The DOI matches its Crossref record; 722 of the 722 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to offer an exhaustive review of the literature exploring the link between social media and political polarization. It highlights the areas where a consensus based on empirical evidence has already emerged but also identifies the questions that remain open and the type of data and analysis that would help address them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This issue is also fueled by the scarcity of comparative studies on social media, especially concerning news consumption (33).”
From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“but that they hardly constitute closed off echo chambers (Barbera ´, 2020)”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Barbera ´, 2020
In the citing paper
“Scholars such as Barbera ´(2020) made a strong case that especially on platforms like Twitter, Reddit, or YouTube (An et al., 2019;Wu & Resnick, 2021), polarization dynamics are not primarily ideological disagreements about issues, but dismissive interactions with out-groups.”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Barbera ´(2020)
In the citing paper
“Yet, in contrast to face-to-face social interaction (Balietti et al., 2021;Brankovi c et al., 2020), intergroup-contact through digital media networks often fosters polarization, at least in the context of political debates (Banks et al., 2021;Barbera ´, 2020;Zhang et al., 2022).”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Barbera ´, 2020
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society
Habermas, J., Bürger, T., & Lawrence, F. P. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4175 · Cited by 12,645
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Schumpeter, J. A. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203202050 · Cited by 8,049
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · Cited by 6,733
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790867 · Cited by 5,986
Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
Carbonell, C. D. (2007) · The Journal of Popular Culture · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00435.x · Cited by 5,532
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160
Degroot, M. H. (1974) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10480137 · Cited by 4,004
Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 3,855
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320040111 · Cited by 3,687
The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
Quam, L. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7133.787a · Cited by 3,611
The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom
Given, J. (2007) · Information Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.03.001 · Cited by 3,396
Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6933 · Cited by 3,358
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,259
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996 · cited 1×
“This alternative conceptualization of polarization is often called “ affective polarization ” (Iyengar et al. 2012 ) or “ psychological polarization ” (Settle 2018 ) as opposed to “ ideological polarization, ” which would be limited to divergence of political views.”
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 · Cited by 2,951
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 · Cited by 2,745
Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
Noble, S. U. (2020) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 · Cited by 2,709
The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
van Dijck, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
Norris, P. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973383 · Cited by 2,660
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery · doi:10.1145/1134271.1134277 · Cited by 2,619
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., & Weber, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955 · Cited by 2,610
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
The spreading of misinformation online
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · Cited by 2,407
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130 · Cited by 2,308
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101 · Cited by 2,103
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 · Cited by 2,022
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006 · Cited by 1,992
Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
Mason, L. (2018) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001 · Cited by 1,985 · cited 5×
“…distance between partisan groups is large, debates are won based on identities and not on substantive arguments and empirical evidence, which in turn can have negative economic consequences such as increased inequality and unemployment (Enns and McAvoy 2012 ; Bonica et al. 2013 ; Mason 2018 ).”
InfluentialFerrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2818717 · Cited by 1,973
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816676645 · Cited by 1,836
Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309341564 · Cited by 1,821
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond
Dryzek, J. S. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925043x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,815
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2706 · Cited by 1,803
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201 · Cited by 1,687
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816661553 · Cited by 1,663
Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square
Tüfekçi, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x · Cited by 1,660
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 · Cited by 1,652
Prior, M. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139878425 · Cited by 1,646
Çömlekçi, M. F. (2019) · Kırklareli University Institutional Repository (Kırklareli University) · Cited by 1,606
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588
Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255484 · Cited by 1,542
The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818769694 · Cited by 1,530
The role of social networks in information diffusion
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187907 · Cited by 1,526
Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001 · Cited by 1,504 · cited 2×
“These are thus good reasons to expect that social media interactions may lead to polarization among the minority of partisan individuals who are most active in discussions about politics on social media (Barberá and Rivero 2015 ; Shore et al. 2016 ; Benkler et al. 2018 ).”
Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · Cited by 1,502
Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615594620 · Cited by 1,472
Self-citationHindman, M. (2008) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837496 · Cited by 1,414
Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars
Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054201468 · Cited by 1,386 · cited 1×
“…and the comparative empirical evidence on this question is scarce, despite the well-known link between polarization and political violence in countries with high levels of ethnic fractionalization (see, e.g., Montalvo and Reynal-Querol 2005 ), which increases the urgency of research on this area.”
Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis
Cederman, L.-E., Wimmer, A., & Min, B. (2010) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887109990219 · Cited by 1,346
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x · Cited by 1,346
Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation
GREEN, D. P. (2024) · doi:10.61700/sgeirzx0v0mjh1252 · Cited by 1,322
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2365 · Cited by 1,300
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139032490 · Cited by 1,281
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000465 · Cited by 1,268
Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x · Cited by 1,266
Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweets
Badjatiya, P., Gupta, S., Gupta, M., & Varma, V. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3041021.3054223 · Cited by 1,253
A Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text
Fortuna, P., & Nunes, S. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3232676 · Cited by 1,241
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3144139 · Cited by 1,222
Boomerang Effects in Science Communication
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211416646 · Cited by 1,221
A free press is bad news for corruption
Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2002) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00186-4 · Cited by 1,214
Underwood, S. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2994581 · Cited by 1,198
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1733 · Cited by 1,181
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 · Cited by 1,174
Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · Cited by 1,167
Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate
Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304567 · Cited by 1,149
Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology
(2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.001.0001 · Cited by 1,127
Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability
Besley, T. J., & Prat, A. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.96.3.720 · Cited by 1,126
Media and Political Polarization
Prior, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 · Cited by 1,125
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots
Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7 · Cited by 1,125
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951719897945 · Cited by 1,097
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Karahalios, K. G., Monroy‐Hernández, A., Lampinen, A., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2018) · Cited by 1,070
Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice
MUTZ, D. C. (2002) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055402004264 · Cited by 1,069
Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3063289 · Cited by 1,061
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058
The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media
Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1428656 · Cited by 1,055
Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x · Cited by 1,050
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Garrett, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x · Cited by 1,040
Gillespie, T. (2014) · Media Technologies · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0013 · Cited by 1,016
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 · Cited by 1,000
Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion
Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090 · Cited by 993
Ideological Segregation Online and Offline *
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr044 · Cited by 980
Redlawsk, D. P. (2002) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00161 · Cited by 978
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 · Cited by 971
Fake News and The Economy of Emotions
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645 · Cited by 964
Stroud, N. J. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001 · Cited by 950
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1806781116 · Cited by 947
SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter
Basile, V., Bosco, C., Fersini, E., Nozza, D., Patti, V., Pardo, F. M. R., Rosso, P., & Sanguinetti, M. (2019) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-2007 · Cited by 941
Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online
Lewis, B., & Marwick, A. E. (2017) · Cited by 932
The Contact Hypothesis Revisited
Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A., & GREEN, D. P. (2017) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.25 · Cited by 931
BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Bots
Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2016) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web - WWW 16 Companion · doi:10.1145/2872518.2889302 · Cited by 909
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y · Cited by 904
Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?
(2006) · British Academy eBooks · doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.001.0001 · Cited by 903
Assessing the Effect of 'Disputed' Warnings and Source Salience on Perceptions of Fake News Accuracy
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478 · Cited by 903
Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities
Ponte, E. B., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Muñoz, F. F. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001 · Cited by 902
Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda.
Paluck, E. L. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0011989 · Cited by 902
Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212466406 · Cited by 902
Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation
Chan, M.-P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617714579 · Cited by 898
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12476 · Cited by 879
Frynas, J. G. (2005) · International Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x · Cited by 865
The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability
Fox, J. (2007) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614520701469955 · Cited by 862
The welfare effects of social media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190658 · Cited by 857
The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation.
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000586 · Cited by 852
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference Information Systems 2023
(2023) · doi:10.33965/is2023 · Cited by 828
See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2017) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312 · Cited by 817
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
Taylor, L. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717736335 · Cited by 802
(2001) · Cited by 783
Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics
Benkler, Y. R., Faris, R. R., & Roberts, H. (2018) · Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) · Cited by 759
Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency
Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510533 · Cited by 752
Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations
Carey, J. (1998) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2658267 · Cited by 748
Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M. A., & Yu, C. (2019) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168019848554 · Cited by 745
Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12234 · Cited by 741
The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross‐National Comparative Experiment
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G. A., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12047 · Cited by 740
Citron, D. K. (2014) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674735613 · Cited by 738
Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817724170 · Cited by 738
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733
All the News That's Fit to Sell
Hamilton, J. T. (2004) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400841417 · Cited by 733
Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 · Cited by 726
Hate Speech Detection with Comment Embeddings
Djuric, N., Zhou, J. L., Morris, R., Grbovic, M., Radosavljević, V., & Bhamidipati, N. L. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2740908.2742760 · Cited by 725
Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Wong Sak Hoi, G., & Tolmie, P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150989 · Cited by 722
(2019) · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1573914 · Cited by 719
Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide *
Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju020 · Cited by 715
Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate
Garrett, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x · Cited by 714
Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide.
