The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 76 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain
Open accessAbstract
The human brain has often been viewed as outstanding among mammalian brains: the most cognitively able, the largest-than-expected from body size, endowed with an overdeveloped cerebral cortex that represents over 80% of brain mass, and purportedly containing 100 billion neurons and 10x more glial cells. Such uniqueness was seemingly necessary to justify the superior cognitive abilities of humans over larger-brained mammals such as elephants and whales. However, our recent studies using a novel method to determine the cellular composition of the brain of humans and other primates as well as of rodents and insectivores show that, since different cellular scaling rules apply to the brains within these orders, brain size can no longer be considered a proxy for the number of neurons in the brain. These studies also showed that the human brain is not exceptional in its cellular composition, as it was found to contain as many neuronal and non-neuronal cells as would be expected of a primate brain of its size. Additionally, the so-called overdeveloped human cerebral cortex holds only 19% of all brain neurons, a fraction that is similar to that found in other mammals. In what regards absolute numbers of neurons, however, the human brain does have two advantages compared to other mammalian brains: compared to rodents, and probably to whales and elephants as well, it is built according to the very economical, space-saving scaling rules that apply to other primates; and, among economically built primate brains, it is the largest, hence containing the most neurons. These findings argue in favor of a view of cognitive abilities that is centered on absolute numbers of neurons, rather than on body size or encephalization, and call for a re-examination of several concepts related to the exceptionality of the human brain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Own interpretation · 28 No full text of the sources · 13 Not checked yet · 13 Own result · 8 No basis given · 5 Partly supported · 5 Sources not found · 3 Supported · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the gray matter of the cerebral cortex, glial cells outnumber neurons by a factor of <2 (Sherwood et al., 2006; Pelvig et al., 2008).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > The human brain in numbers
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Sherwood et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Table 2 (Results; page unavailable) reports glia–neuron ratios below 2 in several sampled frontal-cortex areas, including 1.65 in human area 9L. But the ratio is 2.19 in human area 4, and some sampled ratios are below 1, so the paper does not establish that glia outnumber neurons by a factor of less than 2 throughout cerebral cortical gray matter. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pelvig et al., 2008 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“there is no significant correlation between brain size and general cognitive ability within families (Schoenemann et al., 2000)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Intraspecific variability in size, numbers and abilities
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schoenemann et al., 2000 source
The Abstract reports that within-family correlations between neuroanatomy and general cognitive ability were essentially zero in 36 sibling pairs. The Discussion likewise says that the positive association seen in the general population was not found among sisters in the same families. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
In the paper
“Instead, the number of neurons in the cerebral cortex increases coordinately with the number of neurons in the cerebellum (Herculano-Houzel, submitted).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 3: proportions and relative size matter
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Herculano-Houzel, submitted
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
correlational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the human brain is not exceptional in its cellular composition, as it was found to contain as many neuronal and non-neuronal cells as would be expected of a primate brain of its size.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this fractional number of neurons in the cerebral cortex relative to the whole brain is not correlated with the relative size of the cerebral cortex (Figure 2).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 3: proportions and relative size matter
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with 1468 million neurons, owl monkeys have almost twice as many neurons in the brain as agoutis (which hold 857 million)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Not all brains are created equal: cognitive abilities and numbers of neurons
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a similar 10-fold increase in the number of neurons in a primate brain results in an increase in brain size of only 11-fold”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the capuchin monkey brain has more than twice the number of neurons of the larger-brained capybara (3.7 billion against 1.6 billion)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Not all brains are created equal: cognitive abilities and numbers of neurons
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The increase in numbers of neurons in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and remaining areas is concurrent with an even greater increase in numbers of non-neurons, yielding a maximal glia/neuron ratio that increases with brain size (Herculano-Houzel et al., 2006).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herculano-Houzel et al., 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a 10-fold increase in the number of neurons in a rodent brain results in a 35-fold larger brain”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
- It may state two separate claims as one. 48
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Among birds, those that are larger-brained (corvids, parrots and owls) are also considered the most intelligent (Lefebvre et al., 2004).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > Why bother with cell numbers?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Lefebvre et al., 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Neural and Cognitive Correlates of Innovation in Birds” section identifies corvids, parrots, and owls among larger-brained birds and reports a general association between brain size and cognitive measures. It does not establish that these three groups are considered the most intelligent; in particular, the passage listing owls does not link them to superior cognition. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Absolute brain mass and number of neurons, left out of the encephalization equation, must clearly be taken into consideration, since the “exceeding number of neurons” in a large brain should necessarily be larger than that in a smaller brain of same EQ (Herculano-Houzel, 2007).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Herculano-Houzel, 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Implications for Volume Comparisons Across Orders’ section says that comparisons of brain size should consider neuronal counts directly, not just brain volume. The paper also relates larger primate brain structures to greater numbers of neurons. It does not address encephalization quotient (EQ) or establish that a larger brain has more ‘exceeding’ neurons than a smaller brain with the same EQ; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Cognitive abilities can be meaningfully compared across species.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we have suggested that, rather than humans having a larger brain than expected, it is the great apes such as orangutans and, more notably, gorillas that have bodies that are much larger than expected for primates of their brain size (Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“primate brain size increases approximately isometrically as a function of neuron number, with no systematic change in neuronal density or in the non-neuronal/neuronal ratio with increasing brain size”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007 source
The Discussion states that primate brain size increases linearly with neuron number, neuronal densities remain stable, and the nonneuronal-to-neuronal cell ratio does not correlate with brain mass. These findings support all three parts of the paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In the order Rodentia, we find that the brain increases in size faster than it gains neurons, with a decrease in neuronal densities which, in the presence of constant non-neuronal cell densities, implies that average neuronal size increases rapidly as neurons become more numerous (Herculano-Houzel et al., 2006).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Herculano-Houzel et al., 2006 source
The Results report that brain mass increases faster than neuron number across the six rodent species, while neuronal density decreases and nonneuronal cell density varies very little with structure size. The Discussion says neurons increase in average size as their numbers increase; the paper treats that size change as an estimate rather than a direct measurement. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Different mammalian orders have traditionally been pooled together in studies of brain allometry, as if their brains were built according to the same scaling rules (for example, Haug, 1987; Zhang and Sejnowski, 2000).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 2: brain size matters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Haug, 1987 source
