Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 681

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Finding the engram

Josselyn, Sheena A., Köhler, Stefan, Frankland, Paul W.·2015·Nature Reviews Neuroscience
DOI 10.1038/nrn4000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn4000

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 117

  1. Semon, R. The Mneme (G. Allen & Unwin, 1921).
  2. Semon, R. Mnemic Psychology (G. Allen & Unwin, 1923).
  3. Franz, S. I. & Lashley, K. S. The retention of habits by the rat after destruction of the frontal portion of the cerebrum. Psychobiology 1, 3–18 (1917). · DOI
  4. Lashley, K. S. in Society of Experimental Biology Symposium, No. 4: Psychological Mechanisms in Animal Behavior (eds Danielli, J. F. & Brown, R.) 454–482 (Academic Press, 1950).
  5. Bruce, D. Fifty years since Lashley's In search of the Engram: refutations and conjectures. J. Hist. Neurosci. 10, 308–318 (2001). · DOI
  6. Thompson, R. F. The search for the engram. Am. Psychol. 31, 209–227 (1976). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dudai, Y. & Eisenberg, M. Rites of passage of the engram: reconsolidation and the lingering consolidation hypothesis. Neuron 44, 93–100 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Josselyn, S. A. Continuing the search for the engram: examining the mechanism of fear memories. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 35, 221–228 (2010). · DOI
  9. Schacter, D. L. Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory (Psychology Press, 2001).
  10. Kandel, E. R. The Cellular Basis of Behavior (W. H. Freeman, 1976).
  11. Milner, P. M. The Autonomous Brain: A Neural Theory of Attention and Learning (Psychology Press, 1999). · DOI
  12. Nadel, L. in Science of Memory: Concepts (eds Roediger, H. L., Dudai, Y. & Fitzpatrick, S. M.) 177–182 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).
  13. Dudai, Y. Neurobiology. The shaky trace. Nature 406, 686–687 (2000). · DOI
  14. Nader, K. Memory traces unbound. Trends Neurosci. 26, 65–72 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ramon y Cajal, S. The Croonian lecture: la fine structure des centre nerveux. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 55, 444–468 (in French) (1894). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ramon y Cajal, S. A quelle epoque apparaissent les expansions des cellules nerveuses de la moëlle épinière du poulet? Anat. Anz. 5, 609–613, 631–639 (in French) (1890).
  17. Stefanowska, M. Les appendices terminaux des dendrites cerebraux et leur differents etats physiologiques. Ann. Soc. R. Sci. Med. Nat. Brux. 6, 351–407 (in French) (1897).
  18. Stefanowska, M. Sur les appendices des dendrites. Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Med. Nat. Brux. 55, 76–81 (in French) (1897).
  19. Hebb, D. O. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (Wiley, 1949).
  20. Moser, M. B., Trommald, M. & Andersen, P. An increase in dendritic spine density on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells following spatial learning in adult rats suggests the formation of new synapses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12673–12675 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Muller, D., Toni, N. & Buchs, P. A. Spine changes associated with long-term potentiation. Hippocampus 10, 596–604 (2000). · DOI
  22. Day, J. J. & Sweatt, J. D. Epigenetic mechanisms in cognition. Neuron 70, 813–829 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Sacktor, T. C. How does PKMζ maintain long-term memory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 9–15 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Josselyn, S. A. & Nguyen, P. V. CREB, synapses and memory disorders: past progress and future challenges. Current Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord. 4, 481–497 (2005). · DOI
  25. Guzowski, J. F. Insights into immediate-early gene function in hippocampal memory consolidation using antisense oligonucleotide and fluorescent imaging approaches. Hippocampus 12, 86–104 (2002). · DOI
  26. Horn, G. Pathways of the past: the imprint of memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 108–120 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Horn, G. Memory, Imprinting, and the Brain: An Inquiry into Mechanisms (Clarendon Press, 1985). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Rumpel, S., LeDoux, J., Zador, A. & Malinow, R. Postsynaptic receptor trafficking underlying a form of associative learning. Science 308, 83–88 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Oh, M. M., Kuo, A. G., Wu, W. W., Sametsky, E. A. & Disterhoft, J. F. Watermaze learning enhances excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 2171–2179 (2003). · DOI
  30. Graff, J. & Mansuy, I. M. Epigenetic codes in cognition and behaviour. Behav. Brain Res. 192, 70–87 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Barria, A. & Malinow, R. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by regulating binding to CaMKII. Neuron 48, 289–301 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kristensen, A. S. et al. Mechanism of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II regulation of AMPA receptor gating. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 727–735 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Barth, A. L., Gerkin, R. C. & Dean, K. L. Alteration of neuronal firing properties after in vivo experience in a FosGFP transgenic mouse. J. Neurosci. 24, 6466–6475 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Dudai, Y. in Science of Memory: Concepts (eds Roediger, H. L., Dudai, Y. & Fitzpatrick, S. M.) 13–16 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).
