The DOI matches its Crossref record; 141 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 177 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers
Open accessAbstract
Executive function develops at an unprecedented rate during the preschool period, yet few clinicians attempt to assess executive processes in young children. The primary objective of this article is to demonstrate that executive function can be assessed in preschoolers, and to highlight the importance of detecting executive dysfunction as early as possible. Following a description of executive function and the underlying neural systems, this article outlines some of the challenges in assessing executive function in young children. The various assessment paradigms used for assessing executive function in preschoolers are presented, and based on studies that have applied these measurement tools normal development of executive domains is described. Finally, the benefits and opportunities for executive function intervention in the preschool period are considered.
Checked 2026-10-06 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
129 Not checked yet · 21 Own interpretation · 10 No basis given
In the paper
“The Simon Says task is significantly more difficult for children than the Bear/Dragon task, despite both being Go/No-Go paradigms.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Depending on the nature of the task and the degree of inhibitory control required, Go/No-Go tasks can be administered to children as young as 3 years (M.T. Willoughby, Blair, Wirth, & Greenberg, 2010).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites M.T. Willoughby, Blair, Wirth, & Greenberg, 2010 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One paradigm that has been shown to be age appropriate across the preschool period is the Bear/Dragon task (Carlson, 2005).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“While the NEPSY is an important and popular tool for pediatric neuropsychologists, it has few subtests that assess executive functioning in the lower ranges of the preschool period (K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Delay of gratification or self-control tasks can be administered in young preschool children, with the delay period adjusted according to child's age.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research utilizing measures described above demonstrates that preschool is a period during which executive processes develop at an unprecedented rate; consider the capacity of a 6-year-old in contrast to a 3-year-old.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function development in the preschool period
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and colleagues have successfully designed computer based tasks suitable for preschoolers based on previously validated measures of attention and executive function including appealing and interactive Go/No-Go, response inhibition, delayed alternation, self-ordered pointing and working memory tasks (Hrabok, Kerns, & Muller, 2007;Muller, Kerns, & Konkin, 2012).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Goal setting
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When there is a choice between an immediate or delayed gratification, 3-year-olds are unlikely to wait even when the delayed reward is significantly more appealing than the immediate reward (Lemmon & Moore, 2007).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lemmon & Moore, 2007 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Traditional working memory tasks can also be administered to preschoolers including backward digit span and backward block span.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Substantial improvement in inhibitory control is observed in the preschool period (Carlson, 2005).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 74
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
In the paper
“Further, there are well-established approaches for assessing information processing speed, with research demonstrating significant improvement in reaction/response time during the preschool period and that response speed varies as a function of complexity (Kiselev, Espy, & Sheffield, 2009).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kiselev, Espy, & Sheffield, 2009
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These anti-imitation tasks are suitable across the preschool age range, although young 3-year-olds may struggle.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another working memory paradigm used with preschoolers is self-ordered searching tasks, which requires information, usually visual-spatial, to be maintained and updated in short-term memory.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On the Bear/Dragon task (Go/No-Go task), only about half of young 3-year-olds (< 3½ yrs) are able to resist responding to the instructions of the Dragon puppet, however this increases to 75% for older 3-year-olds (> 3½ yrs) and by age 5 years most children are successfully completing this task (Carlson, 2005).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Delayed Alternation is a task used to assess working memory in young children, and can be administered to toddlers as well as throughout the preschool period (K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, McDiarmid, & Glisky, 1999).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, McDiarmid, & Glisky, 1999 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, even 4-and 5-year-olds struggled to remain still on the No-Go items of the Simon Says task, demonstrating that the context of the task makes some behaviors more difficult to resist than others.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This task is generally considered too difficult for preschoolers, as demonstrated by Luciana and Nelson (1998) who found that less than half of their 4-year-old sample understood task requirements despite extensive training.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Goal setting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Luciana & Nelson, 1998 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Accuracy of responding improved only marginally for children aged between 3 and 5 years on the Inhibit condition (Go/No-Go) on the Shape School test, but speed increased dramatically during this developmental period (K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, & Glisky, 2001;K. Espy, 1997).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, & Glisky, 2001
- Not checked yetcites K. Espy, 1997 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The child needs to inhibit a previously applied behavior to enable fluent switching, otherwise perseverative errors will be observed (Best & Miller, 2010).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Best & Miller, 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While Carlson et al (2005) also showed continued maturation of inhibitory control across 3 to 5 years on delayed gratification tasks, performance again varied and the discrepancy may be explained by the intrinsic value of the gift.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson et al., 2005 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following is a brief summary of developmental trajectories for attentional control, cognitive flexibility and goal setting domains, however it is important to note that there is enormous inter-individual variability in developmental trajectories and this is particularly obvious in young children.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function development in the preschool period
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Dimensional Change Card Sort task has been used extensively to evaluate shifting attention in preschoolers (P.D. Zelazo, Muller, Frye, & Marcovitch, 2003;P. D. Zelazo, 2006).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites P.D. Zelazo, Muller, Frye, & Marcovitch, 2003
- Not checked yetcites P. D. Zelazo, 2006 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Developmental spurts are commonly observed in individual children, and can also be observed on a population level (P.Anderson, 2002).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function development in the preschool period
