Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The proactive brain: memory for predictions

Bar, Moshe·2009·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

It is proposed that the human brain is proactive in that it continuously generates predictions that anticipate the relevant future. In this proposal, analogies are derived from elementary information that is extracted rapidly from the input, to link that input with the representations that exist in memory. Finding an analogical link results in the generation of focused predictions via associative activation of representations that are relevant to this analogy, in the given context. Predictions in complex circumstances, such as social interactions, combine multiple analogies. Such predictions need not be created afresh in new situations, but rather rely on existing scripts in memory, which are the result of real as well as of previously imagined experiences. This cognitive neuroscience framework provides a new hypothesis with which to consider the purpose of memory, and can help explain a variety of phenomena, ranging from recognition to first impressions, and from the brain's ‘default mode’ to a host of mental disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2008.0310

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1037/0096-3445.120.1.3 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/cercor/bhl078 · DOI
  3. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20156 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.021 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1068/p250343 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0507062103 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/hipo.20287 · DOI
  10. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0315 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319 · DOI
  13. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Brewer W.F., 1984, Handbook of social cognition, 119
  15. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0806 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/436471a · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature04766 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1006/jesp.2000.1427 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26027-5 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03628.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770954 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/cercor/bhj097 · DOI
  23. 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.35 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ingvar D.H., 1985, ‘Memory of the future’: an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness, Hum. Neurobiol, 4, 127
  27. 10.1126/science.1149656 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.017 · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01374-5 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/1467-9450.00233 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00437-8 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001333 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nn996 · DOI
  35. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0314 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01163.x · DOI
  37. Noe A. Action in perception (Representation and mind). 2005 Cambridge MA:The MIT Press.
  38. 10.1162/08989290051137549 · DOI
  39. 10.1023/A:1011139631724 · DOI
  40. Petrides M., 1985, Deficits on conditional associative-learning tasks after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in man, Hum. Neurobiol, 4, 137
  41. 10.1073/pnas.0503657102 · DOI
  42. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5053-03.2004 · DOI
  43. Schacter D.L., 1987, Memory, amnesia, and frontal lobe dysfunction, Psychobiology, 15, 21, 10.3758/BF03327261 · DOI
  44. Schank R.C., 1975, Theoretical issues in natural language processing
  45. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1043 · DOI
  46. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.473 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/368633a0 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00006-6 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00391-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1101/lm.40701 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.021 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06726.x · DOI
  53. 10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1093/cercor/bhm105 · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bar, M.
Affiliations
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at MGH, Harvard Medical SchoolCharlestown, MA 02129, USA
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-05-12
Volume
364
Issue
1521
Pages
1235-1243
ISSN
  • 0962-8436
  • 1471-2970
Cited by
498
References
22
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review