Cited by 1,935Health disparities and outcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and Relationships

An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development

Conger, Rand D., Donnellan, M. Brent·2007·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

This article addresses the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES), family processes, and human development. The topic is framed as part of the general issue of health disparities, which involves the oft-observed positive relationship between SES and the cognitive, social, emotional, and physical well-being of adults and children. A review of recent research and theory identifies three general theoretical approaches that provide possible explanations for the association between SES and individual development: the social causation, social selection, and interactionist perspectives. Empirical evidence demonstrates support for the social causation view that SES affects families and the development of children in terms of both family stress processes (the family stress model) and family investments in children (the family investment model). However, there also is empirical support for the social selection argument that individual characteristics lead to differences in SES. Especially important, recent research is consistent with an interactionist approach, which proposes a dynamic relationship between SES and developmental change over time. Drawing on the combined set of research findings, the article concludes with the description of an interactionist model that serves as a heuristic for future studies of the links among SES, parenting behaviors, and child development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Interactionist Model highlights reciprocal influences and transactional processes between SES, family interactions, and individual development.

    “This model highlights reciprocal influences and transactional processes between SES, family interactions, and individual development (Conger and Donnellan, 2007; Conger et al., 2010), accumulating personal, economic, and social disadvantages or advantages across time and generations.”
  • Some findings support the notion of SES-personality correlation, suggesting that SES influences childhood personality development, personality influences school achievement, and educational and occupational experiences shape personality.

    “Some findings support the notion of SES-personality correlation, suggesting that SES influences childhood personality development (11,12), personality influences school achievement (13,14), and educational (15) and occupational (16,17) experiences shape personality and that adult economic attainment may be linked to personality (18,19).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
175-199
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2096741943
Cited by
1,935
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 178 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 185 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 68
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 51361, R01MH051361)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017902, DA 017902)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD047573, HD051746, HD047573, R01HD051746)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
socioeconomic status, human development, health disparities, family processes, social causation, social selection, interactionist perspective, family stress model, parental behavior, child development, adult development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Family, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Psychosocial Deprivation, Social Adjustment, Socioeconomic Factors, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review