The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Abstract
Cross-cultural perspectives have brought renewed interest in the social aspects of the self and the extent to which individuals define themselves in terms of their relationships to others and to social groups. This article provides a conceptual review of research and theory of the social self, arguing that the personal, relational, and collective levels of self-definition represent distinct forms of selfrepresentation with different origins, sources of self-worth, and social motivations. A set of 3 experiments illustrates haw priming of the interpersonal or collective we can alter spontaneous judgments of similarity and self-descriptions. Until recently, social psychological theories of the self focused on the individuated self-concept—the person's sense of unique identity differentiated from others. Cross-cultural perspectives, however, have brought a renewed interest in the social aspects of the self and the extent to which individuals define themselves in terms of their relationships to others and to social groups (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Triandis, Bontempo, Villareal, Asai, & Lucca, 1988). Central to this new perspective is the idea that connectedness and belonging are not merely affiliations or alliances between the self and others but entail fundamental differences in the way the self is construed (Brewer, 1991; Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Singelis, 1994; Trafimow, Triandis, & Goto, 1991; Triandis, 1989; Turner, Oakes, Haslam, & McGarty, 1994). Some of these theories of the social self focus on cross-cultural differences in whether the self is typically construed as individuated or interpersonal. However, all recognize that these different self-construals may also coexist within the same individual, available to be activated at different times or in different contexts. Furthermore, in several theories, achieving an extended sense of self has the status of a fundamental human motivation (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Brewer, 1991). In other words, individuals seek to define themselves in terms of their immersion in relationships with others and with larger collectives and derive much of their self-evaluation from such social identities (Breckler & Greenwald, 1986; Greenwald & Breckler, 1985). The motivational properties of collective identities are systematically documented in Baumeister and Leary's (1995) comprehensive review of the evidence in support of a fundamental need to belong as an innate feature of human nature. All of the theories mentioned above draw some kind of distinction between the individuated or personal self (those aspects of the self-concept that differentiate the self from all others) and a relational or social self (those aspects of the self-concept that
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, cultures that emphasize the values of individualism, low power distance, and low uncertainty avoidance create a cultural environment that supports the expression of one's unique ideas and the exploration of new ways of doing things (Brewer & Chen, 2007; Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Kim & Markus, 1999).”
From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Brewer & Gardner, 1996
In the citing paper
“Individuals need to balance the tension between their need to distinguish them selves from others and be unique individuals, and their willingness to belong to others and assimilate (Brewer & Chen, 2007; Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Brewer & Gardner, 1996
In the citing paper
“Assimilation vs. differentiation needs are related to the values of collectivism vs. individualism (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Brewer & Gardner, 1996
In the citing paper
“Under the social self, we can further differentiate between the relational and the collective self [17, 18].”
From Self-esteem and subjective well-being revisited: The roles of personal, relational, and collective self-esteem (2017) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,207
The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry
Sullivan, H. S., Perry, H. S., Gawel, M. L., & Cohen, M. D. M. B. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315014029 · Cited by 5,280
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Self-citationThe self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
(1972) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(72)80121-7 · Cited by 4,366
The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
Singelis, T. M. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294205014 · Cited by 3,605
A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One’s Social Identity
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292183006 · Cited by 3,057
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
“More recently, Gardner and colleagues (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Gardner, Gabriel, & Lee, 1999) primed IND and COL self-knowledge by having participants read a brief paragraph and circle either first person singular or plural pronouns.”
BackgroundOrganizational Social Capital and Employment Practices
Leana, C. R., & van Buren, H. J. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2202136 · Cited by 2,063
“In contrast, network theorists like Burt (1997) and such researchers as Belliveau et al.”
BackgroundIdentification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308316059 · Cited by 3,073
“More recently, the distinction between shared memberships and relationships has been highlighted (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Brickson, 2000), as expanded on below in “Levels of Self.””
BackgroundCan you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003 · Cited by 2,232
Self-citationSelf‐Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/497549 · Cited by 2,048
“…from other people's self-concepts, recent cross-cultural evidence suggests that individuals' mental representations of self may depend on social aspects of self, such as relationships with others and membership in social groups (Brewer and Gardner 1996; Markus and Kitayama 1991; Triandis 1989).”
BackgroundRelational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
“…results in a “depersonalized” sense of self, “a shift towards the perception of self as an interchangeable exemplar of some social category and away from the perception of self as a unique person” (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987, p. 50, as quoted in Brewer & Gardner, 1996, p. 83).”
BackgroundInfluentialAshmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin‐Volpe, T. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80 · Cited by 2,059
“We consider these definitions to apply to collective identity as used here, consistent with a number of recent writers who advocate a shift in terminology from social identity to collective identity (e.g., Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Sedikides & Brewer, 2001; Simon, 1997; Simon & Klandermans, 2001).”
MethodInclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310385943 · Cited by 2,135
“In this article, the authors first use Brewer’s optimal distinctiveness theory to develop a definition of employee inclusion in the work group as involving the satisfaction of the needs of both belongingness and uniqueness.”
BackgroundMethodSuperstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91 · Cited by 1,597
“In contrast, to be inspired, one must engage one's personal identity, that is, one's sense of oneself as a unique individual striving to accomplish personal goals and ambitions ( Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Markus & Kitayama, 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialPlan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology
McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0401_6 · Cited by 1,588
“…has grown smaller, cross-cultural research collaborations have multiplied, and much is and will continue to be learned about cultural moderators of important psychological processes (e.g., Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Iyengar & Lepper, 1999; Rhee, Uleman, & Lee, 1996; Rhee, Uleman, Lee, & Roman, 1995).”
BackgroundDeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.53503267 · Cited by 1,582
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005 · Cited by 1,426
Self-citationDoes culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311 · Cited by 1,390
“Brewer and Gardner (1996) developed an initial version of this task that contrasted we with they.”
BackgroundLeach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Spears, R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 · Cited by 1,826
“Although focused on the interpersonal level, Brewer and Gardner’s (1996) notion of the relational self is also similar to the notion of solidarity. They conceptualized the relational self as based in individuals’ “role relationships with significant others” in dyads (e.g., mother, friend, sibling) or small coacting gr…”
InfluentialCultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610375557 · Cited by 1,625
“For example, participants may be presented with a paragraph describing the behaviors of a single individual who was referred to as ‘‘I’’ or a paragraph in which the same set of behaviors was attributed to a group described as ‘‘we’’ (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundRoccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_01 · Cited by 1,696
Self-citationBrewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.1.133 · Cited by 1,200
“Instead, Brewer and Gardner (1996) postulated that there are three different levels of the " social self " —the individual, relational, and collective levels of self—as distinct self-representations with different identity properties, loci of agency, and motivational concerns (see also Sedikides &…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationVerplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434 · Cited by 1,283
A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity
Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791602 · Cited by 1,488
Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0113 · Cited by 1,143
“" surfaced both personal identities and social identities (see Brewer and Gardner 1996 for a discussion of personal and social identity).”
BackgroundRelational Identity and Identification: Defining Ourselves Through Work Relationships
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23463672 · Cited by 1,159
The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships.
Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791 · Cited by 1,092
The Dynamics of Organizational Identity
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726702055008181 · Cited by 1,076
“Drawing on work in social psychology (e.g. Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Tedeshi, 1981) and sociology (Goffman, 1959), a few organizational researchers have given attention to the processes defining identity at the collective or organizational level.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAhearne, M., Bhattacharya, C., & Gruen, T. W. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.574 · Cited by 1,043
“What is paramount is that impersonal bonds can exist and be derived from a common identification with some symbolic group or social category (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundOrganizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges
Albert, S. M., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791600 · Cited by 1,034
The nature of awe: elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. (2007) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930600923668 · Cited by 1,025
“Earlier research has demonstrated that selfconcept is somewhat malleable, and subject to state factors such as the priming of individualist vs. collectivist cultural paradigms (e.g., Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Gardner, Gabriel, & Hochschild, 2002; Gardner, Gabriel, & Lee, 1999).”
BackgroundHogg, M. A. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8 · Cited by 990
Levine, M., Prosser, A. L., Evans, D. J., & Reicher, S. D. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271651 · Cited by 984
“For example, the most recent formulation of the arousal cost-reward model (Dovidio et al., 1991; J. Piliavin et al., 1981) includes the concept of we-ness, described as “a sense of connectedness or a categorization of another person as a member of one’s own group” (Dovidio et al., 1991, p. 102). The model suggests tha…”
BackgroundLee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1122 · Cited by 1,031
Self-citationSocial Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x · Cited by 1,399
“…of individualistic conceptions of self and group processes (e.g., Turner & Oakes, 1986), the conceptual focus is on the collective self—self defined in group terms and connected to fellow group members (cf. Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002).”