Snow, R. P., & Graber, D. Α. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070921 · Cited by 713
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9 · Cited by 708
Disinformation as Political Communication
Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755 · Cited by 708
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
(2013) · doi:10.1145/2488388 · Cited by 702
Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion
Oliver, J., & Wood, T. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12084 · Cited by 689
Vargo, C. J., Гуо, Л., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817712086 · Cited by 684
Phillips, W. (2015) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001 · Cited by 677
Detecting Hate Speech on Twitter Using a Convolution-GRU Based Deep Neural Network
Zhang, Z., Robinson, D., & Tepper, J. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_48 · Cited by 676
Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation
Thorson, E. A. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187 · Cited by 675
Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011) · The Communication Review · doi:10.1080/10714421.2011.597250 · Cited by 672
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12166 · Cited by 666
The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489 · Cited by 661
Clayton, K., Blair, S., Busam, J. A., Forstner, S., Glance, J., Green, G., Kawata, A., Kovvuri, A., Martin, J., Morgan, E., et al. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0 · Cited by 658
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. A. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23089 · Cited by 654
Nyhan, B. J., & Reifler, J. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017 · Cited by 649
The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media
Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x · Cited by 646
Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design
Kraut, R. E., Resnick, P., Kiesler, S. B., Ren, Y., Chen, Y., Burke, M., Kittur, N., Riedl, J., & Konstan, J. A. (2012) · Cited by 636
In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism
Strömbäck, J. (2005) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/14616700500131950 · Cited by 632
Khan, L. M. (2022) · doi:10.5040/9798881809775.ch-1 · Cited by 631
Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017731776 · Cited by 627
Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate CrimePreprint
Müller, K., & Schwarz, C. (2020) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3082972 · Cited by 625
Offline Consequences of Online Victimization: School Violence and Delinquency
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2007) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1300/j202v06n03_06 · Cited by 619
Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on Twitter
Talat, Z. (2016) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-5618 · Cited by 612
Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000098 · Cited by 598
Just business: multinational corporations and human rights
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6287 · Cited by 597
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000729 · Cited by 593
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x · Cited by 587
When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611011 · Cited by 584
Keeley, B. L. (1999) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2564659 · Cited by 581
The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x · Cited by 576
Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press
Hanitzsch, T., van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161217740695 · Cited by 575
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots
Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 574
Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12087 · Cited by 570
The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech
Klonick, K. (2018) · St. John's University School of Law (St. John's University) · Cited by 567
Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution
Mondak, J. J. (1998) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2658259 · Cited by 565
How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation
Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564 · Cited by 561
Sources of the continued influence effect: when misinformation in memory affects later inferences
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420 · Cited by 560
Nyhan, B. J., Porter, E. V., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x · Cited by 557
Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: the many faces of Anonymous
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.188504 · Cited by 554
Hate crimes: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-0613 · Cited by 554
Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany *
Adena, M., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., Santarosa, V., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv030 · Cited by 546
Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B. J., & Reifler, J. (2018) · Cited by 544
Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon
Swire‐Thompson, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160802 · Cited by 542
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791048 · Cited by 542
Ratkiewicz (2011) · doi:10.1145/1963192.1963301 · Cited by 541
Should we worry about filter bubbles?
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Trilling, D., Möller, J., Bodó, B., de Vreese, C. H., & Helberger, N. (2016) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2016.1.401 · Cited by 541
How voters decide: information processing during election campaigns
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2956 · Cited by 539
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746796 · Cited by 535
Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse
Hoffmann, A. L. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1573912 · Cited by 535
Research works printed but not linked: 222
- Van Alstyne, 1996, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, 80
- 10.1177/1461444817724170 · DOI · Paper page
- Barberá, P. (2015). How social media reduces mass political polarization: Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US. Paper presented at the 2015 American Political Science Association conference.