- Supportedcites Zhang and Sejnowski, 2000 source
Section 2 (Empirical Scaling Law; page not provided) analyzes 59 mammalian species together under a single gray–white matter power law. The Introduction also describes earlier scaling studies using data from different species. This paper therefore serves as an example of pooling mammalian species under a shared scaling rule, though it does not explicitly classify them by order. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“the cerebral cortex, despite varying in relative size from 42% (in the mouse) to 82% of brain mass (in the human), contains between 13 and 28% of all brain neurons in 15 of 18 species studied, ranging between 13% (in moles) and 41% (in the squirrel monkey; Herculano-Houzel et al., 2006, 2007; Sarko et al., 2009).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 3: proportions and relative size matter
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Herculano-Houzel et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page not provided) report that cortical mass increases with brain size while the cortex contains a relatively stable 17.8 ± 3.4% of brain neurons across six rodent species. This supports the general pattern, but the paper does not establish the quoted 42%–82% mass range or the neuron percentages across 18 species, including humans, moles, and squirrel monkeys. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Fractional Distribution of MBR and Neurons” (page unavailable), the paper reports that the cerebral cortex contains 18.9–41.8% of brain neurons in the primates examined, with 41.8% in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri). It does not establish the claimed 15-of-18-species distribution or the figures for moles, mice, and humans; its reported cortical mass range is 66.8–79.9% for the examined primates. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not matchedcites Sarko et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an informal survey with senior neuroscientists that we ran in 2007 showed that most believed that the number of cells in the human brain was indeed already known: that we have about 100 billion neurons, outnumbered by about 10 times more glial cells – but none of the consulted scientists could cite an original reference for these numbers”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > The human brain in numbers
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the so-called overdeveloped human cerebral cortex holds only 19% of all brain neurons, a fraction that is similar to that found in other mammals.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the human cerebral cortex, which represents 82% of brain mass, holds only 19% of all neurons in the human brain”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An examination of the cellular composition of the cerebellum of orangutans and one gorilla shows that the sizes of the cerebellum and cerebral cortex predicted for these species from the number of cells in the cerebellum match their actual sizes, which suggests that the brain of these animals indeed is built according to the same scaling rules that apply to humans and other primates (Herculano-Hou”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Predictions for great apes
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Herculano-Houzel and Kaas, in preparation
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the absolute number of neurons in the rodent and primate cerebral cortex does increase much faster in larger brains compared to the number of neurons in the combined brainstem, diencephalon and basal ganglia, and is accompanied by a similarly fast increase in the number of neurons in the cerebellum (Figure 5).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“compared to rodents, and probably to whales and elephants as well, it is built according to the very economical, space-saving scaling rules that apply to other primates”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“led two authors to conclude that the “factors that correlate better with intelligence (across species) are the number of cortical neurons and conduction velocity, as the basis for information processing” (Roth and Dicke, 2005).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > Why bother with cell numbers?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Roth and Dicke, 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many original articles, reviews and textbooks affirm that we have 100 billion neurons and 10 times more glial cells (Kandel et al., 2000; Ullian et al., 2001; Doetsch, 2003; Nishiyama et al., 2005; Noctor et al., 2007; Allen and Barres, 2009), usually with no references cited.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > The human brain in numbers
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These authors estimated the number of neurons in the human brain at about 85 billion: 12–15 billion in the telencephalon (Shariff, 1953), 70 billion in the cerebellum, as granule cells (based on Lange, 1975), and fewer than 1 billion in the brainstem.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > The human brain in numbers
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“among economically built primate brains, it is the largest, hence containing the most neurons.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since different cellular scaling rules apply to the brains within these orders, brain size can no longer be considered a proxy for the number of neurons in the brain.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the only possible explanation for the ubiquitous quote of 10 times more glial than neuronal cells in the entire human brain would be the presence of nearly one trillion glial cells in the remaining structures alone – an unlikely scenario, since these structures represent <10% of total brain mass.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > The human brain in numbers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Andersen et al., 1992 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Monkeys, for instance, possess brains that are much smaller than those of ungulates, but the higher cognitive and behavioral flexibility of monkeys over ungulates is anecdotally evident to any observer who compares the ingenious and complex abilities of macaques to those of cows or horses, even though the latter have 4–5× larger brains than macaques.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > Why bother with cell numbers?
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Cognitive abilities can be meaningfully compared across species.
In the paper
“Across species, the number of neurons and their relative abundance in different parts of the brain is widely considered to be a determinant of neural function and, consequently, of behavior (Williams and Herrup, 1988).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > Why bother with cell numbers?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Williams and Herrup, 1988 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is evidence that the cellular scaling rules considered here from a set of primate species also extend to primates as a whole, and can be used to infer the expected cellular composition of the human brain”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Across insectivore species, on the other hand, the cerebellum increases linearly in size as a function of its number of neurons (as in primates), while the cerebral cortex increases in size hypermetrically as it gains neurons (as in rodents; Sarko et al., 2009).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sarko et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings corroborated previous studies describing neuronal density decreasing and the glia-to-neuron ratio increasing with increasing brain size across mammalian taxa (Tower and Elliot, 1952; Shariff, 1953; Friede, 1954; Tower, 1954; Hawking and Olszewski, 1957; Haug, 1987; Reichenbach, 1989; Stolzenburg et al., 1989).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Cellular scaling rules for rodent, insectivore, and primate brains
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our quantitative studies on the cellular scaling rules that apply to different mammalian orders have shown that this assumption is invalid and therefore should no longer be applied”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 2: brain size matters
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With a brain of only 52 g, the behavioral, social and cognitive repertoire of the capuchin monkey is outstanding compared to the capybara, a giant Amazonian rodent (MacDonald, 1981), even though the latter has a larger brain of 75 g.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Introduction > Why bother with cell numbers?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites MacDonald, 1981 source
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Cognitive abilities can be meaningfully compared across species.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Capuchin monkeys, for instance, have much larger EQs than gorillas (Marino, 1998), but are outranked by these in cognitive performance (Deaner et al., 2007).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Cognitive abilities can be meaningfully compared across species.