BackgroundIdentity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill
Lord, R. G., & Hall, R. J. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.003 · Cited by 964
“Finally, collective identities define the self in terms of specific collectives such as groups or organizations, creating a desire to develop in oneself the qualities that are prototypical of these collectives (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundEmotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation.
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93 · Cited by 1,023
Darwinians, Communitarians, and Missionaries: The Role of Founder Identity in Entrepreneurship
Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. B. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0211 · Cited by 1,002
“…& Mackey, 2002), founders’ conceptions of their social selves, as manifested in their social motivations, bases of self-evaluation, and views of relevant reference groups, are arguably central to their decision making and their behavior and actions relative to others (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialKitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890 · Cited by 925
“Unlike social cognition researchers who focus on effects of specific priming stimuli such as I versus we (Brewer & Gardner, 1996) or cultural icons such as Great Walls or Marilyn Monroe (Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martinez, 2000), our emphasis is on the entire pool of icons, lay theories, and…”
BackgroundAlbert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity
Whetten, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492606291200 · Cited by 1,016
“…of a hierarchically ordered set of CED organizational attributes, roughly paralleling the social, relational, and personal attribute-sets constituting an individual’s composite identity (Ashforth & Johnson, 2001; Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Brickson, 2000; Mischel & Morf, 2003; Stets & Burke, 2003).”
BackgroundThe relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory.
Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.619 · Cited by 976
“…knowledge or in the prevalence of triggering contexts, or both, rather than differences in the availability of different forms per se (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Brewer & Roccas, 2001; Higgins, 1989b; Higgins & May, 2001; Kitayama et al., 1997; Reid & Deaux, 1996; Trafimow et al., 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialLeadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., Cremer, D. D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002 · Cited by 920
“An extended sense of self may also be more personalized, and be based on the individual’s roles in relationships with significant others such as their family and close friends (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Sedikides & Brewer, 2001).”
BackgroundThe Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships and Their Consequences
Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281435 · Cited by 904
“identity levels identified by Brewer and Gardner (1996) exist as stable properties of the self concept and not only as transient cognitive states.”
BackgroundInfluentialKruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hettiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. K. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12163 · Cited by 985
Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650302238775 · Cited by 859
“Consistent with the dominant view among identity scholars that group identification is the nexus of individual social identity formation, Brewer and Gardner (1996) noted that the social self emerges from common bonds associated with memberships in interacting groups and from common identities…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network.
Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016076 · Cited by 908
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013935 · Cited by 836
“They focus on the part of the self-concept that captures the way the self relates to groups in general (i.e., they focus on collective identity; Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. S. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.48463334 · Cited by 875
Beyond self-esteem: influence of multiple motives on identity construction.
Vignoles, V. L., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J., & Scabini, E. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308 · Cited by 805
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00162 · Cited by 1,079
“…interdependence have heretofore been cross-cultural, members of Eastern and Western cultures are capable of displaying both kinds of self-construal (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Trafimow, Triandis, & Goto, 1991; Triandis, McCusker, & Hui, 1990), as might be expected given the universality of both the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationImpoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence
Culpeper, J. (2011) · Cited by 800
The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gerçek‐Swing, B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310373752 · Cited by 878
“The first series of studies by Brewer and Gardner (1996) focused on aspects of the interdependent (we) self and compared the effects of the we circling task to the control tasks.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhen group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion.
Swann, W. B., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0028589 · Cited by 862
“Moreover, although all theorists acknowledge that allegiance to the collective provides the basis for identification, some have contended that the personal relationships of group members may also promote identification (e.g., Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Postmes et al., 2005; Prentice et al., 1994).”
BackgroundDevos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447 · Cited by 790
Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples
Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530802073712 · Cited by 788
“The absence of a difference in first-person plural may indicate that the word “we” is not a simple marker of a communal, interdependent mindset (cf. Brewer & Gardner, 1996), rather than indicating doubts about whether women really are rapport oriented.”
Backgroundvan Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.359 · Cited by 763
The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender.
