Cited by 229Robotics and Automated SystemsRobot Manipulation and LearningRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 51 of the 121 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities

Open access

Abstract

This review is dedicated to the advanced applications of robotic technologies in the industrial field. Robotic solutions in areas with non-intensive applications are presented, and their implementations are analysed. We also provide an overview of survey publications and technical reports, classified by application criteria, and the development of the structure of existing solutions, and identify recent research gaps. The analysis results reveal the background to the existing obstacles and problems. These issues relate to the areas of psychology, human nature, special artificial intelligence (AI) implementation, and the robot-oriented object design paradigm. Analysis of robot applications shows that the existing emerging applications in robotics face technical and psychological obstacles. The results of this review revealed four directions of required advancement in robotics: development of intelligent companions; improved implementation of AI-based solutions; robot-oriented design of objects; and psychological solutions for robot–human collaboration.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys 2018–2021 industrial robotics applications in fields with weak robotisation traditions—medical, food, agriculture, and civil engineering—plus human-machine interaction, object recognition, path planning, and optimisation. It identifies four needed directions: intelligent companion equipment, AI-based solutions, robot-oriented object design, and psychological solutions for robot-human collaboration.

Key findings

  • The review selected 115 publications from 79,500 Google Scholar results; it reports 373,000 industrial robots sold globally in 2019 and 2.7 million operating in factories in 2020, while ScienceDirect papers using “Industrial robot” rose from more than 4,500 in 2019 to 5,300 in 2020.
  • Reported application results include a >79% productivity increase in adaptive assembly, >90% object-grasping success after <5 min training, ~99% colour/height sorting efficiency, 49.1% mean average precision for solid waste detection, and nearly 100% online recognition at 2028 picks/h for construction and demolition waste sorting.
  • Medical and path-planning examples include an open-source reinforcement learning environment for da Vinci robots, ~60% average agreement with human experts for personalised affect/engagement perception, eye-tracking plus vision localisation with 5.5 cm average error versus 72 cm for gaze-only, and HMM + Bayesian optimisation assembly success of 93% versus 19% for HMM alone.
  • The paper concludes four advancement directions: development of intelligent companion equipment; improved AI-based signal processing and decision making; redesign of general objects for robotic applications; and psychological solutions for robot-human collaboration and workplace acceptance.

Methods

  • Literature review using keywords such as industrial robots, collaborative robots, and robotics over a four-year period, focused mainly on 2018–2021 applications in medical, food, agricultural, and civil engineering fields, plus human-machine interaction, object recognition, path planning, and optimisation.
  • Google Scholar returned 79,500 results, from which 115 publications were selected according to application area, novelty and significance of achievements, reliability, and feasibility of results.
  • The analysis classifies recent achievements by implementation area and takes a multidisciplinary perspective, including computer vision and machine learning for robotic applications.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: surgical robotics machine learning faces a lack of high-quality medical/surgical data, reliable metrics, and structured skill transfer; deep learning is limited by large training-data needs and long training times; AR is limited by insufficient accuracy, occlusion, and limited wearable field of view; construction adoption is limited by economic, technical/work-culture, and weak-business-case factors including untrained workforce, unproven effectiveness, immature technology, and aversion to change.
  • Stated in the paper: the review focused on a relatively short four-year period and selected 115 publications from 79,500 results, so coverage is selective; the data are not publicly available due to the project consortium agreement.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search protocol, inclusion/exclusion counts, or risk-of-bias assessment, and many performance figures are drawn from cited primary studies rather than independently validated in this paper.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12010135

Cites

108 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

61 Own interpretation · 45 No full text of the sources · 36 No basis given · 28 Supported · 15 Not checked yet · 14 Partly supported · 3 Couldn’t confirm · 2 Own result · 1 Supported so far · 1 Not supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 15 references — free account

Show all 60 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 84
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 94
147 of 147
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The implementation of robotics in non-traditional applications is often limited not by technological issues, but by the company managers' attitudes.

    “This approach confirms the assumption that the implementation of robotics in non-traditional applications is often limited not by technological issues, but by the company managers' attitudes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The number of scientific publications in a database reflects scientific interest in the field.

    “Scientific interest in this field is based on a steady increase in the number of publications, independent of the political, economic, and social factors affecting the market for new robots.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 115 selected publications are representative of recent developments in industrial robotics.

    “According to the search request, Google Scholar returned 79,500 results, from which 115 publications were selected.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Randomly placed unpredictable objects remain a challenge in robotics.

    “Despite significant progress in existing technologies, randomly placed unpredictable objects remain a challenge in robotics.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Typical industrial robots are not feasible for real-time path planning.

    “It is essential to note that typical industrial robots are not feasible for real-time path planning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Robots are still unreliable for a large portion of society, so they are only accepted with significant hesitation.

    “Regarding psychological and ethical factors, robots are still unreliable for a large portion of society.Therefore, they are only accepted with significant hesitation.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. (2021, April 07). IFR Presents World Robotics Report 2020—International Federation of Robotics. Available online: https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/record-2.7-million-robots-work-in-factories-around-the-globe.
  2. (2021, April 07). ScienceDirect Search Results—Keywords (Industrial Robot). Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/search?qs=Industrial%20robot.
  3. Shubha, 2020, International Journal of Engineering Technology Research & Management: A review of multi object recognition based on deep learining, Int. J. Eng. Technol. Res. Manag., 2, 27
  4. Robinson, G. (2016). Global Construction Market to Grow $8 Trillion by 2030: Driven by China, US and India, Global Construction Perspectives and Oxford Economics.
  5. Ghasempourabadi, 2021, Human-robot interaction in construction: A literature review, Malays. J. Sustain. Environ., 8, 49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V.
Affiliations
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT)
Corresponding author
  • Dzedzickis, Andrius
  • Samukaitė-Bubnienė, Urtė
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-23
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
135
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200514762
Cited by
228
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 15
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (2014‐2020, 826060, H2020/2014-2020)
  • Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (H2020/2014‐2020, 826060)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020/2014–2020, 826060)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Keywords
industrial robotics, human-robot collaboration, artificial intelligence in robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review