Cited by 235Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 61 of the 109 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Adolescent Suicide as a Failure of Acute Stress-Response Systems.

Open access
Miller, Adam Bryant, Prinstein, Mitchell J.·2019·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Suicide is the second leading cause of death worldwide for adolescents. Despite decades of research on correlates and risk factors for adolescent suicide, we know little about why suicidal ideation and behavior frequently emerge in adolescence and how to predict, and ultimately prevent, suicidal behavior among youths. In this review, we first discuss knowledge regarding correlates, risk factors, and theories of suicide. We then review why adolescence is a period of unique vulnerability, given changing biology and social network reorganization. Next, we present a conceptual model through which to interpret emerging findings in adolescent suicide research. We suggest that a promising area for future research is to examine adolescent suicide as a failure of biological responses to acute stress in the proximal moments of a suicidal crisis. After reviewing initial evidence for this conceptualization, we review future directions for studies on adolescent suicide.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review proposes that adolescent suicidal crises may be usefully understood as failures or dysregulation of biological acute stress-response systems during a developmentally sensitive period. It synthesizes prior suicide risk-factor research and preliminary biological findings to offer a heuristic model centered on proximal stress responses, stress thresholds, and suicide propinquity.

Key findings

  • Suicide ranks as the second leading cause of death globally among people aged 10–24; suicidal ideation affects roughly 19.8–24% of youths and suicide attempts roughly 3.1–8.8%, yet prediction remains weak.
  • Distal risk factors are limited: internalizing predictors show meta-analytic odds ratios of about 1.17–1.71, and even prior suicidal ideation/behavior weakly predicts later suicidal behavior; only childhood maltreatment, peer victimization, worthlessness, and low self-esteem prospectively predict beyond depression and prior suicidality in one review.
  • Preliminary biological correlates include lower resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia or excessive withdrawal, mixed prospective RSA findings, both hyper- and hypocortisol responses, elevated proinflammatory cytokines in some suicide samples, and altered prefrontal–subcortical activation or connectivity.
  • The authors propose two moderators: a stress-threshold process, where risk rises when stress exceeds a person’s usual or perceived coping capacity, and suicide propinquity, where prior self-injury, exposure to others’ suicide, or peer socialization makes suicide a more available option.

Methods

  • Narrative/integrative review, not a primary empirical study; it synthesizes prior reviews, meta-analyses, theories, and emerging biological literature.
  • Scope focuses on suicidal self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, excluding nonsuicidal self-injury, and covers adolescence, four acute stress-response systems, and a conceptual model.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis and heuristic model-building; the authors note that adolescent biological data are sparse and much cited evidence is cross-sectional or from adults.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it excludes NSSI, cautions against treating suicide constructs as equivalent, notes more research on ideation and attempts than other outcomes, and acknowledges limited adolescent biological data and mostly cross-sectional/adult studies.
  • The authors state the model cannot yet explain why some distressed adolescents develop suicidal outcomes rather than other psychopathology, and they note omitted topics including biological sex, culture, race/ethnicity, religiosity, protective factors, and macrosystem influences.
  • Evident from the text: the proposed acute stress-response framework is heuristic and not directly tested in this review, and many cited biological associations are preliminary, mixed, or based on small samples.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095625

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

32 Own interpretation · 29 Partly supported · 15 No full text of the sources · 13 Supported · 9 Not checked yet · 9 No basis given · 8 Sources not found · 4 Supported so far · 2 Own result · 1 Mixed support · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The acute stress-response systems are the proximal mechanisms linking stress to suicidal ideation and behavior.

    “we have suggested that our understanding and, ultimately, the successful treatment of suicidal thoughts and behaviors and the prevention of suicide would be aided by addressing one of the central facts about this perplexing and troubling clinical phenomenon”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Individuals have a stress threshold that can be exceeded by severe distress.

    “we posit that suicide may become more likely when individuals experience distress that is unusual, severe, and exceeds their actual or perceived capacity to activate cognitive and social coping resources”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Suicide propinquity is a meaningful factor that moderates the association between acute stress response and suicidal ideation or behavior.

    “A second factor that may increase the likelihood that vulnerable (i.e., stress-exposed) adolescents might exhibit suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior reflects the extent to which they have been exposed to suicide as an option for ameliorating distress.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The prefrontal cortex modulates subcortical activation during acute stress responses.

    “The PFC serves a critical role in leveraging higher-order cognitive skills in the service of modulating subcortical activation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Subcortical structures monitor the environment for reward or threat and signal the body to enact stress responses.

    “Subcortical brain regions, including the amygdala and hippocampus, are primitive brain structures that monitor the environment for salient cues for reward or threat.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The biological measures used in the reviewed studies validly index the acute stress-response systems.

    “Although data on adolescents is sorely lacking, research suggests that each of these biological stress-response systems may be linked with suicidal ideation and behaviors.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 158 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Beck AT, 1987, J. Cogn. Psychother., 1, 5
  2. Curtin S, 2016, NCHS Data Brief, 241, 1
  3. Harter S, 1996, J. Res. Adolesc., 6, 285
  4. Menninger KA, 1933, Int. J. Psychoanal., 14, 376
  5. Spirito A, 2012, Child and Adolescent Therapy: Cognitive-Behavioral Procedures, 234

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Miller, A. B., & Prinstein, M. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
425-450
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2915425527
Cited by
235
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH108238, R01MH107479, K01MH116325)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent suicide, suicidal ideation, acute stress response, stress system, suicide risk factors, suicide prevention, adolescent vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Humans, Models, Biological, Stress, Psychological, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review