CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,437Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 181 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations

Heine, Steven J., Proulx, Travis, Vohs, Kathleen D.·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Review
DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The meaning maintenance model (MMM) proposes that people have a needfor meaning; that is, a need to perceive events through a prism of mental representations of expected relations that organizes their perceptions of the world. When people's sense of meaning is threatened, they reaffirm alternative representations as a way to regain meaning-a process termedfluid compensation. According to the model, people can reaffirm meaning in domains that are differentfrom the domain in which the threat occurred. Evidenceforfluid compensation can be observed following a variety of psychological threats, including most especially threats to the self, such as self-esteem threats, feelings of uncertainty, interpersonal rejection, and mortality salience. People respond to these diverse threats in highly similar ways, which suggests that a range of psychological motivations are expressions of a singular impulse to generate and maintain a sense of meaning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Aristotle, 1987, De Anima
  2. Aronson, E., 1968, The cognitive consistency theories: A source book, 5
  3. Audy, J. R., 1980, The anatomy of loneliness, 111
  4. Bartlett, F. C., 1932, Remembering
  5. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Becker, E., 1973, The denial of death
  7. Camus, A. (1955). An absurd reasoning. The myth of Sisyphus and other essays (pp. 3-49). New York: Vintage.
  8. Creel, S. C., 2004, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 1119
  9. Dechesne, M., 2006, Individual differences in terrormanagement research: The case of needforclosure
  10. Ellemers, N., 1999, Social identity
  11. Epstein, S., 1981, Self-concept: Advances in theory of a theory and research, 27
  12. Freud, S., 1930, Sigmund Freud: 12. Civilization, society, and religion, 245
  13. Greenberg, J., 2004, Handbook of experimental existential psychology
  14. Hart, J., Fifth Conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychologists
  15. Heine, S. J., 2003, Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self, 101
  16. Heine, S. J., 2005, Culture and Social Behavior: The Tenth Ontario Symposium, 115
  17. Hogg, M. A., 2001, The social niind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behaviour, 323
  18. James, W., 1997, The meaning of truth
  19. Jost, J. T., 2004, Handbook of experimental existential psychology, 263
  20. Kierkegaard, S., 1997, The essential Kierkegaard, 350
  21. Lifton, R. J., 1976, The life of the self
  22. McGregor, I., annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
  23. Miedema, J., 2006, The influence of ego threat on reactions to perceived fairness
  24. Mikulincer, M., 2004, Handbook of experimental existential psychology, 287
  25. Mischel, W., 2003, Handbook of self and identity, 15
  26. Pinel, E. C., 2004, Handbook of experimental existential psychology, 352
  27. Rank, O., 1941, Beyond psychology
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.392 · DOI
  29. Vaughan, D., 1986, Uncoupling
  30. Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1998). In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 133-173). New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,437

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-05
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
88-110
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
DOI
10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1
OpenAlex
W2156155183
Cited by
1,437
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 61
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh060155-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH060155-01A2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
need for meaning, psychological threat, self-esteem threat, uncertainty, interpersonal rejection, mortality salience, social motivation, meaning maintenance
MeSH terms
Humans, Motivation, Self Concept, Semantics, Social Behavior, Symbolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review