In the paper
“if primates have big brains merely because they have small bodies, we cannot presume that this represents an evolutionary trend driven by cognitive demands”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Deacon, 1997 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Brain size varies across mammals by a factor of approximately 100,000 (Tower, 1954; Stolzenburg et al., 1989).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 2: brain size matters
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“compared to other mammalian orders, primate encephalization is the result of a shift in postcranial growth processes, not a modification of brain growth (Deacon, 1997).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Deacon, 1997 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Compared to mammals as a whole, humans have the largest EQ found for any mammal, of between 7 and 8 (Jerison, 1973)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jerison, 1973
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“like in other non-anthropoid primates, the human brain mass represents about 2% of body mass.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a generic rodent brain of human-sized proportions, weighing 1.5 kg: such a brain would have only 12 billion neurons, and a much larger number of 46 billion non-neuronal cells”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Not all brains are created equal: cognitive abilities and numbers of neurons
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the distribution of cortical mass in humans may differ from that in other primates, endowing particularly relevant regions such as area 10 with relatively more neurons in the human cortex (Semendeferi et al., 2001).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 3: proportions and relative size matter
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Semendeferi et al., 2001 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although gorillas and orangutans overlap or exceed humans in body size, their brains amount to only about one-third of the size of the human brain.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“even if compared to anthropoid primates only, humans still have an EQ of over 3, a value that is larger than that obtained for any other primate or cetacean (Marino, 1998).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marino, 1998 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The very concept of encephalization presupposes that not only the brain scales as a function of body size, but that all brains scale the same way, such that the only informative (and sufficient) variable is brain size and its deviation from the expected.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 2: brain size matters
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its relatively large cerebral cortex, which accounts for 82% of brain mass.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 3: proportions and relative size matter
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“according to this notion, small-brained animals with very large EQs should be expected to have more cognitive abilities than large-brained animals with smaller EQs.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Cognitive abilities can be meaningfully compared across species.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By maintaining the average neuronal size (including all arborizations) invariant as brain size changes, primate brains scale in size in a much more space-saving, economical manner compared to the inflationary growth that occurs in rodents, in which larger numbers of neurons are accompanied by larger neurons.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Not all brains are created equal: cognitive abilities and numbers of neurons
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This assumption, which was justifiable by the lack of direct estimates of the neuronal composition of the brain of different species, is so widespread that it implicitly or explicitly underlies most comparative studies to date (for example, Haug, 1987; Finlay and Darlington, 1995; Barton and Harvey, 2000; Clark et al., 2001).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 2: brain size matters
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“the human brain exhibits a further modification in that it continues to grow as though in a larger body (Deacon, 1997).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > Brain and Body Scaling: The Traditional View > Assumption 1: body size matters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Deacon, 1997 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“sheer size alone, or in relation to body size, is not an adequate parameter to qualify, or disqualify, the human brain as “special””
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Do we have the most neurons? predictions for other large-brained mammals
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our standing among primates as the proud owners of the largest living brain assures that, at least among primates, we enjoy the largest number of neurons from which to derive cognition and behavior as a whole”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Concluding remarks: our place in nature
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the enlargement of the cerebral cortex is not, in principle, an exclusive feature of the human brain: a similar expansion of the mass of the cerebral cortex, relative to the whole brain, is predicted by both the rodent and primate cellular scaling rules, irrespective of the number of neurons contained in the cortex (Table 2).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“if the same linear scaling rules are considered to apply to great apes as to other primates, then similar three-fold differences in brain size and in brain neurons alike apply to humans compared to gorillas, and to gorillas compared to baboons”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Cognitive abilities, brain size and number of neurons
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Azevedo et al. (2009), who found that the adult male human brain, at an average of 1.5 kg, has 86 billion neurons and 85 billion non-neuronal cells – numbers that deviate from the expected by 7 and 24% only.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Azevedo et al. (2009) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the human brain scales as a primate brain: this economical property of scaling alone, compared to rodents, assures that the human brain has many more neurons than would fit into a rodent brain of similar size, and possibly into any other similar-sized brain”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Concluding remarks: our place in nature
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This generic primate brain should have a cerebral cortex of about 1.4 kg, containing 25 billion neurons, and a cerebellum weighing 120 g, with 70 billion neurons (Table 2).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a hypothetical rodent brain with 86 billion neurons, like the human brain, would be predicted to weigh overwhelming 35 kg – a value that is way beyond the largest known brain mass of 9 kg for the blue whale, and probably physiologically unattainable”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Do we have the most neurons? predictions for other large-brained mammals
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“it becomes increasingly likely that humans do not have truly unique cognitive abilities, and hence must differ from these animals not qualitatively, but rather in the combination and extent of abilities such as theory of mind, imitation and social cognition (Marino et al., 2009).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Cognitive abilities, brain size and number of neurons
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Marino et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“although men have been reported to have more neurons in the cerebral cortex than women (Pakkenberg and Gundersen, 1997; Pelvig et al., 2008)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Intraspecific variability in size, numbers and abilities
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pakkenberg and Gundersen, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pelvig et al., 2008 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of the diverging power laws that relate brain size and number of neurons across rodents and primates, the latter can hold more neurons in the same brain volume, with larger neuronal densities than found in rodents.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the increase in cognitive abilities afforded by increasing the number of neurons in the brain can be expected to increase exponentially with absolute number of neurons, and might even be subject to a thresholding effect once critical points of information processing are reached”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Cognitive abilities, brain size and number of neurons
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since neuronal density does not scale with brain size in primates, but decreases with increasing brain size in rodents, the larger the brain size, the larger is the difference in number of neurons across similar-sized rodent and primate brains.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The human cerebral cortex, with an average 1233 g and 16 billion neurons, is slightly below expectations for a primate brain of 1.5 kg”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“glial cells in the human brain are at most 50% of all brain cells, which is an important finding since it is one more brain characteristic that we share with other primates (Azevedo et al., 2009)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Concluding remarks: our place in nature
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Azevedo et al., 2009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Not only the extent of intraspecific variation is much smaller (on the order of 10–50%) than interspecific variation (which spans five orders of magnitude within mammals; Tower, 1954; Stolzenburg et al., 1989)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Intraspecific variability in size, numbers and abilities
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“while the human cerebellum, at 154 g and 69 billion neurons, matches or even slightly exceeds the expected (Table 2)”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to one estimate, the false killer whale and the African elephant would have about 11 billion neurons in the cerebral cortex, despite their large size – and fewer neurons than the 11.5 billion estimated by the same method for the human cerebral cortex, though only marginally so (Roth and Dicke, 2005).”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > Do we have the most neurons? predictions for other large-brained mammals
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Roth and Dicke, 2005 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to these rules, a generic primate brain of 1.5 kg should have 93 billion neurons, and 112 billion non-neuronal cells: glial cells, thus, should constitute at most half of all brain cells.”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Humans are more cognitively capable than larger-brained mammals such as elephants and whales.
“Such uniqueness was seemingly necessary to justify the superior cognitive abilities of humans over larger-brained mammals such as elephants and whales.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cognitive abilities can be meaningfully compared across species.
“the higher cognitive and behavioral flexibility of monkeys over ungulates is anecdotally evident to any observer who compares the ingenious and complex abilities of macaques to those of cows or horses”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-neuronal cell densities are similar across species.