  35. Wilson, M. A. & McNaughton, B. L. Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265, 676–679 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Kudrimoti, H. S., Barnes, C. A. & McNaughton, B. L. Reactivation of hippocampal cell assemblies: effects of behavioral state, experience, and EEG dynamics. J. Neurosci. 19, 4090–4101 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Karlsson, M. P. & Frank, L. M. Network dynamics underlying the formation of sparse, informative representations in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 28, 14271–14281 (2008). · DOI
  38. Carr, M. F., Jadhav, S. P. & Frank, L. M. Hippocampal replay in the awake state: a potential substrate for memory consolidation and retrieval. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 147–153 (2011). A comprehensive review of neural replay studies in rodents, which describe how replay of patterns of neuronal activity in wakefulness and sleep contribute to memory retrieval and consolidation. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Skaggs, W. E. & McNaughton, B. L. Replay of neuronal firing sequences in rat hippocampus during sleep following spatial experience. Science 271, 1870–1873 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Nakashiba, T., Buhl, D. L., McHugh, T. J. & Tonegawa, S. Hippocampal CA3 output is crucial for ripple-associated reactivation and consolidation of memory. Neuron 62, 781–787 (2009). · DOI
  41. Ego-Stengel, V. & Wilson, M. A. Disruption of ripple-associated hippocampal activity during rest impairs spatial learning in the rat. Hippocampus 20, 1–10 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  42. Jadhav, S. P. & Frank, L. M. Reactivating memories for consolidation. Neuron 62, 745–746 (2009). · DOI
  43. Johnson, A., van der Meer, M. A. & Redish, A. D. Integrating hippocampus and striatum in decision-making. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 692–697 (2007). · DOI
  44. Steiner, A. P. & Redish, A. D. Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of regret in rat decision-making on a neuroeconomic task. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 995–1002 (2014). · DOI
  45. Singer, A. C., Carr, M. F., Karlsson, M. P. & Frank, L. M. Hippocampal SWR activity predicts correct decisions during the initial learning of an alternation task. Neuron 77, 1163–1173 (2013). · DOI
  46. Maquet, P. et al. Experience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 831–836 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Deuker, L. et al. Memory consolidation by replay of stimulus-specific neural activity. J. Neurosci. 33, 19373–19383 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Tambini, A., Ketz, N. & Davachi, L. Enhanced brain correlations during rest are related to memory for recent experiences. Neuron 65, 280–290 (2010). A human fMRI study showing that patterns of hippocampal–cortical connectivity after an associative encoding task during rest are task-specific and predict subsequent memory performance for these associations at retrieval. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Watrous, A. J., Fell, J., Ekstrom, A. D. & Axmacher, N. More than spikes: common oscillatory mechanisms for content specific neural representations during perception and memory. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31, 33–39 (2015). · DOI
  50. Tatsuno, M., Lipa, P. & McNaughton, B. L. Methodological considerations on the use of template matching to study long-lasting memory trace replay. J. Neurosci. 26, 10727–10742 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Greenberg, M. E. & Ziff, E. B. Stimulation of 3T3 cells induces transcription of the c-fos proto-oncogene. Nature 311, 433–438 (1984). · DOI
