Cited by 161Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingBiochemical effects in animals

Is There a Physiologic Basis for Creatine Use in Children and Adolescents?

UNNITHAN, VISWANATH B., VEEHOF, SUZANNE H.E., VELLA, CHANTAL A., KERN, MARIALICE·2001·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purported ergogenic benefits of creatine for the adult population have been well documented. In able-bodied children and adolescents, there is a paucity of data on creatine use and the purported ergogenic effects of creatine. Only 1 study to date has investigated the ergogenic properties of creatine in the adolescent population. The purpose of this review was to try to establish a rationale for creatine use in the child and adolescent population. The limited literature available in this area did not provide a strong enough rationale from either a physiologic or performance perspective for creatine supplementation in these populations. However, significantly more research is required before definitive conclusions can be made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/00124278-200111000-00021

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The physiological rationale regarding an ergogenic benefit in adolescents is similar to that seen in adults.

    “While the physiological rationale regarding an ergogenic benefit in adolescents is similar to that seen in adults [8], the lack of randomized controlled trials and clinical data supporting the safety of creatine supplementation protocols among adolescent populations has resulted in hesitation regarding its widespread recommendation by some practitioners.”

    From Creatine Supplementation in Children and Adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Unnithan et al. concluded that in anaerobic athletes there exists a metabolic rationale as to how and why creatine may provide an ergogenic benefit.

    “Unnithan et al. (88) eloquently described the physiological basis for creatine use in adolescents and came to the conclusion that in anaerobic athletes, there exists a metabolic rationale as to how and why creatine may provide an ergogenic benefit.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
UNNITHAN, V. B., VEEHOF, S. H. E., VELLA, C. A., & KERN, M.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of San Francisco (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2001-11
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
524-528
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993077130
Cited by
18
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
San Francisco State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
creatine supplementation, children, adolescents, ergogenic aids, performance improvement, exercise performance
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Creatine, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Physical Education and Training, Sports, Task Performance and Analysis, Anaerobic Threshold, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review