Cited by 410Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationSocial Media and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Media Elements, Ecologies, and Effects

Bayer, Joseph B., Triệu, Penny, Ellison, Nicole B.·2020·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

This review delineates core components of the social media ecosystem, specifying how online platforms complicate established social psychological effects. We assess four pairs of social media elements and effects: profiles and self-presentation; networks and social mobilization; streams and social comparison; and messages and social connectedness. In the process, we describe features and affordances that comprise each element, underscoring the complexity of social media contexts as they shift to a central topic within psychology. Reflecting on this transitional state, we discuss how researchers will struggle to replicate the effects of dynamic social environments. Consequently, we outline the obstacles in isolating effects that reoccur across platforms, as well as the challenges and opportunities that come with measuring contexts across periods. By centering on the elements that define the online ecosystem, psychological research can establish a more durable foundation for replicating the effects of social media and chronicling the evolution of social interaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Buehler EM., 2017, Soc. Media Soc., 3
  3. Fox J, 2020, Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 373
  4. Hampton KN, 2011, Social networking sites and our lives
  5. Hayes RA, 2018, Soc. Media Soc., 4
  6. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schrock AR., 2015, Int. J. Commun., 9, 1229
  8. Seo M, 2016, J. Comput. Commun., 21, 282
  9. Sujon Z, 2018, Soc. Media Soc., 4
  10. Tamir DI, 2015, The Psychology of Desire, 432
  11. Vorderer P, 2013, Int. J. Commun., 7, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2020-01-04
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
471-497
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2973059560
Cited by
410
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 19
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
social media, social networking sites, self-presentation, social networks, social mobilization, social comparison, social connectedness, social interaction
MeSH terms
Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychology, Social, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review