Cited by 817Gut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and DietProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 138 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Effect of Diet on the Gut Microbiota: Rethinking Intervention Duration

Open access
Leeming, Emily R, Johnson, Abigail J, Spector, Tim D, Le Roy, Caroline I·2019·Nutrients

Abstract

The human gut is inhabited by trillions of microorganisms composing a dynamic ecosystem implicated in health and disease. The composition of the gut microbiota is unique to each individual and tends to remain relatively stable throughout life, yet daily transient fluctuations are observed. Diet is a key modifiable factor influencing the composition of the gut microbiota, indicating the potential for therapeutic dietary strategies to manipulate microbial diversity, composition, and stability. While diet can induce a shift in the gut microbiota, these changes appear to be temporary. Whether prolonged dietary changes can induce permanent alterations in the gut microbiota is unknown, mainly due to a lack of long-term human dietary interventions, or long-term follow-ups of short-term dietary interventions. It is possible that habitual diets have a greater influence on the gut microbiota than acute dietary strategies. This review presents the current knowledge around the response of the gut microbiota to short-term and long-term dietary interventions and identifies major factors that contribute to microbiota response to diet. Overall, further research on long-term diets that include health and microbiome measures is required before clinical recommendations can be made for dietary modulation of the gut microbiota for health.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that diet can rapidly alter the gut microbiota, but short-term dietary interventions generally produce transient changes that revert after the intervention or washout. Durable modulation likely requires long-term habitual dietary change, yet evidence is limited by a lack of long-term human studies and follow-up.

Key findings

  • Diet is estimated to explain over 50% of microbial structural variation in mice and 20% in humans, while genetics explains an average of 8.8% in a 2016 analysis of 1126 twins.
  • Short-term interventions can shift the microbiota quickly but transiently: in David et al., 10 subjects consumed plant- or animal-based diets for 5 days, with microbiota returning to baseline within 3 days post-intervention; in Liu et al., FOS/GOS for 14 days in 35 healthy adults increased *Bifidobacterium* and reduced butyrate-producing bacteria, but the microbiota recovered after a 28-day washout.
  • Long-term/habitual diet appears to be a primary driver: the American Gut Project, with over 10,000 individuals, found *Faecalibacterium prausnitzii* and *Oscillospira* increased in those consuming more than 30 plant types per week versus fewer than 10; a year-long study of 350 faecal samples from the Tanzanian Hadza showed seasonal cycling in gut microbiota composition.
  • Probiotic effects are individualised and often transient; a 2016 systematic review found probiotics had no impact on alpha-diversity, evenness, or richness in healthy individuals, except one study noting beta-diversity.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesizing human and animal studies, including short-term dietary interventions, cross-over washout studies, prebiotic/probiotic trials, epidemiological/cross-sectional studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses.
  • The review defines short-term dietary interventions as those investigating immediate impact up to a number of months, and long-term studies as predominantly epidemiological or of an extended period (≥6 months).
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis of existing literature; no formal systematic search strategy or meta-analysis is described.

Limitations

  • The paper states there is a lack of long-term human studies, or follow-ups of short-term dietary interventions, to establish whether diet-induced microbiota modulation endures.
  • The paper states that heterogeneous outcomes may arise from responders versus non-responders based on baseline microbiota, and that research often focuses on broad dietary indices or single/combined nutrients rather than whole foods and food matrices; transit time is also occasionally overlooked.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or risk-of-bias assessment.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11122862

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 138 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 78 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 54
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
65 of 65
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gut microbiota composition is a determinant of human health.

    “Our understanding of the duration required for a dietary intervention to have an enduring impact on the gut microbiota, and consequently health, is hampered by several limitations.”
    “Arguably, the long-term stability of the core species within a host’s gut microbiota is likely to be critical to associations with health and disease.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • David et al. study is cited to a Johnson et al. reference

    Minor

    The sentence about David et al.'s dietary experiment cites reference 35, which the reference list identifies as a Johnson et al. study. The same paragraph separately cites reference 18 for the David et al. results.

  • Berding et al. study is dated both 2019 and 2018

    Minor

    The text groups the Berding et al. study with two 2019 studies, but its reference-list entry gives a 2018 publication year.

  • Vatanen et al. are cited to a Francino reference

    Minor

    The text attributes this observation to Vatanen et al. and cites reference 13, but reference 13 lists Francino as its author. Vatanen et al. appear at reference 14.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 118 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 816

Metadata

Authors
Leeming, E. R., Johnson, A. J., Spector, T. D., & Le Roy, C. I.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Department of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Campus, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-22
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
2862
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990512216
Cited by
817
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 169 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 38
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Chronic Disease Research Foundation (N/A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
gut microbiota, diet, dietary intervention, intervention duration, microbiome stability, habitual diet, dietary modulation of microbiota, microbial diversity
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Diet, Healthy, Nutrients, Duration of Therapy, Circadian Rhythm, Diet, Diet Therapy, Humans, Seasons, Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review