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation (2011) · cites this paper as Pessoa, 2009

  • Positive affect and emotional arousal interfere with cognitive control (e.g., the increase of interference and distractibility).

    “it is well established that positive affect and emotional arousal interfere with cognitive control (e.g., the increase of interference and distractibility78,79)”
  • Automatic evaluation of the affective and motivational significance of stimuli plays a crucial role in anxiety.

    “Another bottom-up process, which plays a crucial role in anxiety, is automatic evaluation of the affective and motivational significance of stimuli (Pessoa & Adolphs, 2010;Pessoa, 2009;Vuilleumier & Driver, 2007;Vuilleumier, 2005); the functions of which are discussed later (Section 4.3.1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pessoa, L.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Pessoa, Luiz
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
160-166
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977802579
Cited by
1,286
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 63
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH071589)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
emotions, motivation, executive function, cognitive control, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, attentional control, effortful control, prefrontal cortex, perceptual competition, affective signals
MeSH terms
Attention, Behavior, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review