“In view of the similar non-neuronal cell densities across species”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Our neural network parameters represent a computational analog to biological neural capacity, directly reflecting the studies showing strong correlations between brain volume and total neuron count across species, humans, and mice brains (68–70).”
From What if eye...? Computationally recreating vision evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The average number of glial cells in the human brain is estimated to be 84.61 ± 9.83 × 109 (Herculano-Houzel, 2009), with the population of glial cells in the neocortex estimated at from 18.2 to 38.6 × 109”
From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We suggest that corvid brains are scaled-up songbird brains, just as humans brains are to brains of nonhuman primates (38, 47)”
From Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“the relative homogeneity of the two largest neuronal structures, with ~69 billion (cerebellar cortex) and ~16 billion (cortex) neurons out of the 86 billion neurons in the human brain33, is striking and suggests an evolutionary expansion of a canonical cortical blueprint34.”
From An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome (2012) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“The neocortex alone contains approximately 16.34 billion neurons (Herculano-Houzel, 2009) and 164 trillion synapses, points of communication between neurons (Tang et al., 2001).”
From The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System (2016) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel, 2009
In the citing paper
“The human CNS is possibly the most complex biological tissue, comprising on average 86.1 billion neurons in the brain and spinal cord in males, along with a roughly equal number of glial cells (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Herculano-Houzel et al., 2015).”
From The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System (2016) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel, 2009
In the citing paper
“which is an order of magnitude more than the total number of cells in the brain of mouse, rat, and many other mammals (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
From The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System (2016) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel, 2009
In the citing paper
“According to the scaling of brain metabolism with its total number of neurons proposed above, the apparently remarkable use in humans of 20% of the whole body energy budget by a brain that represents only 2% of this mass can be explained quite simply by the large number of neurons in the human brain, about 10× larger than would be expected of a rodent brain of its size [44], given the different”
From Scaling of Brain Metabolism with a Fixed Energy Budget per Neuron: Implications for Neuronal Activity, Plasticity and Evolution (2011) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“We have shown previously that the human brain conforms to the neuronal scaling rules that apply to other primates [27], [44].”
From Scaling of Brain Metabolism with a Fixed Energy Budget per Neuron: Implications for Neuronal Activity, Plasticity and Evolution (2011) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“The cortical reorganization hypothesis suggests that selection for absolutely larger brains-and concomitant cortical reorganization-was the predominant mechanism supporting cognitive evolution (77, 91, 100-106, 120).”
From The evolution of self-control. (2014) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > The Human Brain is a Linearly Scaled-Up Primate Brain in its Number of Neurons. What Now? > Concluding remarks: our place in nature
“a cerebral cortex that is exactly as large as expected for a primate brain of 1.5 kg”
§ The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain > A New View: Scaling of Neuronal Numbers > The cellular composition of the human brain
“The human cerebral cortex, with an average 1233 g and 16 billion neurons, is slightly below expectations for a primate brain of 1.5 kg”
Citations
Cites
Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal
Ndiaye, M., Lespez, L., Tribolo, C., Rassé, M., Hadjas, I., Davidoux, S., Huysecom, É., & Douze, K. (2024) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000667478 · Cited by 24,214
(1982) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(82)90076-5 · Cited by 9,150
Henry, M. A. (1995) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0108 · Cited by 3,454
Changes in grey matter induced by training
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/427311a · Cited by 2,373
Azevedo, F. A. C., Carvalho, L. R. B., Grinberg, L. T., Farfel, J. M., Ferretti, R. E. L., Leite, R. E. P., Filho, W. J., Lent, R., & Herculano‐Houzel, S. (2009) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21974 · Cited by 2,337
Self-citationEVOLUTION OF THE BRAIN AND INTELLIGENCE
Radinsky, L., & Jerison, H. J. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2407154 · Cited by 1,982
Control of Synapse Number by Glia
Ullian, E. M., Sapperstein, S. K., Christopherson, K. S., & Barres, B. A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5504.657 · Cited by 1,380 · cited 1×
“Recent efforts to support this uniqueness have focused on fi nding genetic differences between humans and other primates (reviewed in Vallender, 2008), as well as cellular particularities such as the presence and distribution of Von Economo neurons (Nimchinsky et al., 1999; but see Butti et al.,…”
Linked Regularities in the Development and Evolution of Mammalian Brains
Finlay, B. L., & Darlington, R. B. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777856 · Cited by 1,217 · cited 2×
“This assumption, which was justifi able by the lack of direct estimates of the neuronal composition of the brain of different species, is so widespread that it implicitly or explicitly underlies most comparative studies to date (for example, Haug, 1987; Finlay and Darlington, 1995; Barton and Harvey, 2000; Clark et al…”
Black, J. E., Isaacs, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Alcantara, A. A., & Greenough, W. T. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.14.5568 · Cited by 1,161
The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function
Ramnani, N. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1953 · Cited by 1,011 · cited 2×
“…as changes in the relative size of functional cortical areas (for instance, Semendeferi et al., 2001; Rilling and Seligman, 2002), in the volume of prefrontal white matter (Schoenemann et al., 2005) or in the size of specifi c portions of the cerebellum (Ramnani, 2006) may play in human cognition.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome
Hawrylycz, M. J., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, J. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11405 · Cited by 3,083
Circular RNAs in the Mammalian Brain Are Highly Abundant, Conserved, and Dynamically Expressed
Rybak-Wolf, A., Stottmeister, C., Glažar, P., Jens, M., Pino, N., Giusti, S., Hanan, M., Behm, M., Bartok, O., Ashwal-Fluss, R., et al. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.027 · Cited by 2,423
The connectomics of brain disorders
Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., & Breakspear, M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3901 · Cited by 1,734
Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding
Rosenberg, A. B., Roco, C. M., Muscat, R. A., Kuchina, A., Sample, P., Yao, Z., Graybuck, L. T., Peeler, D. J., Mukherjee, S., Chen, W., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam8999 · Cited by 1,422
Development and Evolution of the Human Neocortex
Lui, J. H., Hansen, D. V., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.030 · Cited by 1,342
“However, neo-cortices of different mammalian species vary widely in shape, size, and neuron number (reviewed by Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
Influentialvon Bartheld, C. S., Bahney, J., & Herculano‐Houzel, S. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24040 · Cited by 1,063
“…development, and evolution of the brain, neurological and psychiatric diseases, and aging (Coggeshall and Lekan, 1996; Morrison and Hof, 1997; Azevedo et al., 2009; Hilgetag and Barbas, 2009; Lent et al., 2012; Yuhas and Jabr, 2012; Herculano-Houzel, 2009, 2014; Geuna and HerreraRincon, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System
Silbereis, J. C., Pochareddy, S., Zhu, Y., Li, M., & Sestan, N. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.008 · Cited by 818
“There are approximately 16.34 billion neurons in the cerebral cortex, which includes as many as 2.58 billion neurons in the cortical white matter (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Sigaard et al., 2014).”