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites P.Anderson, 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The inhibition trial is considered appropriate for preschoolers aged 3-years and older, while the more complex switch and combined (switch & inhibit) trials are considered appropriate for children aged 3:6 years and older.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K.Espy, 1997 source
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Bull, Martin, & Stroup, 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Accuracy of switching on Trails-P also improves between 3-and 5-years of age, although generally speaking preschoolers make few errors on this task.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, very few 3-year-olds are able to correctly reverse the sequence of three digits but by 5-years of age most children have this capacity (Carlson, 2005).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Some children as young as 3-years apply an alternating search strategy at least some of the time, however there are also some older children (e.g.5-years) who struggle with this concept (K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, McDiarmid, & Glisky, 1999).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, McDiarmid, & Glisky, 1999 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It should be noted however, that children younger than 4-years of age get very few trials correct and a significant increase in performance is observed between 3-and 4-years.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Goal setting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, & Glisky, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Welsh, Pennington, & Groisser, 1991 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Thus, the developmental trajectories for the Day-Night and Hand Tapping tasks differ, even though they both require the retention of two rules and inhibition of a dominant response (Diamond & Taylor, 1996).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diamond & Taylor, 1996 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The switch condition of the Shape School is successfully completed by most 4-year-olds, and while accuracy increases slightly, improved performance in older preschoolers is predominantly reflected in better switching fluency and reduced time needed to complete the task (K.Espy, 1997).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K.Espy, 1997 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, children aged 5 years and older performed well both in terms of accuracy and speed.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gerstadt et al., 1994 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On average children as young as 3½ years are able to get nearly two-thirds of the trials correct on the Luria hand tapping test, but performance improves significantly throughout the preschool period both in terms of accuracy and speed (Diamond & Taylor, 1996).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diamond & Taylor, 1996 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, enormous development of inhibitory control is observed between 3-to 6years of age with continued maturation beyond the preschool period.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Consistent with these findings, younger preschoolers tend to make their first perseverative error prior to older preschoolers on the Six Boxes test, although the total number of searches needed to find all six boxes decreases only marginally with increasing age (Diamond, Prevor, Callender, & Druin, 1997).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diamond, Prevor, Callender, & Druin, 1997
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With an older sample and a computerized self-ordered search task, Luciana and Nelson (1998) reported that 4-year-olds make more perseverative errors than older preschoolers, which likely reflects less mature working memory.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Luciana & Nelson, 1998 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hongwanishkul and colleagues (2005) reported significant developmental increments between 3 to 5-years of age with their Self-ordered Pointing task, with a particular spurt observed between 3-and 4-years.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hongwanishkul et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, all preschool age groups perform better at the start than at the end of the Day-Night test, suggesting that the task requires considerable cognitive effort that is difficult to sustain (Gerstadt, Hong, & Diamond, 1994).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gerstadt, Hong, & Diamond, 1994 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While 3-year-olds can complete the switch condition on the Trails-P, they are substantially slower in completing the task than 4-year-olds and require almost twice the time needed by 5-year-olds (K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In terms of accuracy, the most significant improvement in performance was observed between 4½ and 5 years, although performance gains continued to age 7 years.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gerstadt et al., 1994 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Children younger than 4½ years were slow on the Day-Night test, while the average latency for the older age groups did not differ.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gerstadt et al., 1994 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using the Object Classification Task for Children 3-year-olds struggle to identify a common feature within a group of six objects (i.e.toys), but in contrast, children aged 4-years and older find it relatively easy to sort different objects according to a single dimension.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Goal setting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smidts, Jacobs, & Anderson, 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In terms of shifting attention, 3-year-olds really struggle to shift sorting categories on the Dimensional Change Card Sort test, but this perseverative behavior is far less common in older 4-year-olds (Carlson, 2005).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlson, 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“certain preschool executive function factor analytic studies have revealed a single latent variable”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“while executive function may comprise several distinct processes, they are inter-related and could still be conceptualized, and referred to, as an integrated supervisory or control system”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“although this is at least partly related to the measures and variables included in the analysis and does not necessarily challenge the view that executive function includes distinct components”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hughes et al., 2009
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Executive Control System conceptualizes executive function as an overall control system that comprises four distinct domains, attentional control, cognitive flexibility, goal setting, and information processing”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites P.J. Anderson, 2010
- Not checked yetcites P. Anderson, 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“During early childhood primary cortical areas such as the auditory and visual cortex, and association areas such as the medial prefrontal cortex, have high levels of synaptic density and undergo a dynamic period of synaptic elimination at differing trajectories”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huttenlocher, 1990
- Not checked yetcites Huttenlocher & Dabholkar, 1997
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given that cognitive processes are emerging and developing at a rapid rate in early childhood, it comes as no surprise that this is also a period of rapid brain development”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Executive function develops at an unprecedented rate during the preschool period.
