Cited by 602Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Human orbitofrontal cortex represents a cognitive map of state space

Open access
Schuck, Nicolas W., Cai, Ming Bo, Wilson, Robert C., Niv, Yael·2016·Neuron

Abstract

Although the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been studied intensely for decades, its precise functions have remained elusive. We recently hypothesized that the OFC contains a "cognitive map" of task space in which the current state of the task is represented, and this representation is especially critical for behavior when states are unobservable from sensory input. To test this idea, we apply pattern-classification techniques to neuroimaging data from humans performing a decision-making task with 16 states. We show that unobservable task states can be decoded from activity in OFC, and decoding accuracy is related to task performance and the occurrence of individual behavioral errors. Moreover, similarity between the neural representations of consecutive states correlates with behavioral accuracy in corresponding state transitions. These results support the idea that OFC represents a cognitive map of task space and establish the feasibility of decoding state representations in humans using non-invasive neuroimaging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.019

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orbitofrontal cortex tracks hidden states and encodes how likely each candidate latent cause is at a given moment in inference.

    “Neurally, the orbitofrontal cortex, which is sensitive to unobservable states [51], has been shown to represent the probability that each latent cause is currently active during the inference process [52].”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [51]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuck, N. W., Cai, M. B., Wilson, R. C., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Schuck, Nicolas W.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1402-1412
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522716651
Cited by
602
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 1
FWCI
26.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0101)
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Intel Corporation
  • National Institutes of Health (R01MH098861)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, cognitive maps, decision-making, neural decoding, behavioral errors, state transitions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Markov Chains, Psychomotor Performance, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review