InfluentialMolecular diversity of midbrain development in mouse, human, and stem cells
La Manno, G., Gyllborg, D., Codeluppi, S., Nishimura, K., Salto, C., Zeisel, A., Borm, L. E., Stott, S. R. W., Toledo, E. M., Villaescusa, J. C., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.027 · Cited by 835
The evolution of self-control.
MacLean, E. L., Hare, B., Nunn, C. L., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Baker, J. M., Bania, A. E., Barnard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111 · Cited by 819
Consciousness: here, there and everywhere?
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0167 · Cited by 811
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201895109 · Cited by 726
“That this represents an enormous 25% of the total body energetic cost is simply a result of the “economical” neuronal scaling rules that apply to primates in comparison to rodents, and probably to other mammals in general: For a similar brain size, more neurons will be found in a primate brain than in possibly any oth…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDesigning neural networks through neuroevolution
Stanley, K. O., Clune, J., Lehman, J., & Miikkulainen, R. P. (2018) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-018-0006-z · Cited by 745
Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex
Florio, M., & Huttner, W. Β. (2014) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.090571 · Cited by 654
“In primates, by contrast, neuron density remains relatively constant as neocortical size increases (Charvet et al., 2013), with no correlative increase in cell size (Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007; Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundAging and neurodegeneration are associated with increased mutations in single human neurons
Lodato, M. A., Rodin, R. E., Bohrson, C. L., Coulter, M. E., Barton, A. R., Kwon, M., Sherman, M. A., Vitzthum, C. M., Luquette, L. J., Yandava, C. N., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao4426 · Cited by 635
The Role of Astrocyte Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease Pathogenesis
Booth, H. D. E., Hirst, W. D., & Wade-Martins, R. (2017) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.001 · Cited by 633
“Astrocytes in Parkinson’s disease Glia account for over 50% of the cells in the brain and can be divided into various subtypes, of which astrocytes are the most populous [1,2].”
BackgroundBirds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain
Olkowicz, S., Kocourek, M., Lučan, R. K., Porteš, M., Fitch, W. T., Herculano-Houzel, S., & Němec, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517131113 · Cited by 564
“We suggest that corvid brains are scaled-up songbird brains, just as humans brains are to brains of nonhuman primates (38, 47), and that large absolute numbers of neurons endow corvids with superior cognitive abilities.”
BackgroundSelf-citationUltrastructural evidence for synaptic scaling across the wake/sleep cycle
de Vivo, L., Bellesi, M., Marshall, W., Bushong, E. A., Ellisman, M. H., Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah5982 · Cited by 574
“3 The cerebral cortex contains 16 billion neurons in humans, 14 million in mice(1), and each neuron harbors thousands of synapses(2).”
BackgroundEngineered In Vitro Disease Models
Benam, K. H., Dauth, S., Hassell, B., Herland, A., Jain, A., Jang, K.-J., Karalis, K., Kim, H. J., MacQueen, L., Mahmoodian, R., et al. (2015) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040418 · Cited by 554
The Indispensable Roles of Microglia and Astrocytes during Brain Development
Reemst, K., Noctor, S. C., Lucassen, P. J., & Hol, E. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00566 · Cited by 516
“…brains have shown that in general, at least 50% of all cells in the human brain are glia, with considerable differences between studies and between different brain areas and a ratio that may change with age (Pelvig et al., 2008; Azevedo et al., 2009; Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Lyck et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSpecific expression and functions of circular RNAs
Mısır, S., Wu, N., & Yang, B. B. (2022) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/s41418-022-00948-7 · Cited by 493
“This may be one of the reasons why higher number of circRNAs are observed in humans compared to mouse brains, as the synaptic density in the human cerebral cortex is higher than that in the mouse brain [95].”
BackgroundZeng, H., Shen, E. H., Hohmann, J. G., Oh, S. W., Bernard, A., Royall, J. J., Glattfelder, K. J., Sunkin, S. M., Morris, J. A., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.052 · Cited by 426
Experimental evidence for sparse firing in the neocortex
Barth, A. L., & Poulet, J. F. A. (2012) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.03.008 · Cited by 364
Single Cell Isolation and Analysis
Hu, P., Zhang, W., Xin, H., & Deng, G. Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2016.00116 · Cited by 401
“This makes the brain a complicated network (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundCortical column and whole-brain imaging with molecular contrast and nanoscale resolution
Gao, R., Asano, S. M., Upadhyayula, S., Pisarev, I., Milkie, D. E., Liu, T., Singh, V. P., Graves, A. R., Huynh, G. H., Zhao, Y., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau8302 · Cited by 376
“5-kg organ that, despite its small size, contains more than 80 billion neurons (1) that connect through approximately 7000 synapses each in a network of immense complexity.”
BackgroundOtani, T., Marchetto, M. C., Gage, F. H., Simons, B. D., & Livesey, F. J. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.003 · Cited by 353
“Although several different processes have been proposed to contribute to increased neuronal numbers in the primate cortex (Herculano-Houzel, 2009), research has focused on two primary mechanisms: an increase in the number of founder neuroepithelial cells, driven by increased proliferation of neuroepithelial cells befo…”
BackgroundStem Cell Models of Human Brain Development
Kelava, I., & Lancaster, M. A. (2016) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.05.022 · Cited by 385
Neuron densities vary across and within cortical areas in primates
Collins, C. E., Airey, D. C., Young, N. A., Leitch, D. B., & Kaas, J. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010356107 · Cited by 361
“Herculano-Houzel S, Collins CE, Wong P, Kaas JH (2007) Cellular scaling rules for primate brains.”
MethodInfluentialHigh-resolution comparative analysis of great ape genomes
Kronenberg, Z. N., Fiddes, I. T., Gordon, D., Murali, S., Cantsilieris, S., Meyerson, O. S., Underwood, J. G., Nelson, B. J., Chaisson, M. J. P., Dougherty, M. L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6343 · Cited by 350
“Over the course of human evolution, humanbrain volume has nearly tripled compared to that of chimpanzees (53), likely owing to differential expression of genes during brain development (6, 8, 54).”