In the paper
“Taki and colleagues (2012) examined white matter volume change in children from age 5, and demonstrated that increasing white matter volume with age is linear in many regions across the brain.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taki et al., 2012
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“During infancy and early childhood, total white matter is increasing in volume at a greater rate than total gray matter”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matsuzawa et al., 2001
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“total brain volume increases and reaches 95% of its adult size by age 6 years”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lenroot & Giedd, 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Executive dysfunction is a common observation in young children and has been reported in many developmental and acquired disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) including attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The increase in white matter volume may be related to an increase in myelination”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tsujimoto, 2008
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A widely held view in brain development is that the frontal lobes develop much later in childhood and adolescence than other brain regions, and although this region undergoes a period of protracted development, infancy and early childhood still sees rapid growth in this anterior area of the brain.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“it may be argued that the integrity of the prefrontal cortex is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for intact executive functioning”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Della Sala, Gray, Spinnler, & Trivelli, 1998
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“thus are dependent on similar prefrontal networks, and they exhibit comparable developmental trajectories”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites P. Anderson, 2002
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cognitive development is thought to reflect brain development”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Casey, Giedd, & Thomas, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Casey, Tottenham, Liston, & Durston, 2005
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Individual tracts that are present in the frontal white matter are identifiable early in the post-natal period and continue to develop throughout the preschool years”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hermoye et al., 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These concomitant changes have been explained as partly reflecting an increase in myelination of the lower cortical layers with age, causing both regional brain expansion and apparent cortical thinning”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sowell et al 2004
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Moriguchi and Hiraki (2011) demonstrated using near infra-red spectroscopy that from age 3 to age 4, children improve their performance on a conceptual switching task, and show a concomitant increase in activation in the inferior prefrontal region.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moriguchi & Hiraki, 2011
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The maturation of white matter, including myelination and the increasing complexity of neural circuits, are thought to support the development of cognitive functions in addition to changes to the gray matter”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Tau & Peterson, 2010
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“executive dysfunction may not always reflect prefrontal pathology and instead reflect compromised neural networks across the brain.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“from age 4, white matter volume increases steadily, but gray matter volumes in the frontal and parietal regions increase and peak during mid-childhood before reducing.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giedd et al., 1999
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Myelination of the major cerebral tracts begins in the post-natal period, with greatest development in the first two years of life, continuing throughout childhood and adolescence”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gao et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Paus et al., 2001
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite this cortical thinning, the prefrontal region expands in size with age, more so than areas surrounding the central sulcus or the posterior medial surface”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sowell et al., 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Different executive processes are supported by widespread neural circuits that mature and change with age”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tau & Peterson, 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the maturation of neural networks involves a move from interconnected local regions, to the connectivity of distributed regions that work together to subserve the same function, and this may mirror maturation of cognitive skills”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function neural systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fair et al., 2009
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“minimal learning effects were observed; instead slightly poorer performance was observed on second testing which was interpreted to reflect fatigue”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beck, Schaefer, Pang, & Carlson, 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“determining the underlying reason for sub-optimal performance can be difficult, limiting the capacity to differentiate specific cognitive deficits.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the novelty factor and level of complexity of such tests are likely to be greater in children”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a recent report showed that test-retest reliability was good for working memory and planning tasks but moderate to poor for response inhibition tasks”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Muller, Kerns, & Konkin, 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“established measures do not necessarily assess what they are claimed to assess (Baron, 2004), and purported measures of executive function are unlikely to be sensitive to impairments in all domains of executive function.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baron, 2004
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Summary scores are often used to assess performance but these may mask personal and situational factors that could explain impaired performance, especially for young children who are more distractible, have shorter attention spans, require greater novelty and have less awareness of the requirements of the testing situation”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reliability estimates vary across tasks and it may be that assessing certain executive processes may be more stable than others.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recent attempts to design measures for preschoolers appreciate the need for age appropriate or child friendly measures, and have specifically designed tests that are appealing to young children”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites C. Hughes, 2011 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other papers reveal reasonable reliability for most experimental tests with estimates consistent with those reported with older childhood and adult populations”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites M. Willoughby & Blair, 2011
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Bull, Kaiser, Martin, & Banet, 2010
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A major challenge, however, is the attainment of good norms as determining age appropriate behavior is very difficult when children are young and developing at a rapid rate”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baron, 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is a strong possibility that these tests tap different skills (and neural networks) in children or at least require greater cognitive resources”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Including rewards of different value can increase the complexity of the task.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Executive dysfunction can present in many forms, and impairment in one domain does not necessarily imply impairment in other executive domains.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The NEPSY-II includes a self-control subtest, called Statue, which does not involve delay of gratification (Korkman, Kirk, & Kemp, 2007).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Korkman, Kirk, & Kemp, 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“during assessments examiners generally provide children with support and encouragement, initiate activities, provide structure, and help to keep the child on task”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Factors that may influence complexity, and therefore age appropriateness, include the stimuli used, the speed that stimuli are presented, and the response modality (verbal or motor).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This discrepancy may also reflect the assessment environment, which is generally a quiet, one-on-one, structured setting with minimal distractions”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Assessment challenges
