Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Constructive episodic simulation: Temporal distance and detail of past and future events modulate hippocampal engagement

Addis, Donna Rose, Schacter, Daniel L.·2008·Hippocampus

Abstract

Behavioral, lesion and neuroimaging evidence show striking commonalities between remembering past events and imagining future events. In a recent event‐related fMRI study, we instructed participants to construct a past or future event in response to a cue. Once an event was in mind, participants made a button press, then generated details (elaboration) and rated them. The elaboration of past and future events recruited a common neural network. However, regions within this network may respond differentially to event characteristics, such as the amount of detail generated and temporal distance, depending on whether the event is in the past or future. To investigate this further, we conducted parametric modulation analyses, with temporal distance and detail as covariates, and focused on the medial temporal lobes and frontopolar cortex. The analysis of detail (independent of temporal distance) showed that the left posterior hippocampus was responsive to the amount of detail comprising both past and future events. In contrast, the left anterior hippocampus responded differentially to the amount of detail comprising future events, possibly reflecting the recombination of details into a novel future event. The analysis of temporal distance revealed that the increasing recency of past events correlated with activity in the right parahippocampus gyrus (Brodmann area (BA) 35/36), while activity in the bilateral hippocampus was significantly correlated with the increasing remoteness of future events. We propose that the hippocampal response to the distance of future events reflects the increasing disparateness of details likely included in remote future events, and the intensive relational processing required for integrating such details into a coherent episodic simulation of the future. These findings provide further support for the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis (Schacter and Addis (2007) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:773–786) and highlight the involvement of the hippocampus in relational processing during elaboration of future events. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20405

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00134-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00149-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/hipo.20340 · DOI
  5. 10.3758/BF03195584 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/741941149 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:1<83::AID-HIPO9>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2781 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00165-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.3758/BF03334277 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0409 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00365-5 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fisher RA, 1950, Statistical Methods for Research Workers
  14. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.050 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371 · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/hipo.20014 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1521/soco.20.5.353.21125 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1107 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/brain/awg064 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/71156 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/hipo.20009 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:6<637::AID-HIPO4>3.0.CO;2-V · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1999)9:6<637::aid-hipo4>3.0.co;2-v
  23. 10.1038/445027a · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:1<7::AID-HIPO2>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  25. Suddendorf T, 1997, Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind, Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr, 123, 133
  26. Szpunar KK, Episodic future thought and its relation to remembering: Evidence from ratings of subjective experience, Conscious Cogn
  27. Talairach J, 1988, Co‐Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
  28. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.039 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.01.014 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-21
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
227-237
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2104084758
Cited by
274
References
18
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.