  52. Curran, T. & Morgan, J. I. Superinduction of c-fos by nerve growth factor in the presence of peripherally active benzodiazepines. Science 229, 1265–1268 (1985). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Link, W. et al. Somatodendritic expression of an immediate early gene is regulated by synaptic activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5734–5738 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Lyford, G. L. et al. Arc, a growth factor and activity-regulated gene, encodes a novel cytoskeleton-associated protein that is enriched in neuronal dendrites. Neuron 14, 433–445 (1995). · DOI
  55. Guzowski, J. F., McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A. & Worley, P. F. Environment-specific expression of the immediate-early gene Arc in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 1120–1124 (1999). An elegant application of IEG technology to identify neuronal ensembles coding different contexts. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Reijmers, L. G., Perkins, B. L., Matsuo, N. & Mayford, M. Localization of a stable neural correlate of associative memory. Science 317, 1230–1233 (2007). This study introduced the influential TetTag approach that allows permanent labelling of neuronal ensembles that are activated during fear memory encoding. These authors showed that tagged neurons were reactivated at above chance levels when the corresponding memory is later recalled. · DOI
  57. Denny, C. A. et al. Hippocampal memory traces are differentially modulated by experience, time, and adult neurogenesis. Neuron 83, 189–201 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  58. Guenthner, C. J., Miyamichi, K., Yang, H. H., Heller, H. C. & Luo, L. Permanent genetic access to transiently active neurons via TRAP: targeted recombination in active populations. Neuron 78, 773–784 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Tayler, K. K., Tanaka, K. Z., Reijmers, L. G. & Wiltgen, B. J. Reactivation of neural ensembles during the retrieval of recent and remote memory. Curr. Biol. 23, 99–106 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  60. Liu, X. et al. Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature 484, 381–385 (2012). The first example of an experiment using the tag-and-manipulate approach to convincingly demonstrate that stimulation of a fear memory engram induces artificial memory expression in the absence of external cues or internally guided retrieval attempts. · DOI
  61. Rugg, M. D., Johnson, J. D., Park, H. & Uncapher, M. R. Encoding–retrieval overlap in human episodic memory: a functional neuroimaging perspective. Prog. Brain Res. 169, 339–352 (2008). · DOI
  62. Frankland, P. W. & Bontempi, B. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 119–130 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  63. McIntosh, A. R. Towards a network theory of cognition. Neural Netw. 13, 861–870 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  64. Maren, S. Neurotoxic basolateral amygdala lesions impair learning and memory but not the performance of conditional fear in rats. J. Neurosci. 19, 8696–8703 (1999). · DOI
  65. Scoville, W. B. & Milner, B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 20, 11–21 (1957). · DOI · Paper page
  66. Milner, B., Squire, L. R. & Kandel, E. R. Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron 20, 445–468 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  67. O'Keefe, J. & Dostrovsky, J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res. 34, 171–175 (1971). · DOI · Paper page