BackgroundTowards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition
de Waal, F. B. M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.003 · Cited by 370
Brain organoids for the study of human neurobiology at the interface of in vitro and in vivo
Chiaradia, I., & Lancaster, M. A. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00730-3 · Cited by 360
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017514 · Cited by 343
“According to the scaling of brain metabolism with its total number of neurons proposed above, the apparently remarkable use in humans of 20% of the whole body energy budget by a brain that represents only 2% of this mass can be explained quite simply by the large number of neurons in the human brain, about 106larger t…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPietschnig, J., Penke, L., Wicherts, J. M., Zeiler, M., & Voracek, M. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.017 · Cited by 316
“Interestingly, recent unpublished data by Morterá and Herculano-Houzel (cited in Herculano-Houzel, 2009, p. 9) showed no association of brain volume with neuron counts among mice of the same age.”
Baronchelli, A., Ferrer‐i‐Cancho, R., Pastor‐Satorras, R., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.010 · Cited by 360
Raven, F., Van der Zee, E. A., Meerlo, P., & Havekes, R. (2018) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2017.05.002 · Cited by 331
“It is estimated that the human brain consists of approximately 86 billion neurons and every single neuron can be connected with thousands of other neurons [1], suggesting that there are close to 100 trillion of these neuronal connections or synapses.”
BackgroundCellular-resolution connectomics: challenges of dense neural circuit reconstruction
Helmstaedter, M. N. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2476 · Cited by 319
Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics
He, B., Sohrabpour, A., Brown, E., & Liu, Z. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120853 · Cited by 297
“INTRODUCTION The human brain is comprised of roughly hundred billions of neurons (1).”
BackgroundRedefining the cerebellar cortex as an assembly of non-uniform Purkinje cell microcircuits
Cerminara, N. L., Lang, E. J., Sillitoe, R. V., & Apps, R. (2015) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3886 · Cited by 315
Maternal exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics causes brain abnormalities in progeny
Jeong, B., Baek, J. Y., Koo, J., Park, S., Ryu, Y., Kim, K., Zhang, S., Chung, C., Dogan, R., Choi, H.-S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127815 · Cited by 327
Evolution of vocal learning and spoken language
Jarvis, E. D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax0287 · Cited by 329
Scaling and systems biology for integrating multiple organs-on-a-chip
Wikswo, J. P., Curtis, E. L., Eagleton, Z. E., Evans, B. C., Kole, A., Hofmeister, L. H., & Matloff, W. J. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50243k · Cited by 312
Physical biology of human brain development
Budday, S., Steinmann, P., & Ellen Kuhl, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00257 · Cited by 337
“It contains approximately 100 billion neurons, of which 20 billion are located in the cerebral cortex (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundSuper-Resolution Imaging of the Extracellular Space in Living Brain Tissue
Tønnesen, J., Inavalli, V. V. G. K., & Nägerl, U. V. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.007 · Cited by 303
“Seeing individual cells and their anatomical context is particularly valuable for brain tissue, which has a uniquely complex spatial organization, both at the cellular and network level, where 1 cubic millimeter of brain tissue is estimated to contain 100,000 neurons and 4 km of axon wires (Braitenberg, 1991; Herculan…”
BackgroundNeural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication
Friedemann Pulvermüller, A. (2017) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.001 · Cited by 311
“Already gross anatomical measures, such as relative brain size (Jerison, 1975) and the total number of neurons (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Schüz and Sultan, 2009), seem to set apart humans from other primates, although it is not clear how an exceptionally large or linearly scaled-up version of a…”
BackgroundA Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction
Kosch, T., Karolus, J., Zagermann, J., Reiterer, H., Schmidt, A., & Woźniak, P. W. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3582272 · Cited by 304
“Past research used this questionnaire to measure cognitive workload, assuming that stressful situations are associated with negative emotions that lead to higher cognitive demand.”
Mora‐Bermúdez, F., Badsha, F., Kanton, S., Camp, J. G., Vernot, B., Köhler, K., Voigt, B., Okita, K., Maričić, T., He, Z., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18683 · Cited by 301
“Neocortex expansion in humans relative to chimpanzees involves an increase in the number of cortical neurons generated during fetal development (Borrell and Reillo, 2012; Florio and Huttner, 2014; Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Lui et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMemristive Artificial Synapses for Neuromorphic Computing
Huang, W., Xia, X., Zhu, C., Steichen, P., Quan, W., Mao, W., Yang, J., Chu, L., & Li, X. (2021) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-021-00618-2 · Cited by 319
Evolution of the human brain: when bigger is better
Hofman, M. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00015 · Cited by 303
“…shown that the number of neurons underneath a unit area of cortical surface is not constant and varies linearly with neuronal density, a parameter that is neither related to cortical size nor to the total number of neurons (Herculano-Houzel et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008; Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialFunctional brain network efficiency predicts intelligence
Langer, N., Pedroni, A., Gianotti, L. R. R., Hänggi, J., Knoch, D., & Jäncke, L. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21297 · Cited by 297
“The human brain is organized as a highly interconnected structural network [Herculano-Houzel, 2009] that functionally links adjacent and distant brain areas.”
BackgroundConservation and divergence of cortical cell organization in human and mouse revealed by MERFISH
Fang, R., Xia, C., Close, J. L., Zhang, M., He, J., Huang, Z., Halpern, A. R., Long, B., Miller, J. A., Lein, E. S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm1741 · Cited by 277
“The human cerebral cortex comprises billions of cells of distinct types (1).”
BackgroundLewerenz, J., Ates, G., Methner, A., Conrad, M., & Maher, P. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00214 · Cited by 276
“About 86 billion neurons (Herculano-Houzel, 2009) are interconnected to enable an incredible array of responses to exterior stimuli that manifest either as behaviors or as processes that we experience as emotions, thoughts or memories.”
BackgroundAn early cell shape transition drives evolutionary expansion of the human forebrain
Benito-Kwiecinski, S. K., Giandomenico, S. L., Sutcliffe, M. A., Riis, E. S., Freire-Pritchett, P., Kelava, I., Wunderlich, S., Martin, U., Wray, G. A., McDole, K., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.050 · Cited by 272
de Klein, N., Tsai, E. A., Vochteloo, M., Baird, D., Huang, Y., Chen, C.-Y., van Dam, S., Oelen, R., Deelen, P., Bakker, O. B., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01300-6 · Cited by 272
Aggarwal, K., Mijwil, M. M., Sonia, Al-Mistarehi, A.-H. W., Alomari, S., Gök, M., Alaabdin, A. M. Z., & Abdulrhman, S. H. (2022) · Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics · doi:10.52866/ijcsm.2022.01.01.013 · Cited by 300
Synaptic Signaling in Learning and Memory
Kennedy, M. B. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016824 · Cited by 270
“A human brain contains, on average, 86 billion neurons (Herculano-Houzel 2009) that in toto make trillions of synaptic connections.”