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites V. Anderson, 1998 source
- Not checked yetcites Lezak, Howieson, Bigler, & Tranel, 2012
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While these general cognitive batteries were not designed to specifically assess executive functioning, all include subtests that tap executive processes.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wechsler, 2002
- Not checked yetcites Roid, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Elliott, 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another updating working memory task described for use with preschoolers is the Six Boxes test (Diamond, Prevor, Callender, & Druin, 1997).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diamond, Prevor, Callender, & Druin, 1997
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Simon Says the No-Go cue is a verbal statement embedded with the command, while the Go and No-Go cues in the Bear/Dragon task are commands from different puppets and much easier to differentiate.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simon Says is also more challenging as it involves active imitation, which is difficult for young children to inhibit.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) has a computerized version of self-ordered searching referred to as Spatial Working Memory.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Luciana & Nelson, 1998 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This test is purported to tap planning ability, and requires the child to move three different sized disks across three pegs to achieve a specific configuration.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Goal setting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy, Kaufmann, & Glisky, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Welsh, Pennington, & Groisser, 1991 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Trails-P is a preschool adaptation of the child and adult version of the Trail Making Test (K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004), and is another measure of switching.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K. A. Espy & Cwik, 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Performance on switching tasks generally requires 1) inhibition to suppress previously applied rule set, and 2) working memory to maintain the alternating rules and when to shift (Chevalier et al., 2012).”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chevalier et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to assessing working memory, good performance on the Delayed Alternation requires the capacity to shift search strategy and, for older kids, to learn the alternating pattern of the search location.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key processes in the cognitive flexibility domain, especially when assessing young children, are working memory (capacity to update or manipulate information in short-term storage), switching between response sets, and shifting attention.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ongoing maturation of executive domains and their associated neural networks is dependent on refinement of other executive and non-executive skills, as well as the enhanced coordination and integration of these systems.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Executive function development in the preschool period
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young preschoolers have limited impulse control and delay of gratification and simple Go/No-Go tasks are the most suitable for evaluating developmental status.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, problem solving tasks that require forward planning and conceptual reasoning can be administered to preschoolers, and this is potentially worthwhile.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Goal setting
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Older preschoolers have greater inhibitory control, and more complex inhibitory control measures are probably necessary to detect subtle impairments in these children.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Attentional control
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast to children in control conditions, children who received the working memory intervention showed improvements in trained and non-trained working memory tasks as well as in attentional control tasks, but no effects in non-trained inhibitory control tasks.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Intervention
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thorell, Lindqvist, Bergman Nutley, Bohlin, & Klingberg, 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, early studies in this area suggest that cognitive training may be an avenue for enhancing the development of executive processes as well as assisting those who are impaired.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Intervention
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, executive function develops rapidly during the preschool period.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A preschool version of the BRIEF is available, called the BRIEF-P (P.K. Isquith, Gioia, & Espy, 2004), with forms for parents and preschool/childcare teachers.”
§ Assessing executive function in preschoolers > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites P.K. Isquith, Gioia, & Espy, 2004 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Executive function develops at an unprecedented rate during the preschool period.
“Executive function develops at an unprecedented rate during the preschool period”
The paper relies on this without support.
Few clinicians attempt to assess executive processes in young children.
“yet few clinicians attempt to assess executive processes in young children”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pediatric neuropsychologists continue to avoid detailed assessments of executive function until clients reach school-age.
“pediatric neuropsychologists continue to avoid detailed assessments of executive function until clients reach school-age”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even in research of brain injured clinical populations, executive function is rarely a focus before children are deemed school ready.
“Even in research of brain injured clinical populations, executive function is rarely a focus before children are deemed school ready.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A lack of validated standardized assessment batteries and a perception that preschoolers lack the necessary attention, inhibitory control, and communication capacities contribute to the avoidance of executive function assessment.
“This is at least partly due to the lack of validated standardized assessment batteries, but also related to a perception that preschoolers don't have the attention, inhibitory control and communication capacities to adequately assess higher-order processes”
The paper relies on this without support.
Young children get tired quickly, struggle to sustain attention during cognitive assessments, often fail to comply with non-appealing tasks, and have immature receptive and expressive communication skills.
“Young children get tired quickly, struggle to sustain attention during cognitive assessments, often fail to comply with non-appealing tasks, and have immature receptive and expressive communication skills.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most executive function measures used with school-aged children were designed and validated in adult populations.
“Most executive function measures used with school-aged children were designed and validated in adult populations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Specific neuropsychological measures for preschoolers are not easily accessed.
“Specific neuropsychological measures for this age group are not easily accessed”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fluctuations in motivation and interest levels are greater in young children and can be observed both across and within testing sessions.
“fluctuations in motivation and interest levels is greater in young children and can be observed both across and within testing sessions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is currently no commercially available, norm-referenced test battery that enables a comprehensive assessment of executive function in preschoolers.
“There is currently no commercially available, norm-referenced test battery that enables a comprehensive assessment of executive function in preschoolers.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The strength of the dominant behavior that needs to be resisted differs and influences task difficulty.