Eagly, A. H. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.64.8.644 · Cited by 823
“Social bonds can take a relational form by linking people to particular others in close relationships or a collective form by linking people to groups and organizations (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-presentation and gender on MySpace
Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001 · Cited by 724
“In addition, individuals also derive a “relational self” from their connections to particular others (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundTrust and Commitment through Self-Verification
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695833 · Cited by 718
Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities
Ren, Y., Kraut, R. E., & Kiesler, S. B. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607076007 · Cited by 748
“Group Robustness A person’s feelings of common identity, and the role of the group in his or her life, changes with the situation (Ashforth and Johnson 2001; Brewer 2001; Brewer and Gardner 1996).”
BackgroundThe Structure of Goal Contents Across 15 Cultures.
Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M. F., Kim, Y., Lau, S., Ryan, R. M., Saunders, S. A., Schmuck, P., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.800 · Cited by 795
“…of inherent psychological needs, but they fall midway between the physical and the self-transcendent, as they primarily concern the personal, psychological realm of the ego (Freud, 1960); the material–social self (James, 1892/1985); or the individual or relational selves (Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundA SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25006-1 · Cited by 733
Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0995 · Cited by 719
Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors.
Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026423 · Cited by 686
“Future work selves can also potentially be considered at other levels of the self-concept (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Lord et al., 1999).”
BackgroundMoral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups.
Reed, A., & Aquino, K. F. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270 · Cited by 674
“This assumption is consistent with the notion of the self as comprising multiple identities (Brewer & Gardner, 1996) that are hierarchically ordered (Stryker, 1980).”
Individual Behavior and Group Membership
Charness, G., Rigotti, L., & Rustichini, A. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.4.1340 · Cited by 672
Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. A. (2007) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.20178 · Cited by 695
“According to experimental studies, when individuals identify with a group they are more willing to forego individual gain in order to enhance the collective good ~Brewer & Gardner, 1996!.”
BackgroundElsbach, K. D., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638 · Cited by 632
“…identity), although most participants discussed the importance of clear separation vs. a large or small separation of identities.2 Second, this definition suggests that disidentification is a form of “relational” categorization (Brewer and Gardner 1996) defining the organization and the individual.”
BackgroundBrickson, S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275679 · Cited by 638
The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity.
Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1998) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.338 · Cited by 647
A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development
Day, D. V., & Harrison, M. M. (2007) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.007 · Cited by 616
Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2832 · Cited by 613
Identity Under Construction: How Individuals Come to Define Themselves in Organizations
Ashforth, B. E., & Schinoff, B. S. (2016) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062322 · Cited by 612
Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self
Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201275007 · Cited by 597
Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · Cited by 582
Social Exclusion and Selective Memory: How the Need to belong Influences Memory for Social Events
Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200266007 · Cited by 578
Self-citationNarrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity
Hammack, P. L. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308316892 · Cited by 923
“Triandis (1989) spoke of high-contrast dichotomies between cultures when he referred to individualism and collectivism (for a review and theoretical extensions, see Brewer & Chen, 2007; Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Oyserman, 1993; Oyserman et al., 2002).”
BackgroundThe Social Identity Perspective
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404263424 · Cited by 564
“For example, work on stereo-typing (e.g., Oakes, Haslam, & Turner, 1994; Leyens, Yzerbyt, & Schadron, 1994), self-conception (e.g., Abrams, 1996; Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Hogg, 2001b; Reid & Deaux, 1996), motivation (e.g., Abrams & Hogg, 1988; Hogg, 2000b; Rubin & Hewstone, 1998), collective…”
BackgroundLiu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014 · Cited by 555
Moral Identity and Judgments of Charitable Behaviors
Reed, A., Aquino, K. F., & Levy, E. P. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.1.178 · Cited by 552
“Aquino and Reed’s traitbased definition of moral identity builds on the work of other writers (e.g., Brewer and Gardner 1996); they argue that traits are the loci of self-definition around which personal identities are structured.”
BackgroundKunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522 · Cited by 553
“Different social groups are often assumed to have different inherent essences (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Hamilton & Sherman, 1996; Medin, 1989; Rothbart & Taylor, 1992), and these may be used to explain differences of opinion between members of different groups (Miller & Prentice, 1999).”
BackgroundBartel, C. A. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094869 · Cited by 544
Theories of identity and the analysis of face
Spencer‐Oatey, H. (2007) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 · Cited by 547
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43 · Cited by 835
Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior
Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2012) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.005 · Cited by 578
(2007) · Cited by 521
The Many Faces of SocialIdentity: Implications for Political Psychology
Brewer, M. B. (2001) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00229 · Cited by 510
Self-citationSelf, self-concept, and identity.
Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. C. M. (2012) · Cited by 511
The Ties That Bind Us: Ritual, Fusion, and Identification
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/678698 · Cited by 509
“Consequently, group identification involves categorical rather than relational ties with others (Brewer and Gardner 1996); when one is identified with a group, one is not relating to other members as unique individual persons, but simply as anonymous members of the same social category who share the…”
BackgroundAbdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (2006) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592706060440 · Cited by 501
“Brewer and Gardner 1996 distinguish three types of identity: personal, collective, and relational.”
Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification
He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601112473815 · Cited by 554
“Based on the notion of multiple identities, a person has a network of identities that can be categorized at personal, interpersonal and social/collective levels (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Brickson, 2000b), or at personal, social and material levels (Ashforth et al., 2008; Skitka, 2003).”
BackgroundA person‐centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology
Meyer, J. P., & Morin, A. J. S. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2085 · Cited by 487
“Drawing on identity theory (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Lord & Brown, 2004) and regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997, 1998), Johnson et al. (2010) argued that employees can form individual, relational, or collective identities and that these identities can have implications for commitment targets.”
BackgroundLord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00081-9 · Cited by 474
Brickson, S. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791604 · Cited by 556
Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts
Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2001) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00072-8 · Cited by 471
Dasgupta, N. (2011) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2011.607313 · Cited by 466
“The importance of role models to disadvantaged individuals makes sense if we consider that stereotype threat activates a collective mindset (thinking “we”) rather than an individual mindset (thinking “me”; see Brewer & Gardner, 1996).”
BackgroundSocialization Processes in the Family: Social and Emotional Development
Grusec, J. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131650 · Cited by 542
Social identification effects in social dilemmas: a transformation of motives
Cremer, D. D., & van Vugt, M. (1999) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199911)29:7 · Cited by 463
Brickson, S. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.50.4.576 · Cited by 463
“Each of these three identity orientations has powerful implications for individuals’ social motivations by cognitively focusing individuals on themselves, their relationship partners, and their social groups, respectively (Brewer and Gardner, 1996; Brickson, 2000a).”
BackgroundInfluentialFitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
“…and interpersonal relationships (e.g., Andersen & Chen, 2002; Aron, Aron, Tudor, & Nelson, 1991; Baldwin, 1992; Berscheid & Ammazzalorso, 2001; Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Chen, Boucher, & Tapias, 2006; Cross, Bacon, & Morris, 2000; Gardner, Gabriel, & Hochschild, 2002; Leary, Tambor, Terdal, &…”
BackgroundHogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. (2012) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.741134 · Cited by 520
Past, Present and Future Research on Multiple Identities: Toward an Intrapersonal Network Approach
Ramarajan, L. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.912379 · Cited by 481
Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: a domain-based approach
Bugental, D. B. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.187 · Cited by 456
“In summary, group membership is typically defined in terms of positive evaluation of and preference for those who are similar and automatic devaluation of and negative action against outsiders—a process that has no counterpart within other domains (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Premack & Premack, 1994).”
BackgroundOn the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure.
Gómez, Á., Brooks, M. L., Buhrmester, M. D., Vázquez, A., Jetten, J., & Swann, W. B. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022642 · Cited by 472
“Whereas members of relational groups tend to perceive fellow members of the group as unique and hence irreplaceable members of a larger “family” (Brewer & Gardner, 1996), members of collective groups perceive fellow members as categorically undifferentiated and interchangeable (see e.g., Tajfel &…”
BackgroundTowards a psychology of collective memory
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701811912 · Cited by 443
“…interest of psychologists in collec- tive identity and collective guilt is also relevant, as well as the earlier work by Sherif (1936) on social norms (e.g., Abrams & Hogg, 1990; Bran- scombe & Doosje, 2004; Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Deaux, 1996; Sherif, 1936; Simon & Klandemans, 2001; Tajfel, 1974).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2015152577
- Cited by
- 3,401
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 143 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 164 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 176 · 2020: 251 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 158 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 168 · 2013: 147 · 2012: 180
- FWCI
- 55.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- collective identity, social self, self-construal, extended self, need to belong, self-representation, social identity, self-concept, similarity judgments, self-description, self-worth, social motivation, self-construal priming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review