Cited by 75Gut microbiota and healthNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 222 of the 222 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut microbiota-driven neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities

Open access

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques, tau hyperphosphorylation, and chronic neuroinflammation. While neuroinflammation—mediated by microglial and astrocyte activation—has long been considered a secondary response to Aβ pathology, emerging evidence positions it as a primary driver of cognitive decline. Notably, the gut microbiota, through the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA), is crucial in modulating neuroinflammation. Dysbiosis disrupts gut barrier integrity, promotes systemic inflammation, and exacerbates neuroinflammatory responses, thereby accelerating AD progression. Recent advances reveal that gut microbiota-derived metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids, lipopolysaccharides) directly influence microglial activation and Aβ aggregation. These findings have opened new therapeutic possibilities, with microbiota-targeted approaches such as probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation demonstrating promising neuroprotective effects in preclinical studies by reducing neuroinflammation and preserving cognitive function. However, translating these findings into clinical applications requires further validation through randomized controlled trials. This review summarizes the current understanding of gut microbiota-driven neuroinflammation in AD, from molecular mechanisms to potential therapeutic strategies. Targeting the MGBA represents a paradigm shift in AD management, emphasizing the modulation of neuroinflammation and pathological progression through gut microbiota interventions. The discussion also addresses existing research challenges and outlines future directions to advance this promising field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1582119

Cites

222 of 222 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Neuroinflammation and its feedback loops in Alzheimer’s disease. In the context of brain injury, pathological signals such as amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau proteins can activate resting microglia and astrocytes. This activation triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the activation of the complement system, which contributes to neuronal damage. In turn, the damaged neurons release more Aβ and tau, promoting their aggregation into amyloid plaques (NPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). These pathological products serve as signals of neuronal injury, initiating a positive feedback loop that further exacerbates neurodegeneration.
Figure 1 Neuroinflammation and its feedback loops in Alzheimer’s disease. In the context of brain injury, pathological signals such as amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau proteins can activate resting microglia and astrocytes. This activation triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the activation of the complement system, which contributes to neuronal damage. In turn, the damaged neurons release more Aβ and tau, promoting their aggregation into amyloid plaques (NPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). These pathological products serve as signals of neuronal injury, initiating a positive feedback loop that further exacerbates neurodegeneration.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Schematic diagram illustrating the regulatory mechanism of gut dysbiosis in AD neuroinflammation. In AD, gut dysbiosis triggers immune responses and the production of harmful metabolites, including lipopolysaccharides (LPS), amyloid, Bile acids (BAs), and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). These metabolites disrupt the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier, allowing LPS to enter systemic circulation. This, in turn, promotes systemic inflammation and activates microglia via the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA). Additionally, amyloid accumulation accelerates the formation of neuronal amyloid plaques by enhancing immune system activity. Elevated levels of BAs and TMAO are associated with increased brain Aβ concentrations, while the interaction between TMAO and tau pathology may further intensify neuroinflammation, contributing to AD progression in the brain.
Figure 2 Schematic diagram illustrating the regulatory mechanism of gut dysbiosis in AD neuroinflammation. In AD, gut dysbiosis triggers immune responses and the production of harmful metabolites, including lipopolysaccharides (LPS), amyloid, Bile acids (BAs), and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). These metabolites disrupt the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier, allowing LPS to enter systemic circulation. This, in turn, promotes systemic inflammation and activates microglia via the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA). Additionally, amyloid accumulation accelerates the formation of neuronal amyloid plaques by enhancing immune system activity. Elevated levels of BAs and TMAO are associated with increased brain Aβ concentrations, while the interaction between TMAO and tau pathology may further intensify neuroinflammation, contributing to AD progression in the brain.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Schematic diagram illustrating the therapeutic potential of gut microbiota in AD neuroinflammation. Interventions targeting gut microbiota (such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and FMT) have been shown to restore the gut microbiota imbalance commonly found in AD patients. These interventions are linked to increased production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), improved intestinal mucosal barrier function, reduced levels of pro-inflammatory factors, and enhanced intestinal neurotransmitters. By correcting the gut dysbiosis and modulating the gut-brain axis, these treatments have been shown to improve the neuropathological status of AD. This is reflected in enhanced cognitive function, reduced activation of neural cells, and a significant decline in amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau protein levels, ultimately helping to alleviate AD-related neuroinflammation.
Figure 3 Schematic diagram illustrating the therapeutic potential of gut microbiota in AD neuroinflammation. Interventions targeting gut microbiota (such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and FMT) have been shown to restore the gut microbiota imbalance commonly found in AD patients. These interventions are linked to increased production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), improved intestinal mucosal barrier function, reduced levels of pro-inflammatory factors, and enhanced intestinal neurotransmitters. By correcting the gut dysbiosis and modulating the gut-brain axis, these treatments have been shown to improve the neuropathological status of AD. This is reflected in enhanced cognitive function, reduced activation of neural cells, and a significant decline in amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau protein levels, ultimately helping to alleviate AD-related neuroinflammation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 75

Metadata

Authors
Lei, W., Cheng, Y., Liu, X., Gao, J., Zhu, Z., Ding, W., Xu, X., Li, Y., Ling, Z., Jiang, R., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Nantong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ling, Zongxin
  • Jiang, Ruilai
  • Chen, Xiaoying
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2025-06-26
Volume
16
Pages
1582119-1582119
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411664782
Cited by
68
References
222
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 8
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2022ZFJH003)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ24H090005)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, gut microbiota, neuroinflammation, microbiota-gut-brain axis, dysbiosis, intestinal barrier integrity, short-chain fatty acids, lipopolysaccharide, microglial activation, amyloid-beta aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation, probiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Brain-Gut Axis, Neuroinflammatory Diseases, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Humans, Probiotics, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review