Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,088

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives.

Brehm, Jack W.·1956·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/h0041006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

THE importance of the choice situation is reflected in the considerable amount of theory and research on conflict. Conflict theory has generally dealt, however, with the phenomena that lead up to the choice. What happens after the choice has received little attention. The present paper is concerned with some of the consequences of making a choice. Previous consideration of the consequences of choice have been limited to relatively unspecified hypotheses (1, 3) or to qualitative analysis (4). However, a recent theory by Festinger (2) makes possible several explicit predictions. According to this analysis of the choice situation, all cognitive elements (items of information) that favor the chosen alternative are and all cognitive elements that favor the unchosen alternative are dissonant with the choice behavior. Furthermore, other things being equal, the greater the number of elements favoring the unchosen alternative (i.e., the greater the relative attractiveness of the unchosen alternative) the greater the resulting When exists, the person will attempt to eliminate or reduce it. Although space limitations preclude further discussion of the theory, it may be said that several derivations are possible concerning the consequences of making a choice. The present study was designed to test the following: 1. Choosing between two alternatives creates dissonance and a consequent pressure to reduce it. The dissonance is reduced by making the chosen alternative more desirable and the unchosen alternative less desirable after the choice than they were before it. 2. The magnitude of the dissonance and the 1 This paper is based on a thesis offered in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at the University of Minnesota. The author wishes to thank his advisor, Dr. Leon Festinger, for his invaluable aid in the formulation and execution of the study. He also wishes to thank the Laboratory for Research in Social Relations, which supported the study. 4 The author is now in the Department of Psychology, Yale University. consequent pressure to reduce it are greater the more closely the alternatives approach equal desirability. 3. Exposing a person to new relevant cognitive elements, at least some of which are consonant, facilitates the reduction of dissonance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0041006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brehm, J. W.
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1956-05
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
384-389
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1037/h0041006
OpenAlex
W2421917313
Cited by
1,088
References
0
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.