“it is assumed that the strength of the dominant behavior that needs to be resisted differs influencing task difficulty (K. A. Espy, Bull, Martin, & Stroup, 2006;M. B. Prevor & Diamond, 2005).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Early intervention is an effective approach for minimizing the long-term consequences of cognitive impairments.
“Early intervention is an effective approach for minimizing the long-term consequences of cognitive impairments, and detailed assessments of young children are the best way to detect children in need for early intervention and for tailoring interventions for the child's specific needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Detailed assessments of young children are the best way to detect children in need of early intervention and to tailor interventions to the child's specific needs.
“Early intervention is an effective approach for minimizing the long-term consequences of cognitive impairments, and detailed assessments of young children are the best way to detect children in need for early intervention and for tailoring interventions for the child's specific needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Few executive function measures designed for preschoolers focus on the goal setting domain.
“Few executive function measures designed for preschoolers focus on the goal setting domain, such as conceptual reasoning, planning ability, organizational skills, and strategic decision-making.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Less research has investigated the early development of goal setting processes such as planning, organizational ability, and conceptual reasoning compared to attentional control and cognitive flexibility.
“In contrast to attentional control and cognitive flexibility, less research has investigated the early development of goal setting processes such as planning and organizational ability, and conceptual reasoning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain and cognitive development are strongly shaped by environmental factors.
“It is well recognized that brain and cognitive development are greatly determined by environmental factors.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The preschool period is a time when cognitive training may be most effective.
“Given that the preschool period is associated with dramatic brain and cognitive development, one could assume that this is a period in which cognitive training may be most effective.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinic-based cognitive test performance does not always match real-life behavior at school or home.
“As performance on clinic based cognitive measures does not always correspond with behavior in real-life settings such as school and home, it is important to acquire as much information as possible about the child's functioning and behavior in these environments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Preschoolers today can access many child-friendly activities on computers, tablets, gaming devices, and similar devices.
“Preschoolers of today have access to a large range of child friendly activities available on computers, tablets, gaming and other devices.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most young children are familiar with information technology platforms, and many are attracted to them.
“As a result, most young children are now very familiar with these IT platforms, and many are drawn to these activities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contemporary preschoolers are more technologically sophisticated than preschoolers from earlier generations.
“As contemporary preschoolers are more technologically sophisticated then preschoolers of previous generations, the way many traditional preschool assessment tasks are presented may need to be updated if they are to continue to be appealing for this age group.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These critical developmental windows exist for different brain regions, including those linked to high-order functions such as language and executive planning 18,19 (Figure 2).”
From Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., Nugent, T. F., Herman, D. H., Clasen, L. S., Toga, A. W., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402680101 · Cited by 5,604
Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study
Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., Paus, T., Evans, A. C., & Rapoport, J. L. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/13158 · Cited by 5,552
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
Shallice, T. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526817 · Cited by 4,072
Specific impairments of planning
Shallice, T. (1982) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0082 · Cited by 3,741
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150
Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 · Cited by 2,695
A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x · Cited by 2,692
Exploring the Central Executive
Baddeley, A. (1996) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755608 · Cited by 2,390
Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood
Anderson, P. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724 · Cited by 2,218
Self-citationKochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.220 · Cited by 1,993
Blair, C. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.2.111 · Cited by 1,874
Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging
Lenroot, R. K., & Giedd, J. N. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.001 · Cited by 1,863
Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x · Cited by 1,766
Principles of Frontal Lobe Function
Stuss, D. T. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.001.0001 · Cited by 1,731
Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children
Carlson, S. M. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3 · Cited by 1,638
Age-related change in executive function: Developmental trends and a latent variable analysis
Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010 · Cited by 1,636
Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-x · Cited by 1,598
The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children
Zelazo, P. D. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.46 · Cited by 1,579
Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease
Benton, A. (1968) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(68)90038-9 · Cited by 1,575
Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive Function
Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. Κ., & Roth, R. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1881-2 · Cited by 1,571
Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development?
CASEY, B., TOTTENHAM, N., LISTON, C., & DURSTON, S. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.011 · Cited by 1,556
Functional brain networks develop from a local to distributed organization
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Power, J. D., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000381 · Cited by 1,530
Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development
Casey, B. J., Giedd, J. N., & Thomas, K. M. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00058-2 · Cited by 1,506
Longitudinal Mapping of Cortical Thickness and Brain Growth in Normal Children
Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Leonard, C. M., Welcome, S. E., Kan, E., & Toga, A. W. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1798-04.2004 · Cited by 1,481
Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR
Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731 · Cited by 1,426
Normal development of brain circuits
Tau, G. Z., & Peterson, B. S. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.115 · Cited by 1,391
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01397.x · Cited by 1,388
Consciousness and Self-Regulation
SCHWARTZ, G. E. R., & Shapiro, D. L. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2571-0 · Cited by 1,370
A normative‐developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649109540483 · Cited by 1,313
Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development
Huttenlocher, P. R. (1990) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90031-i · Cited by 1,239
Dimensions of executive functioning: evidence from children
Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151003321164627 · Cited by 1,226
Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view
Stuss, D. T., & Alexander, M. P. (2000) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s004269900007 · Cited by 1,159
Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention
Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506897102 · Cited by 1,110
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Reynolds, C. R. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese0182 · Cited by 1,057
Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children
Thorell, L. B., Lindqvist, S., Bergman Nutley, S., Bohlin, G., & Klingberg, T. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x · Cited by 1,041
The Problem of Assessing Executive Functions
Lezak, M. D. (1982) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207598208247445 · Cited by 988
Functional brain development in humans
Johnson, M. H. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35081509 · Cited by 980
An Area Specialized for Spatial Working Memory in Human Frontal Cortex
Courtney, S. M., Petit, L., Maisog, J. M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5355.1347 · Cited by 950
Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology
Welsh, M. C., & Pennington, B. F. (1988) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565648809540405 · Cited by 902
Maturation of white matter in the human brain: A review of magnetic resonance studies.
