Cited by 6Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 259 of the 259 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A precision medicine approach to pharmacological adjuncts to extinction: a call to broaden research

Open access

Abstract

There is a pressing need to improve treatments for anxiety. Although exposure-based therapy is currently the gold-standard treatment, many people either do not respond to this therapy or experience a relapse of symptoms after treatment has ceased. In recent years, there have been many novel pharmacological agents identified in preclinical research that have potential as adjuncts for exposure therapy, yet very few of these are regularly integrated into clinical practice. Unfortunately, the robust effects observed in the laboratory animal often do not translate to a clinical population. In this review, we discuss how age, sex, genetics, stress, medications, diet, alcohol, and the microbiome can vary across a clinical population and yet are rarely considered in drug development. While not an exhaustive list, we have focused on these factors because they have been shown to influence an individual's vulnerability to anxiety and alter the neurotransmitter systems often targeted by pharmacological adjuncts to therapy. We argue that for potential adjuncts to be successfully translated from the lab to the clinic empirical research must be broadened to consider how individual difference factors will influence drug efficacy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-018-4999-0

Cites

259 of 259 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hammad T (2004) Review and evaluation of clinical data: relationship between psychotropic drugs and pediatric suicidality. US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
King, G., Baker, K. D., Bisby, M. A., Chan, D., Cowan, C. S. M., Stylianakis, A. A., Zimmermann, K. S., & Richardson, R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
King, Gabrielle
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2018-08-16
Volume
236
Issue
1
Pages
143-161
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2886849746
Cited by
6
References
258
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
precision medicine, extinction, anxiety disorders, exposure therapy, individual differences, sex differences, age effects, genetic factors, stress, diet, alcohol, gut microbiota, translational research, drug development, neurotransmitter systems
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Extinction, Psychological, Humans, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Neurotransmitter Agents, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review