- Gidney, C. , & Ekera, M. (2019). How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09749 · arXiv
- Suzor, 2019, What do we mean when we talk about transparency? Toward meaningful transparency in commercial content moderation, International Journal of Communication, 13, 1526
- Stohl, 2016, Managing opacity: Information visibility and the paradox of transparency in the digital age, International Journal of Communication, 10, 123
- O’Neill, 2006, Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?, 75
- Lamble, 2002, Freedom of information: A Finnish clergyman’s gift to democracy, Freedom of Information Review, 97, 2
- Kroll, 2016, Accountable algorithms, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165, 633
- Klonick, 2017, The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech, Harvard Law Review, 131, 1598
- 10.1017/S1049096519001021 · DOI
- Wu, 2013, Machine speech, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1495
- Rogers, 2017, Wikipedia and intermediary immunity: Supporting sturdy crowd systems for producing reliable information, Yale Law Journal Forum, 127, 358
- Grimmelmann, 2015, The virtues of moderation, Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 17, 42
- Faris, 2017, Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
- Brown Barbour, 2015, Losing their license to libel: Revisiting § 230 immunity, Berkeley Technical Law Journal, 30, 1505
- York, J. C. , Faris, R. , Deibert, R. , & Heacock, R. (2018). Policing content in the quasi-public sphere. OpenNet Initiative bulletin, September. https://opennet.net/policing-content-quasi-public-sphere
- Penney, 2016, Chilling effects: Online surveillance and Wikipedia use, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31, 172
- Meleagrou-Hitchens, A. , & Kaderbhai, N. (2017). Research Perspectives on Online Radicalisation: A Literature Review, 2006–2016. VOX-Pol report. www.voxpol.eu/new-vox-pol-report-research-perspectives-online-radicalisation
- Gebhart, G. (2018). Who has your back? Censorship edition 2018. Electronic Frontier Foundation, September 10. www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2018
- Bar-Ziv, 2017, Behind the scenes of online copyright enforcement: Empirical evidence on notice and takedown, Connecticut Law Review, 50, 1
- McNamee, 2019, Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe
- Lardeau, 2013, State Aid for Newspapers, Media Business and Innovation
- Hogan, 2018, Social media giveth, Social media taketh away: Facebook, friendships, and APIs, International Journal of Communication, 12(5), 592
- Schaffner, 2017, Misinformation and motivated reasoning, Public Opinion Quarterly, 81, 86
- 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059837 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139032490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 · DOI · Paper page
- Friggeri, 2014, Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 101
- Cook, 2011, The Debunking Handbook
- 10.1207/S15324834BASP2401_2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1537592709992714 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444817724170 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.3082972 · DOI
- 10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aao2998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2014, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 1, 530
- Gorwa, R. (2017). Computational propaganda in Poland: False amplifiers and the digital public sphere. Project on Computational Propaganda Working Paper Series, Oxford.
- 10.1111/jcom.12034 · DOI
- 10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.001.0001 · DOI
- Gorwa, R. (2017). Computational propaganda in Poland: False amplifiers and the digital public sphere. Computational Propaganda Research Project Working Paper Series. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
- Lange-Ionatamishvili, 2015, Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression Against Ukraine, 103
- 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · DOI · Paper page
- Nielsen, R. K. , & Graves, L. (2017). What do ordinary people think fake news is? Poor journalism and political propaganda. Columbia Journalism Review, October 24. www.cjr.org/analysis/fake-news-study.php
- 10.1257/0002828054201468 · DOI · Paper page
- Marwick, 2017, Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online
- Gillespie, 2018, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media
- Monaco, N. (2017). Computational propaganda in Taiwan: Where digital democracy meets automated autocracy. Computational Propaganda Research Project Working Paper Series. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
- Mill, 1859, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays
- Goldman, E. (2018). COMO: Content moderation at scale conference recap. Eric Goldman (blog). https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/07/como-content-moderation-at-scale-conference-recap.htm
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI
- Berry, 2013, The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility
- Glasius, 2018, Authoritarian practices in the digital age| Illiberal and authoritarian practices in the digital sphere, International Journal of Communication, 12, 3795
- 10.1093/poq/nfw006 · DOI · Paper page
- Arun, 2019, On WhatsApp, rumours, and lynchings., Economic and Political Weekly, 54, 30
- Twitter. (2018). Update on Twitter’s review of the 2016 US election. Twitter [blog post].
