The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Adaptive Character of Thought
Abstract
Contents: Part I:Introduction. Preliminaries. Levels of a Cognitive Theory. Current Formulation of the Levels Issues. The New Theoretical Framework. Is Human Cognition Rational? The Rest of This Book. Appendix: Non-Identifiability and Response Time. Part II:Memory. Preliminaries. A Rational Analysis of Human Memory. The History Factor. The Contextual Factor. Relationship of Need and Probability to Probability and Latency of Recall. Combining Information From Cues. Implementation in the ACT Framework. Effects of Subject Strategy. Conclusions. Part III:Categorization. Preliminaries. The Goal of Categorization. The Structure of the Environment. Recapitulation of Goals and Environment. The Optimal Solution. An Iterative Algorithm for Categorization. Application of the Algorithm. Survey of the Experimental Literature. Conclusion. Appendix: The Ideal Algorithm. Part IV:Causal Inference. Preliminaries. Basic Formulation of the Causal Inference Problem. Causal Estimation. Cues for Causal Inference. Integration of Statistical and Temporal Cues. Discrimination. Abstraction of Causal Laws. Implementation in a Production System. Conclusion. Appendix. Part V:Problem Solving. Preliminaries. Making a Choice Among Simple Actions. Combining Steps. Studies of Hill Climbing. Means-Ends Analysis. Instantiation of Indefinite Objects. Conclusions on Rational Analysis of Problem Solving. Implementation in ACT. Appendix: Problem Solving and Clotheslines. Part VI:Retrospective. Preliminaries. Twelve Questions About Rational Analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric
Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A. A., Shechtman, E., & Wang, O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00068 · Cited by 14,623
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 · Cited by 4,271
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504
How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe?
Anderson, J. R. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195324259.001.0001 · Cited by 1,483
Self-citationToplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12001 · Cited by 1,381
The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought
Gelman, S. A. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001 · Cited by 1,247
Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0020198 · Cited by 1,141
The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
Schacter, D. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.3.182 · Cited by 1,133
Topics in semantic representation
Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.211 · Cited by 1,122
Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x97001611 · Cited by 1,082
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 · Cited by 1,087
The adaptive nature of human categorization.
Anderson, J. R. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.3.409 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citationAction understanding as inverse planning
Baker, C. L., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005 · Cited by 920
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 · Cited by 880
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0022777 · Cited by 897
A Motivated Action Theory Account of Goal Orientation.
DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096 · Cited by 786
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772
Varieties of Confirmation Bias
Klayman, J. (1995) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60315-1 · Cited by 755
Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003 · Cited by 737
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019737 · Cited by 722
Designing for Productive Failure
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.591717 · Cited by 674
Language Acquisition as Rational Contingency Learning
Ellis, N. C. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami038 · Cited by 559
Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades.
Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.376 · Cited by 485
Memory for goals: an activation‐based model
Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2002) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2601_2 · Cited by 795
Confabulation and the control of recollection
Burgess, P. W. (1996) · Memory · doi:10.1080/096582196388906 · Cited by 509
A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701802071 · Cited by 469
Information foraging in information access environments
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1995) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223904.223911 · Cited by 464
An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Osman, M. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196730 · Cited by 444
Kimberg, D. Y., & Farah, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.4.411 · Cited by 442
Laird, J. E., Lebiere, C., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2017) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v38i4.2744 · Cited by 392
The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body
Kording, K. P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shadmehr, R. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1901 · Cited by 393
Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning
Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., & Navarro, D. J. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020511 · Cited by 369
Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.461 · Cited by 360
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis
Kruschke, J. K. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.001 · Cited by 342
The Probability Heuristics Model of Syllogistic Reasoning
Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0696 · Cited by 324
GRAY, W. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(04)00005-9 · Cited by 321
Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0401-9 · Cited by 288
A model of the self-explanation effect.
