Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18,657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Riding as an Alternative Treatment for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Wang, Guoqin, Ma, Ruiqin, Qiao, Guangwei, Wada, Koji, Aizawa, Yoshiharu, Satoh, Toshihiko·2015·Integrative Medicine International
DOI 10.1159/000368408
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background and Objectives: There is a substantial body of evidence assessing the effects of equine-assisted therapy on physiological and psychological aspects of individuals with disabilities. This study aimed to evaluate the physiological benefits of this alternative therapy for children with cerebral palsy (CP) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This systematic review included all randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials of hippotherapy (HT), therapeutic horse riding (THR), and artificial saddle (AS) for the treatment of children with CP by a systematic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases up to November 2012. Articles were assessed for inclusion eligibility and quality by two independent reviewers. Any discordant case was re-reviewed and consensus was obtained after sufficient discussion. A random effects model of meta-analysis was applied to provide summary statistics for each outcome. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 4 non-RCTs, and 7 self-controlled studies were included for quality assessment. Ten studies assessed the effect of HT, 5 evaluated THR, and 3 evaluated AS. The sample size differed from 3 to 72, and the quality ranged from low to moderate. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis, and there was a significant improvement in the 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66), the GMFM-66/88 total score, and the dimension E of the GMFM. Although the asymmetry score tended to be reduced, it failed to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: HT, THR, and AS seem to improve the total score of the gross motor function via improvement of the walking, running, and jumping dimension. However, they are not likely to be of benefit to the symmetry of postural muscle activity. Studies included in this review lack high-quality RCTs with a sufficient number of subjects, which thus warrants further evaluations of these modalities using large-scale well-designed RCTs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000368408

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1136/edpract-2011-300593 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/mrdd.20066 · DOI
  3. 10.1046/j.1563-258x.2002.01111.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0195-5616(85)50306-X · DOI
  5. 10.1080/J006v15n01_02 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/00001577-199901120-00006 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.pmr.2004.02.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1300/J006v27n04_03 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/09593980902776662 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/J006v22n03_04 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61458-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61482-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/01.PEP.0000136003.15233.0C · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb12344.x · DOI
  15. 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181a39532 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.011 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00815.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.026 · DOI
  19. 10.1089/107555303771952163 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03245.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1186/1471-2474-11-71 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb05114.x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.344 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/J006v27n02_02 · DOI

Cited by

Items 201–300 of 1,005

Metadata

Authors
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T.
Venue
Integrative Medicine International
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015-04-02
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
211-222
ISSN
2296-7362 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1159/000368408
OpenAlex
W246286872
Cited by
18,657
References
22
FWCI
175.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.