- Habermas, 1991, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society
- Tynan, 2016, How Facebook powers money machines for obscure political “news” sites, The Guardian, 24
- Sample, 2015, The Ends of Electronic Literature, 58
- 10.1017/bpp.2018.25 · DOI
- Pariser, 2011, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You
- Shapiro, R. Y. , & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2006). Political polarization and the rational public. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada.
- Czapla, P. , Gugger, S. , Howard, J. , & Kardas, M. (2019). Universal language model fine-tuning for Polish hate speech detection. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the PolEval 2019 Workshop: 149. May 31, Warsaw, Poland.
- 10.1093/jcmc/zmx002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0143611 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Gillespie, 2018, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media
- Chowdhury, 2019, Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop, 273
- Paavola, 2016, Understanding the trolling phenomenon: The automated detection of bots and cyborgs in the social media, Journal of Information Warfare, 15, 100
- Cardozo, N. , Crocker, A. , Gebhart, G. , Lynch, J. , Opsahl, K. , & York, J. C. (2018). Who Has Your Back? Censorship Edition 2018. Electronic Frontier Foundation report. www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2018
- 10.1080/10584609.2019.1619639 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x · DOI
- Surowiecki, 2005, The Wisdom of Crowds
- Woolley, S. , & Guilbeault, D. (2017). Computational propaganda in the United States of America: Manufacturing consensus online. Computational Propaganda Project Working Paper Series. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute. · DOI
- Barnouw, 1966, A Tower in Babel
- 10.1111/jcom.12315 · DOI
- Murthy, 2016, Can bots influence a political discussion? Social capital, technical skill, and conversations about public affairs, International Journal of Communication, 10, 20
- Vaccari, 2016, Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter, Social Media and Society, 2, 1
- 10.1093/qje/qjr044 · DOI · Paper page
- Newell, 2016, Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 279
- 10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · DOI · Paper page
- Segal, 2018, When China rules the Web, Foreign Affairs, 97
- Kolo, 2013, State Aid for Newspapers, Media Business and Innovation
- Campbell, 1960, The American Voter
- Dadvar, 2012, Proceedings of the Twelfth DutchBelgian Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR 2012), 23
- 10.1177/0894439314558836 · DOI
- 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2629438 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa1160 · DOI · Paper page
- Schieb, C. , & Preuss, M. (2016). Governing hate speech by means of counterspeech on Facebook. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: Communicating with Power, June 9–13, Fukuoka, Japan.
- Del Vigna, 2017, Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Cybersecurity (ITASEC17), 86
- 10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aap9559 · DOI · Paper page
- Bessi, 2016, Social bots distort the 2016 US presidential election online discussion, First Monday, 21
- King, 2018, A new model for industry-academic partnerships
- 10.1111/1468-2508.00161 · DOI
- Barberá, P. (2015). How social media reduces mass political polarization: Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US. Paper presented at the 2015 American Political Science Association conference.