VanLehn, K., Jones, R. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1992) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0201_1 · Cited by 305
Reber, P. J. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019 · Cited by 296
Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00121-2 · Cited by 274
Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning
Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014282 · Cited by 259
The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources
Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., M. Huys, Q. J., & Goodman, N. D. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1286-8 · Cited by 230
The probability of causal conditionals
Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.05.002 · Cited by 229
Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002849 · Cited by 205
Word meanings across languages support efficient communication
Regier, T., Kemp, C., & Kay, P. (2015) · The Handbook of Language Emergence · doi:10.1002/9781118346136.ch11 · Cited by 196
Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects
Sanborn, A. N., Mansinghka, V. K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0031912 · Cited by 189
The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty
Krynski, T. R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.430 · Cited by 183
Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022 · Cited by 169
Exploring a latent cause theory of classical conditioning
Gershman, S. J., & Niv, Y. (2012) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-012-0080-8 · Cited by 149
The Effects of Operator Implementation Cost on Planfulness of Problem Solving and Learning
O'Hara, K. P., & Payne, S. J. (1998) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0676 · Cited by 155
Theory Is All You Need: AI, Human Cognition, and Causal Reasoning
(2024) · doi:10.1287/stsc.2024.0189 · Cited by 151
Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: An Evaluation of Cascade
VanLehn, K. (1999) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0801_3 · Cited by 150
Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability
West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03194383 · Cited by 143
How Programmers Debug, Revisited: An Information Foraging Theory Perspective
Lawrance, J., Bogart, C., Burnett, M., Bellamy, R., Rector, K., & Fleming, S. D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2010.111 · Cited by 142
Formalizing Neurath’s ship: approximate algorithms for online causal learning.
Bramley, N. R., Dayan, P., Griffiths, T. L., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000061 · Cited by 136
Theoretical and empirical evidence for the impact of inductive biases on cultural evolution
Griffiths, T. L., Kalish, M. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0146 · Cited by 131
Bayesian intractability is not an ailment that approximation can cure
Kwisthout, J., Wareham, T., & van Rooij, I. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01182.x · Cited by 122
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.549 · Cited by 121
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling
Franke, M., & Degen, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154854 · Cited by 115
Ellis, N. C., O'Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2014) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2013-0031 · Cited by 113
Toward the neural implementation of structure learning
Tervo, D. G. R., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2016) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.014 · Cited by 106
Statistical computations underlying the dynamics of memory updating
Gershman, S. J., Radulescu, A., Norman, K. A., & Niv, Y. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003939 · Cited by 101
McCoy, R. T., Yao, S., Friedman, D., Hardy, M. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322420121 · Cited by 96
Self-citationAnother source of individual differences: Strategy adaptivity to changing rates of success.
Schunn, C. D., & Reder, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.59 · Cited by 95
Understanding Human Intelligence through Human Limitations
Griffiths, T. L. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.001 · Cited by 88
A memory for goals model of sequence errors
Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., & Ratwani, R. M. (2011) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.07.010 · Cited by 85
Soto, F. A., Gershman, S. J., & Niv, Y. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037018 · Cited by 81
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.040 · Cited by 77
Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking
Storm, B. C., & Patel, T. N. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000006 · Cited by 68
Tasks and their role in visual neuroscience
Kay, K., Bonnen, K., Denison, R. N., Arcaro, M. J., & Barack, D. L. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.03.022 · Cited by 61
The whats and hows of programmers' foraging diets
Piorkowski, D. J., Fleming, S. D., Kwan, I., Burnett, M. M., Scaffidi, C., Bellamy, R. K. E., & Jordahl, J. (2013) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466418 · Cited by 61
(2000) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 55
An online testing design choice typology towards cheating threat minimisation
Munoz, A., & Mackay, J. (2019) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.16.3.5 · Cited by 51
Reactive information foraging for evolving goals
Lawrance, J., Burnett, M., Bellamy, R., Bogart, C., & Swart, C. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753332 · Cited by 50
Gigerenzer, G. (2020) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12480 · Cited by 48
Instructional Scaffolding: Foundations and Evolving Definition
Belland, B. R. (2017) · Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_2 · Cited by 40
Is that what Bayesians believe? Reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012).
Bowers, J. S., & Davis, C. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027750 · Cited by 38
Problem Solvers Adjust Cognitive Offloading Based on Performance Goals
Weis, P. P., & Wiese, E. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12802 · Cited by 38
Katidioti, I., & Taatgen, N. A. (2014) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720813504216 · Cited by 37
Influencing Cognitive Strategy by Manipulating Information Access
Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Morgan, P. L., & King, S. (2007) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxm064 · Cited by 35
Unified Theories of Cognition and the Role of Soar
Newell, A. (1992) · Studies in Cognitive Systems · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2426-3_3 · Cited by 35
Working memory failure in phone-based interaction
Huguenard, B. R., Lerch, F. J., Junker, B. W., Patz, R. J., & Kass, R. E. (1997) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/254945.254947 · Cited by 34
(2006) · Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) · Cited by 23
The influence of prior belief on scientific thinking
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002) · The Cognitive Basis of Science · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517.011 · Cited by 22
Bayesian cognitive science, predictive brains, and the nativism debate
Colombo, M. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1427-7 · Cited by 15
Rational Simplification and Rigidity in Human Planning
Ho, M. K., Cohen, J. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231200547 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Massaro, D. W., Friedman, D., & Anderson, J. R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 467
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092919341
- Cited by
- 2,174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.