Paus, T., Collins, D. L., Evans, A. C., Leonard, G., Pike, B., & Zijdenbos, A. (2001) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(00)00434-2 · Cited by 863
Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575 · Cited by 829
Executive Functions in Children Aged 6 to 13: A Dimensional and Developmental Study
Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2602_3 · Cited by 815
NEPSY : A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment
Dumont, R., & Willis, J. O. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced1463 · Cited by 775
Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability
Hughes, C. H. (1998) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1998.tb00921.x · Cited by 759
Prefrontal Cortex Cognitive Deficits in Children Treated Early and Continuously for PKU
Diamond, A. D., Prevor, M. B., Callender, G. G., & Druin, D. P. (1997) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166208 · Cited by 731
A shift from diffuse to focal cortical activity with development
Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Tottenham, N., Galvan, A., Spicer, J., Fossella, J. A., & Casey, B. J. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00454.x · Cited by 692
The Contribution of Executive Functions to Emergent Mathematic Skills in Preschool Children
Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M. M., Cwik, M. F., Stalets, M. M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T. E. (2004) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6 · Cited by 687
NEPSY, Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment
Kreutzer, J. S., DeLuca, J., & Caplan, B. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_4835 · Cited by 672
Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement
Clark, C. A. C., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019672 · Cited by 671
I. The Development of Executive Function
Zelazo, P. D., Muller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.0037-976x.2003.00261.x · Cited by 655
Hongwanishkul, D., Happaney, K. R., Lee, W. S. C., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_4 · Cited by 654
Neural systems engaged by planning: A PET study of the Tower of London task
Baker, S. C., Rogers, R. D., Owen, A. M., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1996) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00133-6 · Cited by 635
The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. W. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0124 · Cited by 633
Diamond, A., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00248277 · Cited by 628
Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1998) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00109-7 · Cited by 620
Developmental changes in performance on tests of purported frontal lobe functioning
Levin, H. S., Culhane, K. A., Hartmann, J., Evankovich, K. D., Mattson, A. J., Harward, H. N., Ringholz, G. M., Ewing‐Cobbs, L., & Fletcher, J. M. (1991) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649109540499 · Cited by 605
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580
Differential development of attention and executive functions in 3- to 12-year-old Finnish children
Klenberg, L., Korkman, M., & Lahti-Nuuttila, P. (2001) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2001_6 · Cited by 571
Diamond, A. (1985) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130099 · Cited by 555
The domain of supervisory processes and the temporal organization of behaviour
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. W. (1998) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524410.003.0003 · Cited by 551
Biological and psychological development of executive functions
Stuss, D. T. (1992) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/0278-2626(92)90059-u · Cited by 496
(2013) · David Fulton Publishers eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203390269-11 · Cited by 488
Tracking executive function across the transition to school: A latent variable approach.
Hughes, C., Ensor, R., Wilson, A., & Graham, A. (2009) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640903325691 · Cited by 448
Anderson, P. J., Doyle, L. W., & Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group (2004) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.114.1.50 · Cited by 443
Self-citationHermoye, L., Saint‐Martin, C., Cosnard, G., Lee, S., Kim, J., Nassogne, M., Menten, R., Clapuyt, P. R. M., Donohue, P., Hua, K., et al. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.017 · Cited by 422
Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing
Long, C. J., & Sbordone, R. J. (1996) · Cited by 404
Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective.
Anderson, V. A., Jacobs, R. K., & Anderson, P. J. (2008) · Cited by 387
Self-citationConditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response.
Diamond, A. D., Kirkham, N. Z., & Amso, D. (2002) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.352 · Cited by 382
Neuropsychological Evaluation of the Child
Baron, I. S. (2003) · Cited by 353
The development of executive function in early childhood.