  68. Milner, P. M. Cell assemblies: whose idea? Psycholoquy [online] , (1999).
  69. Han, J. H. et al. Neuronal competition and selection during memory formation. Science 316, 457–460 (2007). This study shows that neurons with higher CREB activity in the LA are more likely than their neighbours with lower CREB activity to be allocated to a fear memory engram. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Josselyn, S. A. et al. Long-term memory is facilitated by cAMP response element-binding protein overexpression in the amygdala. J. Neurosci. 21, 2404–2412 (2001). · DOI
  71. Maren, S. The amygdala, synaptic plasticity, and fear memory. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 985, 106–113 (2003). · DOI
  72. Fanselow, M. S. & Gale, G. D. The amygdala, fear, and memory. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 985, 125–134 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  73. Frankland, P. W. & Josselyn, S. A. Memory allocation. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 243 (2015). · DOI
  74. Zhou, Y. et al. CREB regulates excitability and the allocation of memory to subsets of neurons in the amygdala. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1438–1443 (2009). · DOI
  75. Hsiang, H. L. et al. Manipulating a “cocaine engram” in mice. J. Neurosci. 34, 14115–14127 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  76. Sano, Y. et al. CREB regulates memory allocation in the insular cortex. Curr. Biol. 24, 2833–2837 (2014). · DOI
  77. Sekeres, M. J. et al. Increasing CRTC1 function in the dentate gyrus during memory formation or reactivation increases memory strength without compromising memory quality. J. Neurosci. 32, 17857–17868 (2012). · DOI
  78. Yiu, A. P. et al. Neurons are recruited to a memory trace based on relative neuronal excitability immediately before training. Neuron 83, 722–735 (2014). Along with reference 105, this study establishes that allocation of neurons to the engram is governed by neuronal excitability; that is, more excitable cells are more likely than their less excitable neighbours to become part of an engram for a fear memory. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Armbruster, B. N., Li, X., Pausch, M. H., Herlitze, S. & Roth, B. L. Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5163–5168 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  80. Deisseroth, K. Optogenetics. Nat. Methods 8, 26–29 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  81. Gouty-Colomer, L. A. et al. Arc expression identifies the lateral amygdala fear memory trace. Mol. Psychiatry http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.18 (2015). · DOI
  82. Kim, D., Pare, D. & Nair, S. S. Assignment of model amygdala neurons to the fear memory trace depends on competitive synaptic interactions. J. Neurosci. 33, 14354–14358 (2013). · DOI
  83. Han, J. H. et al. Selective erasure of a fear memory. Science 323, 1492–1496 (2009). Using an allocate-and-manipulate approach, this paper is the first to show that fear memories may be 'erased' by ablating engram neurons in the LA. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Tanaka, K. Z. et al. Cortical representations are reinstated by the hippocampus during memory retrieval. Neuron 84, 347–354 (2014). A recent study showing that optogenetic silencing of engram neurons in the hippocampus prevents reactivation of engram ensembles in the cortex, leading to retrieval failure. · DOI
  85. Koya, E. et al. Targeted disruption of cocaine-activated nucleus accumbens neurons prevents context-specific sensitization. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1069–1073 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  86. Bossert, J. M. et al. Ventral medial prefrontal cortex neuronal ensembles mediate context-induced relapse to heroin. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 420–422 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  87. Alvarez, P. & Squire, L. R. Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: a simple network model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7041–7045 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  88. Treves, A. & Rolls, E. T. Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory. Hippocampus 4, 374–391 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  89. Penfield, W. & Perot, P. The brain's record of auditory and visual experience. A final summary discussion. Brain 86, 595–696 (1963). · DOI · Paper page
  90. Hamani, C. et al. Memory enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep brain stimulation. Ann. Neurol. 63, 119–123 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  91. Hamani, C. et al. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus: effects of electrical stimulation on pilocarpine-induced seizures and status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res. 78, 117–123 (2008). · DOI
  92. Wang, J. X. et al. Targeted enhancement of cortical–hippocampal brain networks and associative memory. Science 345, 1054–1057 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  93. Ramirez, S. et al. Activating positive memory engrams suppresses depression-like behaviour. Nature 522, 335–339 (2015). · DOI
  94. Cowansage, K. K. et al. Direct reactivation of a coherent neocortical memory of context. Neuron 84, 432–441 (2014). This study shows that stimulation of engram-associated neurons in a single cortical region (of a distributed engram) is sufficient for retrieval of the corresponding fear memory. · DOI · Paper page
  95. Penfield, W. Engrams in the human brain. Mechanisms of memory. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 61, 831–840 (1968).