BackgroundMethods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development
Mills, K. L., & Tamnes, C. K. (2014) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.04.004 · Cited by 282
“However, primate and rodent brains differ on a number of levels, including neuronal size and packing density (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundXiang, X., Wind, K., Wiedemann, T., Blume, T., Shi, Y., Briel, N., Beyer, L., Biechele, G., Eckenweber, F., Zatcepin, A., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abe5640 · Cited by 268
“We note that the human brain comprises a higher neuron to nonneuronal cell ratio when compared to a weight normalized brain of rodents (56).”
The population doctrine in cognitive neuroscience
Ebitz, R. B., & Hayden, B. Y. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.07.011 · Cited by 286
“However, brain areas contain hundreds of millions of neurons (Herculano-Houzel, 2009), and somewhere between the scale of single neurons and the gross pooling in electroencephalogram (EEG) or fMRI, neuronal populations produce macroscale phenomena that are poised to link the scale of single neurons…”
BackgroundNeural Decoding of EEG Signals with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
Saeidi, M., Karwowski, W., Farahani, F. V., Fiok, K., Taïar, R., Hancock, P. A., & Aljuaid, A. M. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111525 · Cited by 295
“The human brain is a complex system containing approximately 100 billion neurons and trillions of synaptic connections [1,2].”
BackgroundThe role of mechanics during brain development
Budday, S., Steinmann, P., & Ellen Kuhl, A. (2014) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.010 · Cited by 246
“With 86 billion neurons, 0.15 quadrillion connections, and a mass of 1500 g, the human brain is often considered as the most developed mammalian brain (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA diffusion MRI tractography connectome of the mouse brain and comparison with neuronal tracer data
Calabrese, E., Badea, A., Cofer, G., Qi, Y., & Johnson, G. A. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv121 · Cited by 221
“At an isotropic voxel size of 43 µm, the spatial resolution is approximately 30 000 times higher resolution than a typical human diffusionMRI scan, and 10 times higher after accounting for the approximately 3000-fold difference in total brain volume (Herculano-Houzel 2009).”
BackgroundIntegrating Machine Learning with Human Knowledge
Deng, C., Ji, X., Rainey, C., Zhang, J., & Lu, W. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101656 · Cited by 243
Abaci, H. E., & Shuler, M. L. (2015) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c4ib00292j · Cited by 248
Rapid neurogenesis through transcriptional activation in human stem cells
Busskamp, V., Lewis, N. E., Guye, P., Ng, A. H. M., Shipman, S. L., Byrne, S. M., Sanjana, N. E., Murn, J., Li, Y., Li, S., et al. (2014) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20145508 · Cited by 222
“To cope with the vast complexity of the human brain with its billions of cells and trillions of synapses (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Rockland, 2002), research efforts usually take deconstructive approaches by focusing on individual brain regions of model organisms.”
Connectomic comparison of mouse and human cortex
Loomba, S., Straehle, J., Gangadharan, V., Heike, N., Khalifa, A., Motta, A., Ju, N., Sievers, M., Gempt, J., Meyer, H. S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abo0924 · Cited by 242
“T he human brain, with its 86 billion nerve cells (1) forming a network of unparalleled complexity, is of special interest for neuroscience.”
BackgroundRussell, J. J., Theriot, J. A., Sood, P., Marshall, W. F., Landweber, L. F., Fritz‐Laylin, L. K., Polka, J., Oliferenko, S., Gerbich, T. M., Gladfelter, A. S., et al. (2017) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0391-5 · Cited by 237
“vertebrates, their neurogenic potential is greatly increased in humans, giving rise to over a thousand times the number of neurons in a mouse brain [180], and a brain that is over three times larger than our closest relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos [181].”
BackgroundCoevolution of cultural intelligence, extended life history, sociality, and brain size in primates
Street, S. E., Navarrete, A. F., Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620734114 · Cited by 233
Concurrent fNIRS and EEG for Brain Function Investigation: A Systematic, Methodology-Focused Review
Li, R., Yang, D., Fang, F. Z., Hong, K., Reiss, A. L., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22155865 · Cited by 244
Cognition with few neurons: higher-order learning in insects
Giurfa, M. (2013) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.12.011 · Cited by 237
Relaxed genetic control of cortical organization in human brains compared with chimpanzees
Gómez‐Robles, A., Hopkins, W. D., Schapiro, S. J., & Sherwood, C. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1512646112 · Cited by 235
The Edge of Sentience: Risk and Precaution in Humans, Other Animals, and AI
Birch, J. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780191966729.001.0001 · Cited by 236
Microenvironmental Regulation of Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Response in Brain Metastasis
Schulz, M., Salamero‐Boix, A., Niesel, K., Alekseeva, T., & Sevenich, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01713 · Cited by 226
“Further exploration of neuronal mimicry revealed that GABAergic signaling is not limited to the CNS, but has also emerged as a tumor signaling molecule in cancers of peripheral organs such as breast, liver, pancreas, and colon (24).”
BackgroundInfluentialA diffusion tensor MRI atlas of the postmortem rhesus macaque brain
Calabrese, E., Badea, A., Coe, C. L., Lubach, G. R., Shi, Y., Styner, M. A., & Johnson, G. A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.072 · Cited by 205
“Image resolution is particularly important because the macaque brain is 10–15 fold smaller volumetrically than the human brain (Herculano-Houzel, 2009), so image voxels must be 10–15 fold smaller to have comparable structural resolution.”
BackgroundEmbodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum
Barton, R. A. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0112 · Cited by 210
Cerebral cortical folding, parcellation, and connectivity in humans, nonhuman primates, and mice
Essen, D. C. V., Donahue, C. J., Coalson, T. S., Kennedy, H., Hayashi, T., & Glasser, M. F. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902299116 · Cited by 198
“Each primate species (human, chimpanzee, macaque, and marmoset) has 6 heavily myelinated regions (red and orange) that include early somatomotor (1), auditory (2), early visual (3), middle temporal (MT) complex (4), parietal (intraparietal sulcus) visual (5), and retrosplenial cortex (6).”