(2003) · doi:10.1111/j.0037-976x.2003.00260.x · Cited by 353
Changes and challenges in 20 years of research into the development of executive functions
Hughes, C. (2011) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.736 · Cited by 347
Anderson, V. A., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Mikiewicz, O. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.4.231.13509 · Cited by 338
Self-citationThe shape school: Assessing executive function in preschool children
Espy, K. A. (1997) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649709540690 · Cited by 315
Age-related Volumetric Changes of Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Infants and Children
Matsuzawa, J. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.4.335 · Cited by 315
Gao, W., Lin, W., Chen, Y., Gerig, G., Smith, J. K., Jewells, V. L., & Gilmore, J. H. (2008) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a1363 · Cited by 305
Neuropsychology of Early-Treated Phenylketonuria: Specific Executive Function Deficits
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., Ozonoff, S. J., Rouse, B. M., & McCabe, E. R. B. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03560.x · Cited by 305
Anderson, V. (1998) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/713755568 · Cited by 304
Rhoades, B. L., Greenberg, M. T., Lanza, S. T., & Blair, C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.004 · Cited by 295
How do families help or hinder the emergence of early executive function?
Hughes, C. H., & Ensor, R. A. (2009) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.234 · Cited by 295
The Prefrontal Cortex: Functional Neural Development During Early Childhood
Tsujimoto, S. (2008) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858408316002 · Cited by 291
Executive Function in Preschool Children: Examination Through Everyday Behavior
Isquith, P. K., Gioia, G. A., & Espy, K. A. (2004) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_3 · Cited by 287
The central executive: A concept and some misconceptions
BADDELEY, A. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561779800513x · Cited by 281
Willoughby, M. T., The Family Life Project Investigators, Blair, C. B., Wirth, R. J., & Greenberg, M. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0018708 · Cited by 280
Neural correlates of planning ability: Frontal lobe activation during the tower of London test
Morris, R. G., Ahmed, S., Syed, G. M. S., & Toone, B. (1993) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(93)90104-8 · Cited by 270
Cortico-subcortical contributions to executive control
Heyder, K., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2004) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.010 · Cited by 263
Executive Function in Preschool Children: Test–Retest Reliability
Beck, D. M., Schaefer, C., Pang, K., & Carlson, S. M. (2011) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.563485 · Cited by 262
The performance of human infants on a measure of frontal cortex function, the delayed response task
Diamond, A., & Doar, B. (1989) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.420220307 · Cited by 254
The Neuropsychology of the Prefrontal Cortex
Rezai, K., Andreasen, N. C., Alliger, R., Cohen, G., Swayze, V., & O'Leary, D. S. (1993) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540060066020 · Cited by 247
Wolfe, C. D., & Bell, M. A. (2003) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.10152 · Cited by 243
Executive function deficits in preschool children with ADHD and DBD
Schoemaker, K., Bunte, T. L., Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., Deković, M., & Matthys, W. (2011) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02468.x · Cited by 234
Espy, K. A., Kaufmann, P. M., McDiarmid, M. D., & Glisky, M. L. (1999) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1006/brcg.1999.1117 · Cited by 226
Lloyd, K. E. (1994) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392658 · Cited by 221
Diamond, A. D. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 218
Neuropsychological evaluation of the child
Semrud‐Clikeman, M. (2004) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.03.004 · Cited by 216
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-6177 · Cited by 211
Executive control and dimensions of problem behaviors in preschool children
Espy, K. A., Sheffield, T. D., Wiebe, S. A., Clark, C. A. C., & Moehr, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02265.x · Cited by 207
A comparison of performance on the Towers of London and Hanoi in young children
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Senn, T. E. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00268.x · Cited by 206
Stuss, D. T., ALEXANDER, M. P., Floden, D. P., Binns, M. A., Levine, B., McIntosh, A. R., Rajah, N., & Hevenor, S. J. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.003.0025 · Cited by 205
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese1324 · Cited by 180
Neuropsychology of Early-Treated Phenylketonuria: Specific Executive Function Deficits
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., Ozonoff, S. J., Rouse, B. M., & McCabe, E. R. B. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130832 · Cited by 180
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence
Park, S. E., & Demakis, G. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1037-1 · Cited by 176
New Procedures to Assess Executive Functions in Preschool Children*
Espy, K. A., Kaufmann, P. M., Glisky, M. L., & McDiarmid, M. D. (2001) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.15.1.46.1908 · Cited by 162
Hot and cool aspects of executive function: Relations in early development.
Zelazo, P. D., Qu, L., & Müller, U. (2005) · Cited by 158
Tsujimoto, S. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh030 · Cited by 157
Frontal lobe damage in children and adults: A comparative review
Grattan, L. M., & Eslinger, P. J. (1991) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649109540496 · Cited by 147
Towards a developmental model of executive function.
Anderson, P. J. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203837863-11 · Cited by 146
Self-citationLEVINE, B., STUSS, D. T., MILBERG, W. P., ALEXANDER, M. P., SCHWARTZ, M., & MACDONALD, R. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617798002471 · Cited by 145
The Luria-Nebraska Children's Battery: Theory and Formulation
Golden, C. J. (1981) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 144
10 years outcome from childhood traumatic brain injury
Anderson, V. A., Godfrey, C., Rosenfeld, J. V., & Catroppa, C. (2011) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.09.008 · Cited by 143
Functional Neural Networks of Semantic and Syntactic Processes in the Developing Brain
Bräuer, J., & Friederici, A. D. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1609 · Cited by 143
A review of the day–night task: The Stroop paradigm and interference control in young children
Montgomery, D. E., & Koeltzow, T. E. (2010) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.07.001 · Cited by 131
Measuring the development of executive control with the shape school.
