Cited by 233Gut microbiota and healthAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Alzheimer’s disease and gut microbiota modifications: The long way between preclinical studies and clinical evidence

Mancuso, Cesare, Santangelo, Rosaria·2018·Pharmacological Research

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested the role of an infectious component in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In light of this, research has focused on some bacteria constituting the intestinal microbial flora which can produce amyloid. Once generated, the latter hypothetically triggers a systemic inflammatory response which compromises complex brain functions, such as learning and memory. Clinical studies have shown that, in cognitively impaired elderly patients with brain amyloidosis, there is lower abundance in the gut of E. rectale and B. fragilis, two bacterial species which have an anti-inflammatory activity, versus a greater amount of pro-inflammatory genera such as Escherichia/Shigella. According to these findings, some clinical studies have demonstrated that supplementation with Lactobacilli- and Bifidobacteria- based probiotics has improved cognitive, sensory and emotional functions in subjects with AD. Moreover, certain herbal products, in particular dietetic polyphenols, have proved capable of restoring dysbiosis and, therefore, their prebiotic role could be effective in counteracting the onset of AD regardless of their activity of free radical scavenging or enhancement of the cell stress response. One of the recent greatest novelties in the field of neurodegenerative diseases is the chance to prevent or slow down AD progression with agents, such as probiotics and prebiotics, acting outside the central nervous system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.12.009

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the stools of patients with AD, the abundance of pro-inflammatory bacteria (Escherichia/Shigella) increases and the abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria (Eubacterium rectale) and Bacteroides fragilis decreases.

    “In the stools of patients with AD, the abundance of pro-inflammatory bacteria (Escherichia/Shigella) increases and the abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria (Eubacterium rectale) and Bacteroides fragilis decreases (Mancuso and Santangelo 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mancuso, C., & Santangelo, R.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Mancuso, Cesare
Venue
Pharmacological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
129
Pages
329-336
ISSN
1043-6618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774851697
Cited by
232
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Catholic University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, gut microbiota, gut-brain axis, amyloid, Bacteroides fragilis, lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium, probiotics, prebiotics, polyphenols, dysbiosis, neuroinflammation, cognitive impairment, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review