  96. Richards, B. A. & Frankland, P. W. The conjunctive trace. Hippocampus 23, 207–212 (2013). · DOI
  97. Schacter, D. L. Constructive memory: past and future. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 14, 7–18 (2012). · DOI
  98. Ohkawa, N. et al. Artificial association of pre-stored information to generate a qualitatively new memory. Cell Rep. 11, 261–269 (2015). · DOI
  99. Kim, J., Kwon, J. T., Kim, H. S., Josselyn, S. A. & Han, J. H. Memory recall and modifications by activating neurons with elevated CREB. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 65–72 (2014). This study established that artificially expressed fear memories also undergo protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation and, therefore, share properties with natural fear memories. · DOI
  100. Allen, T. A., Morris, A. M., Mattfeld, A. T., Stark, C. E. & Fortin, N. J. A sequence of events model of episodic memory shows parallels in rats and humans. Hippocampus 24, 1178–1188 (2014). · DOI
  101. Eichenbaum, H. & Fortin, N. J. Bridging the gap between brain and behavior: cognitive and neural mechanisms of episodic memory. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 84, 619–629 (2005). · DOI
  102. Lashley, K. S. Integrative functions of the cerebral cortex. Physiol. Rev. 13, 1–42 (1933). · DOI
  103. Lashley, K. S. Studies of cerebral funciton in learning. XI. The beahvior of the rat in latch-box situations. Comparative Psychol. Monographs 11, 5–42 (1935).
  104. Lewis, D. J. Psychobiology of active and inactive memory. Psychol. Bull. 86, 1054–1083 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  105. Tronel, S., Milekic, M. H. & Alberini, C. M. Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. PLoS Biol. 3, e293 (2005). · DOI
  106. O'Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Clarendon Press, 1978).
  107. Olds, J., Disterhoft, J. F., Segal, M., Kornblith, C. L. & Hirsh, R. Learning centers of rat brain mapped by measuring latencies of conditioned unit responses. J. Neurophysiol. 35, 202–219 (1972). · DOI · Paper page
  108. Weinberger, N. M. & Bakin, J. S. Research on auditory cortex plasticity. Science 280, 1174 (1998). · DOI
  109. McCormick, D. A., Clark, G. A., Lavond, D. G. & Thompson, R. F. Initial localization of the memory trace for a basic form of learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2731–2735 (1982). · DOI · Paper page
  110. Campeau, S. & Davis, M. Involvement of subcortical and cortical afferents to the lateral nucleus of the amygdala in fear conditioning measured with fear-potentiated startle in rats trained concurrently with auditory and visual conditioned stimuli. J. Neurosci. 15, 2312–2327 (1995). · DOI
  111. Mishkin, M. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature 273, 297–298 (1978). · DOI · Paper page
  112. Brown, M. W. & Xiang, J. Z. Recognition memory: neuronal substrates of the judgement of prior occurrence. Prog. Neurobiol. 55, 149–189 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  113. Fuster, J. M. & Alexander, G. E. Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science 173, 652–654 (1971). · DOI · Paper page
  114. Miyashita, Y., Kameyama, M., Hasegawa, I. & Fukushima, T. Consolidation of visual associative long-term memory in the temporal cortex of primates. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 70, 197–211 (1998). · DOI
  115. Rey, H. G. et al. Single-cell recordings in the human medial temporal lobe. J. Anat. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.12228 (2014). · DOI
  116. Squire, L. R. Memory and Brain (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987).
  117. Moscovitch, M. et al. Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory. J. Anat. 207, 35–66 (2005). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Josselyn, S. A., Köhler, S., & Frankland, P. W.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-08-20
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
521-534
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
DOI
10.1038/nrn4000
OpenAlex
W1591199750
Cited by
681
References
47
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.