Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,751

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex

Fischl, B., Liu, A., Dale, A.M.·2001·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
DOI 10.1109/42.906426
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Highly accurate surface models of the cerebral cortex are becoming increasingly important as tools in the investigation of the functional organization of the human brain. The construction of such models is difficult using current neuroimaging technology due to the high degree of cortical folding. Even single voxel misclassifications can result in erroneous connections being created between adjacent banks of a sulcus, resulting in a topologically inaccurate model. These topological defects cause the cortical model to no longer be homeomorphic to a sheet, preventing the accurate inflation, flattening, or spherical morphing of the reconstructed cortex. Surface deformation techniques can guarantee the topological correctness of a model, but are time-consuming and may result in geometrically inaccurate models. In order to address this need we have developed a technique for taking a model of the cortex, detecting and fixing the topological defects while leaving that majority of the model intact, resulting in a surface that is both geometrically accurate and topologically correct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/42.906426

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1126/science.7754376 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Tootell, 1993, Mapping human visual cortex: Evidence from functional MRI and histology, Investigat. Opthalmol. Visual Sci., 34, 813
  3. 10.1038/276 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1073/pnas.90.11.4952 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/cercor/3.2.79 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Turner, Functional mapping of the humanvisual cortex at 4 Tesla using oxygen contrast EPI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.95.3.811 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/mrm.1910290221 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.270.5237.769 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:1<29::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  11. 10.1038/681 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-03-00913.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0034 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/cercor/7.2.181 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2382 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dale, 1997, Spatiotemporal localization of cortical word repetition effects in a size-judgment task using combined fMRI/MEG, NeuroImage, 5
  17. 10.1152/jn.1998.80.5.2657 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1097/00004424-199212002-00011 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8945 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.558 · DOI
  21. 10.1006/nimg.1997.0305 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-19-08560.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1007/BF00304699 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-18-07079.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1109/34.35506 · DOI
  26. 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.95.3.788 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1006/nimg.1999.0534 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1109/42.544496 · DOI
  33. 10.1006/cviu.1997.0605 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1109/2945.537306 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1109/42.650881 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1109/42.511747 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Kapur, 1999, Model based segmentation of medical images
  38. 10.1109/42.781013 · DOI
  39. MacDonald, 1998, A method for identifying geometrically simple surfaces from three-dimensional images
  40. 10.1097/00004728-199811000-00022 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200002)9:2<81::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  42. 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Bollobás, 1979, Graph Theory, An Introductory Course
  44. 10.1073/pnas.200033797 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Dixmier, 1984, General topology, 10.1007/978-1-4757-4032-5 · DOI
  46. do Carmo, 1976, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces
  47. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1098-6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fischl, B., Liu, A., & Dale, A. M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2001
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
70-80
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/42.906426
OpenAlex
W2155963684
Cited by
1,751
References
4
FWCI
18.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.