CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,009

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid Dendritic Morphogenesis in CA1 Hippocampal Dendrites Induced by Synaptic Activity

Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R., Svoboda, K.·1999·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.283.5409.1923
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Activity shapes the structure of neurons and their circuits. Two-photon imaging of CA1 neurons expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein in developing hippocampal slices from rat brains was used to characterize dendritic morphogenesis in response to synaptic activity. High-frequency focal synaptic stimulation induced a period (longer than 30 minutes) of enhanced growth of small filopodia-like protrusions (typically less than 5 micrometers long). Synaptically evoked growth was long-lasting and localized to dendritic regions close (less than 50 micrometers) to the stimulating electrode and was prevented by blockade of N -methyl- d -aspartate receptors. Thus, synaptic activation can produce rapid input-specific changes in dendritic structure. Such persistent structural changes could contribute to the development of neural circuitry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.283.5409.1923

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex undergo activity-dependent structural remodelling.

    “Dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex undergo activity-dependent structural remodelling1–5”

    From Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines (2004) · cites this paper as [4]

  • How structural remodelling supports synaptic plasticity such as long-term potentiation, and whether such plasticity is input-specific at the level of the individual spine, has remained unknown.

    “How structural remodelling supports synaptic plasticity4,5, such as long-term potentiation7, and whether such plasticity is input- specific at the level of the individual spine has remained unknown.”

    From Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines (2004) · cites this paper as [4]

  • New filopodia or spines require at least 20 min to emerge from dendrites after the induction of LTP and therefore cannot explain the rapid onset of LTP.

    “In contrast, new filopodia or spines require at least 20 min to emerge from dendrites after the induction of LTP4,5 and therefore cannot explain the rapid onset of LTP.”

    From Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines (2004) · cites this paper as [4]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1126/science.274.5290.1133 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cline H. T., Debski E. A., Constantine-Paton M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 4342 (1987); · DOI
  3. Kleinschmidt A., Bear M. F., Singer W., Science 238, 355 (1987); · DOI
  4. Fox K., Daw N., Sato H., Czepita D., J. Neurosci. 12, 2672 (1992); · DOI
  5. ; B. L. Schlaggar K. Fox D. D. M. O'Leary Nature 364 623 (1993); K. Fox B. L. Schlagger S. Glazewski D. D. O'Leary Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 5584 (1996). · DOI
  6. Cline H. T., Constantine-Patton M., Neuron 3, 413 (1989); · DOI
  7. Kalb R. G., Development 120, 3063 (1994); · DOI
  8. Vogel M. W., Prittie J., J. Neurobiol. 26, 537 (1995); · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80239-1 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07836.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fifkova E., Van Harreveld A., J. Neurocytol. 6, 211 (1977); · DOI
  12. Van Harreveld A., Fifkova E., Exp. Neurol. 49, 736 (1975); · DOI · Paper page
  13. Desmond N. L., Levy W. B., J. Comp. Neurol. 253, 466 (1986); · DOI
  14. ; Synapse 5 139 (1990); · DOI
  15. Sorra K. E., Harris K. M., J. Neurosci. 18, 658 (1998). · DOI
  16. Hosokawa T., Rusakov D. A., Bliss T. V. P., Fine A., J. Neurosci. 15, 5560 (1995). · DOI
  17. Minkwitz H. G., Holz L., J. Hirnforsch. 16, 37 (1975);
  18. ; D. Purpura in Adv. Neurology G. W. Kreutzberg Ed. (Raven New York 1975) vol. 12 pp. 91–116;
  19. Lund J. S., Boothe G. R., Lund R. D., J. Comp. Neurol. 176, 149 (1977); · DOI
  20. Miller M., Peters A., ibid. 203, 555 (1981).
  21. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-09-02983.1996 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Papa M., Bundman M. C., Greenberger V., Segal M., ibid. 15, 1 (1995).
  23. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80283-4 · DOI
  24. Fischer M., Kaech S., Knutti D., Matus A., ibid. 20, 847 (1998).
  25. Saito Y., et al., Neurosci. Lett. 147, 81 (1992); · DOI
  26. Fiala J. C., Feinberg M., Popov V., Harris K. M., J. Neurosci. 18, 8900 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Gahwiler B. H., Capogna M., Debanne D., McKinney R. A., Thompson S. M., Trends Neurosci. 20, 471 (1997). · DOI
  28. Schlesinger S., Trends Biotechnol. 11, 18 (1993). · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.8303295 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00685-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00450-5 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.2321027 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81237-4 · DOI
  34. Z. F. Mainen et al. Methods in press.
  35. Kirkwood A., Lee H.-K., Bear M. F., ibid. 375, 328 (1995);
  36. Bortolotto Z. A., Bashir Z. I., Davies C. H., Collingridge G. L., Nature 368, 740 (1994). · DOI
  37. Collingridge G. L., Herron C. E., Lester R. A., J. Physiol. 399, 301 (1988). · DOI
  38. Collin C., Miyaguchi K., Segal M., J. Neurophysiol. 77, 1614 (1997). · DOI
  39. Stoppini L., Buchs P. A., Muller D. A., J. Neurosci. Methods 37, 173 (1991). · DOI
  40. R. Malinow et al. in Imaging Living Cells R. Yuste F. Lanni A. Konnerth Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor NY in press).
  41. 10.1126/science.272.5262.716 · DOI · Paper page
  42. S. Siegel Nonparametric Statistics (McGraw-Hill New York ed. 1 1956).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R., & Svoboda, K.
Affiliations
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
1999-03-19
Volume
283
Issue
5409
Pages
1923-1927
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.283.5409.1923
Cited by
1,009
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review