Espy, K. A., Bull, R., Martin, J., & Stroup, W. (2006) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.373 · Cited by 130
Disorders of Frontal Lobe Functioning
Alexander, M. P., & Stuss, D. T. (2000) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-2000-13175 · Cited by 126
Validating Antonovsky's sense of Coherence scale
Flannery, R. B., Perry, J. C., Penk, W. E., & Flannery, G. J. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4 · Cited by 121
Neuropsychological approaches to children: Towards a developmental neuropsychology
Fletcher, J. M., & Taylor, H. G. (1984) · Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688638408401195 · Cited by 117
Schneider, W., Schumann-Hengsteler, R., & Sodian, B. (2014) · Cited by 115
Assessment of executive functions in children with neurological impairment.
Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. Κ., & Guy, S. C. (2001) · Cited by 114
Test-retest reliability of a new executive function battery for use in early childhood
Willoughby, M. T., & Blair, C. (2011) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2011.554390 · Cited by 113
Smidts, D. P., Jacobs, R., & Anderson, V. (2004) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_2 · Cited by 111
Color–object interference in young children: A Stroop effect in children 3½–6½ years old
Prevor, M. B., & Diamond, A. D. (2005) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.04.001 · Cited by 111
The Development of a Trial Making Test in Young Children: The TRAILS-P
Espy, K. A., & Cwik, M. F. (2004) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/138540409052416 · Cited by 105
Willoughby, M. T., Wirth, R. J., & Blair, C. B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.007 · Cited by 102 · cited 2×
“Examples of this approach are the Self-ordered Pointing and Pick the Picture tests (Hongwanishkul et al. 2005; Willoughby et al. 2011).”
BackgroundMethodFrom neuropsychology to mental structure
Beaumont, J. G. (1989) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(89)90038-0 · Cited by 102
Frontal Lobe Functioning in Man: The Riddle Revisited
Sala, S. D., Gray, C., Spinnler, H. R., & Trivelli, C. (1998) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/13.8.663 · Cited by 90
Neuropsychology, A Clinical Approach
Benson, D. F. (1979) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.29.6.915 · Cited by 89
Chevalier, N., Sheffield, T. D., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A. C., Wiebe, S. A., & Espy, K. A. (2012) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2011.632458 · Cited by 87
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II)
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_69969 · Cited by 86
Test–Retest Reliability and Practice Effects of Executive Function Tasks in Preschool Children
Müller, U., Kerns, K. A., & Konkin, K. (2012) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2011.645558 · Cited by 84
Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children
Kiselev, S. Y., Espy, K. A., & Sheffield, T. D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.02.002 · Cited by 83
The development of prudence in the face of varying future rewards
Lemmon, K., & Moore, C. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00603.x · Cited by 83
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition (KABC-II)
Lichtenberger, E. O., & Kaufman, A. S. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71799-9_218 · Cited by 83
The central executive does not exist
PARKIN, A. J. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617798005128 · Cited by 81
Frontal lobe damage and neuropsychological assessment
Bigler, E. D. (1988) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/3.3.279 · Cited by 45
Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Thyreau, B., Sassa, Y., Takeuchi, H., Wu, K., Kotozaki, Y., Nouchi, R., Asano, M., Asano, K., et al. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22033 · Cited by 35
The Vigilance, Orienting, and Executive Attention Networks in 4-Year-Old Children
Hrabok, M., Kerns, K. A., & Müller, U. (2007) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13825580600977224 · Cited by 29
Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. L. (2007) · Cited by 15
Espy, K. A., Bull, R., Kaiser, H. R., Martin, J. A., & Banet, M. (2008) · Cited by 10
Huttenlocher (1997) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19971020)387:2
Diamond, A., & Taylor, C. (1996) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199605)29:4
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential ability scales second edition: Introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.
- Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-binet intelligence scales, fifth edition: Technical manual. Itasca: Riverside.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cortés Pascual, A., Moyano Muñoz, N., & Quílez Robres, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582 · Cited by 540
Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review
Fay‐Stammbach, T., Hawes, D. J., & Meredith, P. J. (2014) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12095 · Cited by 517
Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders
Marín, O. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4225 · Cited by 374
Neural substrates of early executive function development
Fiske, A., & Holmboe, K. (2019) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2019.100866 · Cited by 307
Neuropsychological outcomes of children born very preterm
Anderson, P. J. (2013) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2013.11.012 · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, P. J., & Reidy, N.
- Affiliations
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, Peter J.
- ORCID
- Anderson, Peter J.
- Venue
- Neuropsychology Review
- Published
- 2012-10-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345-360
- ISSN
- 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6660
- OpenAlex
- W1964937126
- Semantic Scholar
- f61b7154eb5895db8f07b4d77f360cc1bf50f5b8
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- State Government of Victoria
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- executive function, preschool children, executive function assessment, executive dysfunction, early detection, evaluation paradigms, executive function interventions
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Child, Child Development, Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review