Cited by 2,065Schizophrenia research and treatmentSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review of Mortality in Schizophrenia: Is the Differential Mortality Gap Worsening Over Time?

Saha, Sukanta, Chant, David, McGrath, John·2007·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite improvements in mental health services in recent decades, it is unclear whether the risk of mortality in schizophrenia has changed over time. OBJECTIVE: To explore the distribution of standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for people with schizophrenia. DATA SOURCES: Broad search terms were used in MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify all studies that investigated mortality in schizophrenia, published between January 1, 1980, and January 31, 2006. References were also identified from review articles, reference lists, and communication with authors. STUDY SELECTION: Population-based studies that reported primary data on deaths in people with schizophrenia. DATA EXTRACTION: Operationalized criteria were used to extract key study features and mortality data. DATA SYNTHESIS: We examined the distribution of SMRs and pooled selected estimates using random-effects meta-analysis. We identified 37 articles drawn from 25 different nations. The median SMR for all persons for all-cause mortality was 2.58 (10%-90% quantile, 1.18-5.76), with a corresponding random-effects pooled SMR of 2.50 (95% confidence interval, 2.18-2.43). No sex difference was detected. Suicide was associated with the highest SMR (12.86); however, most of the major causes-of-death categories were found to be elevated in people with schizophrenia. The SMRs for all-cause mortality have increased during recent decades (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to mortality, a substantial gap exists between the health of people with schizophrenia and the general community. This differential mortality gap has worsened in recent decades. In light of the potential for second-generation antipsychotic medications to further adversely influence mortality rates in the decades to come, optimizing the general health of people with schizophrenia warrants urgent attention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1123

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 90 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saha, S., Chant, D., & McGrath, J.
Affiliations
Park Centre for Mental Health (AU)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2007-10-01
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
1123
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149288810
Cited by
2,065
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 174 · 2016: 152 · 2015: 151 · 2014: 138 · 2013: 144 · 2012: 118
FWCI
49.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
schizophrenia, mortality, standardized mortality ratio, all-cause mortality, suicide, causes of death, mortality trends, atypical antipsychotics, health disparities, mental illness
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Data Collection, Female, Forecasting, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mortality, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Sex Factors, Suicide, Antipsychotic Agents, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review