BackgroundFonseca-Azevedo, K., & Herculano-Houzel, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1206390109 · Cited by 196
“sapiens, the primate with the largest number of brain neurons (1, 4, 5).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPham, T. H., & Gardier, A. M. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.02.017 · Cited by 186
“As an example, it has been estimated that, in the whole human brain, there are roughly two hundred thousand serotonergic neurons out of ninety billion total neurons (Baker et al., 1991; Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundUltralow Power Wearable Heterosynapse with Photoelectric Synergistic Modulation
Wang, T., Meng, J., He, Z., Chen, L., Zhu, H., Sun, Q., Ding, S., Zhou, P., & Zhang, D. W. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201903480 · Cited by 190
Spatiotemporal expansion of primary progenitor zones in the developing human cerebellum
Haldipur, P., Aldinger, K. A., Bernardo, S., Deng, M., Timms, A. E., Overman, L. M., Winter, C., Lisgo, S., Razavi, Silvestri, E., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax7526 · Cited by 187
de Waal, F. Β. Μ. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05912.x · Cited by 206
Neuronal factors determining high intelligence
Dicke, U., & Roth, G. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0180 · Cited by 175
Not All Brains Are Made the Same: New Views on Brain Scaling in Evolution
Herculano‐Houzel, S. (2011) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000327318 · Cited by 183
“Rather, the cerebral cortex typically contains around 20% of all brain neurons, while the cerebellum holds 70–80% of all brain neurons [Herculano-Houzel, 2009] regardless of brain size and inclusive of the human brain [Azevedo et al., 2009].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFormation and function of apolipoprotein E-containing lipoproteins in the nervous system
Vance, J. E., & Hayashi, H. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.02.007 · Cited by 155
Developmental mechanisms underlying the evolution of human cortical circuits
Vanderhaeghen, P., & Polleux, F. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00675-z · Cited by 173
Shine, J. M. (2020) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101951 · Cited by 171
“Using estimates from human anatomical studies (Herculano-Houzel, 2009), and the knowledge that”
MethodA Student’s Guide to Neural Circuit Tracing
Saleeba, C., Dempsey, B., Le, S., Goodchild, A., & McMullan, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00897 · Cited by 153
“…sheer magnitude of the task: full connectomic reconstruction of the human brain would require the mapping of approximately 86 billion neurons (Azevedo et al., 2009; Herculano-Houzel, 2009) and the identification of the thousands of inputs and outputs that connect each one (Nimchinsky et al., 2002).”
BackgroundDevelopment and Evolution of Cerebral and Cerebellar Cortex
Essen, D. C. V., Donahue, C. J., & Glasser, M. F. (2018) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000489943 · Cited by 166
“Adapted, with permission, from Herculano-Houzel (2009).”
Batool, S., Raza, H., Zaidi, J., Riaz, S., Hasan, S., & Syed, N. I. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00833.2018 · Cited by 171
“Given the strict blueprints of synaptic partnership between neurons, organization of the 100 billion neurons present in the human brain must be highly specific and tightly regulated (Herculano-Houzel 2009).”
BackgroundThe Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review
Tanaka, H., Ishikawa, T., Lee, J., & Kakei, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2020.00019 · Cited by 155
“In humans, the cerebellum is estimated to share no less than 80% of the CNS neurons in no more than 10% of the brain volume (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundAstrocytes promote glioma invasion via the gap junction protein connexin43
Sin, W. C., Aftab, Q., Bechberger, J. F., Leung, J., Chen, H., & Naus, C. C. G. (2015) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2015.210 · Cited by 167
Human induced pluripotent stem cells for modelling neurodevelopmental disorders
Ardhanareeswaran, K., Mariani, J., Coppola, G., Abyzov, A. S., & Vaccarino, F. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.45 · Cited by 162
Chronic Stress Weakens Connectivity in the Prefrontal Cortex: Architectural and Molecular Changes.
Woo, E., Sansing, L. H., Arnsten, A. F. T., & Datta, D. (2021) · Chronic Stress · doi:10.1177/24705470211029254 · Cited by 159
Methodological aspects of EEG and body dynamics measurements during motion
Reis, P., Hebenstreit, F., Gabsteiger, F., von Tscharner, V., & Lochmann, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00156 · Cited by 160
“The basic functional structure of the brain is the neuron and the human brain contains about 1011 of them (Herculano-Houzel, 2009).”
BackgroundBeres, A. M. (2017) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/s10484-017-9371-3 · Cited by 159
“The average human brain has about 86 billion neurons (Herculano-Houzel 2009), and the communication between them is the key brain activity.”
Herculano-Houzel, S., Avelino-de-Souza, K., Neves, K., PorfÃrio, J., Messeder, D., Mattos Feijó, L., Maldonado, J., & Manger, P. R. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00046 · Cited by 153
“Thus, as predicted previously (Herculano-Houzel, 2009), the elephant cerebral cortex has far fewer neurons than the human cerebral cortex (Azevedo et al., 2009), and fewer than estimated for the great ape cerebral cortex (Herculano-Houzel and Kaas, 2011) (ca. 9 billion neurons in gorilla and…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDifferential Susceptibility of the Developing Brain to Contextual Adversity and Stress
Boyce, W. T. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.294 · Cited by 164
Nafisah, S. I., & Muhammad, G. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07258-6 · Cited by 157
“The human brain has approximately 86 billion neurons [32].”
BackgroundLu, D., & Xu, A.-D. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00053 · Cited by 154
“This may explain that fact that synaptic density in the human cerebral cortex may be four times higher than in the mouse brain (Herculano-Houzel, 2009; Veno et al., 2015). ciRS-7 contains more than 70 selectively conserved miRNA target sites and functions as a miR-7 sponge to regulate the…”
BackgroundMathematical model on Alzheimer’s disease
Hao, W., & Friedman, A. (2016) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0348-2 · Cited by 164
“The number of astrocytes is approximately equal to the number of neurons [86, 87], hence A0 = N0 = 0.”
BackgroundCura, A. J., & Carruthers, A. (2012) · Comprehensive physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c110024 · Cited by 171
Human frontal lobes are not relatively large
Barton, R. A., & Venditti, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215723110 · Cited by 146
“Volumes of different brain structures change at different rates as brain and body size evolve (14, 15), and with different implications for variables more directly related to information processing than volume, such as numbers of neurons and synapses (16).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Herculano-Houzel, S.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 31-31
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2776484
- OpenAlex
- W2005926822
- Cited by
- 1,778
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 172 · 2020: 176 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 33.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- human brain, primate brain, brain size, neuron number, glial cells, cerebral cortex, encephalization, cognitive ability, rodents, elephants, whales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
