Cited by 352Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Voluntary Running Exercise Alters Microbiota Composition and Increases n-Butyrate Concentration in the Rat Cecum

MATSUMOTO, Megumi, INOUE, Ryo, TSUKAHARA, Takamitsu, USHIDA, Kazunari, CHIJI, Hideyuki, MATSUBARA, Noritaka, HARA, Hiroshi·2008·Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry

Abstract

The effects of voluntary wheel-running exercise on cecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acid production were investigated in rats. The microbiota composition was notably different between the exercised and sedentary rats. Furthermore, the exercised rats showed a significantly higher n-butyrate concentration than the sedentary rats. This alteration of the cecal microbial environment may contribute to the beneficial effect of exercise on gastrointestinal disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1271/bbb.70474

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regular running exercise in rats is related to an increase in butyrate-producing bacteria and an increase of butyrate concentration.

    “Matsumoto et al. [72] reported that regular running exercise in rats was related to an increase in butyrate-producing bacteria in the microbiota composition along with an increase of butyrate concentration.”

    From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [72]

  • The cecum was approximately 1.5 times larger in the exercise group than in the control group, and cecal tissue weights and contents were much greater in the exercise group, indicating a significant change in the cecal environment in response to voluntary wheel running.

    “The cecum was approximately 1.5 times larger in the exercise group than in the control group, and the cecal tissue weights and contents were much greater in the exercise group than in the control group, indicating that a significant change had occurred in the cecal environment in response to voluntary wheel running [80].”
  • N-butyrate levels increased significantly in the exercise group (8.14 ± 1.36 mmol/g of cecal contents) compared to the control group (4.87 ± 0.41 mmol/g of cecal contents).

    “Levels of N-butyrate increased significantly between the exercise groups (8.14 ± 1.36 mmol/g of cecal contents) compared to the control group (4.87 ± 0.41 mmol/g of cecal contents) [80].”
  • The cecal microbiota and SCFA profiles were much different between the exercise and control groups.

    “Additionally, the cecal microbiota and SCFA profiles were much different between the exercise and control groups [80].”
  • In 14 male Wistar rats over five weeks, rats that voluntarily exercised using a wheel presented higher cecum levels of SCFA than the sedentary control group.

    “Matsumoto et al [80] performed a study in 14 male Wistar rats during five weeks. The control group was sedentary and the exercise group had access to an exercise wheel in their cage. They discovered through 16S rRNA gene sequencing that the rats that voluntarily exercised using the wheel presented higher cecum levels of SCFA than the sedentary control group.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MATSUMOTO, M., INOUE, R., TSUKAHARA, T., USHIDA, K., CHIJI, H., MATSUBARA, N., & HARA, H.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Institute of Nutrition and Pathology (Japan) (JP)
  • Kyoto Prefectural University (JP)
  • Fuji Women's University (JP)
Venue
Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry
Published
2008-02-23
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
572-576
ISSN
  • 0916-8451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-6947
OpenAlex
W1975807766
Cited by
352
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
voluntary wheel running, physical activity, gut microbiota, cecal microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, n-butyric acid, cecum, sedentary behavior, gut health
MeSH terms
Animals, Butyrates, Cecum, Male, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review