- 10.1140/epjds6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511790867 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1706588114 · DOI · Paper page
- Starbird, 2014, Proceedings of iConference 2014
- Pariser, 2011, Filter Bubbles: What the Internet Is Hiding from You
- Howard, 2015, Pax Technica: The Impact of Automation on Public Opinion
- 10.1177/1461444817724170 · DOI · Paper page
- Feuz, 2011, Personal Web searching in the age of semantic capitalism: Diagnosing the mechanisms of personalisation, First Monday, 16
- 10.1073/pnas.1706588114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0002716214555474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0093650212466406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/poq/nfw006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · DOI · Paper page
- Nguyen, 2019, Testing popular news discourse on the “echo chamber” effect: Does political polarisation occur among those relying on social media as their primary politics news source?, First Monday, 24
- Quist, 2012, “Plumbing the depths” of the CDA: Weighing the competing Fourth and Seventh Circuit standards of ISP immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, George Mason Law Review, 20, 275
- 10.18352/ulr.420 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rsos.160802 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aal4230 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9781315694504-11 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055417000363 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818758715 · DOI
- Abokhodair, 2015, Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 839
- 10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · DOI · Paper page
- American Press Institute. (2017). “Who Shared It?” How Americans Decide What News to Trust on Social Media. American Press Institute report. www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/trust-social-media/
- 10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Marwick, 2017, Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x · DOI
- Selepak, 2010, Skinhead Super Mario Brothers: An examination of racist and violent games on White supremacist web sites, Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 17, 1
- 10.1111/pops.12394 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aau2706 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0956797615594620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · DOI · Paper page
- Marwick, 2017, Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online
- 10.2202/1540-8884.1354 · DOI
- Gonzales, 2017, Bots as a news service and its emotional connection with audiences: The case of Politibot, Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudios de Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales, 0, 63
- 10.1037/xge0000465 · DOI · Paper page
- Kwok, 2013, AAAI’13 Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1621
- 10.2139/ssrn.3144139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aap9559 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1134271.1134277 · DOI · Paper page
- Aiello, 2012, Friendship prediction and homophily in social media, ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 6, 9
- 10.1257/aer.20190658 · DOI · Paper page
- Allport, 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
- 10.1145/2187836.2187907 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/21670811.2018.1510741 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055417000120 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.27.3.103 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1974.10480137 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11109-011-9176-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcom.12315 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0093650210384984 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059837 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444816634677 · DOI
- 10.1093/poq/nfs038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0052168 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511791048 · DOI
- Arendt, H. (1971). Lying in politics: Reflections on the Pentagon Papers. The New York Review of Books, November 18. www.nybooks.com/articles/1971/11/18/lying-in-politics-reflections-on-the-pentagon-pape/
- 10.1017/CBO9781139032490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0093650212466406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0003055402004264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0002716214555474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9781139878425 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108560573 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2139/ssrn.2813342 · DOI
- 10.1177/1940161217740697 · DOI
- Sunstein, 2001, Republic.com
- Van Alstyne, 1996, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, 80
- 10.1017/CBO9780511818691 · DOI · Paper page
- Chancellor, 2016, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1201
- Duarte, 2018, Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, Vol, 106
- Gagliardone, 2015, Countering Online Hate Speech
- Izsak, R. (2015). Hate speech and incitement to hatred against minorities in the media. UN Humans Rights Council. arXiv.org. www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Minorities/SRMinorities/Pages/Annual.aspx
- Kang, S. , Kim, J. , Park, K. , & Cha, M. (2018). Classification of hateful comments in a Korean news portal. www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07503234
- Kennedy, B. , Kogon, D. , Coombs, K. et al. (2018). A typology and coding manual for the study of hate-based rhetoric. arXiv.org. https://psyarxiv.com/hqjxn/
- Liu, 2015, Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2015), 1, 487
- Jeong, 2015, The Internet of Garbage
- 10.2139/ssrn.3082972 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11109-016-9373-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1940161217740697 · DOI
- Chan, 2015, The Internet and racial hate crime: Offline spillovers from online access, MIS Quarterly, 14, 381
- Van Hee, 2015, International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), 672
- Varol, 2017, Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM)
- Bradshaw, S. , & Howard, P. (2017). Troops, trolls and troublemakers: A global Inventory of organized social media. Computational Propaganda Research Project Working Paper Series. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
200 of 222 shown
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The echo chamber effect on social media
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2023301118 · Cited by 2,092
“This issue is also fueled by the scarcity of comparative studies on social media, especially concerning news consumption (33).”
BackgroundEcho chamber effects on short video platforms
Gao, Y., Liu, F., & Gao, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33370-1 · Cited by 109
Wojcieszak, M., Casas, A., Yu, X., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn9418 · Cited by 90
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60
The Platformization of Violence: Toward a Concept of Discursive Toxicity on Social Media
Recuero, R. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231224264 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Barberá, P.
- Corresponding author
- Barberá, Pablo
- ORCID
- Barberá, Pablo
- Venue
- Social Media and Democracy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2020-08-31
- Pages
- 34-55
- OpenAlex
- W3080223069
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 722
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 224.68
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- social media, echo chambers, political polarization, filter bubbles, information environment, political attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
